{"id":7381,"date":"2017-09-19T13:36:22","date_gmt":"2017-09-19T09:06:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/?p=7381"},"modified":"2021-01-21T19:24:05","modified_gmt":"2021-01-21T15:54:05","slug":"pssst-whisper-even-irans-enemies-dont-want-regime-change","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/posts\/7381","title":{"rendered":"Pssst, Whisper It, Even Iran\u2019s Enemies Don\u2019t Want Regime Change"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Following President Rouhani\u2019s re-election in May 2017 many Middle East analysts arrived at the conclusion that the 78% turnout and clear majority was a clear enough indication that while the people of Iran do want greater political and social freedoms, they are prepared to seek this incrementally through civic pressure, not through violent regime change.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-7382 size-full\"src=\"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/Trump_Rouhani.jpg\"alt=\"\"width=\"600\"height=\"338\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/Trump_Rouhani.jpg 600w, https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/Trump_Rouhani-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/Trump_Rouhani-390x220.jpg 390w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>The rationale of experts, however, has not stopped Iran\u2019s enemies from aggressively demanding the kind of regime change aimed at preventing growing Iranian influence in the region. Donald Trump\u2019s confrontational, high risk approach toward Iran, using the JCPOA as an instrument of conflict only feeds this agenda.<\/p>\n<p>The problem is, that while anti-Iran antagonism has deep roots in the American psyche, the stark reality is that regime change would necessarily be imposed by America through violence, whether war or terrorism or both.<\/p>\n<p>And while \u2018regime change\u2019 makes a good sound bite, the recent events in Egypt, Libya, Iraq, Syria and Yemen, should sound a claxon warning. Iran has developed a formidable military and naval capacity in recent years. Its missile programme presents a real threat to American interests in the region \u2013 not least the state of Israel.<\/p>\n<p>Confrontation with Iran would prove catastrophic not only for the whole region but for the protagonists themselves. Would American taxpayers really accept another expensive and endless war? If Iraq and Syria have spawned chaos, destruction and blowback, the consequences of a military conflagration involving Iran would be much worse. There is good reason why, even though Saudi Arabia has maintained a verbally hostile stance toward Iran for two years, nothing has actually happened.<\/p>\n<p>In any case, what system or government do the regime change proponents propose would replace Iran\u2019s current rulers. The country itself presents an enviable level of civic stability in the region. As much as they may wish for it there is no evidence of a nationwide indigenous protest movement with the will or capability of stepping into the breach.<\/p>\n<p>When Donald Trump entered the White House, Reza Pahlavi, son of the exiled Shah of Iran, wrote a letter of introduction. The monarchists, he suggested, are natural allies of the United States and would be happy to work toward regime change with the new administration. This overture was rebuffed. The fact is, that when Reza Pahlavi offers his services, there is a glimmer of a possibility that his monarchist movement would be able to garner at least some popular support among Iranian citizens chafing against repressive religious leaders. Instead, ironically, most prominent regime change pundits back the Mojahedin Khalq. And although this puzzles many (the MEK are so deeply unpopularinside Iran that it would be wilful stupidity to believe the group could seize power even with American support), the reason is quite simple. Even Iran\u2019s enemies don\u2019t want regime change.<\/p>\n<p>Every year when the self-styled \u2018Iranian Resistance\u2019, aka the Mojahedin Khalq, holds its annual gathering at Villepinte near the French capital, there is a weary sense of d\u00e9j\u00e0 vu. It\u2019s not only that the same paid speakers \u2013 John Bolton, Rudi Giuliani, Saudi Arabia\u2019s Prince Turki and other lesser political personalities \u2013 appear on the platform with sad regularity. It\u2019s not only that the whole audience, bar the MEK\u2019s own fanatical followers, is made up of rent-a-crowd, bussed in as part of a cheap weekend holiday trip. It\u2019s not even the conspicuous splurge from an apparently bottomless pit of money to hold the event.<\/p>\n<p>The d\u00e9j\u00e0 vu arises from the elephant in the room which visits every event. Behind the glitz and glamour \u2013 and nobody loves glamour more than Maryam Rajavi \u2013 lurks the reality that regime change in Iran is not happening anytime soon and nobody in that room really believes it will either. And certainly, nobody is under any illusion that the MEK could make it happen.<\/p>\n<p>It is easy to decipher the signs that the MEK is no longer working toward regime change. The MEK\u2019s notoriously expensive propaganda aims only to promote the MEK brand. The group, under de facto leader Maryam Rajavi \u2013 is currently advertising its election of a female Secretary General, Zahra Merrikhi Ahangar Kala\u2019i. (It is difficult to keep a straight face when the totalitarian MEK cult claims to hold elections.)<\/p>\n<p>But it is not engaged in any other activity aimed at destabilising or endangering Iran. Even the MEK\u2019s alleged involvement in the Daesh attacks on Tehran is more about attracting sponsorship money than precipitating the fall of Iran\u2019s government.<\/p>\n<p>As the West is cruelly aware, an active terrorist group aggressively recruits to swell its ranks. The MEK has not recruited for two decades. The mean age of its members is over 60 years, many are feeble and sick. Indeed, well over a thousand members have abandoned the organisation since 2003 when the group lost its main benefactor Saddam Hussein. This trend has increased since the group was forcibly transferred from Iraq to Albania. The group is disintegrating in all but name. This is not a force for regime change.<\/p>\n<p>But this is exactly why politicians, retired government officials and others are lining up to promote the group. Advocating for the MEK allows them to rant and threaten and provoke ire among Iran\u2019s leaders and hatred among the citizens. Safely.<\/p>\n<p>While it is by no means clear that Donald Trump actually wants war with Iran \u2013 given the huge risks involved for the whole region \u2013 his strategy of brandishing the threat to destroy the JCPOA is certainly an attention-grabbing negotiating tactic. So too is brandishing the MEK as a terrorist threat against Iran. It is one of the cards which the anti-Iran pundits feel they can bring to the table. Promoting the MEK is about shuffling and arranging the negotiating cards because nobody, not even Iran\u2019s enemies wants to pay the price of actual regime change.<\/p>\n<p>Huffpost,Massoud Khodabandeh Director at Middle East Strategy Consultants, Co-authored by Anne Khodabandeh<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Following President Rouhani\u2019s re-election in May 2017 many Middle East analysts arrived at the conclusion that the 78% turnout and clear majority was a clear enough indication that while the&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":7382,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[99],"tags":[79,15],"module":[81],"ctype":[17],"blog":[82],"class_list":["post-7381","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-mujahedin-khalq-organizations-propaganda-system","tag-mujahedin-khalq-declining","tag-hypocrisy_mko","module-article","ctype-story","blog-masud-khodabande"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7381","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7381"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7381\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7382"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7381"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7381"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7381"},{"taxonomy":"module","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/module?post=7381"},{"taxonomy":"ctype","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ctype?post=7381"},{"taxonomy":"blog","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nejatngo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/blog?post=7381"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}