Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip
Nejat Society
Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip
© 2003 - 2024 NEJAT Society. nejatngo.org
Massoud Rajavi
Massoud Rajavi

An Analysis on Massoud Rajavi and his addiction to power

Based on Gabor Maté’s views on addiction
Dr. Gabor Maté, renowned addiction expert, believes that the source of addictions is not to be found in genes, but in childhood trauma and in stress and social dislocation endemic to systems of inequality and injustice. In his TEDx Talks, he states some facts about power-addict people. The criteria that he clarifies is dramatically compatible with Massoud Rajavi.

According to Gabor, some people are addicted to power, to wealth and to acquisition because they want to make themselves bigger. Their sense of insecurity and inferiority makes them need power to feel okay in themselves.

He refers to certain dictators in the history such as Alexander, Napoleon, Stalin and Hitler. To make themselves bigger, and in order to get that power, they were quite willing to fight wars and to kill a lot of people, just to maintain that power. “The addiction to power, is always about the emptiness that you try and fill from the outside,” Gabor says.

First of all, why did they need power so much? The interesting thing is that physically, they were all relatively short people, about my size, or even smaller. They came from the margins; they were not part of the mainstream population. Stalin was Georgian, not Russian; Napoleon was Corsican, not French; Alexander the Macedonian, not Greek; and Hitler was Austrian, not German. So, there was a deep sense of insecurity and inferiority complex in them.

Remember Massoud Rajavi, short man born in a small town far from capital with no upper-class family! He finds himself in a situation that all the first founders of the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK) are gone. He takes over the organization. However, after the Iranian revolution he and his group cannot find any position in the newly-established Islamic government. So, he sets off for a bloody war with Iranian government.

“They needed power to feel good about themselves, to make themselves feel great,” Gabor suggests. “And to get that power, they were quite willing to wage war and kill a lot of people, just to keep that power.” That’s what Rajavi did in accomplice with Saddam Hussein and other war-addicts around the world. His addiction to power led him to build his cult of personality in which he violates the right of his member, abuses women and trains child soldiers.

Amir Yaghmai, a former child soldier of the MEK, recalls Rajavi’s compatibility with what Gabor says about power addicts:
A man of about 160 centimeters tall, full of sexual and psychological complexes, who had built the structure of a cult around his pathological need for control and power. Forced divorces, obtaining confidentiality signatures from hundreds of women, weekly sexual confessions, forced baths called “ideological purification baths” [self-criticism sessions as cult jargons in the MEK ]

None of these were signs of faith, spirituality, or liberation. Rather, they were all tools for dominating people, from the inside and outside. Rajavi was a concrete example of what Gabor Maté was talking about: a person who felt empty without power and found existential meaning only in dominating others.

Mazda Parsi

May 31, 2025 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Ebrahim Khodabandeh, the CEO of Nejat Association
The cult of Rajavi

Tehran Times Interview with Ebrahim Khodabandeh- Part2

In the first part of the interview of Ebrahim Khodabandeh, the CEO of the Nejat Society with Tehran Times, he presented a brief of his involvement with the MEK and missions of Nejat Society.

Asked about his activities as a member of the MEK, he explains how he served the group as foreign affairs agent who used to travel across the world. However, he was always under the group’s cult-like monitoring system.

Based on his testimonies, although he was not isolated at Camp Ashraf, Iraq, Khodabandeh was not allowed to visit his family including his daughter who was based in London.
He also told Tehran Times the process that ended with his arrest and extradition to Tehran and eventually his defection from the MEK. The foundation of Nejat Society was one of his achievements after he was released from Evin Prison. He explained about this humanitarian act.

The interview has been published in three parts on Tehran Times website. This is part two.

https://dlb.nejatngo.org/Media/Interview/Tehrantimes-khodabandeh-22.mp4
May 26, 2025 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
MEK members' families at Liberty Gates,Iraq
The cult of Rajavi

Family Bonds vs. Rajavi’s Brainwashing Machine

Introduction

In one of the darkest chapters of the history of terrorist Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK), led by Massoud Rajavi, an incident revealed that the power of family bonds is stronger than any brainwashing tool. Families who came to the gates of Camp Ashraf to see their loved ones encountered a plot not aimed at emotional reunion, but rather at propaganda in order to recruit family members. However, these plans unexpectedly led to the weakening of the cult’s internal structure.

Behind Ashraf’s Closed Doors

During the years the MEK was located at Camp Ashraf , Iraq, hopeful families traveled to this heavily guarded and isolated compound seeking a short visit with their children, siblings, or spouses. Social and emotional pressure from these families forced the organization to react. Rajavi and other leaders temporarily allocated houses—formerly used by couples before the so-called “ideological divorce”—to families.

Note:
The ‘ideological divorce’ was a policy imposed by Massoud Rajavi that forced members to sever all emotional and familial ties, so that their emotional dependency would be entirely eliminated. Based on this policy all married members were coerced to divorce.

The Real Goal Behind Family Invitations

Though it appeared to be a gesture of goodwill, the real purpose was to deceive public opinion, recruit younger family members, and emotionally drain the families through strictly monitored visits. Rajavi also aimed to build a sociable portrait for his group attracting individuals among the visitors who would portray a supportive image of the group and promote the cult’s official narrative. These efforts, however, failed, as the emotional atmosphere and truth-seeking spirit of the families prevented the manipulated narrative from taking hold.

Cracks in the Cult: The Voices of Mothers

Rajavi’s plan failed. Not only did those who met their families consider escaping or leaving the group, but even other members—present in the meeting halls or who merely watched over the visiting parents—experienced deep emotional impact. These meetings, orchestrated for the first time with specific propaganda goals, unexpectedly led to emotional awakening and internal doubt. Even those who weren’t allowed to meet their families were affected by witnessing these emotional scenes or hearing families’ stories. The cult, despite its extensive psychological isolation efforts, could not sever the deep-rooted human connections.

Testimonies from Former Members

Mohammadreza Yazdanpanah:
“When I heard my mother crying at the camp gate, everything collapsed inside me. For years they told us that family was the enemy, but that day I realized who the real enemy was.”
Sara Nouri:
“The moment I saw my father, I froze. They didn’t let us speak, but that one look was enough to make my decision final.”
Hamid Davari:
“Even those who didn’t meet their families were shaken by the sound of mothers crying. That was the voice of truth, not propaganda.”

Conclusion

The MEK, under Massoud Rajavi’s leadership, attempted once again to mask the truth using emotional manipulation and staged propaganda. However, the presence of families at Camp Ashraf’s gates not only disrupted these plans, but also triggered widespread awakening and defections. The story of Ashraf proved once again that the strength of familial bonds surpasses any fabricated ideology or forced isolation.

Ali Mohammadi

May 26, 2025 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
MEK women
Mujahedin Khalq Organization's Propaganda System

Under what circumstances can MEK women violate the forced hijab law?!

A few weeks ago, the Middle East Forum published an article about the unpopularity of Maryam Rajavi among Iranian youth. The author stated that the reason for the unpopularity of the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK) among Iranian youth was the hijab of the leader and female members of the group.

Although the author of this article only addressed one of the reasons for the unpopularity of the MEK and did not consider important reasons such as the terrorist record, betrayals, and crimes of the MEK against the Iranian nation, his reference to the issue of forced hijab in Maryam Rajavi’s organization is worth examining.

What is clear is that in the MEK, the right to choose one’s clothing is very limited for members, both men and women. This restriction is even worse for women. In Maryam Rajavi’s ruling structure, the hijab is completely mandatory.

The rule of forced hijab for female members inside the MEK campa continues to this day despite the protests against forced hijab in Iran. A significant example is the case of a child soldier in the MEK, Damona Taavoni. During the Albanian police raid on Camp Ashraf 3, Damona, who was being interviewed by an Albanian news outlet, was warned by her superior about her hijab. The film went viral in the social media.

As a matter of fact, the MEK leaders, namely Maryam Rajavi, are unable to lift the restrictions on clothing for members within the group because breaking any of the organizational restrictions means breaking the cult bars. In an organization where there is strict gender segregation, forced divorce, and a ban on getting married and having a family, observing hijab and conservative clothing style is a very serious tool in controlling the members.

But in order to attract the attention of Western politicians and to purify their image among Iranian youth, the leaders of the MEK are forced to cover up the ban on hijab inside their camps. They allow certain number of their followers and sympathizers to show up in the group’s rallies without a veil on their heads. That is why in the images of events of the MEK that are held outside camp Ashraf 3 –with the mouth-watering titles of freedom, human rights, democracy, and women’s rights– Iranian girls are seen without hijab, albeit in relatively conservative clothing such as long sleeve jackets and suits.
These young un-veiled girls are usually chosen from among the daughters of the MEK members. These girls are the same former children who were separated from their Mujahed parents and were smuggled to Europe and North America in 1991. Girls like Militia Javedan, whose parents were MEK members and who were separated from their parents and passsed between several foster families in Norway. Today she serves the MEK office in Norway when ever they need a young modern woman to speak on behalf of the MEK.

A large number of MEK girls and its former child soldiers such as Atefeh Sabdani and Zhina Hosseinnejad, have managed to keep their distance from this organization and even criticize it, but many of these girls are still financially and even emotionally dependent on the MEK’s cult-like system because they may still have their mothers in Ashraf 3 or because they are like Damona still trapped in Ashraf 3.

MEK girls living in Europe, with their modern clothing, have the duty to be propagandists for the organization that has imprisoned their mothers in the village of Manz, Albania, in that remote camp. Given that their mothers are alive, they live in complete isolation from the outside world in a cult-like violent group that has required them to observe the compulsory hijab.

Mazda Parsi

May 25, 2025 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mothers Protest against MEK’s presence in Durres, Albania
Missions of Nejat Society

Mothers Protest against MEK’s presence in Durres, Albania

A demonstration was held in Durres, the city where the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK) is based, at the initiative of Nejat Society Albania.

The demonstration, which took place right in front of the municipality of Durres lasted for an hour. Albanian mothers who are members of Nejat Society Albania distributed flyers to the public to enlighten them about the MEK’s inhumane actions, including not allowing mothers to visit their loved ones, not even receiving letters, opposing the Red Cross in this regard.
The flyers read: “Dear people of Durres! Unfortunately, the group that has occupied part of your city has ruthlessly deprived all its members of basic human rights. One of these rights is the right to contact their families. We have a large number of letters that need to be delivered to them. Please help us in this noble and blessed work by kindly and vigilantly transferring these paper butterflies between families and their loved ones in the MEK, because family is the most precious thing in the world.”

During the rally, Nejat Society Albania also read a statement addressing the Albanian government:
“The honorable Albanian government,
We, former members of the MEK, sympathetically declare that the organization we were once members of is far from human rights, democracy, and humanity. For this reason, its presence in every country has always been accompanied by tension. The group has only been able to cooperate and accompany with a dictatorial host like Saddam Hussein.”

Nejat Society Albania warned the Albanian government and citizens that The MEK’s independent presence in Albania running a dangerous group independently from the Albanian government and isolated from the Albanian society with its own laws is certainly a terrible blow to the freedoms stipulated in Albanian laws.

The demonstrators demanded the government to treat the MEK members like all refugees in all European countries so that their trapped members enjoy the minimum freedoms of a human being today. According to them, the MEK’s independent and controlled base inside Albania is not only meaningless and annoying, but also contrary to the interests of the government and people of Albania.

May 24, 2025 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Ebrahim Khodabandeh, the CEO of Nejat Association
Former members of the MEK

Tehran Times Interview with the CEO of Nejat Society – Part 1

Ebrahim Khodabandeh, a former MEK member and current CEO of the Nejat Society, was interviewed by Tehran Times a few weeks ago.

Sheida Sabzehvari of Tehran Times introduces Nejat Society as “a Tehran-based entity with offices across Iran and Europe that assists families seeking contact with loved ones in the MEK.”

Presenting a summary of his involvement with the MEK, Khodabandeh tell Tehran Times about the group’s tactics to infiltrate the western governments, to buy the support of certain politicians and to raise funds in European cities. He also speaks of the cult-like attitudes of the group leaders who violate the basic rights of their own members.

The CEO of Nejat NGO explains about the activities of the NGO during the past two decades in order to accomplish its mission which is to aid the families of MEK members who are not allowed by the group leaders to contact their loved ones. According to Khodabandeh, cooperating with the international human rights bodies, Nejat NGO has taken a lot of actions to help families but in most cases the bodies have failed to provide adequate assistance in this regard.

The interview has been published in two parts on Tehran Times website. This is part one.

https://dlb.nejatngo.org/Media/Interview/Tehrantimes-khodabandeh-1.mp4
May 21, 2025 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
lobby
Mujahedin Khalq Organization's Propaganda System

The MEK Illusion of “International Support”

In recent years, the terrorist organization Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK), under the leadership of Massoud and Maryam Rajavi, has persistently attempted to create a false image of legitimacy by showcasing superficial links with Western officials. In reality, the Rajavi cult seeks out elderly and retired politicians from Europe and the United States to fabricate an illusion of “international support.”

A prime example of this deception is the recent interview with David Jones, a former MP from Wales, aired on the group’s media outlet, so-called “Simaye Azadi.” Jones, who has long been retired from active politics, does not represent the official stance of the British government in any capacity.

This tactic extends beyond David Jones. Over the years, MEK has exploited the appearances or statements of figures such as:
– John Bolton, former U.S. National Security Advisor
– Rudy Giuliani, Donald Trump’s former personal attorney
– Patrick Kennedy, former U.S. Congressman
– Ingrid Betancourt, retired Colombian politician
– Alejo Vidal-Quadras, former Vice President of the European Parliament
– Giuliano Pisapia, former Italian MEP

And other retired personalities who either accepted financial donations or were drawn in by their anti-Iran stance—willingly or unknowingly serving the propaganda machine of the Cult of Rajavi.

A Reality Far from Their Propaganda

None of these individuals, especially in their current roles, hold any influence in official decision-making bodies. Their participation in MEK events does not reflect the policies of their respective governments and has sometimes drawn criticism from media and the public alike.

Conclusion: Unmasking Deceit through Responsible Awareness

Through relentless propaganda efforts, the Rajavi cult seeks to disguise its dark history with a polished exterior. It is incumbent upon journalists, human rights defenders, independent institutions, and free media to expose these manipulative tactics. The exploitation of retired figures, instead of genuine grassroots or political support, only underscores the group’s deep isolation and lack of credibility among nations.

Fereydoon Ebrahimi

May 19, 2025 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
republican US Congressman, Tom McClintock
Mujahedin Khalq; A proxy force

Why so much hate speech against MEK sponsor in the US Congress

Once more the republican US Congressman, Tom McClintock, has declared his support for the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK) and eventually has received a new wave of online hate speech. He announced on his X account that he would voice his support for H.Res. 166 in the House of Representatives, a few days ago.

This resolution is in the first stage of the legislative process. It was introduced into Congress by McClintock on February 26, 2025. According to the Congress, the resolution has been cosponsored by 224 representatives (139 Republicans, 85 Democrats), and the chance of being agreed is 21 percent.

The act of McClintock and his peers indicate that the MEK have mastered the art of lobbying in the US government. Through clandestine funding and aggressive lobbying, the MEK has managed to gain the endorsement of Western politicians, this time Congressman McClintock. They. These endorsements, however, are based on a selective narrative that conveniently ignores the MEK’s history of terrorism and authoritarianism.

The MEK and its political arm, the so-called NCRI (National Council of Resistance of Iran), are primarily used as leverage by Western powers to gain strategic concessions, rather than as legitimate contenders for Iran’s future leadership. While the group may serve tactical purposes in short-term objectives—such as intelligence gathering, sabotaging nuclear facilities, or eliminating key figures—their role is largely instrumental.

The most recent role that the MEK played was echoed by Fox News last week when it claimed that new satellite images obtained by Fox News have shown a secret Iranian nuclear weapons facility. The MEK’s figure Alireza Jafarzadeh on Fox News has been responsible to fear-monger about what he calls “the threat of the nuclear weapons program of Iran”. Whenever the US-Iran negotiations get close to a potential agreement, the MEK is the best instrument for US warmongers and Israel to play in their ground.

As a matter of fact, The MEK is a pawn in a larger geopolitical game, one where it is useful for undermining the regime but is not considered a viable alternative for a future Iran even if the H.Res. 166 resolution claims that Maryam Rajavi’s ten-point plan enjoys the support of thousands of western figures.

MEK’s History of Terrorism, Betrayal

When discussing Iran’s future, the MEK stands out—not for its promise of democracy, but for its long history of terrorism, betrayal, and oppressive practices. Despite attempts to rebrand itself as a democratic force, the MEK’s violent history, actions and alliances speak of a much darker story.

An authoritarian group

The MEK’s origins lie in its founding as an Islamo-Marxist organization, ideologically tied to communism. Early on, it sought financial and logistical support from the Soviet KGB, requesting $300 million and asylum for its members in 1970. Such alliances paint a clear picture of a group willing to partner with dictatorships such as Saddam Hussein for survival and influence, rather than championing democratic ideals.

Terror Campaigns against Americans and Western Interests

The MEK’s history is marked by brutal attacks on Americans and Western institutions. In 1972, the group attempted to assassinate Brig. Gen. Harold Price, leaving him permanently disabled. In 1973, they murdered Lt. Col. Louis Lee Hawkins in Tehran. By 1976, the MEK was implicated in the killing of three American employees of Rockwell International—William Cottrell, Donald Smith, and Robert Krongard.
Beyond assassinations, the MEK engaged in bombings throughout the 1970s, targeting multinational corporations like Pan-American Airlines and Shell Oil, as well as SAVAK intelligence facilities. These attacks were not acts of resistance but calculated acts of terror aimed at spreading fear and asserting control.

Crimes against Humanity as Saddam’s private army

The MEK’s betrayal of its homeland reached a peak during the Iran-Iraq War, where it allied with Saddam Hussein. The group not only fought alongside Iraqi forces against Iran but also participated in suppressing Kurdish, Turkmen, and Shia uprisings in Iraq. These actions directly contributed to crimes against humanity, cementing the MEK’s reputation as opportunists willing to side with despots for power.

Rajavi’s Cult of Personality

Internally, the MEK operates as a cult, enforcing rigid authoritarian control over its members. Absolute loyalty is demanded, dissent is crushed, and brainwashing techniques are used to maintain the Rajavis’ dominance. These practices expose the group’s true nature: not a political movement, but a power-hungry organization bent on domination.

Detested by Iranians

Far from being a voice for the Iranian people, the MEK is widely despised across political and social spectrums in Iran. Its betrayal during the Iran-Iraq War, violent history of killing Iranian people, and authoritarian practices have alienated it from the population. The MEK’s lack of grassroots support underscores its illegitimacy as a representative of Iran’s future.

Warning for MEK sponsors

The MEK’s history disqualifies it as a legitimate opposition group or a viable alternative for Iran’s future. From assassinations and bombings to collaboration with Saddam Hussein, the group’s actions reveal a pattern of betrayal and authoritarianism. Any endorsement of this group– even as a tool to obstruct Iran-Us talks– betrays the values of justice and human rights that.

By Mazda Parsi

May 17, 2025 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Why is Fox News Carrying Weapon of MKO
Mujahedin Khalq; A proxy force

Why is Fox News Carrying Weapon of MKO?

Fox News’ claim about hidden tritium production facilities in Iran, based on suspicious information from the Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization (MKO), once again exposes the outdated tactics of Zionist media propaganda. This is an attempt to disrupt the Tehran-Washington diplomatic process, which more than anything else highlights the strategic crisis facing Israel.

Amid the resumption of indirect negotiations between Iran and the US, Fox News’ new claim about the discovery of secret tritium production facilities in Iran again uncovers the worn-out and repetitive approach of Zionist media and its affiliated networks. This claim, released based on information from the terrorist group MKO, is an unsuccessful attempt to influence the Tehran-Washington diplomatic process and a clear sign of the structural crisis within the Israeli regime, which, instead of redefining its strategy, has turned towards futile media theatrics.

A Crisis-Ridden Think Tank: Zionism and Terrorism in One Media Frame

The re-publication of fake information by Fox News and sources like the MKO reveals two simultaneous crises: First, the crisis of legitimacy of global Zionism, which, unable to counter Palestinian resistance, turns its attention to Iran to divert public opinion; and second, Israel’s strategic impotence due to its inability to control the regional diplomatic process, now coinciding with the US ceasefire with Yemen and the positive momentum of Iran’s nuclear negotiations.

Utilizing a group like the MKO, which lacks credibility even with other Western actors, shows that the media operation rooms against Iran have run out of reliable options.

A Heavy Shadow of Distrust Over Washington: When Netanyahu Dictates to Trump

Fox News’ claim comes at a time when the negotiation process between Iran and the US, centered around Oman, has made some relative progress, and even senior US officials have spoken positively about Iran’s responses. At the same time, Trump’s obvious distancing from Tel Aviv during his upcoming visit to the region and his support for a ceasefire with Yemen’s Ansarullah has angered the Zionists.

In this context, the nuclear accusations against Iran are, in fact, a nervous reaction to the strengthening of Iran’s regional weight and its role as a key player in multipolar regional interactions.

Exposing Contradiction in US Foreign Policy: Inconsistency Between Diplomacy, Sanctions

The US’s behavior toward Iran in recent weeks shows signs of internal division in Washington. On one hand, US officials speak of a possible agreement and acknowledge Iran’s right to peacefully use nuclear energy, while on the other hand, the Treasury Department of the same government imposes new sanctions.

This inconsistency has become a tool for Zionist and neoconservative warmongers, who, through intensified psychological and media pressure, aim to bring Washington back to the maximum pressure campaign.

Tehran’s Consistent Position: Agreement Only with the Real Lifting of Sanctions

In these circumstances, Tehran maintains its strategic cohesion and does not succumb to baseless media campaigns, emphasizing that negotiations will only succeed if sanctions are truly and fully lifted. Contrary to Western media’s perception, the diplomatic environment for Iran is not the result of seeking concessions but a product of an independent will for dignified interaction.

Collapse of Zionist Narratives Against Iran’s Strategic Rationality

Fox News’ new claim is neither the beginning of a new wave of pressure nor a diversion from the diplomatic process. What is clearer than ever today is the deep divide between the regional realities and the delusions fabricated by the Zionists. A regime that has failed in Gaza, even with open support from the US, and faces internal crises, resorts to using a bankrupt group like the MKO, which only confirms its own desperation.

As Iran’s foreign minister has stated, employing a deviant cult to spread seemingly terrifying information is nothing but a sign of the strategic collapse and legitimacy crisis within the Israeli regime.

NOURNEWS

May 12, 2025 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Women in the MEK: Trapped, tortured, and silenced
The cult of Rajavi

Women in the MEK: Trapped, tortured, and silenced

Throughout history, women have often been more vulnerable than their male peers and faced higher risks of crime, sexual exploitation, and forced labor.

This is a recurring theme around the world, and while each society has its own unique expressions of this, women everywhere can often share tragic stories of struggle.

One place you might not expect to find abuse against women is in an organization that so loudly proclaims itself the “defender” of women’s rights, especially one that boasts about having a female “leader” and purportedly keeps men inferior throughout its ranks.

The terrorist group Mojahedin-e-Khalq (MEK) may not consider its killing of over 23,000 Iranians a heinous act, nor its alliance with Saddam Hussein against Iran during the 1980s invasion. A member might even argue that these acts of terror and treason were committed in the name of a just cause. However, what the group would certainly never admit is its systematic abuse of its own members, especially the women it so desperately tries to portray as free and happy.

Yet, as time goes on, an increasing number of female ex-members are breaking their silence to expose the truth: a truth characterized by unimaginable violence and violation of human, personal, and gender rights. Maryam Sanjabi is one of these women.

Maryam looked composed as she sat across from me for the interview. Her demeanor provided a stark contrast to the chilling information I had just read online – that the MEK was looking to assassinate her. I asked her if this was true. She said yes, but what she cared about was that the group’s façade would come down, especially in the European countries currently sheltering the MEK.

Maryam’s introduction to the organization came through her older brother when she was just in middle school. She joined the terror outfit in the 80s, a decision she now reflects on with deep regret. “While I know I have to take responsibility for what I did, I can’t help but wonder how I ended up in the Ashraf Camp in Iraq,” she explained. “Of course, I didn’t fully understand what I was signing up for. I was young, naïve, and easily sucked in by their lies. The MEK leaders said their aim was to make Iran free and prosperous, but all they ever cared about was murdering innocent people and enslaving us.”

For 25 years, Maryam was part of the organization. In 2011, she finally fled Iraq after witnessing horrific crimes against its members, especially women.

The Tehran Times had previously reported on the Ashraf Camp’s isolation: members were cut off from technology and the outside world, subjected to strict segregation, and forced into hours of daily brainwashing. They were even forced to divorce their spouses and send their children away. But speaking with Maryam provided deeper insight into the particular struggles women in the group endured.

The forced sterilization of women

Up until the 1990s, women in the MEK held no real status under the leadership of its early founders. At best, they were limited to working in kitchens, kindergartens, or dormitories, Maryam said. But in the 90s, when Maryam Qajar-Azdanlou rose alongside Massoud Rajavi, a new deception took shape.

“Qajar-Azdanlou is the group’s most notorious female fraud—everything she says about women’s rights is a lie, and her actions completely contradict her words. The group’s propaganda boasts that women hold top leadership roles and portrays them as free-thinking revolutionaries. But in reality, the women there are essentially prisoners, stripped of any real agency or decision-making power.”

Maryam explained that the MEK was particularly concerned about women leaving the organization. They employed extreme measures to ensure no woman could escape or think about anything beyond devotion to Rajavi. “A key part of their control strategy was systematically eliminating women’s roles as wives and mothers,” she said.

As previously reported by the Tehran Times, the MEK ended up forcing all couples within the Ashraf Camp to divorce their spouses. Then it proceeded to ban any form of romance and intimacy, with women facing harsher punishments than men for breaking the rules. “I knew a 30-year-old woman who confessed her feelings to a male member,” Maryam recalled. “When the MEK leadership discovered this, they forced dozens of members to verbally abuse her during our nightly ‘confession sessions’ – hour-long rituals where we had to admit any ‘wrongdoings’ from the day.”

“The constant humiliation destroyed her. She eventually committed suicide by electrocuting herself with high-voltage wiring.”

The MEK’s family destruction campaign progressed methodically: after separating spouses, they removed children—first shipping them to Jordan, then dispersing them across Europe. Finally, they ensured women could never bear children again. “They moved from forced divorces to mass sterilizations,” Maryam stated.

The organization actively sought opportunities to perform sterilizations. “A simple stomachache became justification,” Maryam revealed. “They’d claim your life depended on the procedure. If you resisted, they’d invent another surgical reason and sterilize you while anesthetized—without your knowledge.”

Having worked in the MEK’s documentation center, Maryam had unique insight: “I knew of about 150 sterilized women. Many horrific cases crossed my desk that others never saw.”

Leaving made impossible

During the first few years of MEK’s presence in Iraq, exiting the organization was relatively straightforward. Departing members would be held in separate quarters for about a year before release. However, after the group suffered major losses during a failed 1988 operation against Iran, they implemented draconian measures to prevent defections.

“Everything changed overnight,” Maryam explained. “Anyone requesting to leave would be confined in isolation for two years. Upon release, they’d be given only basic provisions—a fork, spoon, bag of flour, used clothing, and minimal cash—before being abandoned at Abu Ghraib prison. Without passports (which we’d surrendered upon joining), Iraqis detained these stateless individuals for six to seven years.”

Abu Ghraib had long been synonymous with systematic torture, both before and after the U.S. invasion of Iraq. The prison gained global notoriety in 2004 when leaked photographs exposed its brutal torture practices: prisoners led on leashes, naked detainees stacked in human pyramids, and individuals forced into crucifixion-like positions.

“Some former members begged to rejoin the MEK after being sent to Abu Ghraib,” Maryam revealed. “Many disappeared inside that prison – we never heard from them again. Others didn’t survive at all.”

For those who endured the Iraqi facility’s horrors, survival didn’t mean recovery. The Tehran Times recently learned about the case of one woman who returned to Iran after her imprisonment. The former MEK member spent her remaining years institutionalized in psychiatric care before dying earlier this year.

Punished before disobedience

The MEK conducted periodic “purification” campaigns to eliminate discontent within its ranks. Members suspected of dissatisfaction or potential desertion were rounded up and subjected to days of torture. Maryam eventually became one of these targeted “impure elements.”

“They accused me and others of being Iranian government agents, which was nonsense, ” Maryam recounted. “They knew perfectly well we had no outside contact. This was simply their way of warning unhappy members about the consequences of attempting to leave.”

Eight years after joining, Maryam was taken to the “Castle” – a notorious prison complex within Ashraf Camp. “The first person I saw was Mahboubeh Jamshidi, sitting on a chair, screaming curses at me, and demanding confessions. Then others in the room began beating me.”

Maryam was confined in a cell with other women prisoners. Their daily existence consisted of relentless beatings, with only three one-minute bathroom breaks outside their cells each day.

“Four jailers oversaw our torture: Heshmat Tiftakchi, Nahid Sadeghi, Kobra Hassanvand, and Fatemeh Kheradmand. Kheradmand would kick me with her military boots – head, face, everywhere. Her blows split my lips open and left permanent scars. My wounds bled profusely, but I never received any medical treatment.”

“The violence escalated one day when Kheradmand attacked me like a wild animal and tried to break my hand. Though I fought back, she damaged nerves in my right hand and left it numb for years. The injury remains visible today.”

Maryam endured this torture for ten days. “Then Shahin Haeri, Saeeda Shahrokhi, and other guards came. They dragged me to a room, bound my limbs, and whipped my feet and body until I passed out. They revived me with water, only to repeat the process again and again.”

After this ordeal, Maryam was returned to the general population with strict orders never to speak about what had happened.

Death, the ultimate fate of the women who dared escape

But what awaited those who miraculously escaped Ashraf Camp, avoided Abu Ghraib prison, and survived the MEK’s internal torture system? Almost certain death – particularly for women.

“I escaped during a period when surveillance had weakened after Saddam’s fall,” Maryam explained. “The regime’s collapse meant the MEK lost its main ally in hunting down fugitives. Those who tried escaping earlier weren’t so lucky – many were captured and executed.”

Maryam recounted the tragic story of Minoo Fathali, a camp guard who fled with a male colleague she loved. “The MEK deployed sixty Iraqi patrol vehicles to track them down. They were captured in Baghdad and dragged back.”

While the man eventually escaped after serving two years’ imprisonment, Minoo suffered a far worse fate – she was executed with cyanide. “This was their standard method,” Maryam noted. “Countless others chose suicide over continued torment. I knew of about 100 suicides among our 5,000 members – an unimaginable toll.”

Maryam said she feels bad for some of the people left trapped in the MEK. “Before I escaped, I confided in my two closest friends,” she shared. “But fear kept them from joining me. Now they’re stuck in the MEK’s Albanian compound—I don’t think they’ll ever be able to find a way out, but I pray to God that someone helps them leave that hell.”

By Sheida Sabzehvari – Tehran Times

May 11, 2025 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Recent Posts

  • The Rhetorical Style and Polemical Language of the MEK

    July 15, 2026
  • Death of Lindsey Graham, notorious hardliner against Iran

    July 13, 2026
  • Nejat Society Albania’s 2026 Peace Delegation

    July 11, 2026
  • When Reality Does not Fit the MEK’s Narrative

    July 11, 2026
  • From Baghdad to Washington: How the MEK Aligns with Corrupt Global Politicians

    July 4, 2026
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Youtube

© 2003 - 2025 NEJAT Society . All Rights Reserved. NejatNGO.org


Back To Top
Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip