Mujahedin Khalq; A proxy force

Britain aids Washington-backed MKO terrorists instead of fighting it

Exposing the part of Britain aiding terrorists like the Washington-backed Mojahedin Khalq (aka;MKO, MEK, NCRI, Rajavi cult)instead of fighting it
Exposing the part of Britain aiding terrorists like the Washington-backed Mojahedin Khalq (aka;MKO, MEK, NCRI, Rajavi cult)instead of fighting it

… Press TV reports on Western double-standards in the so-called ‘war on terror’ as the UK is known to host the leaders and members of several anti-Iran terrorist groups, such as MEK, Pejak and Jundullah. Massoud Khodabandeh criticised support for the MEK in particular, saying the group had by its own admission, killed 16,000 Iranians and 25,000 Iraqis. This is criminal behaviour and has nothing to do with politics. Instead of inviting MEK members into parliament. they should be prosecuted for these crimes …
Download Britain aids terrorists like the Washington-backed MKO instead of fighting it
Download Britain aids terrorists like the Washington-backed MKO instead of fighting it

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Former members of the MEK

Pictorial- Residents of Camp Ashraf escaped the cult

Mr. Mehrdad Amiri and Mr. Hojat Rafiee residents of Camp Ashraf escaped the cult on Saturday October2, 2010 at 2 O’clock am.
Mr. Mehrdad amiri, 35, and Mr. Hojat Rafiee, 42 were captured in Camp Ashraf of MKO for more than ten years. They told the families that they decided to runaway although they were seriously terrified by MKO leaders of being arrested by Iraqi forces or Iranian Intelligence." the situation created by the Camp leaders is terribly chocking so members are under too much mental pressure. The women in the group are frightened of being raped so they fear to escape more than their male comrades," they said. Residents of Camp Ashraf escaped the cult

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mujahedin Khalq; A proxy force

Unmistakable similarity of Sawers language with MKO terrorists

The unmistakable similarity of John Sawers language with Washington backed MKO terrorists

Text of report by state-run Iranian TV channel one on 10 November
[Presenter] You probably know what they call an individual residing in a country and gathering secret information for an alien country. Yes, that is right; they call that person a spy.

The report that Reza Nowruzian has prepared for us in the magazine report section tries to give a greater explanation of espionage.

[Nowruzian] The western countries which follow a colonial agenda make great investments in espionage and have vast networks in this arena.

The CIA which is an American espionage organisation and MI6 which works for the British are cases in point.

The latter; I believe it was the first time that its head [John Sawers] ever talked in public. It appears that in recent years he has gathered a large number of spies around him.

Yes, this very Mr Sawers has stressed that they [presumably MI6] are very sensitive on the issue of Iran and they will do anything they can to hamper Iran and cause problems for it.

But, we have to listen to the remarks of our country’s Minister of Intelligence [Heydar Moslehi] who has analysed the remarks of Mr Sawers in a sense. Let us see the report.

After 101 years, for the first time and as the head of the British intelligence outfit John Sawers appeared in front of the cameras in order to announce the general outline of the espionage activities of his country.

[John Sawers shown delivering speech with Persian voice over] The British intelligence service known as MI6 has increased its cooperation with foreign elements in recent years.

[Moslehi] If they could recruit anyone as a spy or groups such as this, they would normally have been employed for terrorist and subversive activities.

[Nowruzian] In a part of his remarks, the head of MI6 John Sawers said that [Persian voice over] in the British intelligence services we obtain our intelligence from our secret agents.

But who are these secret agents of Britain in reality? [John Sawers shown delivering speech with Persian voice over] These are usually foreign individuals and all of whom have access to secret information and cooperate with us through their own personal choice.

[Moslehi] This is a country which itself admits that it is meddling in another country. We also have evidence that this country is conducting these operations in a context of terrorist activities. We have to expose their real image as self-claimed upholders of human rights.

[Nowruzian] While as a diversion he claims that Iran is priority number one for Britain, Sawers goes on to mention only Iran in the course of his speech and tries to portray the psychological warfare that it has waged against Iran before and after its nuclear development as an intelligence victory.

[John Sawers shown delivering speech with Persian voice over] The revelation of the enrichment site in Iran was an intelligence victory.

[Nowruzian] Reflecting a little on the language used in the course of the talks by Sawers, one would notice that his literature has an unmistakable similarity to that of the Monafeqin [Mojahedin Khalq Organisation opposed to the Islamic Republic]. Of course, it will not be and is not surprising for you to know that Sawers has deep ties with the Monafeqin terrorist group for 10 years now. And, in the course of these 10 years he has rendered great services to this group by removing them from the blacklist of terrorist groups.

The head of the British intelligence services has advanced the Iran-phobia project by defining the new doctrine of the British espionage outfit as stopping the nuclear activities of Iran in this way:

[John Sawers shown delivering speech with Persian voice over] We need intelligence operations in order to make the path of countries which are developing in the nuclear field much harder.

[Moslehi] As we definitely see one of our missions as the need to defend the Islamic Revolution, we consider no limits constraining us in this issue. Everywhere, our belief is that wherever the global arrogance is confronting us we have to stand up to it.
[Nowruzian] Financial and moral assistance given to small and big groups in the east and west of our country is another aspect of the subversion of Britain [against Iran].

The terrorist gangs such as the Monafeqin, PJAK, Rigi [Baluchestan Sunni armed group in south east Iran] and Komala [Maoist organisation mostly active in south of Iranian Kurdistan] and others have rendered great services to Western espionage organisations such as MI6. These are done in order to distort the security situation in the country. This was against a background where the Islamic Republic was confronting the ruffians with resolve.

[Video of an unnamed suspect] In the course of two trips to Iraq and returning to Tehran my unit head was a lady called Nahid and who resided in Britain and contacted me from there. She told me that I have to carry out operations.

[Video of another suspect with dramatic music played in the background] The silence and tranquillity that has been established must be broken [must be broken repeated several times for dramatic effect].

[Moslehi] All the groups that are conducting terrorist operations and soft war, so to speak, against the Islamic Republic; their major nucleus is either located in London or one of their main nuclei is in Britain. In other words, one of the central units is located there.

[Nowruzian] One of these terrorist groups that has directed its actions from Britain is the Komala terrorist gang. It is a group that is being directed by Jalil Fattahi. After conducting a number of terrorist operations in Iran, Jalil Fattahi fled to London so that he can carry out his plans inside Iran with the aid of British agents.

By undertaking numerous trips to Sulaymaniyah in Iraq, Fattahi met Komala terrorists and transferred financial and oral support of Britain for these gangs.

But, in the latest tracking down operations, four members of this terrorist gang were trapped in the net set for them by the security agents of Iran. While admitting to the kind of operations in our country – terror against individuals – they described their links to Britain thus:

[Video of one of the people presented as an arrested member of the group of four] In reality, I am not the key player, there are others such as Britain.

[Nowruzian] In reality what Sawers says is not gaining intelligence but creating news in the style of Monafeqin. This is because the fabrication of news on the transparent nuclear activities of Iran shows that Sawers’s allies have perpetrated news fabrication in this media war against Iran.

[Moslehi] In effect the Revolution has found itself. And, it has found the path it needs to traverse and it is advancing at full throttle. The anger that they feel is caused by this momentum. If they wage a soft war against us it will be a defensive one. We, in reality, are conducting a guided soft war against the global arrogance formerly by the leadership of the Great deceased Imam [Khomeyni] and latterly by the Supreme Leader [Ali Khamene’i].

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Iraq

Iraqi parliament leaves Saddamists and Mojahedin Khalq in the cold

Nouri Maliki reappointed Iraqi prime minister

Newly re-elected Iraqi President Jalal Talabani has reappointed Nouri Maliki, a Shia, as prime minister.

The move comes after eight months of political deadlock which followed inconclusive elections in March.

But the event was marred by a walkout by al-Iraqiyya, the main Sunni-backed alliance led by former PM Iyad Allawi.

It said Mr. Maliki had reneged on an agreement to reinstate four Sunni leaders who had been banned for alleged ties to Saddam Hussein’s Baath party.

US President Barack Obama welcomed the progress that Iraq had made in recent days.
"The president is encouraged by the substantial progress that has been made in forging an inclusive government that represents the Iraqi people and the results of this year’s election," said a White House statement.

The White House added that the US president had spoken to several Iraqi leaders in the run-up to the parliamentary session.

‘Stabbed in the back’
Iraq’s parliament convened after a delay of several hours on Thursday.
Their first act was to hold secret ballot which appointed Osama al-Nujaifi – a Sunni Arab member of Mr Allawi’s al-Iraqiyya coalition – as speaker. He was previously governor of Nineveh province.
MPs were then due to vote on reappointing Mr Talabani, leader of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK), as president. But before the vote could be held, about a third of the al-Iraqiyya MPs – including Mr Nujaifi and Mr Allawai – walked out of the parliament.

The BBC’s Jim Muir in Baghdad says the al-Iraqiyya members had wanted parliament to pass a motion to remove the stigma of Baathism which had barred four of the coalition’s key figures from taking political office.

Although not opposed to Mr Talabani’s re-election itself, they had wanted the motion to be passed before the election of the president.

"We boycotted the session because we showed good intentions to others, but they stabbed us in the back," Saleh al-Mutlak, one of the barred lawmakers, told the AFP news agency.
"We will not return without international guarantees," he added, but gave no further details.

Stalemate
But despite the walk-out, the parliamentary session continued and MPs went on to re-elect Mr Talabani.

"Today is the day of victory. The victory of the true Iraqi will," Mr Talabani told parliament.
As had been agreed in the deal reached on Wednesday, Mr Talabani then handed the task of forming a government to the largest coalition, the National Alliance – a merger of Mr Maliki’s State of Law coalition and the Iraqi National Alliance of the radical Shia cleric Moqtada Sadr.
Mr Maliki now has a month to put together a cabinet, during which efforts will be made to draw Mr Allawi back into the process, says our correspondent.

Under the power-sharing deal – struck late on Wednesday – Mr Allawi will head a new Council for National Strategy. Al-Iraqiyya will also get the foreign ministry.
Al-Iraqiyya won two more seats than State of Law in March’s election, but neither had enough seats to form a government.

The tide turned for Mr. Maliki in early October when the Iraqi alliance announced that the 40 or so seats he controlled in the new parliament would back the incumbent for a second term.
Our correspondent says that many Iraqis are now cautiously hopeful that they are on the road to a stable government which includes all the main factions and could turn the corner to a better future for the whole country.

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mujahedin Khalq; A proxy force

Canadian Lobbyist MPs defend their holiday trip to Paris paid by MKO terrorists

Five Canadian lobbyist MPs defend their holiday trip to Paris paid by MKO terrorist group

Liberals Accept Free Travel From Terrorists To Meet In France
MPs Raymonde Folco, Carolyn Bennet, Rob Oliphant, Andrew Telegdi and Tom Wappel travelled to France at the invitation of Mojahedin e Khalq, or MEK, also known as the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran. The trips are detailed in travel reports submitted to the Ethics Commissioner for the years 2008 and 2009.(…)

Bennett admitted that meeting with the group and accepting free travel from it carries risks. But she also said Canada needs to take a second look at the terror listing.
"Sometimes we need to take risks," Bennett said.

Bennett said she knows the group has a checkered past but that she will take them at their word when they say they want to bring democracy to Iran.

Yeah, sure. And maybe we’ll achieve utopian paradise on Earth called "Gaia", and there’ll be rainbow-farting unicorns prancing, Ferrari-logo-horse-style, all over the place as everyone will be happy and gay and the state will take care of everything for them and there’ll be no bad people at all…

What we’re seeing here is an example of Leftist Mental Disorder. They just WANT to BELIEVE that bad people are actually good… that you just need to "talk to ’em" and they’ll be nice, or that it’s our fault that they’re bad or something…

Seriously, the terrorists they met with:

When Saddam Hussein was in power, MEK received the majority of its financial support from the Iraqi regime. It also used front organizations, such as the Muslim Iranian Student’s Society, to collect money from expatriate Iranians and others, according to the State Department’s counterterrorism office. Iraq was MEK’s primary benefactor. Iraq provided MEK with bases, weapons, and protection, and MEK harassed Saddam’s Iranian foes. MEK’s attacks on Iran traditionally intensified when relations between Iran and Iraq grew strained. Iraq encouraged or restrained MEK, depending on Baghdad’s interests.

Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Palin’ ’round with Saddamite terrorists.

In liberals/"progressives’" minds, everything they do is right, even when it’d be wrong for non-liberals to do it. It’s all in the spin.

Warm and fuzzy ideological words can fool the lazy-minded into thinking that it’s ok to treat hellbent evildoers as if they were innocent, sane and rational, sort of like how a gallon of powerful air freshener, profusely atomized throughout the room, can mask the stink of a fresh pile of soft turds. But, of course, if one bothers to look around rather than just closing their eyes and hearing/smelling the sugarcoaty rhetoric/odor, one will discover that the truth is something really awful and disgusting

Dr. Bennett is the same person who, I recall, cried and held her nose and voted against compensating the sufferers/victims of the Hep-C contamination of the blood supply due to governmental negligence. Rather than doing the right thing and quitting the Liberal Party and voting for what’s right, she falsely justified doing something unethical, immoral and mean-spirited, with a few crocodile tears.

And now here she is again attempting to justify appeasing evildoers. She’s not fooling me. This woman would rather do the easy thing than do the right thing.
Typical leftist-"progressive". They delusionally tell themselves and others that everything’s ok as long as they "mean well". But knowing that one’s doing something
that’s wrong, even while "meaning well" doing that which one knows all along is wrong… it doesn’t work that way- it’s illogical and doesn’t make a wrong ok.
Guilt negates fake "well-meaning".

Also… "Progressive" propagandists will conveniently accuse me of "defending Iran", which I am NOT doing, but if they make this charge, then they’re themselves saying that terrorism is ok. But the next moment, they’ll turn around and fearmonger about imaginary, hypothetical, unseen, unfound "right-wing extremists" allegedly, hypothetically "committing anti-state terrorism" in response to "progressive" governmental policies, as if it requires the suspension of all "right-wing" peoples’ rights in order to stop the "terrorism", though, in classic "progressive" double-standard fashion, they’ll never accept any sort of violation of the rights of any supremacist terrorists, nor "progressive" extremist terrorists, let alone all of them.

This is yet another reason why we can’t afford to have the Iffy Liberals in power in Canada, either as a minority/majority gov’t, or in coalition with the NDP and separatist Bloc Quebecois.

The Canadian sentinel, November 12, 2010

Liberals defend meeting terrorist-branded group
 
CBC, November 12, 2010

Five Liberal members of Parliament say they did nothing wrong when they accepted an invitation from an Iranian opposition group on Canada’s terrorist list.
MPs Raymonde Folco, Carolyn Bennet, Rob Oliphant, Andrew Telegdi and Tom Wappel travelled to France at the invitation of Mojahedin e Khalq, or MEK, also known as the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran. The trips are detailed in travel reports submitted to the federal ethics commissioner for the years 2008 and 2009.
The groups’ tactics have led both Canada and the U.S. to deem it a terrorist organization.
According to Public Safety Canada’s website, which lists groups Canada has branded as terrorist organizations, MEK is based in Iraq, with the principal objective to overthrow the existing Iranian regime.
"To achieve their objectives, the MEK has used physical force, including armed attacks," the website says.
It was listed as a terrorist organization in 2005, when Liberal Paul Martin was prime minister.
In 2008, the European Union removed MEK from its terrorism watch list, and Canadian MPs have attended its Paris conferences for the past three years.
In travel reports filed by the MPs, the sponsor appears mostly as the Iran Democratic Association. But Folco does not deny who paid for her ticket and makes no apologies either.
"I was invited by MEK, the Mojahedin e Khalq," she said.
Folco said she knows the group is on Canada’s terrorism list.
Bennett admitted that meeting with the group and accepting free travel from it carries risks. But she also said Canada needs to take a second look at the terrorism listing.
"Sometimes we need to take risks," Bennett said.
Bennett said she knows the group has a checkered past but that she will take them at their word when they say they want to bring democracy to Iran.
A variety of militant opposition groups seeking the end of Iran’s regime, including the Iranian Labour and Democratic parties, operate in exile from Iraq. Several of them have received support from the United States.

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Iraq

Pictorial-Iraqi tribes sympathize with MKO hostages families

On Monday October 4th, 2010 a number of Iraqi tribal nationals from Salahuddin Province including Doctor Nafe’ and Ms. Dm-i-Ali offered their sympathy to families who are on strike in front of Ashraf gates. Iraqi journalists were also present at the meeting that lasted a few hours.The tribe’s deputies said that they had had no idea of the families strike at Camp Ashraf and MKO had abstained to respect such a reasonable right.They promised to pursue the case in Iraqi judiciary and media. During the visit a few recently defected members of MKO also spoke to the audience by clarifying the current atmosphere ruling the cult. Their descriptions caused extreme wonder among the attendees.

Iraqi tribes sympathize with MKO hostages families

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Former members of the MEK

Pictorial- Mr. Ali Barzegar ;MKO Cult defector joined his family

Mr. Ali Barzegar, a former member of MKO, returned home after twenty years of membership in the organization. Mr. Barzegar was welcomed by his family who had been awaiting his return since he had gone on compulsory military service twenty years ago when he was captured by MKO. During those twenty years, he was under psychological manipulation by Rajavi’s destructive cult and deprived from enjoying a normal life.

Mr. Barzegar defected mko cult and joined his family after 20 years

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Iraq

McCain, Al-Maliki meeting in Baghdad rising hopes for the victims of MKO

…. Attacks on American citizens, other foreigners, and Iranian citizens and officials during the time of the Shah. Involvement in a civil war in which it took a strong anti-American and anti-Western stance, was a more extreme leftwing movement than Iran’s Tudeh Communist Party, and regularly used terrorism and assassination during the struggle for power following the Shah. Involvement in a Saddam Hussein funded and supported military movement attacking Iran during the Iran-Iraq War, and in maintaining such a military movement on Iraqi soil during and after the invasion of Kuwait. Continuing involvement in a low level struggle of terrorism and …

John McCain, Al-Maliki meeting in Baghdad rising hopes for the victims of MKO

BAGHDAD / Aswat al-Iraq: Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki held on Tuesday a meeting with a U.S. Congressional delegation, led by Senator John McCain, according to an official statement.
“Al-Maliki discussed with a delegation of U.S. congress, led by Senator John McCain, the development of bilateral relations and the ongoing political process,” said the statement received by Aswat al-Iraq news agency.

“The premier underlined the importance of boosting ties with Washington in all fields, and the signed strategic agreement,” it added.

“We are keen to form a government of national unity, which includes all political blocs,” the statement quoted the premier as saying .

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mujahedin Khalq Organization as a terrorist group

Terrorism Profiles – Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization

Terrorism Profiles – Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization (MEK or MKO)

Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization (MEK or MKO)

Name(s).
People’s Mujahedeen of Iran; PMOI; The National Liberation Army of Iran (NLA, the militant wing of the MEK), National Council of Resistance (NCR); the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI); Muslim Iranian Student’s Society.

Goals and Objectives.
The MEK is an Iranian dissident group whose ideology originally blended Marxism with a moderate interpretation of Islam. In the 1970s, the group opposed the regime of the Shah for its corruption and perceived susceptibility to U.S. and Western influence. Since the Islamic Revolution of 1979, MEK has opposed the religious Iranian regime, favoring a secular government in Iran. The group apparently supports the Arab-Israeli peace process and the rights of Iran’s minorities, although some believe the group takes these positions only to improve its image in Western countries.

Brief History.
The MEK was founded in the 1960s by leftist college students in Iran opposed to the Shah, who they believed was corrupt and too open to Western influences. During the 1970s, the group conducted several attacks against U.S. military personnel and civilians working with the Shah, as well as attacks against the Iranian government. The MEK participated in the 1979 revolution against the Shah, but quickly fell out of favor with Ayatollah Khomeini. Some of its original leadership was executed by the Khomeini regime.
In 1981, the MEK bombed several important government buildings, killing as many as 70 high-ranking Iranian officials. Under pressure from the government in Tehran, the group fled to France from 1981 to 1986, after which it took refuge in Iraq. While in Iraq, Saddam Hussein armed the group and sent it into battle against Iran during the Iran-Iraq War. The group also provided various security services for the Saddam Hussein regime, including helping with the suppression of Kurdish and Shi’a revolts after the first Gulf War in 1991. It continued to attack the Iranian regime, conducting a 1992 bombing campaigning of Iranian embassies in 13 different countries. In early 2000, the group used mortars to attack the leadership complex in Tehran that houses the offices of the Supreme Leader and the President. Since the end of the Iran-Iraq War, the group has represented an important security threat to the Iranian regime.

U.S. and international policy toward the MEK has been ambivalent and controversial. Some see the group as a legitimate, pro-democracy resistance to the illiberal Iranian government, while others condemn the group’s earlier anti-Western attacks and regard the group as an anti-Western cult with a pro-democracy facade.
French authorities arrested more than 160 members, including the group’s leader Maryam Rajavi, in Paris in 2003, reversing the longstanding French policy of giving asylum to the group. Several high-profile figures have opposed the arrests.
During the 2003 Iraq war, U.S. forces bombed MEK bases in Iraq but later signed a cease-fire with the group. Finally in May 2003, the U.S. military disarmed the group.

Favored Tactics.
The MEK’s tactics range from bombings to organized guerilla warfare.

Anti-American Activities.
The MEK has not attacked or targeted U.S. interests since the 1979 Islamic Revolution in Iran. During the 1970s, it conducted several attacks against American military and civilian targets and participated in the capture of the U.S. embassy during the revolution.

Areas of Operation.
The MEK is primarily based in Iraq, near the border with Iran, but it has a global presence. The group conducted attacks in Iran and has also attacked Iranian interests in Europe and elsewhere. The group has affiliated lobbying organizations in the United States and Europe, and prior to a French crackdown in 2003, its members took refuge in France.

Strength and Composition.
The MEK is comprised of Iranian dissidents opposed to the Islamic regime in Iran. According to the State Department, the group possesses several thousand fighters in Iraq and additional members operating overseas. Within Iraq, the group has until recently controlled aging military equipment given to it by Saddam Hussein, including tanks, artillery, and armored vehicles. The U.S. military in Iraq recently disarmed the group.

Connections With Other Terrorist Organizations.
MEK has no known connections with other terrorist groups.

State Supporters and Other Sources of Funding.
Until the recent war to topple Saddam Hussein in Iraq, the MEK received all of its military assistance and much of its financial support from the Iraqi regime. The group apparently uses front organizations to solicit contributions from Iranian expatriates and others, and may also raise funds among sympathizers within Iran .

Originally Designated as an FTO.
October 8, 1997.

Re-designated.
October 8, 1999, October 5, 2001.

Legal Challenges to Designation.
In 1998, a majority in the U.S. House of Representatives signed a letter challenging the State Department’s designation of MEK as an FTO. Some Members have suggested that the United States should support the group as an alternative to the Islamic regime in Iran. The debate over designation of the group has resurfaced in the aftermath of the 2003 Iraq war. Some believe that the group represents legitimate opposition to the regime in Iran, while others contend that the group is essentially a fanatical cult with a sophisticated public relations wing and that its pro-Western, pro-democracy overtures should not be trusted. The State Department continues to resist pressure to remove the MEK from the FTO list. On August 15, 2003, the State Department added the group’s political wing, the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCR) to the group’s designation. Previously, the NCR had operated in the United States as a legitimate, registered lobbying organization.

Issues of Concern for Congress.
In the recent past, this group has actively lobbied on Capitol Hill. Its political/lobbying arm is now also specifically cited by name as an alias for the MEK (and thus a foreign terrorist organization), and its assets have been frozen as a specially designated entity by the Treasury Department under Executive Order 13224. (See also Legal Challenges to Designation, above.)

American treatment of this group in the aftermath of active hostilities in Iraq was at first ambivalent, but the group is currently disarmed. The status of this group is an important issue in the relationship between the United States and Iran.

By Miguel Denyer , overwatchreport.com ,Fri, Oct 22, 2010

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
USA

Letter of Mr. Naderi to the US Secretary of States concerning MKO

Honorable Madam Hillary Clinton, The US Secretary of State
Letter of Mr. Naderi to the US Secretary of States concerning MKO
Respectfully, at the beginning of my letter, I would like to introduce myself. I am Nader Naderi one of the former members of PMOI (People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran ) with almost twenty years of membership in that organization. I managed to separate from them and took refuge in the American camp (TIPF), located in Iraq, after the fall of Saddam Hussein the dictator of Iraq. I stayed in TIPF for four years.

During those awful years, I was witnessing the many crimes that this organization implemented against me and others. I had felt the real essence and content of this organization by my own flesh and bone, and the reality of this organization that I experienced in their garrisons and military bases is completely different than their behavior and attitude (anti terrorism and pro human rights) in Europe and United States of America.

The entity and the internal relations of this organization like the other religious cults throughout the world is based on fundamentalism and terrorism which separate them from any humanitarian values and foundations and as a result of this fact, their cultic internal relations are completely in contrast with all humane values and criteria. The members of this organization are deprived of having any choice, complaint and criticism and they are suffering from the lack of the basic and inferior individual rights, as a matter of fact in this organization having such rights are considered as blasphemy and treason against its leadership interests and they have designated harsh and severe punishments for people who wants to have those rights. Any dissent and disobedience in this organization will be suppressed and oppressed viciously and brutally with no mercy. [..]under PMOI leadership any protest, complaint, and criticism will be suppressed utterly with no mercy.

This organization with such a terrorist identity had participated in many crimes against humanity in Iraq during Saddam Hussein’s reign and they cooperated with Saddam Hussein by all means. This organization with such a terrorist content and essence while the catastrophic event of 9/11 occurred in USA by the terrorist Al Quaida organization, they began throwing parties and distributing cookies, candies, and pastries among their members in their garrisons and military bases in Iraq to celebrate this cowardly and shameful attack which caused the death of thousands American men and women in twin towers and other places on US soil. The PMOI leader Maryam Rajavi who is living in her command base on French soil and she pretends that she is in love with democracy, freedom , justice and she cares about human rights and etc , she was the main factor to provoke and encourage her members to celebrate the death of thousands innocent people. Simultaneously, her husband, Massoud Rajavi was threatening and doing war cry. Massoud Rajavi said, “This operation (referring to 9/11) was the production of the fundamentalist Islam, now you wait and see what will happen if the revolutionary Islam comes to power (meaning the PMOI).” He was joyful and happy while he was watching the catastrophic event of 9/11 on the widescreen in Bagherzadeh Garrison.

Dear Madame Clinton, unfortunately some of your politicians have closed their eyes on PMOI’s past and its terrorist entity and instead of condemning the PMOI as a terrorist organization, they support and back them up. We are talking about an organization which according to one of the US State Department’s reports, is introduced as one of the most dangerous organizations throughout the world. We are talking about an organization which is totally against capitalism and it is proud of killing the American military advisors by its members during the Shah’s time. We are talking about an organization which one of its teachings was the struggle against Imperialism led by USA. These teachings were compulsory and all the members had to participate in those classes and Mr. Mohammad Seyed Al Mohaddessin, who is currently in charge of PMOI foreign affairs and pretends that he is pro human rights and against terrorism was the instructor of those classes. It is pretty strange that Mrs. Maryam Rajavi and Mr. Mohaddessin rapidly change their faces and become anti terrorism and pro human rights! The leader of this organization, Massoud Rajavi at the beginning of the war between coalition forces led by USA and Iraq declared war against USA and its troops and he said, “The day of revenge and punishment of Imperialism has arrived” and he instructed to all his members to fight against invasion of USA to Iraq, but his instruction was confronted with dissent in general by his rank and file and he was forced to retreat from his instruction.

This organization has made lots of humanitarian-like associations throughout Europe and in USA to deceive parliamentarians and politicians with the glamorous slogans like freedom , democracy , social justice, etc, but in their internal relations they are continuing their infelicitous ideological teachings to brainwash their members for keeping them ready for diabolic and ominous objectives.

This fact that they are disarmed completely by coalition forces led by USA is utterly right, but this question crosses my mind that “is their terrorist ideology which propagandizes death and hollowness also disarmed?” Their ideology is based on terror and maximum violence and the tool for begetting violence and terror is arms, so this ideology which is still working in their internal relations forces them to find arms and in my opinion they are capable of finding arms.

This organization basically is against family and making family. As you know after the ideological revolution in this organization all people who were married, were forced to get divorced, and now you can not find any married person and family in their internal relations. Since nine months ago many families of those stranded members who have been kept in Ashraf have been picketing to see their loved ones. It is more than two decades that those families have not seen their loved ones and now the PMOI operatives and officials do not allow those desperate families to visit their loved ones.

Recently Massoud Rajavi, the supreme leader of PMOI, has declared in one of his messages that if the Iraqi government wants to take its property back (Ashraf Garrison) the world will come across with a mass suicide like Khalkha group and David Koresh. Mr. Rajavi is ready, for his own survival, to sacrifice all those members. Well, this organization with such a cultic ideology probably would carry out such a mass suicide.

Now, Madam Clinton with all cultic behaviors and attitudes of PMOI and its terrorist ideology and beliefs the US politicians should stand under the PMOI emblem and take a picture with PMOI officials on your soil? The PMOI emblem which has a sign of an arm (Kalashnikov) which propagandizes the maximum violence?

Dear Madam Clinton, I urge you to intervene and force the PMOI officials to allow the families to meet with their loved ones, and also I urge you to prevent a human catastrophe (mass suicide) which PMOI supreme leader Massoud Rajavi, in his recent message has threatened. Massoud Rajavi the PMOI supreme leader deliberately and purposely wants to begin a skirmish with Iraqi forces to beget the human catastrophe that I mentioned above.

Madam Clinton, history has showed to us that all the terrorist organizations are alike and they should be isolated internationally. I wish all those captives of Rajavi’s ideology can be freed in the near future.

Regards,
Nader Naderi, Paris
Separated member of PMOI

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts