<\/p>\n
The 30th court session examining the charges against 104 members of the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK) as well as the organization\u2019s nature as a legal entity, was held on March 4th in branch 11 of the Criminal Court of Tehran Province, presided over by Judge Amir Reza Dehghani.<\/span><\/p>\n After the Judge started the commence of the trial, Madah, the lawyer for the plaintiffs in the case, reviewed the previous sessions saying that pamphlets that were discovered in the 1360s from the MRK team houses were presented to the court.<\/span><\/p>\n In these pamphlets, the MEK taught bombing, forgery, stealing people’s cars, forming team houses, keeping weapons, and carrying out operations and assassinating the people of Iran. The source of these pamphlets is the MEK\u2019s official journal, Mujahed. <\/span><\/p>\n According to the lawyer, some other pamphlets were not taken from the journal. They only had a security code and this pamphlet was given to the head of the unit team to distribute among the members. These pamphlets were discovered in the MEK cars and team houses. Maddah said, \u201cIf the defendants’ lawyers have doubts about the authenticity of these pamphlets, they can refer them to an expert\u201d<\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n The problem raised by the defendants’ lawyers was that some of the defendants were not members of the organization at the time of the crime and later became members of the organization.<\/span><\/p>\n The plaintiffs’ lawyer replied: “Being a member of a criminal group is enough for a person to be considered a rebel. It is not necessary to take up arms. More than 17 of the organization’s former members and a large number of experts have appeared in court so far and testified that the accused ones of the organization were involved in bombings and assassinations.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Mansour Nazari, a former member of the MEK who was a member of the group, for about 23 years appeared in the court. He lives in France and he states that had showed up in the court voluntarily. In his testimonies, Nazari spoke of a victim of torture in the MEK: <\/span><\/p>\n I was present at the trial of this person. Fathollah Fathi wanted to leave the organization, but people like Mahvash Sepehri said that this person should be executed. The MEK is a corrupt and complicated system, and they treated and tortured people who were recruited by it and wanted to leave the organization in the worst way.<\/span><\/p>\n About his own experience of being tortured he said, \u201cI was under a lot of mental pressure and in all the meetings they held, such as the Digh meeting [one of the self-criticism meetings in the MEK], where they subjected people to mental and psychological pressure. In the Dagh meetings, they subjected and attacked those who had problems. I myself have been subjected many times in these meetings, especially by Mojgan Parsai, who was notoriously known for her violence and brutality.\u201d <\/span><\/p>\n \u201cDuring the 22 years that I left the organization, I have said many times in various articles that the organization’s defectors are like an antidote to this cancerous tumor.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n In response to the question of the lawyer for the defendants about how decisions were made, communicated, and implemented in theMEK, Mansour Nazari said: \u201cDecision-making is always made by the top of the organization, and other members, except for the executor, are not informed of the decisions. The leadership council includes women from the organization, including Maryam Rajavi, Mahvash Sepehri, Fahmieh Arvani, Mojgan Parsiai, Roqiyeh Abbasi, Zohreh Atrianfar, Sepideh Ebrahimi, Zahra Marikhi, Jila Dehim, Mehraban Hajinejad, Soraya Shahri, and more, but I don’t remember when they made the decisions.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n He added, \u201cThe members of the Leadership Council were the executors of the orders of the head of the organization and made decisions on how to execute and implement them. Therefore, they are the executors and decision-makers. They were also informed of the actions and were in contact with all members of the MEK.<\/span><\/p>\n Elahe Pirouzfar, the lawyer for the defendants, appeared on the stand and asked Mansour Nazari, whether women played a role in the decision-making regarding the terrorist act. Nazari replied: The members of the Leadership Council were the executors of the orders of the head of the organization and made decisions on how to execute and implement them. Therefore, they are the executors and decision-makers. They were also aware of the actions and were in contact with all members of the MEK.<\/span><\/p>\n Seyyed Jalal Sadatian, one of the survivors of the terrorist attack that blew up the office of the Islamic Republic Party, appeared on the stand and said: “My ears were damaged in the explosion and my body parts were damaged, and the damage caused cannot be compensated<\/span>.”<\/span><\/p>\n Yasser Ezzati, a former child soldier of the MEK also testified ih the 30th<\/sup> session of the MEK trial. He was involved with the MEK since he was 3. He left the group at the age of 27. <\/span><\/p>\n He addressed the court: <\/span><\/p>\n When I was younger, we, about 800 of us, ranging from infants to 19 years old, were sent to Germany to receive the necessary trainings. Kak Saleh [a commander of the MEK ranks], gave us organizational training and brainwashed us. We returned to Iraq in 1976, and in 1977, I witnessed the self-immolation of people at Camp Ashraf who could not cope with the conditions there. Also, in 1999, one of the members killed himself with a gun, which the MEK\u2019s journal published under the title “Unwanted Shot.”<\/span><\/p>\n Ezzati explained about the female child soldier, Alan Mohammadi: \u201cAlan Mohammadi was 15 years old. She was a militia like me. I mean she had been trained to be a child soldier but she did not have such a personality for fighting, struggle and revolution. She could not bear it and she shot he<\/span>\u0642<\/span>lself.\u201d <\/span><\/p>\n Masoud Sadeghi Azad, a survivor of the terrorist attack on the Islamic Republic Party\u2019s office, appeared on the stand and after taking the oath, stated:<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cUsually, people would receive invitations to enter the meetings in the office of the party, meaning that no one would enter this meeting without an invitation, but that day, Mr. Kolahi strangely guided everyone who was in the courtyard into the building.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Asked by judge Dehghani if he had any information about Kolahi, the operative of the explosion, Sadeghi Azad answered, \u201cUntil the party building was blown up, we did not know Mr. Kolahi. He was in charge of the meetings. Kolahi always checked the invitations, but on the day of the incident, he brought people into the hall with great courtesy. Apparently, he had placed a box of explosives in a book cover under the meeting table. I was working in the Prime Minister’s office at the time. Kashmiri also killed Martyr Bahonar and Martyr Rajai. Kashmiri was someone we all followed in leading prayers and he became the Imam of the congregation. This is how hypocrisy misleads people.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n In the end, Judge Dehghani said: So far, the statements of 14 families of victims have been heard in court and their complaints have been registered, and more than 12 lawyers were present in court. 5 are the defendants’ hired lawyers, and the opinions of 10 experts in the offending fields have been used, and 28 witnesses have testified in court that 17 were members of the organization that had left and 11 were members of the Republican Party or committee commanders and firefighters. Given that the number of complaints is large, we expect a long time for the hearings. The next court session will be held on April 14, 1404<\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The 30th court session examining the charges against 104 members of the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK) as well as the organization\u2019s nature as a legal entity, was held on March 4th…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":15809,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[221],"tags":[24437],"module":[27],"ctype":[17],"blog":[3],"class_list":["post-15913","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-iran","tag-courts","module-reports","ctype-story","blog-nejat-bloggers"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15913","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15913"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15913\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/15809"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15913"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15913"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15913"},{"taxonomy":"module","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/module?post=15913"},{"taxonomy":"ctype","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ctype?post=15913"},{"taxonomy":"blog","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/blog?post=15913"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}