Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip
Nejat Society
Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip
© 2003 - 2024 NEJAT Society. nejatngo.org
Mujahedin Khalq Organization members' families

A humanitarian plea for the visit of two sisters

Mr. Ghorban Ali Hossein Nejad ,defector of MKO who was a veteran translator of the group leader has repeatedly asked the International Human Rights bodies to help his two daughters have a visit.

He has two daughters, one in Iran [Mona,33] and one in Camp Liberty [ Zeinab, 37]. The two sisters have not been able to see or have any contact with each other during their lifetime due to the enforced separation of families within the Cult of Mujahedin-e Khalq.

Mr. Hussennejad says even during his reside in MKO Camps he couldn’t manage to visit his daughter; Zeinab for twenty years.

Last week Mona Hussennejad for the second time traveled to Iraq, Camp Liberty to visit her dear sister.  However the MKO leaders refused the visit because they fear Zeinab would defect the cult.    

April 23, 2015 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Albania

High ranking MKO members in Albania

List of several high ranking MEK in Tirana gathered together from various places.

Some are from the leadership ranks, most are top level intelligence and military commanders of the MEK. Among them is Mahmoud Atai who signed the treaty of surrender with the American army in Camp Ashraf on behalf of Massoud Rajavi. Most have false passports and documents which Iran Interlink has listed along with their real identities.

 One of the missions is to buy large amounts of land and real estate in order to create a new cult camp. But the main and immediate objective is to silence or eliminate the former members who no longer obey the MEK commanders by whatever means possible.

The sources of this information – who are known to Iran Interlink- are afraid for their lives; these are highly trained and ruthless intelligence operatives from the time of Saddam Hussein.

Some are known to be Massoud Rajavi’s personal bodyguards. Rumours circulating among those in Tirana anticipate that this combination of activities – buying land, removing disaffected members – indicates that they are preparing a place to bring Rajavi. This matches with the new situation in Iraq; the defeat of ISIS and the killing of Al Douri in Tikrit have signalled the loss of hope in the Saddamists.

Iraninterlink provided the list and Nejat Society members of Mazandaran Branch provided the photos.

April 21, 2015 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Iran Interlink Weekly Digest

Iran Interlink Weekly Digest – 92

++ Two weeks ago an active MEK member was involved in an accident in Baghdad. He was arrested and imprisoned to await trial. Iraqi officials stated that pending his trial he was free to be released on bail. The MEK preferred not to pay this, but instead created a brouhaha for publicity purposes claiming that he had been kidnapped by ‘agents of the Iranian regime’, even writing to Ban Ki Moon. But when a group of families arrived in Baghdad trying to get contact with for their loved ones in Camp Liberty the MEK panicked. Fearing their member might run away the MEK suddenly paid the bail and welcomed him back in the camp with flowers and cheers of ‘victory, victory’. Following this MEK publicity several former members write that this person whom the MEK call Safar Zakeri is actually Safar Ali Zamanian. Writers say the MEK uses false names and has certainly done so for some of those going to Tirana and America. They point out different reasons: 1. To prevent the families of these people from finding them; 2. To hide the trail of criminal activities; 3. Historically Rajavi claimed money for fictional forces from Saddam Hussein; 4. Several disaffected members have been killed and their names used by other members to hide the fact.

Others ridicule this event saying the MEK have been reduced from claiming to free the whole world to celebrating bailing one member from prison.

Massoud Khodabandeh on Facebook says that at the root of the issue is that this person will never be trusted inside the MEK again. Anybody who undertakes an unsupervised absence – whether in prison or hospital or other reason – for a few days will be treated as an infiltrator by Massoud Rajavi. And like many before him, this person will be treated like this for the rest of his life. According to Khodabandeh it doesn’t stop there because sooner or later, after being treated like this, the person will rebel. And at that point the MEK will be forced to get rid of him, like many others. Khodabandeh says, if you look deeply into the photograph of the man with the flowers it looks not like a celebration but like his funeral. It hasn’t unfolded yet, but it will.

++ This week Iran Interlink published a list of several high ranking MEK who have arrived in Tirana, gathered together from various places. Some are from the leadership ranks, most are top level intelligence and military commanders of the MEK. Among them is Mahmoud Atai who signed the treaty of surrender with the American army in Camp Ashraf on behalf of Massoud Rajavi. Most have false passports and documents which Iran Interlink has listed along with their real identities. One of the missions is to buy large amounts of land and real estate in order to create a new cult camp. But the main and immediate objective is to silence or eliminate the former members who no longer obey the MEK commanders by whatever means possible. The sources of this information – who are known to Iran Interlink- are afraid for their lives; these are highly trained and ruthless intelligence operatives from the time of Saddam Hussein. Some are known to be Massoud Rajavi’s personal bodyguards. Rumours circulating among those in Tirana anticipate that this combination of activities – buying land, removing disaffected members – indicates that they are preparing a place to bring Rajavi. This matches with the new situation in Iraq; the defeat of ISIS and the killing of Al Douri in Tikrit have signalled the loss of hope in the Saddamists.

++ The Commentariat poured scorn and ridicule on the MEK for going into overdrive to support Saudi Arabia’s attack on Yemen. The MEK, they say, is more Saudi then the Saudis themseleves.

++ Another activity which the MEK has embarked on in its websites it to publish the letters of Said Masouri from inside prison in Iran. Masouri has been affiliated with MEK on and off for years and this is not the first time the MEK have tried to take ownership of him, or someone, anyone. But this pose becomes ridiculous when the MEK publishes Masouri’s letters from inside prison in praise of terrorism and yet nobody is stopping them. And the MEK claim he has visits every week even though he is charged with murder and terrorism. Commentators point out that on the contrary, families of the residents in Liberty can’t even have a letter or phone call after twenty years let alone a visit. They point out that the MEK is saying the prisons in Iran are ten times better than the camp in Iraq.

++ Camp Liberty resident Jalal Abedini has died in hospital after an operation on a tumour. The MEK as usual have written a letter to President Obama and other leaders claiming that ‘agents of Iranian regime’ [the Iraqi authorities] have laid siege to Camp Liberty and don’t allow them to access medical treatment. They say that for months they have asked Jane Holl Lute of the UN to allow them to take him out of Iraq and she refuses. (This, of course, is not true and this news is only published in Farsi.) Already internal critics including Atefeh Eghbal have questioned “if you knew he was ill for a long time as you say, why is it we only find out after he died that you tried to save him? Why do people die before you plead for help, why not before?”

In English:

++ Fareed Zakaria in Newsmax ‘Iran Is Methodical and Rational’. Zakaria writes that Iran is denounced as irrational by some enemies who, at the same time, say Iran will bow to the pressure of sanctions; a rational response. Others say Iran is rational but not reasonable. The article argues that Iran is acting rationally and reasonably in line with its geopolitical interests: “Seymour Hersh has reported extensively for The New Yorker on America’s covert support for groups within Iran that seek not only to topple the regime but also dismember the country. Some of these groups, like the Mujahedeen-e-Khalq and Jundallah, are regarded by some as pretty nasty terrorist outfits. For a decade starting in 2001, Tehran watched as 200,000 American troops massed across its eastern and western borders in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Bush administration openly talked about the need for “regime change” in Tehran, which was branded as part of the globe’s “axis of evil.” I am not making the case that any of these policies should have been altered — international politics is a rough business — but given these realities, is it so bizarre that Iran has behaved as it has? Or that it has sought to build a nuclear industry that could give it a pathway to a nuclear weapon? Would a secular, hyper-rational country facing this same array of threats have acted differently?”

++ Mazda Parsi, Nejat bloggers ‘Concerns of False Prophets after Nuclear Deal’. The article deals with why the long term alliance between the Zionist regime, war mongers and the MKO is so deep. MEK pays for support from people like John Bolton and Robert Menendez to keep the group alive. “Furthermore, John Bolton is a senior fellow at the neoconservative American Enterprise Institute and the chairman of the Gatestone Institute, a right-wing “pro-Israel” activist group that has been accused of fomenting anti-Muslim sentiment. He is a steadfast supporter of the right-wing Israeli government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Exactly like the MKO and its Israeli ally Netanyahou, he is a vocal opponent of President Obama’s diplomatic approach regarding Iran. About the MKO-Israeli alliance it is worth mentioning that terrorist attacks against the Iranian nuclear scientists that ended in with the death of five of them was actually done in collaboration with a team of MKO operatives who were all trained by Mossad Intelligence Service.” The article concludes: “The MKO and its American and Israeli supporters are false prophets. They all have “an interest in creating a panic about Iran’s nuclear capabilities”.”

++ The title of Michael Luciano’s blog in Daily Banter really says it all: ‘Rudy Giuliani Supports a Mujahedin Group With a Hammer-and-Sickle Logo Because He’s Been Paid To’.

++ Ebrahim Khodabandeh writing for Iran Interlink exposes increasing infighting and disaffection inside the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), which is based in Paris (although its life-term Chair, Massoud Rajavi has been in hiding since March 2003). Interestingly, Khodabandeh receives communications from a wide spectrum of current and former MEK members and supporters who know him personally. Collectively their communications reveal a picture of disintegration and dissent over the undemocratic practices inside the NCRI where even non-MEK members are expected to unquestioningly obey MEK dictates.

++ Anne Khodabandeh (Singleton) has written an Open Letter to Nancy Pelosi warning her not to allow the MEK to hijack her name. The MEK’s Farsi sites have appropriated her name and attributed to her words and political stances which are not only fictional but are far from her real position in relation to the MEK. Khodabandeh points out that in Farsi even the anti-Iran Neoconservative members of Congress have been misrepresented as attending an Iranian Nourouz celebration specifically to support the MEK.

++ In a long and detailed analytical article in Truthout, Gareth Porter exposes the myths fuelling the ‘The “Possible Military Dimensions” Bomb That Could Blow Up the Iran Deal’. The article exposes how the MEK was instrumental in information laundry for the Israelis to derail the nuclear negotiations with manufactured information. “Information now available shows that the documents were created in Israel. According to a senior German office official, those documents were given to Germany’s foreign intelligence service, the BND, in 2004 by the Mujahedin e-Khalq (MEK), the armed exile Iranian opposition group that had been an Israeli client organization for several years. A popular Israeli history of the most successful covert operations by Israel’s Mossad, originally published in Hebrew in Israel, asserts that Mossad provided some of the documents to the MEK that later become the centerpiece of the case against Iran.”

++ Caleb Maupin’s article in RT says ‘US can’t afford more war and aggression, people want peace with Iran’. He says Iranians and Americans want peace, but a small but very wealthy and powerful group of oil corporations and military contractors in alliance with Israel want further hostilities throughout the Middle East. “All throughout the Middle East there are many countries with complex political situations. There are many people throughout the region who don’t like living under US-backed autocracies like the Saudi Arabia monarchy, or the regimes that they prop up throughout the region and they may be in rebellion. But this is not because Iran told them to. There are people all throughout the Middle East who are upset about the fact that Wall Street controls their oil resources and that people throughout the Middle East are hungry and starving while they have so much oil. These are very wealthy countries. Yet, the wealth of these countries is not under the control of their people. To characterize Iran as sponsoring terrorism is outrageous, especially when the US government and Israel are in alliance with the Mojahedin-e-Khalq which is a vile terrorist organization that has assassinated and murdered people. And the US and the Israeli government are working with them to destabilize Iran.

“The US is also working with Jundallah which is the terrorist organization that has been attacking Iran as well. Terrorist attacks have been taking place in Iran by US backed forces. Yet, Iran has attacked no one. Iran hasn’t attacked any of its neighbors, Iran want to live in peace. It is a country that is trying to survive. This is a country that was born in a revolution and in which the forces of wealth and power and Wall Street were kicked out, and they began with nationalized oil resources to develop independently. And of course that is a threat to any of the rich and powerful countries in the West because if one country can break free, other countries can break free, as well. The attack on Iran is an attempt to stifle independent economic development.”

April 19, 2015 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mujahedin Khalq; A proxy force

US can’t afford more war and aggression, people want peace with Iran’

Iranians and Americans want peace, but a small but very wealthy and powerful group of oil corporations and military contractors in alliance with Israel want further hostilities throughout the Middle East, claims Caleb Maupin, International Action Center.

A large number of Republicans are opposing the nuclear deal with Iran and threatening to block it. Following them, some individual American states say that they may keep up their own sanctions against Iran.

RT: So we’re hearing that individual states may keep their own sanctions against Iran. How likely is that to scupper the deal?

Caleb Maupin: It’s important to be clear that at no point in US history and nowhere in the US constitution is the establishing of foreign policy ever delegated to local and state governments. That has always been exclusively the power of the Federal government. This is yet another maneuver by a cartel of criminal profiteers to try and sabotage any hope for peace between the US and Iran. Many people around the world rejoiced when they heard that the deal had been reached. Yet, the relentless efforts of certain forces to prevent peace and cooperation between countries; and further war and aggression around world- they continue. And we shouldn’t really be surprised.

RT: Could these few individual states in America derail the process? Do they have the power within themselves to disrupt the agreements that have been reached?

CM: Under the authority of the constitution they certainly don’t have the authority to do that. But will they be allowed to continue and try and undermine the efforts going on right now- we will have to see. There is a really a criminal cartel, a section of the wealthy in the US. This is the oil corporations, the military contractors in alliance with the Israeli government and their network of supporters around the world. They are doing everything they can to try and prevent any peace and cooperation between the US and Iran. Civilized people are all over the world want peace and cooperation between nations – this is a basic thing. People in the US with high levels of unemployment, food banks all across this country are having a record demand, as there is a record amount of food insecurity all across this country. We can’t afford more war and aggression. People in the US want peace with Iran. People in Iran want peace with the US; they don’t want to be attacked, they don’t want to be the subject of further sanctions.

The forces that want war are very small but they are also very wealthy and very powerful. This is the struggle of the people against the forces of wealth and power that very much want to further hostility throughout the region. Right now the US is in alliance with Saudi Arabia. As Saudi Arabia murders civilians left and right in Yemen. People are dying. Yet, the US is worried about Iran; yet, there is a talk of attacks on Iran. Who is the real source of aggression in the region?

RT: In addition to those individual states we already know that a large number of Republicans are against this deal too. They say that they are afraid that Iran will “continue to sponsor terrorism.” The breakthrough agreement seems doomed doesn’t it?

CP: The notion that Iran is sponsoring terrorism is an extreme mischaracterization. It is very common throughout the US press. In Bahrain, for example, the Shia community there which is the majority of the people is highly discriminated against… And if you were to believe what CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC were saying, you would think that the only reason people in Bahrain are rebelling against an absolute monarchy is because Iran told them to or something like that. That is outrageous.

All throughout the Middle East there are many countries with complex political situations. There are many people throughout the region who don’t like living under US-backed autocracies like the Saudi Arabia monarchy, or the regimes that they prop up throughout the region and they may be in rebellion. But this is not because Iran told them to. There are people all throughout the Middle East who are upset about the fact that Wall Street controls their oil resources and that people throughout the Middle East are hungry and starving while they have so much oil. These are very wealthy countries. Yet, the wealth of these countries is not under the control of their people. To characterize Iran as sponsoring terrorism is outrageous, especially when the US government and Israel are in alliance with the Mojahedin-e-Khalq which is a vile terrorist organization that has assassinated and murdered people. And the US and the Israeli government are working with them to destabilize Iran.

The US is also working with Jundallah which is the terrorist organization that has been attacking Iran as well. Terrorist attacks have been taking place in Iran by US backed forces. Yet, Iran has attacked no one. Iran hasn’t attacked any of its neighbors, Iran want to live in peace. It is a country that is trying to survive. This is a country that was born in a revolution and in which the forces of wealth and power and Wall Street were kicked out, and they began with nationalized oil resources to develop independently. And of course that is a threat to any of the rich and powerful countries in the West because if one country can break free, other countries can break free, as well. The attack on Iran is an attempt to stifle independent economic development.

Caleb Maupin, RT

April 19, 2015 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mujahedin Khalq; A proxy force

The”Possible Military Dimensions”Bomb That Could Blow Up the Iran Deal

The United States and Iran may have agreed on a vague framework for resolving remaining issues between them, including the lifting of sanctions, but the final stage of the negotiations will bring a diplomatic confrontation over the sequence and timing of lifting sanctions.

And the most difficult issue in the coming talks will be how the "Possible Military Dimensions" or "PMD" – the allegations of Iranian nuclear weapons work that have been at the center of the entire Iran nuclear crisis for several years – is to be linked to lifting certain UN Security Council sanctions.

On that linkage Iran will insist that its cooperation in providing access to the International Atomic Energy Agency must be reciprocated with the lifting of certain sanctions on an agreed-upon timetable, regardless of how long the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) takes to make up its mind and what judgment it renders, according to a source in close contact with the Iranian negotiating team.

The US "fact sheet" on the "parameters" of an agreement says, "All past United Nations Security Council resolutions on the Iran nuclear issue will be lifted simultaneously with the completion by Iran of nuclear related activities addressing all key concerns," and the list that follows includes "PMD."

However, nothing was officially agreed on in Lausanne on how Iranian cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on the PMD issue would be linked to sanctions relief, according to the source close to the Iranian negotiators. But the source said that an informal understanding was reached that the linkage would involve the lifting of UN Security Council sanctions directly involving Iran’s imports for its nuclear and missile programs.

Iran is prepared to cooperate to complete the IAEA investigation of past allegations, the source said, but will demand concrete limits that provide assurances that the process will not be prolonged indefinitely.

Iran continues to insist that the evidence being used to impugn its intentions was "manufactured." Nevertheless, Iran "would be ready to give access to the IAEA on PMD even though that goes beyond NPT [Nonproliferation Treaty]," the source told Truthout.

But the source said Iran would not agree to make the lifting of those UN sanctions contingent on any IAEA judgment about the PMD issue. Instead, Iran will demand a list in advance of everything the IAEA wants. "We would give the IAEA access to everything on the list," said the source.

Once the IAEA completed its visits and its environmental sampling, however, Iran will consider that the process is finished. "We don’t care what the IAEA analysis would be or how long it took," the source said. "What Iranians cannot accept is that [the PMD issue] becomes an indefinite instrument for the Israelis, because they want to find out about Iranian capability and ask for this or that military site and a new inspection."

The negotiations on the PMD-sanctions linkage will be part of a broader set of negotiations in which Iran will insist on a detailed set of arrangements on sanctions relief in return for each of its concessions in the agreement, according to the source. "Each of the elements listed in the US fact sheet must have a step-by-step plan with a timetable and proportionate reciprocation," said the source.

Obama Under Pressure He Helped Create

The Obama administration has been under heavy pressure from the Israelis and their supporters in Washington to insist that Iran confess to having carried out nuclear weapons research and development as a condition for sanctions relief.

That pressure is the result of several years of news media coverage that has treated allegations that Iran carried out research and development on nuclear weapons, published by the IAEA in 2011, as established fact. The media have constantly repeated the theme that Iran has been "stonewalling" the IAEA to cover up its past nuclear weapons experiments.

Absent from the media narrative is the fact that the allegations that the IAEA is demanding that Iran explain are all based on intelligence that is now known to have come from Israel and which the IAEA itself suspected of being fabricated, from 2005 to 2009.

But the Obama administration itself helped to make PMD a hot button issue in American politics. It made Iran’s alleged refusal to cooperate with the IAEA investigation of the purported intelligence alleging an Iranian nuclear weapons research and development program the rationale for imposing punishing sanctions on Iran.

The administration has been wary of demanding an actual admission of guilt, which it knew was unrealistic, but it has been unwilling to completely dismiss the position of the Israelis and their followers either. Last November a "senior Western official" told Reuters that the United States and the other five powers would try to "be creative" in finding a formula to satisfy both those who were insisting that Iran must "come clean" about its nuclear past and those who said it was not realistic to expect a confession.

In an April 8 interview with Secretary of State John Kerry, the host of "PBS NewsHour" Judy Woodruff asserted that the IAEA wanted Iran to "disclose past military-related activities" but that Iran was "increasingly looking like it’s not going to do this." Woodruff then asked, "Is the US prepared to accept that?"

Without challenging the premise that Iran is expected to "disclose past military activities," Kerry responded, "No. They have to do it. It will be done."

Fabricated Intelligence and IAEA Investigation

The George W. Bush administration pressed documents supposedly from the laptop computer of an Iran scientist involved in an Iranian nuclear weapons research program on the IAEA in mid-2005. But Mohamed ElBaradei, then IAEA director general, refused to regard the documents as legitimate evidence because they had never been authenticated, and Bush administration officials refused to answer questions about their origins. In his memoirs published in 2011, ElBaradei writes, "The problem was, no one knew if any of this was real.

Information now available shows that the documents were created in Israel. According to a senior German office official, those documents were given to Germany’s foreign intelligence service, the BND, in 2004 by the Mujahedin e-Khalq (MEK), the armed exile Iranian opposition group that had been an Israeli client organization for several years.

A popular Israeli history of the most successful covert operations by Israel’s Mossad, originally published in Hebrew in Israel, asserts that Mossad provided some of the documents to the MEK that later become the centerpiece of the case against Iran.

ElBaradei also reveals in his memoirs that the IAEA received another series of purported Iranian documents directly from Israel in summer 2009. Among them was a two-page document in Farsi describing a four-year program to produce a neutron initiator for a fission chain reaction. The former IAEA chief inspector in Iraq, Robert Kelley has recalled that ElBaradei found that document to be lacking credibility because it had no chain of custody, no identifiable source, and no official markings or anything else that could establish its authenticity. But ElBaradei’s successor as IAEA director general, Japanese diplomat Yukiya Amano, gave the IAEA’s imprimatur to the entire collection as well as the earlier set of documents in an annex to the November 2011 report. After his election, Amano assured US officials that he was "solidly in the US court" in his handling of the Iran file.

The IAEA has never revealed that Israel was the source of the latter set of documents. The IAEA justified its decision to keep the identity of the member states that provided intelligence secret by citing the alleged necessity to protect "sources and methods." The decision to maintain silence on the source has served to shield both Israel and the IAEA itself from questions about the obvious political motives behind the purported intelligence.

The other major purported intelligence find published by the IAEA was the claim from Israel that Iran had installed a large steel explosives containment cylinder at its military base in Parchin in 2000 for nuclear weapons-related testing. But no corroborating evidence has ever been produced, and Robert Kelley has challenged the IAEA’s adoption of the Israeli intelligence claim on the grounds it was technically implausible.

Relations between Iran and the IAEA on cooperation over the PMD issue have gone through three major phases. In a series of meetings in early 2012, Iran and the IAEA were close to reaching agreement on a framework for Iranian cooperation. Iran agreed on an IAEA visit to Parchin, where the bomb test cylinder was said to have been located, as part of the process. But the talks broke down over the IAEA’s insistence that the investigation would never have an end point, and that the Agency would have the right to return to any question or site, even after Iran had provided the necessary access and other cooperation.

A second phase of relations began when Iran and the IAEA reached agreement on a "Framework for Cooperation" in February 2014. Iran agreed to provide information and access in regard to a list of PMD issues, starting with the "Exploding Bridgewire" (EBW) issue.

But after Iran provided documentary evidence to show that its research in the field was for its oil and gas industry and not for nuclear weapons, Amano refused to acknowledge publicly that Iran had discredited one of the arguments about the intelligence documents.

The head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization, Ali Akhbar Salehi, claimed that the IAEA had promised in the agreement to close issues once Iran had provided required information, and the IAEA did not challenge his claim. Amano insisted, however, that the IAEA would not issue any assessment until it had completed its investigation of all of the issues.

Iran apparently concluded from that experience that the IAEA would keep Iran on the hook as long as the United States and its allies wanted to maintain leverage over Iran. The Obama administration has now confirmed that conclusion by holding the lifting of sanctions hostage to Iran’s "cooperation" on PMD.

US officials have never explained how they would expect Iran to satisfy the IAEA if the intelligence at issue was indeed fabricated.

Truthout,

April 18, 2015 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Former members of the MEK

Pictorial – Mr. Dashtestani met MKO hostages’ families

Mr. Dashtestani ;ex-member of the destructive cult of MKO who is now a member of NejatNGO Fars Province visited the families of MKO hostages of West Azarbayjan  at the NejatNGO office.

He clarified the ways the families could help their beloved ones release themselves from the pawns of the cult.

Mr. Dashtestani met MKO hostages' families

April 16, 2015 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
The cult of Rajavi

Disputes in the NCRI escalate to a higher extent

Recently I have received many letters and messages from members and supporters of the Mojahedin-e Khalq Organization (MKO) and the National Council of Resistance (NCR), in particular from France, Iraq and Albania. These communiations indicate that the long running disputes between the members and the officials inside the Council have escalated to an even greater extent so that this has become the main concern of the leaders.

Apparently when Iraj Mesdaghi issued his first report about the unrealistic policies of the NCRI and directly questioned the cult leader Massoud Rajavi, and consequently Abdol Karim Qasim and Mohammad Reza Rouhani, two prominent members of the NCR, resigned as a sign of protest and revealed many facts about the internal affairs of the Council, and Iraj Mesdaqi wrote his second report on the anniversary of the first one, and then the argument of Esmail Yaghmai with the organization erupted over financial scandals, an unusual atmosphere was created inside the NCR. This resulted in several sessions being held one after another over a short time, even though no session had been held for a long period.

The question “where is Massoud Rajavi?” continuously asked by the members and supporters has really taken the breath of the leaders. Of course the officials have no response to give but to insult and accuse the person asking such a question. The members of the NCR openly say that this a typical trick used by Cult leaders to sanctify themselves.

After all this, the authorities of the NCRI instructed the members to denounce their former colleagues; those who left the Council and criticized its internal undemocratic relations. As a result, articles in this regard were published by the likes of Mansur Qadarkhah and Parviz Khazai and others. But the majority refused to take part and did not accept to betray their old friends and repeat the MKO’s fabricated lies about them. Of course they had their own excuses. Some put it this way, that it would be better that they keep their contact with them in order to keep the way back to the NCR open for them. Some explained that they have family relationships and old friendship so they would be ashamed to turn against them. Some of course being under pressure by the MKO leaders did write something without mentioning any names just to comply with their demands.

Reports indicate that the NCR members openly bring their disputes for discussion to the sessions and complain about the lack of the minimum of democratic rights when decisions are made. The articles that the members write for the websites and publications are edited by NCR officials before being published and sometimes their contents are totally altered.

The NCR members argue that although the MKO members have accepted a super military discipline and they must accept orders without question, this obviously should not be the case for the NCRI members.

The present members of the NCRI discuss the term “national” in the National Council of Resistance and say that this means that the Council must contain all tendencies of the Iranian people, but in reality it only represents the MKO and its policies and ideas and only obeys the instructions of Massoud Rajavi. The same argument is put for the MKO satellite television program which is called “National TV” but only reflects the ideas of the Rajavi cult.

They also argue that the term “council” means that all decisions must be taken collectively after adequate discussion; otherwise it has no difference from the Mojahedin-e Khalq Organization. They say that from the beginning it was accepted that the policies of the Council be criticized and opposed by the members, but now anyone doing so is accused of being at the disposal of the Iranian regime. This trick is constantly used to silence the discontented members, though the critics continue with their disputes. In many Western countries the members and supporters of the NCR talk about these issues openly and bluntly.

One other matter the members claim is that in recent years many members left the NCRI but no one was recruited, and all those proposed to become members were opposed by the MKO leaders who hold hegemony over the Council. They ask firstly, why they do not allow more dignitaries and organizations to become members and secondly, why the opinions of the present members, when they are not in agreement with the MKO policies, are immediately ruled out and suppressed.

We can deduct from the letters and messages received from within the NCRI, that we must expect more dispatches from the Council in the near future which will reveal more facts about the undemocratic internal relations of the NCRI.

Iran interlink,

April 15, 2015 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mujahedin Khalq Organization's Propaganda System

Open Letter to Nancy Pelosi: Don’t allow the MEK to hijack your name

Dear Ms Pelosi,

Following the long awaited announcement in Lausanne on the Iran nuclear agreement, your strong opposition to Senator Corker’s legislation has been welcomed by peaceable Iranians and Americans who, like you, support President Obama’s push to resolve the nuclear issue through diplomatic means.

It will come as some surprise to you therefore, that a group of Iranian war-mongering regime change proponents, the terrorist Mojahedin Khalq (MEK), claim to have your support.

In an astounding act of hubris, the MEK has not only appropriated your good name and attached it to a stance which is in contradiction to what you have always stated, but the group has also apparently fooled many of your opponents in Congress whose presence in this event has also been misrepresented as specific support for the MEK.

The MEK’s website Iran News Online reported as a news item a celebration held in Congress on March 17 to mark the Iranian New Year or Norouz. According to this news item, the event was attended by several advocates and lobbyists of the MEK – those named include Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Ted Poe and Jackson Lee, all of whom advocate the MEK’s regime change stance. As well as around 300 Congressional staff, many, but not all, of the attendees have been Neoconservatives whose anti-diplomacy stance is overtly expressed by people like John Bolton who so recently exhorted America to ‘bomb Iran’.

This is not company in which we would expect to find your name, let alone your endorsement. Yet, the duplicity and deceit and treachery of the Mojahedin is so bold as to allow them to do exactly this.

In this reporting of the event in Iran News Online – written in Farsi, not in English – the MEK have quoted a letter purported to have been written by yourself especially for the event on the occasion of the Iranian New Year. This letter states simply that you “congratulate the people of Iran on their New Year”.

This of course is a natural and commendable expression of support. But the context in which this letter is used makes it appear as though you are in agreement with the other participants. The event was attended by Sona Samsami, a long-term MEK member who represents the MEK’s front organization the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) in the United States. This group promotes itself as the agent of violent regime change in Iran – even though it has no support among Iranians and no capacity to undertake any such activity.

The MEK have misreported and manipulated this event so that it looks as though it has been held specifically to promote the MEK and its regime change agenda. I am sure that most of the attendees had no such awareness or intention.

Screenshot from MEK site

But this is not all. The MEK’s public site Mojahedin.org actually puts words into your mouth as though you were at the event and reports that Nancy Pelosi “Congratulates the people of Iran and the residents of Camp Liberty”. This, of course, is preposterous. These residents, the old and sick remnants of the MEK’s army, are awaiting expulsion from Camp Liberty and Iraq because of the MEK’s thirty year history of terrorism and treachery in that country. The UN mandate is to find them third countries to be transferred to for their safety. (Unfortunately this process has stalled because the MEK leader Massoud Rajavi refuses to cooperate and is holding the residents incommunicado inside Camp Liberty without any access to their families or the outside world. And in addition, most countries shun the MEK as a terrorist outfit and are very reluctant to accept them even as individual refugees.)

The report also quotes you from 2007 when you mentioned the situation of these Iranians in Iraq and said ‘something must be done about them’ in a way to sound as though you supported the MEK. But it is simply amazing that the MEK could think anybody except their own brainwashed members would believe you support such a group except on humanitarian grounds, in which case your support would take a very different form.

Screen shot from MEK site

I write to you as an expert on the MEK who has been campaigning for over a decade to help free the residents of Camp Ashraf and Camp Liberty, and to expose the lies and deceit of the MEK’s leaders Massoud and Maryam Rajavi. I would urge you to investigate the matter of your name and reputation being hijacked by this group. But further, I would urge you also to alert your colleagues in Congress – including those who are your political opponents – to the duplicitous methods of this group. The MEK’s unchallenged interference in the political process of America is not only very much against your country’s national interests, it is a slap in the face of those peaceful Iranians and Americans who, like yourself and President Obama have invested so much time and energy into allowing diplomacy to work.

About Anne Khodabandeh (Singleton):

 Middle East Strategy Consultants,

 http://www.mesconsult.com

 Autor of “Saddam’s Private Army” and “The life of Camp Ashraf”

 http://www.camp-ashraf.com

April 15, 2015 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Former members of the MEK

Pictorial- Mr. Mansour Shaabani wishes to back to his homeland

Mr. Jahangir Shaabani whose brother; Mansour- transferred to Albania from Camp Liberty visited Nejat society Gilan Branch.

Mr. Mansour Shaabani was prisoner of Iran- Iraq War. Then the MKO Cult mercenaries tricked him into joining the group. From then on he has been far from his family and homeland.

Mansour’s brother – Mr. Jahangir Shaabani says:” during the last years we several times traveled to Iraq to visit our brother. However not only didn’t we succeed to visit Mansour, but also the Cult leaders insulted and offended us. “

Anyway, fortunately on March 2014 my brother transferred to Albania and could contact us. Mansour was so excited and happily said that he was calling us from Tirana far from the cultish severe controls and bars. He said that he missed us a lot and wished to visit us as soon as possible.

Now we are regularly have contact. We are trying to pave the way for his repatriation.

Mr. Mansour Shaabani wishes to back to his homeland

April 14, 2015 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mujahedin Khalq; A proxy force

Concerns of False Prophets after Nuclear Deal

Constructive negotiations between Iran and the six world powers finally resulted in an agreement on Wednesday March 31 despite deep concern expressed by Israel, US hardliners, and the enemy of their enemy, the Mujahedin Khalq Organization (the MKO/ MEK).

Such a common stance between the MKO, Zionists, and American hardliners is justified by the long record of cooperation amongst these three parties whose reactions to the nuclear deal shared on main term: Concern.

Why the alliance between Zionist regime, war mongers and the MKO is so deep?

 At the first place that’s money that ”talks”. A large number of US Congressmen and former high profiles are paid big amounts of money by the MKO to back up the group in the US government.  Former US ambassador to at the UN, John Bolton has been a vocal cheerleader of the MKO. “He has been consistently misrepresenting a totalitarian cult as a “democratic” Iranian opposition group,” according to Daniel Larison of the American Conservative. “When Bolton or someone else with this record talks about “vigorous American support for Iran’s opposition,” we can be fairly sure that he means that the U.S. should be backing the MEK in its quest for seizing power in Iran.” [1]

While the nuclear negotiations between the U.S. and Iran was in its crucial phase, the New York Times published an op-ed by John Bolton titled “To Stop Iran’s Bomb, Bomb Iran.”[2] As it is widely reported, Bolton has received enormous amounts of money just for speaking on behalf the MKO and is seeking to overthrow the Islamic Republic.

Jon Schwarz of The Intercept who analyzed former UN ambassador’s “factual errors” in his Op-ed, asserted,” Bolton did not respond to questions about how much he has been paid by the MEK. However, the Financial Times reported in 2011 that speakers such as Bolton received from $20,000 to $100,000 per speech, with four-speech packages being “common.” [3]

“This confirms Bolton’s extremely poor judgment and underscores how truly crazy his overall argument for war with Iran is. It also reminds us how oblivious Iran hawks such as Bolton are to the political realities inside Iran,” Daniel Larison suggests. [4]

Furthermore, John Bolton is a senior fellow at the neoconservative American Enterprise Institute and the chairman of the Gatestone Institute, a right-wing "pro-Israel" activist group that has been accused of fomenting anti-Muslim sentiment. He is a steadfast supporter of the right-wing Israeli government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Exactly like the MKO and its Israeli ally Netanyahou, he is a vocal opponent of President Obama’s diplomatic approach regarding Iran.

  About the MKO-Israeli alliance it is worth mentioning that terrorist attacks against the Iranian nuclear scientists that ended in with the death of five of them was actually done in collaboration with a team of MKO operatives who were all trained by Mossad Intelligence Service. “Deadly attacks on Iranian nuclear scientists are being carried out by an Iranian dissident group that is financed, trained and armed by Israel’s secret service, “NBC News cited from U.S. officials. [5]

John Bolton is hardly alone in his Zionist-MKO stance against Islamic Republic. Democrat Senator Robert Menendez has been another voiced figure in the mainstream media for his anti-diplomacy, pro-MKO and pro-Israel stances. New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez is among those who back congressional quest to vote for more sanctions against Iran. He shares his foreign policy ideas with republicans. Why?

“Menendez received more campaign contributions from the MEK and its allies than any other member of Congress,” write Ali Gharib of the Nation. Gharib describes Menendez’s efforts to derail diplomacy with Iran:

 “The constant efforts, in cahoots with Republicans, to constrain the Obama administration’s diplomacy with Iran, for instance, have divided Democrats bitterly. In January of 2014, Menendez, along with rapacious anti-Iran Senator Mark Kirk (Ill.), introduced a new sanctions bill backed by the powerful anti-diplomacy American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Critics said the bill would kill the interim agreement struck by Iran and world powers—the framework that just today bore fruit as negotiations toward a comprehensive pact advanced—leading to widespread opposition among the Democratic Senate leadership. When liberal grassroots groups rallied enough Democrats to sustain a promised presidential veto, the bill failed to come to a vote.

“This year, Menendez introduced another sanctions measure with Kirk, but it too has so far stalled without the necessary Democratic support. He also sponsored a bill with Republican Foreign Relations Chair Bob Corker to empower Congress to vote on any deal with Iran—earning another veto threat from Obama. And working with Republicans came back to bite Menendez when Majority Leader Mitch McConnell couldn’t restrain his partisan impulses and sought to bring the bill to a quick vote; even Menendez himself had to object.”[6]

As Jim Lobe declared in Loblog, “Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ) was the top congressional recipient of “pro-Israel” campaign funding in the 2012 election cycle, the last time he ran for office, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.”

Lobe quotes from the recent investigated article of Ali Gharib and Eli Clifton in The Intercept that” Menendez has been also a top recipient of campaign funding from donors with ties to the Mojahedin-e Khalq (MeK), the cultish group that was until recently included on the State Department’s terrorism list.” [7]

Menendez accepted more than $25,000 from donors with ties to the MEK, making him the largest recipient from 2012, when the MeK was delisted that September, to the present. That’s not much compared to the well over $300,000 Menendez received from pro-Israel groups during the 2012 election cycle, but it was more than twice what was provided to the next biggest recipients, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) and Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA). [8]

It might be crystal clear now, why the three groups oppose any deal with the Iranian Government. Once the historical statement of agreement was published by the EU high representative and Iranian Foreign Minister, the disappointed opponents of the deal particularly the MKO launched its propaganda to convince its limited audience that a deal with Iran is bad in any case.

The MKO and its American and Israeli supporters are false prophets.  They all have “an interest in creating a panic about Iran’s nuclear capabilities”.

Mazda Parsi

Sources:

[1]Larison, Daniel, Bolton and the MEK, the American Conservative, March 27, 2015

[2]Bolton, John, To Stop Iran’s Bomb, Bomb Iran, The New York Times, March 26, 2015

[3] Schwarz, Jon, The Factual Errors in John Bolton’s “Bomb Iran!” Op-Ed in the New York Times — and Why You Should Care, The Intercept, April 4, 2015

[4] Larison, Daniel, Bolton and the MEK, the American Conservative, March 27, 2015

[5] Engel, Richard & Windrem, Robert, Israel teams with terror group to kill Iran’s nuclear scientists, U.S. officials tell NBC News, NBC News, February 9, 2015

[6] Gharib, Ali, Good Riddance to Bob Menendez?, The Nation, April 06 2015  

[7] Lobe, Jim, Sen. Menendez Top Recipient of MEK-Related Campaign Funding, Lobelog, February 27, 2015

[8]Gharib, Ali & Clifton, Eli, Long March of the Yellow Jackets: How a One-Time Terrorist Group Prevailed on Capitol Hill, The Intercept, February 26, 2015

April 13, 2015 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Recent Posts

  • The Rhetorical Style and Polemical Language of the MEK

    July 15, 2026
  • Death of Lindsey Graham, notorious hardliner against Iran

    July 13, 2026
  • Nejat Society Albania’s 2026 Peace Delegation

    July 11, 2026
  • When Reality Does not Fit the MEK’s Narrative

    July 11, 2026
  • From Baghdad to Washington: How the MEK Aligns with Corrupt Global Politicians

    July 4, 2026
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Youtube

© 2003 - 2025 NEJAT Society . All Rights Reserved. NejatNGO.org


Back To Top
Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip