Dialogues

UNHCR welcomes Albanian offer to Hurriya residents

UNHCR chief welcomes Albanian offer of humanitarian admission for 200 residents of Camp Hurriya, Iraq

The UN High Commissioner for Refugees, António Guterres, on Monday welcomed an offer by the Albanian Government to grant humanitarian admission for 210 residents from Camp Hurriya in Iraq to Albania.

The camp has seen a recent deterioration of the security situation of its residents, with a mortar attack on the camp on February 9th killing eight and wounding dozens, with subsequent threats made against the residents.

Guterres expressed gratitude to the Albanian government saying “This generous offer is a demonstration of international solidarity and burden sharing for a vulnerable population”. He strongly encouraged other”countries to follow Albania’s lead and offer solutions for the camp residents that enable them to relocate outside of Iraq”.

He said “The residents of Camp Hurriya urgently need solutions to relocate out of Iraq”. And he expressed the hope that they”welcome the offer and cooperate to ensure the departure of this important number of people”.

Camp Hurriya, also known as Camp Liberty, has over 3000 residents.

Donn Bobb, United Nations,Duration: 58″,.unmultimedia.org/radio/

To Listen to the audio file click here

Download UNHCR welcomes Albanian offer to Hurriya residents

June 26, 2013 0 comment

The cult of Rajavi

MEK former member speech on Terrorism and Destructive Cults

Terrorism and Destructive Cults – speech by former MEK member Massoud Bani Sadr

This year’s FECRIS annual Conference was hosted in London by The Family Survival Trust (UK) on 16 April 2010.

FECRIS (European Federation of Centres of Research and Information on Sectarianism) was founded on 30 June 1994 in Paris following the Congress on Sectarianism in Barcelona in 1993. It is a non-commercial association under French law. It declare itself politically, philosophically and religiously neutral as stated in article 2 of its statutes.

Dr. Massoud Bani Sadr, a former member of the Mojahedin-e Khalq cult, was a speaker at the meeting. He talked about the links between terrorism and destructive cults such as the MEK.

……

Back to terrorism; let me give you an example: Although MEK that I was member of born with an ideology based on Islam and Marxism and recruit with anti Imperialism and anti Zionism and social justice slogans; and later after the revolution, when I along tens of thousands more students of schools and universities joined it, used any ills, any injustice or lack of freedom to recruit; but after it changed into a terrorist organisation and then into a destructive cult, its survival, its internal strength had nothing to do with either of causes of its existence, its original slogans, or what was happening in Islamic world or in Iran. To survive and to fulfill the leader’s dreams, contrary to their nationalistic slogans; during Iran-Iraq war, they collaborated with Sadam Hussein and hand in hand with Iraqi army they fought with Iran. Sadam’s generous assistance to MEK; financial help, free land to build their bases in, sophisticated armament etc; didn’t mean that MEK will be loyal to their host, when they saw American army, they announced their readiness to help Americans and fight along side of new victorious army[i]. All said it doesn’t mean that MEK now is going to be loyal toward American; because cults are not loyal to any partner or friend, ideology, policy, slogan, agreement but only those that help their survival and their goal’s advancement.

As the matter of fact for me as for almost all members, after MEK’s ideological revolution (the name they gave to their brain washing techniques[ii]), Iran and Islam where not important anymore; or at least not nearly as important as the existence and success of the organisation and its leader. Then in a letter to the leader I explained this change in myself and other members by admitting that if they ask us to choose between happiness and success of Iranian and Muslims in one hand and victory of our leader anywhere around the world even if he becomes president of Zimbabwe, we all will choose the latter one. Of course then our logic was based on this assumption that if our leader finds a foothold anywhere in the world, soon he can expand his influence and can save the whole world and change the history. Yes MEK was and still is using any ills that might exist in Iran to recruit, for propaganda purposes and for legitimization of its existence, but for its members what is happening in Iran or as matter of fact in the whole world outside, is not slightly as important as their internal relations, their absolute loyalty and obedience toward the leader

FECRIS Conference, London

April 25, 2010 0 comment

Former members of the MEK

A meeting of Ancient Iran, Glorious Future

A meeting of Ancient Iran, Glorious Future (AIGF) in Paris

deliberation on the current conditions of Mojahedin after the removal of the EU terrorist entities’ list, current developments of the Ashraf Garrison and reflection of the imminent outcomes of Masood Rajavi’s recent message.

Dated February 21 of 2009, a 6-hour gathering held with the presence of separated ex-members of the People Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI) in Paris. Most of these former members have already been emancipated from the cage of Ashraf Garrison and reached the European states. In this get-together, the latest developments of the Ashraf Garrison and critical conditions of the incarcerated victims were discussed and the participants implored the Iraqi govt. to spread out its human efforts with the aiming of creature of the free space for victims’ families visit away from Mojahedin officials’ interventions and intrusions. The précis of the partakers’ views is as underneath.

deliberation on the current conditions of Mojahedin after the removal of the EU terrorist

In the opening, Mr. Karim Haghi, one of the Mojahedin former top officials put forward some questions pertaining to the past and existing developments of the Mojahedin. Subsequently, the Mojahedin victims replied the proposed questions in conformity with their visual observations as outlined beneath:

Mr. Engineer Hassan piransar: the Mojahedin cult leadership, Masood Rajavi, and Maryam Rajavi left their victims by themselves and fled at any historic juncture and dilemma to save their own lives. Masood Rajavi and Maryam Rajavi were the first who escaped the scene of war. In the military rules, the commander is the last one who leaves the war field. This reality shows that this leadership does not pay the cost of his action from his own pocket…. One of the ways to put pressure on the Iraqi govt. is to resort hunger strike versus the Ashraf garrison victims’ willing. The Mojahedin in charges compel the victims to go on hunger strike by means of threat…. afterward apprehend of Maryam Rajavi, the top officials of the cult asked the whole subordinates to commit self-burning suicide in the Ashraf garrison and the around of this base. Nevertheless, no one accepted the top officials’ demands. From then on, the question arose among the subordinates that, if the self-burning suicide is a correct and revolutionary action, why the cult top officials do not commit so…

Mr. Nader Naderi, an ex-member of the Mojahedin cult who has taken part in the Mojahedin military hostilities against Kurdish not guilty people, confessed the terrible scenes of the Kurds genocide and carnage. Such as a woman commander called Maboobeh ordered her subordinates to open a fire on a residential place occupied by many people on the contrary to her subordinates’ objections…

Mr. Hamid Siah Mansouri: Masood Rajavi’s latest message is an evident symptom of the violation of international laws owing to ignoring the right of national sovereignty of Iraq through frequent threats. He aroused the Ashraf victims for hunger strike followed by commit suicide and self-burning. According to the principles of the UN charter, Iraq govt. can work out the pre-emptive actions to defend its territory that facing jeopardy and insecurity.

Mr. Mansoor Nazari: now, Masood and Maryam Rajavi claim that the extradition to Iran is a “crime against humanity” but they themselves have already exercised these action frequent years and sent the dissidents of Mojahedin cult to Iran to pretext that there was no dissident surrounded by the cult. This cult killed the ones who had decided to abandon the cult as Saied Noroozi and Saied Kiani and the rest.

Mr. Mohammad Razaghi, a former member of Mojahedin cult: according to Rajavi’s rule, nobody was allowed to meet his or her family within the cultic relations. What happen? In addition, what has been changed? Nowadays, Rajavi has become an advocate of the family relations and feelings. Following the put an end to Saddam Hussein dictatorship, the Mojahedin cult top officials were unexpectedly surprised because, they bumped into a new phenomenon called ‘family’. So that they didn’t want the victims’ families to enter the Ashraf garrison. Therefore, they claimed that these families are the mercenaries of the Iranian Secret Service and asked Americans to detain them then American military forces took in for questioning these families ensuing Americans found out that they were victims’ families after a few hours.

Other victims at this gathering confirmed the above-mentioned bitter realties and expressed their terrible conditions under the control of Mujahidin

March 9, 2009 0 comment

A debateon the terrorist listing of MKO in House of Lords

Following is a partial transcript of the debate in the House of Lords on Monday on the terrorist listing of MKO

People’s Mujaheddin Organisation of Iran Question

2.44 pm

Asked By Lord Waddington

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what steps they will take to observe the latest judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities concerning the People’s Mujaheddin Organisation of Iran.

The Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office (Lord Malloch-Brown): My Lords, mindful of the clear judgment of the Court of First Instance of 4 December 2008 annulling the July 2008 listing of the PMOI, the UK believe that EU member states must observe and respect the court’s judgment in the current review of the EU list of terrorist organisations.

Lord Waddington: My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord for his reply, but I think that he will agree with me that so far the British Government have not covered themselves in glory, having abstained rather than supported the Court of Appeal’s decision that the PMOI was not a terrorist organisation when the matter was before the Council of Ministers some months ago. Did not the European Court say in its judgment of 4 December that the British Government’s excuse for abstaining on that occasion—namely, that they had to vote either for or against the whole list of terrorist organisations—was wholly spurious? Surely

12 Jan 2009 : Column 1008

we are entitled to expect that from now on the Government will ensure that the judgments of the Court of Appeal and the European Court are observed and that the European Union respects the rule of law.

Lord Malloch-Brown: My Lords, the noble Lord is, as always, gracious; he was kind enough, in attributing the spurious response to the Government, not to say that it was my response in this Chamber to him and others. This gives me the opportunity to say that, while the Court thought the view incorrect that it was impossible to vote against only one member of that list, I checked back with officials, who have reconfirmed that it is up to the presidency of the European Council at the time to determine how such business is dealt with. A whole list was given and there was no option but to vote it up or down. Therefore, if we had not abstained, other terrorist organisations would have been delisted.

Lord Wallace of Saltaire: My Lords, it is always a great pleasure to hear the noble Lord, Lord Waddington, supporting so strongly the EU Court of Justice and the importance of obeying its rules. We all recognise the delicacy of defining a terrorist organisation. I am not an expert on the PMOI, but I have some hesitation about it, which arises from the fact that right-wing think tanks, Washington, Christopher Booker and the Sunday Telegraph are among its strongest proponents. Does the Minister accept that we are concerned about the delicate line between legitimate exiled organisations in this country and terrorist organisations? For example, the last day we met in December, the VHP from India was mentioned in the context of raising charitable moneys in this country that may go through to violence against minorities in India. Are the Government looking overall at the question?

Lord Malloch-Brown: My Lords, we constantly review which organisations we believe should be proscribed. It is enormously important that our reviews and the decisions that we and our European partners make are subject to scrutiny by the courts. In this case it is clear that courts both at the national and the EU levels have found repeatedly against our desire to proscribe this organisation and it is enormously important that we accept and respect those judgments.

Lord Wedderburn of Charlton: My Lords, will my noble friend reassure the House in clear and absolute terms that every future vote cast by Her Majesty’s Government will aim at the removal of the word “terrorist” in relation to the PMOI?

Lord Malloch-Brown: My Lords, let me be clear: at the end of this month there will be a decision on this issue by Ministers at the European level. Let me be equally clear that the UK will, both in the working meetings that precede that decision and at the time of the decision itself, urge respect for the decisions of the courts.

Lord Campbell of Alloway: My Lords, will the noble Lord explain why, if one is excluded, all others are excluded? Surely there is a form of assessment on the merits of each case. What is going on?

12 Jan 2009 : Column 1009

Lord Malloch-Brown: My Lords, each organisation is individually considered by the working committee that gives advice to the Council of Ministers. It is then the prerogative of the presidency to decide how a vote is taken on the list derived from those discussions. The last presidency determined that the vote should be on the list as a whole and that the list should be either adopted by consensus or rejected. It was not possible, in the view of the officials involved, to demand a vote on individual organisations on the list.

The Lord Bishop of Southwell and Nottingham: My Lords, in the light of the PMOI’s hopes for a Government in Iran who respect religious freedom, what action are Her Majesty’s Government taking on the position of the seven leaders of the Baha’i community who have been imprisoned without trial and held in severe conditions and who are now threatened with execution for no other crime than their religious beliefs?

Lord Malloch-Brown: My Lords, we are very much aware that seven leading members of the Baha’i community have remained in detention without formal charge since their arrest in the first half of last year. We received reports in December that the group had been sentenced to death and that executions were imminent, although we have been unable to confirm this and cannot therefore substantiate the reports. Since the arrests, we have made several representations to the Iranian authorities calling for the group’s release and will continue to monitor developments closely. I associate myself with the right reverend Prelate in saying that this is an extraordinary attack on freedom of religion in that country.

Baroness Turner of Camden: My Lords, does my noble friend agree that, in view of the court decision that effectively removes the PMOI from the terrorist list, it would be quite wrong to seek its inclusion on the EU’s asset-freeze list?

Lord Malloch-Brown: My Lords, the two lists are in this sense linked. The deproscribing of the PMOI indeed has knock-on effects on the organisation as a whole.

Lord Avebury: My Lords, when the decision comes before European Ministers at the end of this month, will there be an individual decision on the PMOI? Will the Government then vote for deproscription?

Lord Malloch-Brown: My Lords, in the light of the court decision, we hope that the list, when it arrives before Ministers, will ideally not contain the PMOI.

January 15, 2009 0 comment

MEK Camp Ashraf

What kind of city is Camp Ashraf?

Mr. Hassan Piransar arrived in Europe a few weeks ago. He is one of the former executive members of the MKO who managed to escape Camp Ashraf by taking refuge with American forces in the TIPF which was established to help people escape the cult. When TIPF was closed earlier this year, Mr Piransar made his way through Iraqi Kurdistan and on to freedom in the west where he is now a political refugee due to his opposition to the MKO and the IRI.

As one of the executive members, he has experienced and witnessed the many abuses and deceptions practiced by the Rajavis not only toward outsiders but in particular against their own members. He attended a meeting of the Iran Delegation of the European Parliament on September 9, 2008 to ask that Camp Ashraf be opened up to humanitarian bodies and that the people trapped inside be rescued. He emphasised that mass of misinformation issued by the Rajavis and their backers such as Robin Corbett, Paulo Casaca and Struan Stevenson, is aimed at keeping human rights organisations out of Camp Ashraf so that Massoud and Maryam Rajavi can continue their inhuman mistreatment of their captives behind closed doors.

Download What kind of city is Camp Ashraf?

October 4, 2008 0 comment

Missions of Nejat Society

British Ambassador, paid a visit to the Nejat Society

The British Ambassador to Iran, Geoffrey Adams, along with a high ranking official from the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) who was visiting the country required a meeting in the office of the Nejat society in Ambassador paied a visit to The Nejat Society Tehran.

A number of members and associates of the society including Mr. Arash Sametipour, the international relations secretary, were present in the meeting.

Mr. Sametipour welcomed the visitors and introduced those present in the meeting and explained that the Nejat Society in Tehran consists of the former members of the Mojahedin-e Khalq Organization (MKO) who managed to flee from the notorious base of this organization called the Ashraf Camp in Iraq and are striving to help their former colleagues trapped inside the MKO terrorist cult.

The topics of the discussions were the de-proscription of the MKO by the British government and its consequences and also the situation of the Ashraf camp in Iraq after the resolution passed by the Iraqi administration which gives the control of the base to the Iraqi government.

The British high diplomats thoroughly explained the legal procedure of the decision made by the Proscribed Organizations Appeal Commission (POAC) which ultimately excluded the MKO from the list of terrorist groups in Britain.

Mr. Adams emphasized that the British Government has not changed its policy towards the group and still considers the MKO as a terrorist entity and has prohibited all government officials to have any contacts with the organization.

"Britain is part of the European Union (EU) and the EU has continuously designated the organization as a proscribed terrorist group and this proscription applies in Britain too" he explained, "the decision made by the POAC would have no effect on the policy adopted by the FCO or the British government anyway".

Mr Sametipour discussed the very fact that the MKO is a destructive cult which has held its followers mentally and even physically captive in the Ashraf Camp. "All cults need to show false victories to their followers to keep them manipulated within the isolated atmosphere of the cult" he said, "therefore de-listing the MKO serve the leaders to have better chance to deceive people".

Mr. Adams and his company agreed that no excuse should be given to the MKO to have open hands to carry on mind control techniques within the cult. They also approved the fact that the prime victims of a cult are its own followers who would lose everything. Mr. Adams also gave assurances that under no circumstances the British government is willing or aiming to use the MKO elements for any purpose at all. He made it clear that the British government would not stop its struggle to proscribe the organization again in Britain.

The high ranking British diplomats visiting Nejat Society in Tehran expressed their hope that the Ashraf Camp would be controlled by the Iraqi government as soon as possible and the misery of the families who wish to meet their beloved ones captured inside Rajavi’s cult be ended in near future.

In the end they invited Nejat Society to send a delegation to Britain to discuss the matters further with the British statesmen and parliamentarians in London. Mr. Adams reckoned such trip to be quite fruitful for the aims of the society.

August 16, 2008 0 comment

Missions of Nejat Society

Symposium of Nejat Society in Tehran

One day symposium of the Nejat Society in Tehran, Monday 28 July 2008

In a one day symposium held on 2008-07-28 by the Nejat Society in Tehran, the members and the associates of the society as well as the families of members of the Mojahedin-e Khalq Organization (MKO) captive inside the Ashraf Camp in Iraq gathered from different provinces demanding the free access of the families to their children in Iraq.

Mr.Ebrahim Khodabande

Initially in this symposium Mr. Ebrahim Khodabandeh a former member of the international relations department of the MKO in the UK discussed two topics which were the de-proscription the MKO in Britain and the recent resolution passed by the Iraqi governments which indicates that the control of the Ashraf Camp must be handed over to the Iraqi authorities. He pointed out that the families have suffered most from the latest decision made by the British government since the MKO needs to show false victories to its followers to further control their minds and keep them captive for longer periods. Khodabandeh emphasized that if the British government intends to play the role of Saddam Hussein for the MKO, one has to expect more catastrophes to occur which would result to more victims on both sides. He stressed that protesting against the decision made by the British government is quite essential as far as the families are concerned.

About the resolution of the Iraqi government on the MKO based on the Iraqi constitution, Khodabandeh gave some detailed explanations and finally demanded the Iraqi government to ensure that the items of the resolution are fulfilled as soon as the control of Ashraf Camp is handed over to the Iraqi government. He emphasized that the families do not accept any delay for a direct and free visit with their beloved ones when the Iraqi government holds control over Ashraf Camp in Iraq.

Khodabandeh pointed out that when the former regime in Iraq was toppled, there were hops that the families could have free access to their relatives in Iraq. They were disappointed when they released that there are other forces who intend to use the group the same way Saddam Hussein did. He explained that when the MKO is de-listed in Britain the worrying of the families have become doubled and they have the fear that their beloved ones might be used as tools of terror again. He said that the families expect the Iraqi government to end their sufferings and facilitate direct and continuous meetings with the relatives in the Ashraf Camp in Iraq.

Mr. Arash Sametipour

Next Mr. Arash Sametipour the international relations secretary of the Nejat Society explained about the recent activities of the Society in connection with the Iraqi government and efforts made to pave the way to let the families visit their beloved ones in Iraq. He then answered the families’ questions in this regard and expressed that the Iraqi government must facilitate the immediate and direct connection of the families in Iran with their relatives in Iraq once they had control over the Ashraf Camp and its inhabitants.

After the session was terminated, the participants moved to outside the British Embassy in Tehran and made a gathering opposite to the main entrance to protest against the decision made by the British government to remove the name of the MKO from the list of terrorist groups in that country.

Nejat Society Symposium -Tehran

Families gave slogans such as”there is no good or bad terrorism”,”down with Rajavi”and”free meetings are our just right”and they condemned legitimizing a terrorist cult which in the first hand has mentally captured its own members and followers.

According to Nejat reporter from opposite the British Embassy in Tehran, the participants were carrying banners with writings such as”do not sacrifice our children for state terrorism”and”the Saddam’s terrorists are now employed by the British government”.

The participants also signed a resolution in the form of a letter addressed to the British Prime Minister Mr. Gordon Brown and protested against the decision made by the British government to de-proscribe the group.

The families gathered outside the British Embassy in Tehran emphasized in their letter to the British Prime Minister that they are dreadfully worried about the decision made and its consequences over their captured children in the Ashraf Camp. This resolution was handed over to the British Embassy in Tehran.

Foreign reporters as well as representatives from humanitarian and international organizations were present in this gathering that made talks with some of the 200 families present at the scene.

August 3, 2008 0 comment

The MEK Expulsion from Iraq

Falujah demanded the expulsion of Mojahedin Khalq

In a meeting with secretary general of Habilian Association(Representatives of 16000 terror victims in Iran), a group of Falujah political figures and newsmen as well as the heads of different Iraqi tribes called for the expulsion of MKO terrorist group from their Country. In this meeting initiated with Seyyed Muhammad Javad Hashemi Nejad’s appreciating his guests’ arrival in the holy city of Mashhad, secretary general of Habilian Association said: The two nations of Iran and Iraq are today on each others sides while having many things in common to talk about ,regardless of what has happened to us during past 30 years. We are now supposed to struggle for each others prosperity. Taking a look at the history of the two nations we would realize that dividing them is no way possible. Iran and Iraq are the cradle of civilization. The region we are in is the one the whole world has eyes for it and no one can turn a blind eye on it.

Falujah demanded the expulsion of Mojahedin Khalq

Our countries are in a region overflowing with oil resources and our enemies’ cravings for it elevate day by day. Islam’s heart beats only in Iran and Iraq and all conspiracies have targeted these two countries. There are many ties between us and we have many things in common. But the enemies won’t like friendship and peace to rule between us. This is because of our standing on an enormous resource of wealth and also our ability to stand on our own feet independently. So the colonizers have put their backs into getting into the region and make the most out via obliterating the two nations. To do this they have to enter the region directly or through applying some penetrating elements to follow their wicked ambitions. They have long tried to spread disunion among the two nations through former governments in Iraq and Iran. On one hand Shah of Iran insisted on being of a superior race of Persian and on the other hand Saddam Hussein who knew Arabs to be of superiority. But as far as they didn’t succeed in separating the two nations, the colonizers began to support terrorist groups to make the region destabilized. One of these terrorist groups which is now based for over two decades in Iraq is MKO terrorist group. They have so far assassinated over 16000 Iranian civilians as well as officials in Iran but as far as they didn’t satisfy America’s desire, the great Satan decided to arrive in the Islamic world in person.

Falujah demanded the expulsion of Mojahedin Khalq

Indisputable is that our enemies’ conspiracies to keep the two nations of Iran and Iraq apart from each other has fallen flat. But we have to be aware not to make any mistakes in current crucial situation.

Falujah demanded the expulsion of Mojahedin Khalq

Right now the Bush administration has adopted the policy of Divide and Rule in the region. To do this they have set up and support terrorist groups like MKO which has during last two decades committed several crimes in your country. America was the first country to recognize MKO as terrorist but the question is why America supports this terrorist group and why America insists, against Iraq’s constitution law, to keep this group in Iraq. Isn’t it because it needs the dividing role of this group? Taking a brief look at their website, you would undoubtedly realize that they are either trying to persuade America to attack Iran or to cause disunion between the two nations. Today America is well aware that loosing the region would result in its loosing the whole Middle East. But their presence in the region has resulted in the death of over one million Iraqis so far.

Falujah demanded the expulsion of Mojahedin Khalq )

After that Jasem Albadivi (Former governor of Falujah) also said: today we have come from the exploited city of Falujah to tell the Iran’s authorities and people that we don’t support terrorist rebels. We have come to reveal the truth to you about the damages we have received from terrorists. Nowadays we have to forget about all the crimes the former corrupt dictators committed to us and to step into the way towards unity and unanimity. All Iraqis are well aware of the terrorist nature of MKO and as the representatives of Alanbar province we want the Iraqi government to respect the rightful demands of Iraqi people and to adopt more determined measures in deporting them from Iraq.

Falujah demanded the expulsion of Mojahedin Khalq

Then Hashemi Nejad stated: The issue of weapons of mass destruction posed by Americans was merely a pretext to attack Iraq. Americans invaded your country without the permission of the security council of the United Nations. In fact it was not a war on terror or the war for democracy; it was a war for oil. We know that America would accept us only when we are dependent to it. This is why America has always opposed our peaceful nuclear program, though we have never violated any international laws, while accusing us baselessly of being involved in producing WMD. This is at the same time they support terrorist groups in the region. They support MKO terrorist who killed over 16000 innocent people in Iran and about the same number in Iraq and are disliked by the people of both nations.

Another speaker to the meeting was Tariq Al Ma’amouri (editor in chief of Albelad Alyoum newspaper). Who said: The existence and improvement of terrorist groups in Iraq is a result of military occupation of Iraq. It also resulted in annihilation of Iraq’s military, judicial and administrative as well as lawmaking systems. But in spite of all these issues the media are active in Iraq, although the ones tied to America and terrorist groups try to abuse and exaggerate the current discrepancies between Shiites and Sunnis. One of the issues they are still propagating about and try to threaten Arabs with is Iran’s nuclear energy. It was Saddam who invited MKO terrorists to Iraq not the people. The governing council of Iraq called them in a statement as terrorist soon after the fall of Saddam. From then on all Iraqis have condemned the presence of this terrorist group in Iraq.

Hashemi Nejad also said in the meeting: Thank you for the way you explained the common concerns of the two nations. We have very good relations with Iraqi people and officials. About MKO I should also say we are well aware of their crimes in Iraq and believe that they would soon pay for it.

Doctor Valid Alaraji (member of falujah Sheikhs council) was another speaker in the meeting. He said: As my friends mentioned Saddam Hussein granted asylum to PKK and MKO and supported them. These two terrorist groups have invaded our country and we demand for their total expulsion from Iraq. We are on to hold enlightening sessions in Iraq about the terrorist entity of MKO based on the document you give us.

At the end Muhammad Javad hashemi Nejad added: The phenomenon of terrorism is a western product for exploiting the third world countries. America has full access to PKK and can easily ban their activities but not only doesn’t do that but also supports them while accusing us of supporting terrorism. At the end I wish for a day Iraqi people would live in a free Iraq in peace.

July 28, 2008 0 comment

Mujahedin Khalq Organization as a terrorist group

The newly released list of Specially Designated Global Terrorists

Rajavi and his cult in the newly released list of Specially Designated Global Terrorists, Foreign Terrorist Organisations,…

Rules and Regulations Alphabetical Listing of Blocked Persons, Specially Designated Nationals, Specially Designated Terrorists, Specially Designated Global Terrorists, Foreign Terrorist Organizations, and Specially Designated Narcotics Traffickers – Part 3 of 4 Federal Register, 1 July 2008 Vol. 73, No. 127 Daily publication of the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, listing all public regulations and legal notices issued by all U.S. federal agencies. Country of origin:

United States http://www.find-inc.com …

MUJAHEDIN-E KHALQ ORGANIZATION (a.k.a. MEK; a.k.a. MKO; a.k.a. MUJAHEDIN-E KHALQ; a.k.a. MUSLIM IRANIAN STUDENT’S SOCIETY; a.k.a. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF RESISTANCE; a.k.a. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF RESISTANCE (NCR); a.k.a. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF RESISTANCE OF IRAN; a.k.a. NCRI; a.k.a. NLA; a.k.a. ORGANIZATION OF THE PEOPLE’S HOLY WARRIORS OF IRAN; a.k.a. PEOPLE’S MUJAHEDIN ORGANIZATION OF IRAN; a.k.a. PMOI; a.k.a. SAZEMAN-E MUJAHEDIN-E KHALQ-E IRAN; a.k.a. THE NATIONAL LIBERATION ARMY OF IRAN) [FTO] [SDGT] … NATIONAL COUNCIL OF RESISTANCE (NCR) (a.k.a. MEK; a.k.a. MKO; a.k.a. MUJAHEDIN-E KHALQ; a.k.a. MUJAHEDIN-E KHALQ ORGANIZATION; a.k.a. MUSLIM IRANIAN STUDENT’S SOCIETY; a.k.a. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF RESISTANCE; a.k.a. NLA; a.k.a.[Page Number 37609] … ORGANIZATION OF THE PEOPLE’S HOLY WARRIORS OF IRAN; a.k.a. PEOPLE’S MUJAHEDIN ORGANIZATION OF IRAN; a.k.a. PMOI; a.k.a. SAZEMAN-E MUJAHEDIN-E KHALQ-E IRAN; a.k.a. THE NATIONAL LIBERATION ARMY OF IRAN); including its U.S. representative offices and all other offices worldwide [FTO] [SDGT] … PEOPLE’S MUJAHEDIN ORGANIZATION OF IRAN (a.k.a. MEK; a.k.a. MKO; a.k.a. MUJAHEDIN-E KHALQ; a.k.a. MUJAHEDIN-E KHALQ ORGANIZATION; a.k.a. MUSLIM IRANIAN STUDENT’S SOCIETY; a.k.a. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF RESISTANCE; a.k.a. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF RESISTANCE (NCR); a.k.a. NLA; a.k.a. ORGANIZATION OF THE PEOPLE’S HOLY WARRIORS OF IRAN; a.k.a. PMOI; a.k.a. SAZEMAN-E MUJAHEDIN-E KHALQ-E IRAN; a.k.a. THE NATIONAL LIBERATION ARMY OF IRAN); including its U.S. press office and all other offices worldwide [FTO] [SDGT] .. PMOI (a.k.a. MEK; a.k.a. MKO; a.k.a. MUJAHEDIN-E KHALQ; a.k.a. MUJAHEDIN-E KHALQ ORGANIZATION; a.k.a. MUSLIM IRANIAN STUDENT’S SOCIETY; a.k.a. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF RESISTANCE; a.k.a. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF RESISTANCE (NCR); a.k.a. NLA; a.k.a. ORGANIZATION OF THE PEOPLE’S HOLY WARRIORS OF IRAN; a.k.a. PEOPLE’S MUJAHEDIN ORGANIZATION OF IRAN; a.k.a. SAZEMAN-E MUJAHEDIN-E KHALQ-E IRAN; a.k.a. THE NATIONAL LIBERATION ARMY OF IRAN); including its U.S. press office and all other offices worldwide [FTO] [SDGT]

Federal Register

July 7, 2008 0 comment

Mujahedin Khalq Organization's Propaganda System

Mojahedin hired Polish students!!

Mojahedin hired Polish students,to claim support in France!! Rajavi cult,Mojahedin Khalq terrorists hired Polish students, Afghani refugees and Actors to claim support in France!! France 24 Television aired a video report on the desperate move by Rajavi Cult terrorists and its western supporters, hiring Refugees, Students and Actors!! Here you see some pictures of the video: Mujahedin Khalq terrorists hired Polish Students,Afghani refugees and Actors to claim support in France!!

Mojahedin Khalq terrorists hired Polish students, Afghani refugees and Actors to claim support in France!!

July 1, 2008 0 comment

Newer Posts

Older Posts