{"id":11026,"date":"2020-09-05T12:12:22","date_gmt":"2020-09-05T07:42:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/?p=11026"},"modified":"2021-10-02T10:35:12","modified_gmt":"2021-10-02T07:05:12","slug":"the-danger-of-mek-troll-farm-bolstering-the-propaganda-of-their-paymaster","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/posts\/11026","title":{"rendered":"The danger of MEK troll farm bolstering the propaganda of their paymaster"},"content":{"rendered":"

There is at least one more foreign policy opinion writer from the Mujahideen-eKhalq (MEK) whose existence is dubious, based on a study by a social media analyst and statements from a defector from the group. Amir Basiri, who contributed to Forbes 9 times, the Washington Examiner 52 times, OpenDemocracy, Algemeiner, and The Hill once also appears to be a fabrication.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The MEK is an Iranian exile group for which John Bolton, Rudy Giuliani, and other foreign policy luminaries have given paid speeches. Dems like Joe Lieberman and Howard Dean have also spoken on their behalf. But the group has American blood on its hands, has been accused of practicing forced sterilization, and their belief system has been described as a mixture of Marxism and Islamism. Its supporters claim they, and their front group the National Council of Resistance of Iran, are a sort of government-in-exile, despite nearly nonexistent support for the group within Iran. They also have waged a substantial disinformation campaign in the Western press, in particular targeting conservative media.<\/p>\n

\u201cAmir Basiri and Heshmat Alavi are two fake accounts<\/strong>,\u201d Hassan Heyrani, an MEK defector told TAC.<\/p>\n

\u201cAt Camp Liberty, near the BIAP airport in Iraq, I was in the political unit of the organization with some of the persons who grew up in America and Canada. We worked as a team to write the articles analyzing the Iranian regime. The MEK put them in The Washington Post and all the newspapers in Western countries.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Basiri\u2019s op-eds focus on the need for regime change in Iran which he claimed is \u201cwithin reach.\u201d The thrust of Basiri\u2019s writing \u2013 last placed at the Examiner in October of 2018 \u2013 is to encourage American readers to take an interest and sympathize with the plight of Iranian protesters and dissidents. Basiri consistently argued against the Iran nuclear deal, downplayed terrorism against Iran, called for tougher sanctions as a method of regime change and highlighted the necessity of Trump working with the Iranian opposition.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe are currently looking into the matter, so I won\u2019t comment on this specific byline,\u201d Philip Klein, Executive Editor and Commentary Editor of the Washington Examiner told TAC. \u201cBut I will say that we have recently instituted more rigorous vetting of outside contributors, including but not limited to asking for photo identification if necessary. We are especially on guard when it comes to unsolicited foreign policy commentary.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n

A request for comment from OpenDemocracy, a site greatly concerned about disinformation campaigns, has not been returned as of press time. Basiri\u2019s articles on Forbes are no longer online. (Update: Julian Richards, managing editor of OpenDemocracy, writes, \u201cThis article was submitted to us through our normal process and our editor corresponded with Amir Basiri about the text. In light of the allegations you have made, we have removed the article text from our site for the time being and I have written to the email address that Amir Basiri used to ask for confirmation of his identity.\u201d)<\/p>\n