{"id":10129,"date":"2019-08-15T12:56:18","date_gmt":"2019-08-15T08:26:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/?p=10129"},"modified":"2021-01-21T19:28:06","modified_gmt":"2021-01-21T15:58:06","slug":"voa-mek-trump-pr-machine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/posts\/10129","title":{"rendered":"VOA: MEK – Trump PR Machine!"},"content":{"rendered":"

How Voice of America Persian Became a Trump Administration PR Machine<\/strong><\/p>\n

AS AN IRANIAN AMERICAN journalist covering the Iran-U.S. relationship, Negar Mortazavi is accustomed to receiving vitriol on social media. Still, she found it unusual when she saw on Twitter that someone had called her a \u201ctreasonous criminal\u201d and \u201ca spy and an enemy of the people.\u201d The tweets got darker: \u201cIf the U.S. had laws of the Middle Ages like Iran, this mouthpiece of the corrupt regime would have been executed,\u201d one read, in Farsi.<\/p>\n

What made the tweets unusual was that the person targeting her was Ali Javanmardi. Javanmardi is a prominent television journalist at the Voice of America Persian, the U.S.-owned network broadcasting to Iranians \u2014 which means that he works for the U.S. government. Mortazavi is a former VOA Persian reporter herself and was a colleague of Javanmardi\u2019s, and she was shocked enough by his tweets to complain to VOA editors. An editor told her that he had reminded Javanmardi that personal attacks online were unacceptable to the agency, Mortazavi said in an email to The Intercept. But Javanmardi did not remove his attacks, and they are still available.<\/p>\n\n

The online tirade directed at Mortazavi is part of a pattern: Journalists at VOA Persian have been lashing out at Americans they deem unsupportive of President Donald Trump\u2019s Iran policy, in apparent violation of VOA\u2019s declared standards.<\/p>\n

The public attacks are the most visible manifestation of a transformation that\u2019s been underway since November 2016. VOA Persian and many of its staffers have become rabidly pro-Trump, abandoning their stated mission of providing balanced news to Iranians. So perhaps it\u2019s not surprising that its reporters are now acting on social media like Trump himself.<\/p>\n

For years, hawks complained that VOA Persian wasn\u2019t sufficiently hostile enough to the Iranian government. In 2012, a Heritage Foundation report accused VOA Persian of being \u201cpro-Iranian\u201d and \u201canti-American\u201d for having done such things as \u201creported only the negative aspects of bombing in Iraq and implied that the war was a mistake.\u201d Writers for theWall Street Journal and Commentary lodged similar complaints.<\/p>\n

The irony is that that station, which premiered as a radio station in the 1940s, was widely known for hostility to the Iranian government since the 1979 Islamic Revolution. \u201cIt was always anti-regime,\u201d said Ali Sajjadi, who was the senior managing editor there before retiring last year. Former executive editor Mohammad Manzarpour told me that he was shocked when he arrived at VOA Persian in 2013, after many years at the BBC, to discover that his new company was filled with monarchists and supporters of the Mojahedin-e Khalq, or MEK, an Iranian opposition group in exile that advocates relentlessly for the Iranian regime\u2019s overthrow.<\/p>\n\n

For all its flaws, however, VOA Persian also upheld some journalistic standards and ran stories critical of the United States. It showcased positive aspects of the Obama administration\u2019s engagement with Iran. Those qualities were, of course, why hawks despised the station: It didn\u2019t act simply as a propaganda network for the right-wing view of Iran. Guests sometimes spoke of Iran as if it could play a constructive role in the region and didn\u2019t always treat the Iranian government as something that needed to be overthrown.<\/p>\n

And then Trump was elected.<\/p>\n

Since then, the network has become, as Sajjadi puts it, \u201ca mouthpiece of Trump \u2014 only Trump and nothing but Trump.\u201d Manzarpour describes the situation as \u201cblatant propaganda.\u201d He said, \u201cThere is no objectivity or factuality.\u201d<\/p>\n

For example, the MEK is covered heavily and favorably, despite having almost no support inside Iran, a history of terroristic violence, and a well-founded reputation as a cult. A VOA employee, who asked to speak anonymously for fear of reprisal, said, \u201cVOA Persian, for the first time in decades, has been acting as media arm of MEK and is giving wall-to-wall live coverage of their gatherings and events.\u201d And VOA Persian published multiple articles by Heshmat Alavi, a pro-MEK persona exposed by The Intercept this June as having been the product of a multiperson propaganda outfit housed in an MEK compound in Albania. (VOA Persian later said it would remove the articles.)<\/p>\n

The VOA has broadcast puff pieces on Reza Pahlavi, the son of the Shah, whom Iran hawks see as a viable opposition leader. Hard-line Iran hawks are frequent guests on the network, often on the receiving end of friendly interviews. These guests include current Trump administration officials like Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, national security adviser John Bolton, Trump\u2019s special envoy for Venezuela Elliott Abrams, as well as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, an inveterate Iran hawk. Pundits like Michael Ledeen have appeared, as have personnel from three heavily neoconservative Washington-based think tanks: the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, the Heritage Foundation, and the Hudson Institute.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s pro-Trump in a way that disregards the way Trump\u2019s polices are hurting Iranians, whether through sanctions or anything else.\u201d<\/p>\n

A spokesperson for VOA declined to discuss \u201cindividual personnel matters\u201d but told The Intercept that \u201call VOA journalists, be it federal government employees or contractors, are expected to adhere to VOA\u2019s social media policy as delineated clearly in its Best Practices Guide. When potential policy violations are brought to the attention of VOA management, employees are reminded of the policy and expected to ensure that their social media accounts comply.\u201d She added, \u201cVOA pursues its mission by producing accurate, balanced and comprehensive reporting, programming, as well as online and social media content for a global audience, particularly for those who are denied access to open and free media.\u201d<\/p>\n

Azadeh Moaveni, an Iran expert at the Crisis Group, says that VOA\u2019s decline worsens the possibilities for engagement between the U.S. and Iran. \u201cIt\u2019s pro-Trump in a way that disregards the way Trump\u2019s polices are hurting Iranians, whether through sanctions or anything else,\u201d she told The Intercept. \u201cTo the extent that it might have served as a medium through which Iranians learned about the U.S. and better understood its policies, its present condition as a naked propaganda mouthpiece doesn\u2019t help relations.\u201d<\/p>\n

SEVERAL PEOPLE INTERVIEWED for this article described VOA Persian\u2019s shift toward becoming a Trump administration PR service as one that was mostly motivated by internal factors. Careerists, anti-regime journalists, and staff members sought to curry favor with the Trump administration. Some saw an opportunity to promote their like-minded views. For others, \u201cthe only reason\u201d to push Trump\u2019s policies \u201cis because they want to save their jobs,\u201d said Vafa Azarbahari, a former writer at VOA Persian.<\/p>\n

At the same time, soon after Trump was elected, his allies began campaigning to change VOA Persian. Right-wing pundit Kenneth Timmerman penned an op-ed saying the station had \u201clong been a disaster;\u201d he soon wrote another column calling it \u201cThe Voice of Tehran.\u201d Other op-eds followed suit, in the Wall Street Journal and Washington Examiner.<\/p>\n

In December 2016, Republicans in Congress disbanded the board of the Broadcasting Board of Governors, the independent agency that oversees VOA, and concentrated its power in the hands of a politically appointed CEO. It was clear that things would change: In January 2017, VOA\u2019s Twitter account shared then-White House spokesperson Sean Spicer\u2019s infamous claims that Trump\u2019s inauguration crowds were the largest ever. Days later, two aides from Trump\u2019s campaign visited the VOA studios, sending a conspicuous message about who was in charge.<\/p>\n

Republicans disbanded the board of the Broadcasting Board of Governors, the independent agency that oversaw VOA, and concentrated its power in the hands of a politically appointed CEO.<\/p>\n

In 2017, the new BBG chair, Kenneth Weinstein \u2014 who is also CEO of the Hudson Institute \u2014 asked a different conservative think tank, the hawkish American Foreign Policy Council, to review the BBG\u2019s Iran programs. Unsurprisingly, the resulting reportdetermined that VOA had not been critical enough of the regime or the nuclear deal signed in 2015 by President Barack Obama and Iran \u2014 even while acknowledging that the station frequently devoted attention to the plight of minorities inside Iran. \u201cSignificant coverage of the state of U.S.-Iranian relations reflected the mistaken notion that the Iranian regime is now friendlier to the United States,\u201d the report read.<\/p>\n

The analysis lamented that sometimes the United States and Iran were treated as equals, stating \u201creportage on bilateral relations between the U.S. government and the Iranian regime conveyed an impression of equivalence between the parties, a position that is both surprising and improper for broadcasting that is funded by the U.S. government.\u201d<\/p>\n

Perhaps most consequentially, in 2018, the Senate Committee on Appropriations cleared legislation directing Pompeo to use the BBG to counter Iranian influence. The law directed the BBG to devote its resources to highlighting the Iranian government\u2019s proxies in Syria and Yemen and the damage caused by the Iranians\u2019 foreign policy. In February 2019, Masih Alinejad, who hosts a show on VOA Persian, appeared with Pompeo in Washington to do a photo op purportedly demonstrating the administration\u2019s concern for women\u2019s rights inside Iran. (The BBG, which in 2018 rebranded as the U.S. Agency for Global Media, did not respond to requests for comment.)<\/p>\n

VOA Persian journalists and staffers began demonstrating their support for the Trump administration on social media, sometimes urging the administration to be even tougher on Iran. On May 20, a missile believed to have originated in east Baghdad, home to Iranian-backed Shiite militias, struck near the U.S. embassy in Baghdad. Trump tweeted in response, \u201cIran made a very big mistake!\u201d Javanmardi responded to Trump: \u201cMr. President you have to punish the Iranian regime. They have attacked the site of the American Embassy and should be punished. A simple warning should not be sufficient.\u201d<\/p>\n

In time, VOA employees began targeting critics of Trump\u2019s policies. In March, Saman Arbabi, the co-host, creator, and executive director of \u201cParazit,\u201d a popular satirical program that has been compared to The Daily Show, sent a tweet to Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., comparing her hijab to hoods worn by the Ku Klux Klan. He and fellow VOA host Alinejad have repeatedly targeted the National Iranian American Council, which favors engagement between the U.S. and Iran.<\/p>\n

Similar attacks directed at anti-Trump journalists and human rights experts were leveled earlier this year by the Iran Disinformation Project, an organization funded by the State Department\u2019s Global Engagement Center. But when the Iran Disinformation Project\u2019s actions were publicized, Congress terminated its government funding. The center\u2019s special envoy and coordinator, Lea Gabrielle, said, \u201cIt was never the intent of the Global Engagement Center to have anyone tweeting at U.S. citizens.\u201d<\/p>\n

Yet that\u2019s exactly what\u2019s happening at the VOA Persian. It\u2019s not just Trump-style tweets. The changing editorial direction of the site is turning it into a potentially dangerous propaganda channel for hard-line Iran hawks at a time when parts of the U.S. government seem determined to start a war with Iran.
\nBy Jordan Michael Smith, the intercept<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

How Voice of America Persian Became a Trump Administration PR Machine AS AN IRANIAN AMERICAN journalist covering the Iran-U.S. relationship, Negar Mortazavi is accustomed to receiving vitriol on social media.…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":7447,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[99],"tags":[20],"module":[81],"ctype":[17],"blog":[109],"class_list":["post-10129","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-mujahedin-khalq-organizations-propaganda-system","tag-third-view-mek","module-article","ctype-story","blog-western-bloggers"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10129","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10129"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10129\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7447"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10129"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10129"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10129"},{"taxonomy":"module","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/module?post=10129"},{"taxonomy":"ctype","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ctype?post=10129"},{"taxonomy":"blog","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/blog?post=10129"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}