Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip
Nejat Society
Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip
© 2003 - 2024 NEJAT Society. nejatngo.org
Maryam Rajavi

The leadership Catalyst in MKO

Leadership is the most pivotal position that preserves a cult. A fact that cannot be gainsaid is that cults are authoritarian in structure but the guru needs assistants who may help him in administering the members and making the most of them. So, together with his selected aids, the leader forms a hierarchical structure of leadership that is of great significance in handling the cult. For a better understanding of leadership structure in a cult Singer describes it in this form:

For a simple visual portrayal of a cult, imagine an inverted T. The leader is alone at the top, and the followers are all at the bottom. The leader is regarded as the supreme authority although he may delegate certain power to a few subordinates for the purpose of seeing that members adhere to his wishes and rules. There is no appeal outside of the leader’s system to greater systems of justice. 1

Singer’s described T can also be drawn as a triangle which forms a dynamical harmony which turns into a total disorder in case of angles disarray. The leadership at the top establishes a hierarchical cohesion with other appointed subordinates who in turn guarantee his authority. An investigation into the cult of Mojahedin’s fundamental leadership change, especially after the forced internal ideological revolution in 1985, signifies that Mojahedin’s long maintained democratic centralism, simply meaning obedience to the central leader, was abolished only to pave the path for Rajavi’s hegemony. Now appointing himself at the top, Rajavi needed to establish a different structure with devoted and trustful assistants to work as binding links between him and other ranks and to transcend his status analogous to that of a god. 

The role of Maryam Rajavi, his wife, in this revolution was the same as a catalyst. Appointed second in rank to Rajavi, she was evolved as the archetype for other members to achieve her status of being unquestionably devoted to Rajavi’s ideological leadership. She was the catalyst between the unattainable at the top and lower ranks. Thus, Maryam being closely attached to Rajavi, recognition of him was only possible through attachment to her. She plays the role of a qualified subordinate for the purpose of seeing that other members adhere to her husband’s wishes and rules:

Maryam was held up as an example to the women in the organisation. It was claimed that women could free themselves from their oppression as women, only by following her example. But although the move was a pretext for freeing the energy of the women in the organisation, it had the very real value of being able to exploit the women members’ devotion, and keeping the men in a state of permanent confusion over their role. 2

In the same way that the personality of Maryam is made so tangible and immediate that it can act as a catalyst to help lower ranks transcend, her attachment to Rajavi and his ideological adulation increases her transcendental advancement.  Expounding on the recognition of Maryam as a pivotal catalyst, Bijan Nyabati observes:

First, Maryam has to be turn into a value in Mojahedin’s mind whatever the cost might be; otherwise no other valuable alternative can possibly be substituted. 3

That is where Maryam’s unconventional divorce and remarriage is gauged an ideological value and an example of absolute devotion for others to follow. She is much described as a rebel against the tradition and the norms conventionally adhered to in Iranian culture:

Here, Maryam becomes an anti-traditionalist and family iconoclast! She aims at the foundations of the long-lasted social traditions and divorces her man. Again, she is the one who picks her man and weds herself to him. 4

It was a move that totally questioned traditionally and religiously adopted laws and rituals and hardly anybody could comprehend what the couple was weaving as a revolutionary ideology. Of course, in the same way that nobody could understand and grasp the devised revolution, they failed to gain the necessary competence to get close to leader’s ideological sanctum. Unlike them, Maryam due to her rebellious move gained the essential competence to allow her to hold the position of co-leader:

The third phase of Mojahedin’s internal ideological revolution exposed Massoud’s factual status, tangible only for Mojahedin’s heads, for the lower ranks. Hereon, Massoud is beyond the reach of Mojahedin. He is unachievable unless through a catalyst who is Maryam for certain. Massoud is inaccessible unless those in his quest are melted in Maryam. To understand it in the words, all the members one by one have to follow Maryam as an example. 5

But the real purpose of the phase was to strengthen Rajavi’s hegemonic leadership. He intended to make a sanctuary that no rival could penetrate it. As explained by Anne Singleton:

The real purpose of this phase was to guarantee that there would be no leadership challenge. Rajavi had now removed himself from the ordinary level of leader and elevated himself beyond the normal leader’s role to that of link with God. An unassailable position. 6

Accordingly, any leadership challenge could mean criticising God’s vicegerent which would be considered an unforgivable sin. Besides, any challenge could only be aimed at Maryam and, consequently, left his status untouched. He demanded members total devotion and his hallowed position had to be instilled into the members through chosen apostles who necessarily formed the base angle of the leadership triangle:

What Rajavi was asking everyone in the Mojahedin to do was to give him total obedience. He implied to them (through the mouths of Maryam and Fahimeh) that he had links with God and therefore knew things that ordinary members couldn’t be expected to understand. This meant that anyone who rejected him was blaspheming against God. The members were mostly willing to allow themselves to be indoctrinated with this new concept. 7

Maryam’s credibility could best be instituted by Rajavi himself. Through a variety of illustrated allegories, Rajavi in his internal meetings frequently referred to Maryam’s highly elevated status and her angel-like salvation power. In fact, he meant appreciation and recognition of his own transcendent and god-like position. Imparted in the memoirs of an ex-member quoting Rajavi we read:

In one of his meetings Rajavi said: actually you are in a grave. Is there anything worse than it? With a stone covering it. We send Maryam to push it away so you could see a shining light. It is the light coming from Massoud. See how you are distanced? She becomes light while you are sleeping in your graves with a stone over them. Who has made self-sacrifice to save you? Maryam, for sure. Then, if you intend to come out and reach me, you have to take advantage of Maryam’s aid. You cannot possibly reach the source of light but you have to be thankful of being extricated from your graves. You will come to understand little by little. 8

Hardly will you encounter people other than Massoud and Maryam with highly elevated position as leading cadre in the cult of Mojahedin. Other ranks get their legitimacy from the couple. While Rajavi is holding hegemonic control of the cult, his wife, Maryam, is granted the legitimacy of a catalyst to mobilize members’ devotion and heightens their vision of an urgent commitment to justify destructive cult-like activities that not only threatens the world peace but also jeopardizes the insiders’ life as human beings. 

References:

1.    Thaler Singer, Margaret; Cults in Our Midst: The Continuing Fight Against Their Hidden Menace, p. 9.

2.    Iran-Interlink; Anne Singleton’s Saddam Private Army.

3.    Niyabati, Bijan; A Different Look at the Ideological Revolution within MKO, Khavaran Publication.

4.    Ibid.

5.    Ibid.

6.    Iran-Interlink; Anne Singleton’s Saddam Private Army.

7.    Ibid.

8.    [7]. Soliloquies in solitude, a collection; interview with an ex-member of MKO.

June 19, 2008 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mujahedin Khalq Organization as a terrorist group

Atlas of Radical Islam

The following is extracted of the book:”Atlas of Radical Islam” which was written under the supervision of Mr. Khavier Raufer.  The book was published by Cnrs edistion, in Paris, in 2007. According to the author, the objective ofMr. Xavier Rauf the publication of the book is to represent a useful solution to the lack of information on radical Islam. The book includes descriptions on all Islamic extremist and terrorist groups such as Al-Qaida and Mujahidin Khalq. There is also analysis on radical Islamic groups whether Sunnite or Shiite, their doctrine or theory, their networks and supporters and their history and activities.

In pages 335 to 340, a short report on MKO’s activities, background and ideology is presented so as a lot of realities are not told about the group.

Martial Condition

Muajhedin—e-Khalq organization was one of the most known opposition groups which fought Shah of Iran and had an eight-year experience in armed struggle against the regime. It could penetrate the government system and play an important part in overthrowing the monarchist government using the modern propaganda techniques.

Atlas of Radical IslamFollowing the February, 1979, Masud Rajavi asked his hundreds of young, passionate supporters to stop their manifestations and enter the governmental structure of Islamic regime in a covered way. Therefore, after the dismissal of Bani Sadr from presidential position, on June 20th,1981,Mujahedin set out for armed struggle once more, entering a new phase of struggle.

Muajhedin-e-Khalq Organization launched deadly attacks against Islamic Republic in less than a week. But it couldn’t take any advantage of such an action.  Later Mr. Rafsanjani confessed that after the attempt against Ayatollah Khomeini on June 27th1981 in Mosque Abuzar, Tehran, the regime was totally wondering for a  few days. The following day, on June 28th,1981, a bomb exploded in the office of Islamic Republic Party that ended with the death of 10 ministers and  vice-ministers, 20 parliament members and 44 other people of high-ranking officials. Mujahedin had really pretended in the high political  gathering so as two months later ,they could easily take a baggage to the administration building ,to burn up Muhammad Javad Bahonar-Prime Minister- and Mohammad Ali Rajaiee, the President. 

–        April 23rd 2001, they attached the headquarters of police in Shemiran, North of Tehran, while the commandants of the region were having a meeting on the recent attacks of MKO. There is no available estimate on  the measures of damages.

–        September 11th, 2001, MKO didn’t announce any statement on its performed operations in order not to be condemned of terrorism.

Meanwhile, the organization asked its supporters to get in the streets for protest, then they filmed them to use the films in the propaganda. At the same time some groups were investigating the mental and psychological conditions of MKO members and supporters to select those who were ready to launch suicide operations and then to prepare them with complicated trainings. For launching a terrorist operation the members should be so skillful that they can manage everything up to the end. 

Thus, the group started astonishing actions to create a psychological warfare within the Regime; for instance it could penetrate the closest supporters of the leader and could find out that a clandestine council had been founded to choose a successor for the leader that if he was killed in a terrorist operation, another person could be replaced. A number of young guys launched the suicide operations tying explosives around their waist and body. When the Intelligence Service became stronger, MKO made the 15-16 year-old girls involved in the operations.

 

Suicide Operations

Three months before the suicide operation in Beirut, MKO launched the first suicide operation of the Middle East, in Tabriz, against ayatollah Madani – the spiritual leader of Tabriz-on September 11th 1981. Later, the organization launched an attack against Abdul Hussein Dastgheib – the spiritual leader of Shiraz- on December. 11th,1981. And on July 2nd,1982, MKO  operated  another suicide and assassinated ayatollah Sadughi in Yazd and also on October  15th 1992,they had a terrorist operation to kill Ayatollah Ashrafi Isfahani- the spiritual leader and the supreme leader’s representative – in Kermanshah.

The Mujahedin-e-Khalq Organization did the series of operations through the years and finally in February 2006, it decided to give up armed struggle. The Islamic Republic didn’t ignore their activities and executed thousands of MKO members including Musa Khiabani who was executed on February   8th, 1982 along with 22 other leaders of the organization.

In 1983, while the zenith of Iran-Iraq war, MKO set out for cooperation with Saddam Hussein’s regime.

Masud Rajavi who had been expelled from France, joined Iraq on June 7th 1996. MKO was equipped with all kinds of arms by the help of Saddam Hussein and thus the National Liberation Army was established.

In July 1988,three days after the end of Iran-Iraq war, the executive council of MKO started the “ Eternal Light” operation “ to liberate Iran” but the NLA, under the command of Mahin Rezaiee, Ali Zarkesh, Mohamamd Maasumi, Asghar ZamanVaziri, Mohsen Tadayoni and Reza Pourgel, passed a few Kurdish villages in its way and  was stopped  and could never reach Tehran. A few days later the army was totally demolished and nothing survived.

The confrontations between Iran and MKO lasted 13 more years but the more they lasted, the more MKO was discredited. The European countries realized how dangerous MKO is, having found out its terrorist and cult-like behavior and they do not believe MKO’s statements of victory any more. Since 1991, MKO has held various press conferences in European capitals in order to present the news on Iran and also to “denounce”, trying to interpret any thing for its own benefit. MKO has been designated as a terrorist organization by the US, since 1997.In 2001 the other front organizations attached to MKO were also listed. In 2003, the group was forced to give up its military camp in Iraq and at the present time it is seriously controlled by most of the European governments. Therefore the organization does its best to use its information to take advantages from western governments. The “denunciation” made by MKO was not considered as important until 2002 when other reports told of tormenting advancement of Iranian nuclear program and the presence of a clandestine nuclear site in Natanz.

In fact, Iran’s nuclear program has never been clandestine or secret. The program, originally started in 1973 when the oil income of the country increased five times as before and some questions formed in the minds of the authorities, on the future of their nation after the oil sources would be finished.

Thus in 1974 the Iranian government commanded three companies: Framatome, Alsthome, spie-batignolle, to build two nuclear sites. Then the French Prime Minister Jacque Chirac who had been in Iran for a three –day visit, signed the related contracts and a number of Iranian experts then nuclear scientists went to France.

The Iranian nuclear program was restarted while the Iran-Iraq war and the presidential era of Sayed Ali Khameneie.

When the problem of the purchase of ground to ground missiles was presented in the Iranian administration, naturally the problem of the fuel of the missiles was also crucial and the case of nuclear fuel was mentioned.

These efforts ,after 15 years ,on July 22nd 1998, were ended with launching of Shahab 3 missile which boarded 1300 kms. Since that time, the military engineers of the Revolutionary Guard promoted the power of the missile and its board is now 2000 km.

A number of terrorist operations of MKO’s military branch:

-June 27th 1981, Hojatol Eslam Ali Husseini Khameneiee who was the leader’s representative in the Supreme Council of Defense, was the objective of a terrorist attempt while addressing in Abuzar Mosque and his right hand became disabled. The bomb had been put in a tape recorder.

– June 28th   1981, a bomb exploded in the meeting of Islamic Republic Party where Beheshti and 73 other people including 4 ministers, 6 vice-ministers and 20 parliament members were assassinated. There were some other people who were killed in the bombing like; Muhammad Montazeri, the son of  Ayatollah Montazeri, Abbas Ali  Nateq Nouri, Sadeq Eslami, Ali Darakhshan, Dr. Abbas pour and Sarhaddi

– August 30th,1981, a bomb exploded in a bag that ended with the death of the president Muhammad Ali Rajaiee and the Prime Minister  Muhammad Javad Bahonar, Colonel Vahid Dastjerdi and a number of the Cabinet                  members.

– Septebmer 5th1981 a terrorist operation was launched against Ali Qodusi, Tehran Attorney General and Brigador General Dastjerdi the general commandant  of gendarmerie.

September 11th1981, a terrorist operation was  launched against Ayatollah Sayed Asad Allah Madani, the spiritual leader of Tabriz ,he got the title “ First Martyr of Altar”

–        September 29th 1981, a terror operation was launched against Hojatol Eslam Abdul Karim Hasheminezhad, Ayatollah Khomeini’s deputy in Mashad.

–        October 5th,1981, terror of Hasan Ayat, one of the leaders of Republic Party and former member of Iran’s Labour Party.

–        December 11th 1981, a terror suicide operation against ayatollah Abdul Hassan Dastgheib, the spiritual leader and Leaders’ representative in Shiraz, they called him “the second Martyr of Altar”.

–        July 2nd1982 a terror operation against Ayatollah Saduqi, Leader’s representative and spiritual leader in Yazd, he was then called “The Third Martyr of Altar.”

–        August 12th,1982, three revolutionary  guards were assassinated .

–        October 15th,1982 a terrorist operation was launched against  ayatollah Ashrafi Isfahani, the leader’s deputy and the spiritual leader of Kermanshah, he got the title of” The Fourth Martyr of Altar”

–        April 1992, MKO’s operations against 13 Iranian Embassies.

–        1993 operations against oil pipelines near Abadan.

–        1993,bombing in the Shrine of Imam  Reza.

–        June 2nd,1998,the deadly operation was launched against  Haj Hassan Salehi, one of the founders of Sepah Pasdaran, who then started  working at the Revolution  Court  and was involved in the execution of hundreds of MKO members in the summer of 1988. In this operation that happened by a bomb explosion in a baggage that was put at the office of Attorney general of Revolution Court in Tehran, three other people,an Armenian and two kids were killed and 22 people were wounded. In 2000, Hojat Zamani who was accused of launching this operation, was arrested. His two brothers were also executed in 2001 and a few months later his father died but he fled to Turkey where he was arrested by the police. And submitted to Iranian government. On July 17th,2004 he was sentenced to death and on February 7th,2006 the ruling was executed in Gohardasht Prison.

–        June 2nd,1998 , a number of mortar attacks were launched at Sepah headquarters in Shemiran. A base in Vanak and also the Defense Industrial Centre in the North of Tehran were the objectives of mortar attacks. There is no available information on the casualties. Rafsanjani told IRNA: “if the Americans do really believe in condemning terrorism, they should restrict MKO’s activities in their territory.”

–        The following day, the American administration issued a statement and condemned the attack. On July 15, the Canadian foreign affairs Minister condemned terrorism in any form and also condemned MKO’s act declaring that the known members of the group were not allowed to enter Canadian soil.

–        August 23 rd, 1998, Asad Allah Lajvardi, Asghar Esmaielie and two other anonymous employees of Defense Ministry  were assassinated.

–        September 13,1998, the unsuccessful attempt against Mohsen Rafiq Dust the former commandant of Sepah and the director of “ Mustazafan Foundation”. The bullet was shot from the hill across from his office.

–        January 6th1999, the unsuccessful terror of Ali Razini, who has had various responsibilities in Revolution Court. Due to the attack, one passenger was killed and 4 other were wounded. The reformist newspaper of Tehran had accused him of taking 100 million dollars from the governmental accounts and settled in his personal account to spend for Ansar Hezbollah and their journal “Shalamche”.

–        January 6th1999, the terror of Ali Sayad Shirazi

–        , a high ranking commandant of the Army and the leader’s military advisor. He was killed by the shot of a MKO’s commando while he was taking his son to school. The commando was disguised as a sanitation worker. The operation which was called “ Dawn” was launched in order to revenge the death of six NLA’s commandants in the operation “ Eternal Light”

–        February 15th,2000, a number of mortars was shot towards Presidential Palace at 14:30’ . Khatami was not in his office, but a worker and 5 other people were killed.

–        March 13th, several mortars were launched against Sepah’s headquarters in the northern part of Vanak Square. Apparently ,Safavi, Sepah’s  commandants, and  Zolqadr, his successor, who was responsible for the cross border operations against MKO, were the objectives of this operation. Some of the bullets hit the residential complex of Nour. The quantity of casualties is not bases of Sepah 120 times, since last year.

–        March 14th,2000, a  number of mortars were launched against the common headquarters  of armed forces, Ashura base and Baqeri base in Dushan Tappe’. The casualties are not known.

–        April 21st 2001,the unsuccessful attempt on the life of Farhad Nazari, the former commandant  of the police in the Great Tehran.   Mr. Khavier Raufer

Download Atlas of Radical Islam
Download Atlas of Radical Islam

June 19, 2008 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Europe

Spy-Agents of An EP Intergroup

As the co-chair of the Friends of a Free Iran Intergroup of the European Parliament, Struan Stevenson along with his colleagues have discovered that the terrorist Mojahedin-e Khalq Organization (MKO/PMOI/MEK) backs exactly the same objectives of restoration of democracy, rule of law, human rights, women’s rights, and the abolition of the death penalty and nuclear weapons in Iran. How they have come to such a glorious conclusion requires a discussion of its own.

But one thing is for certain and that they endorse the group is fighting a war, or carrying out terrorist attacks depending how they might view it, against Iran’s regime to bring it down. Does it really have anything to do with the goals they seek to accomplish for Iranian people? Furthermore, who has appointed them as the advocates of another nation to befriend the enemies of that nation?

Mr. Stevenson broadly boasts that his meetings with Maryam Rajavi, the self-elected leader of a cult of personality, has been a success but criticizes press articles that accuse him and his colleagues of being "friends of terrorists". What should really people call those who are in accomplice with globally proscribed terrorists? Not only people like Struan Stevenson are interfering in the internal affairs of another country which is in absolute contradiction to principles of democracy, but also exploiting terrorists as tools in a variety of ways for political interests. Here is Mr. Stevenson’s approbation of utilizing MKO as spy agents to collect intelligence against Iran:

I recently received detailed information from the Transatlantic Institute proving that major European companies are working with the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) inside Iran. I then asked the PMOI to verify this information from their sources within Iran.

Last week they delivered the answer; a major Italian company is supplying dual-use equipment, while a leading German company is supplying a mass of sophisticated tunnelling machinery. Pictures given to me clearly show the emblems of IRGC, which is on the US list of nuclear proliferators, above the tunnels.

Based on Struan Stevenson’s The west stands in the way of a democratic Iran released by THE HERALED.

 

June 19, 2008 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
France

Anniversary of Raid on a Sect called MKO

France says Iran sect are ‘fanatical’

In Paris on Sunday 15 June [2003], a judge ordered detention of the leader of MKO and a number of her followers to face trial for possible links with terrorism. The following is what the Observer reported of the French police raid to arrest the suspects and the aftermath. 

Anniversery of Raid on a Sect

‘ font-size: 10pt”>The leafy rue des Gords in this little market town north of Paris hardly lives up to its reputation as a new world capital of terrorism.

‘ font-size: 10pt”>It was here that hundreds of police smashed open the doors of suburban houses in a dawn raid which the French claimed had pre-empted worldwide strikes by the militant Iranian opposition group, the People’s Mujahideen.

‘ font-size: 10pt”>About 20 members of the organisation were on hunger strike on the pavement this weekend, watched by riot police and comforted by neighbours who had lived alongside the exiled Mujahideen for 22 years. The operation, involving 1,300 police, concentrated on 21 rue des Gords, home of Maryam Radjavi, the most visible leader of what has been dismissed as a violent Marxist-Islamic sect.

The suicide attempts by fire in Paris, London, Rome and Berne Around the building a permanent encampment for followers had been set up. But police blocked attempts by residents – all political refugees – to return and collect their belongings as they continued to search cellars and attics.

The suicide attempts by fire in Paris, London, Rome and Berne focused attention on the movement without clarifying why France chose last week to turn on the Mujahideen, given refuge here after falling out with Tehran’s Islamic leadership.

‘ font-size: 10pt”>Labelled as Maoist when it was founded in 1965, the Mujahideen worked alongside Ayotallah Khomeini when he planned the overthrow of the Shah in 1979. But the allies soon fell out and thousands of Mujahideen refugees sought sanctuary in France in 1981. They campaigned against oppression in Tehran, where their members were tortured and hanged in public.

‘ font-size: 10pt”>
Radjavi was still being held by police among more than 160 people taken into custody. The DST, the French equivalent of MI5, claimed that she and her husband, Massoud, were ready to turn Auvers into their terrorist headquarters.

‘ font-size: 10pt”>Referring to allegations by Iran that the Mujahideen were responsible for at least 500 murderous attacks inside the country, Pierre de Bousquet, the DST’s director, said the organisation could no longer claim that its aim was to defend human rights and bring about democracy.

‘ font-size: 10pt”>’The attempts at self-immolation to protest against the arrest of Madame Radjavi are proof of a new fanaticism,’ he said. ‘Auvers was to become the Mujahideen’s world headquarters after the loss of bases in Iraq.’  

June 19, 2008 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Iraqi Authorities' stance on the MEK

Iraq is planning to expel MKO

Iraqi defense minister has said that the Iraq government is planning the expulsion of members of the banned Iranian terrorist group MKO.

Abdul-Kader Jassem al-Obeidi noted that the terrorists of the Mujahedeen Khalq Organization (MKO) should no longer remain in Iraq.

"According to a newly enacted Iraqi law, nationals of all foreign countries currently residing in Iraq should return to their own countries. Anyone wishing to not return to their country should apply through international organizations," he added.

Referring to the problems of the prolonged presence of MKO elements in Iraq, al-Obeidi pointed out that their presence imposes heavy costs on Iraq.

General al-Obeidi further noted that the details of the MKO expulsion from Iraq will be made public later.

June 19, 2008 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
MEK Camp Ashraf

Death of Another Member of the MKO’s Leadership Council

Premature deaths are among most critical challenges many of cults encounter. The cult of Mojahedin is not an exception. Only a few days after death report of Faezeh Daneshvar, a member of the MKO’s Leadership Council, another compeer, Zohere Ghobari, was reported to have met her death after a sever apoplexy. She was only 46 and was heading a MKO’s HQ in Europe when she died. No report was released by the organization on her death.

The remarks of Batool Soltani, a separated member of MKO and once a member of  Leadership Council, on the death of many female members indicates the internal critical crises in the organization that is critically in need of maintaining its experienced rankings:

The tragic death of some of the members of the MKO’s Leadership Council who were presumed to be hegemonic leads in MKO well indicate victimization of women in the organization. A number of these deaths include suicides of Mehri Moussavi and Minoo Fath-ali, Mahin Amini who died of cancer, Zahra Noori working in intelligence section, Hamideh Kozehgar and Nasrin Parsian both died in car accident, Sedigheh Mojaveri who committed self-immolation in Paris, Simin Feizbakhsh, Naghmeh Hakimi and Ziba Daneshvar and much more.

As a former member of the MKO’s Leadership Council, Mrs. Soltani has been aBatul Soltani witness of different forms of physical and psychological pressures imposed on women inside MKO:

Physical and psychological pressures inflicted over MKO’s rank and file and particularly on the opponent members is so crushing that these members end in a variety of physical and psychological afflictions which, of course because of the cultic atmosphere, remain unattended of the least medical care.

The only working measure to relive women of their critical condition within MKO is an overall interfere by international humanitarian organizations and that is what Mrs. Soltani urges:

All the international organizations and human rights activists must be alerted of the members’ critical physical and psychological condition in Rajavi’s destructive cult and they do have to interfere to rescue them of physical and mental slavery.

There are also reports of another female member, Sima Dadjoo, living in a serious condition after undergoing a number of surgeries.

June 19, 2008 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Former members of the MEK

Interim Report by SAHAR Family Foundation

from Arbil, Sulymanyeh and Dahuk in Iraqi Kurdistan

On May 2nd the American army run Temporary International Persons Facility (TIPF) at Camp Ashraf was closed completely, ending a process whichTIPF had begun in December 2007. The TIPF was situated adjacent to the military base of the terrorist Rajavi cult in Khales, Diyali province, in Iraq. TIPF had been established in 2003 to give refuge to survivors of the cult who had rejected the group and managed to escape. Around 3,300 members of the Mojahedin-e Khalq (aka Rajavi cult) are still being held as ‘protected’ prisoners by the American military.

After the removal of several of the survivors of the cult in December 2007 and the establishment of Sahar Family Foundation with the help of the Iraqi Government, Iraqi and international human rights organizations, as well as the families of the victims and survivors, the remaining people who did not wish to leave the protection of the American army were transferred on May 2, to Dahuk in Iraqi Kurdistan.

Dahuk Camp

Ms. Batool Soltani, an ex-member of the Leadership Council of MKO who managed to escape from Camp Ashraf about 4 months ago, is now representing Sahar Family Foundation in Iraq and Turkey. Following a visit to Istanbul in May, she has now visited Arbil, Sulymanyeh and Dahuk in the Kurdish region of Iraq to assess the situation of the survivors who are now accommodated temporarily in these places until they find a way to settle in safer places.

Ms. Soltani also met with officials from the Kurdish Regional Government, various NGO offices in these cities, and officials from the US army in Kurdistan. These meetings will continue over the next few days and a full report will be published in this respect.

The statistics and situation currently pertaining to the survivors in Kurdistan are:

At this moment in time there are 12 people in Arbil, 2 in Sulymanyeh and out of the 85 people who were transferred from TIPF to Dahuk, 65 are still present (others have left to reach neighboring and European countries). The American army personnel who have been accommodating the people in Dahuk have now begun transferring them to Arbil. These will be accommodated with the other 12 people who live in 2 houses, and a new house which has been hired by UNHCR. The 12 who were there and the new arrivals are all under the protection of UNHCR and are given shelter (in houses) and food rations. They are free in respect of movement and are accepted by the Kurdish Regional Government (special thanks to PM Shirvan Barezani).

In recent days MKO members have been contacting these people (the group has hired (bought) one of the survivors as its agent in Kurdistan whose name, place and contact numbers and other information including his contacts in the terrorist organization are available for interested official bodies if needed) and has offered 1300 US dollars and 250,000 Iraqi Dinars (about 200 US dollars) altogether 1500 US dollars to whoever signs papers to say that the MKO has treated them well and includes all the usual cultish claims associated with forced confessions. We must stress that some of the people who are being approached are in such a desperate situation that have not had any fruit or vegetables for over 2 months and have survived on only grains and pulses.

Many people have refused to sign these papers and receive the money but Ms. Batool Soltani who is being accompanied by Mr. Massoud Khodabandeh from Iran-Interlink asked all the survivors to sign the papers (which are not worth the paper written on) and take the money which is desperately needed in this situation. Massoud Khodabandeh explained to the survivors that the signatures which the Rajavi cult gets from people in need (or by force in the cult’s terrorist camp or in their terror HQ in the suburbs of Paris), is part of a psychological war with those people who have been subjected to cult manipulation for years. Khodabandeh emphasized that when the survivors reach free countries in Europe and elsewhere, they will be able to talk freely about what has happened to them and that these kinds of signature (and video confessions) obtained by the cult using deception and coercion, will not negate the truth, and people in free countries would not criticize you for accepting to sign bogus papers in order to rescue yourselves.

Some of the survivors told us that Rajavi’s representative in Kurdistan (the same bought agent) has told them that “SAHAR Family Foundation activities have increased your price [that is, the value of the people there] and we pay this money to see that if they can match what we can offer [that is, if Sahar can pay more to buy the people that Rajavi thinks he has bought for 1500 dollars].

Khodabandeh and Soltani in response announced that first Rajavi should understand that a single hair of any of these people is worth more than the combined leadership of the cult, and the rest of the money stolen from these people by the cult leaders will be taken back through European courts in future (it is interesting that already Rajavi is offering 5,000 US dollars in Turkey and 20,000 US dollars in European countries to silence these survivors for a short time, and we believe they should take the money and sign whatever is given as this is only a small percentage of their own money stolen by the cult leaders).

In a meeting with some of the survivors in Dahuk, Ms. Soltani gave a brief report on her meetings with various officials and said that the representative of the US Army in Camp Ashraf has clearly announced that, contrary to the propaganda of MKO, for the people trapped in the camp, anyone who approaches the US army personnel would be taken under the protection of the army and under no circumstances would the person seeking protection be handed back to the cult leaders inside the camp.

These people would be transferred to the protection of UNHCR in Kurdistan and join the other survivors already there. The official from the US army also emphasized that again contrary to what MKO is publicizing, there is not a grain of sympathy with this terrorist organization among Americans, or for that matter Iraqis, and the US army is already seriously concerned about what is called the Exit part (MKO has apparently arranged accommodation inside Camp Ashraf for disaffected members and is keeping them there by force) and is investigating. He emphasized that these kinds of activities by the Mojahedin-e Khalq terrorists inside the camp is as illegal as it is immoral.

According to eye witnesses in Kurdistan, the survivors in Kurdistan (as well as the ones in Turkey and other countries reaching Europe) have been told by MKO agents that if they accept to sit in front of a camera and announce that "… I am at this moment in good health etc… and announce that MKO has been overly humanitarian etc and it is my fault that I have left them because I am weak etc,… and if in future you see me saying things against MKO I say from now that it would only happen under the pressure of the Intelligence Ministry of Iran …." they would receive a sum substantially more that the 1500 US dollars they can receive now for signing in their favour.

Considering the various cases of kidnapping, missing people and the reports about killing people inside the various camps of MKO terrorists in Ashraf (Iraq) and Auvers-sur-Oise (France), Khodabandeh reminded the survivors that if these conditions involve their presence in the HQ of Rajavi cult or their safe houses in Iraq, Turkey or European countries, they should not take the risk until after obtaining their legal status as refugees from a democratic countries and to not do so without the full knowledge of the law enforcement agencies of these countries.

The survivors are also reporting that the agents of MKO have announced that for any information as to the whereabouts of the families who are trying to visit Camp Ashraf (under protection of the US army) to see their relatives (which should be encouraged by the occupying forces according the Fourth Geneva Convention), and especially information as to the whereabouts of Ms. Soltani and Mr. Khodabandeh, MKO would pay a lavish price – enough to provide a good capital for the informer to start a new life in a western country of his or her choice.

Ms. Soltani in response said that the man (Rajavi) has always been a subject for jokes and laughter from day one. She said that in the last telephone conversation between the Leadership Council of MKO terrorists in Camp Ashraf and Massoud Rajavi (the cult guru-in-hiding who has not surfaced in the last 5 years), practically all the Leadership Council were making jokes about his daft approach to any situation. “Now I can see that he can not confine his approach to inside the cult and is amusing the survivors and us” said Ms Soltani.

She said in her message to Rajavi: "the day that you manage to kill me and my body falls in blood and dust, is the day that I have been honored to give my life in the path of rescuing my friends and countrymen. And of course that is the day that hundreds of Soltanis will arise to bring you and your nasty cult down". She added: "After my successful escape do you think that there is even one person in your Leadership Council whom you will ever be able to trust? I don’t think so".

Link to a video conversation between Ms. Soltani and one of the survivors in Arbil in Farsi.

June 19, 2008 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
European Union

EU postpones decision on Mujahedin Khalq

EU diplomats say the bloc has postponed a decision on whether to remove the Mujahedin Khalq Organization from its list of terrorist groups.

A diplomat said on Wednesday that European Union foreign ministers had beenEU Postpones deceision on MKO expected to review the list of terrorist organizations at a meeting in Luxembourg next Monday.

The issue, however, has been dropped from the meeting’s agenda pending a decision by the British Parliament on taking the terrorist group off the UK’s blacklist, the diplomat added.

The MKO, which is blacklisted by many countries as a terrorist organization, has so far claimed responsibility for many terror attacks inside Iran.

It is also accused of assisting former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein in the massacre of thousands of Iraqi civilians.

June 19, 2008 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Iran

Iran Busts CIA-Backed Terror Group

Announcement follows Neo-Con General’s urge for Bush administration to support terrorist bombings in Iran.

The Iranian Intelligence Ministry busted a CIA-backed terror group that was planning to bomb scientific, educational, and religious centers, and carry out assassinations, according to a report in the Tehran Times. The arrests come weeks after Ret. Gen. Thomas McInerney urged the U.S. to carry out terror bombings in Iran.

"The Intelligence Ministry on Saturday released details of the detection and dismantling of a terrorist network affiliated to the United States," reports the newspaper.

"The United States Central Intelligence Agency comprehensively supported the terrorist group by arming it, training its members, and sponsoring its inhumane activities in Iran, the Intelligence Ministry stated."

The attack on a religious center in Shiraz last month which killed thirteen people and wounded 190 was blamed on the same group and according to the report, "it also had plans to carry out similar attacks on the Tehran International Book Fair, the Russian Consulate in Gilan Province, oil pipelines in southern Iran, and other targets."

While it’s obviously naive to take a report out of Iranian state-controlled media at face value, top Neo-Cons have been calling for the US to back terror groups in Iran and other reports clearly indicate that this program has already been in place for years.

On Friday we reported on the comments of Ret. Gen. Thomas McInerney, who in a Fox News appearance publicly called for the U.S. government to support groups like MEK (Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization), which is listed by the State Department as a terrorist organization, and carry out deadly bombings in Iran.

 "Here’s what I would suggest to you. Number one, we take the National Council for Resistance to Iran off the terrorist list that the Clinton Administration put them on as well as the Mujahedin-e Khalq at the Camp Ashraf in Iraq," said McInerney.

"Then I would start a tit-for-tat strategy which I wrote up in the Wall Street Journal a year ago: For every EFP that goes off and kills Americans, two go off in Iran. No questions asked. People don’t have to know how it was done. It’s a covert action. They become the most unlucky country in the world," he added.

Last November, Fox and Friends host Brian Kilmeade openly called for US support for acts of terrorism, such as car bombings, in Tehran. Colonel David Hunt, who has over 29 years of military experience including extensive operational experience in Special Operations, Counter Terrorism and Intelligence Operations, agreed with Kilmeade, stating "absolutely" in response to Kilmead’s question about whether cars should start blowing up in Tehran.

The U.S. government is already funding MEK and the group has been linked with numerous bombings inside Iran over the course of the last few years. The organization has also killed U.S. troops and civilians since the 70’s.

According to Global Security.org, "In the early 1970s, angered by U.S. support for the pro-Western shah, MEK members killed several U.S. soldiers and civilians working on defense projects in Iran. MEK members also supported the 1979 takeover of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, in which 52 Americans were held hostage for 444 days."

In addition – British SAS have been caught training insurgents in Iraq to carry out hi-tech bombings that are later blamed on Iran. Another Iranian-based terror group that the Bush administration is already funding as a means of regime change in Iran is Jundullah – a Sunni Al-Qaeda terrorist group formerly headed by the alleged mastermind of 9/11, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

"The CIA is giving arms-length support, supplying money and weapons, to an Iranian militant group, Jundullah, which has conducted raids into Iran from bases in Pakistan," the London Telegraph reported last year. The group has been blamed for a number of bombings inside Iran aimed at destabilizing Ahmadinejad’s government and is also active in Pakistan, having been fingered for its involvement in attacks on police stations and car bombings at the Pakistan-US Cultural Center in 2004.

As award-winning journalist Seymour Hersh reported back in 2004, U.S. intelligence and Israel’s Mossad are busy at work stirring up trouble in Iran in preparation for an attack on that country. In early 2005, the Guardian reported that “American special forces have been on the ground inside Iran scouting for US air strike targets for suspected nuclear weapons sites."

Prison Planet

June 19, 2008 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
MEK Camp Ashraf

MKO cries wolf again over Camp Ashraf

[Note by Iran-Interlink The context for the following article is that at the time of the alleged missile attack on Camp Ashraf, another group of families had arrived at gates of Camp Ashraf trying to get visiting rights with their relatives who are trapped inside Camp Ashraf under US army ‘protection’.

A similar incident took place in February this year. A group of families travelled to Camp Ashraf and asked to meet with relatives without MEK minders being present. None were granted this right. At the same time the MKO said a water pump supplying the camp had been blown up by one of the visitors. When they discovered the person was not even in the same country at that time, they quickly changed tack and said Iran’s Qods Force had blown up the water pump. External investigation found no evidence of this.]

The lying warmongers at The Associated Press, the New York Times, and Fox News are at it again, and blatantly as ever.

False Flag at Camp Ashraf

The latest chapter in self-destructive neocon hypocrisy has the neocons’ favorite U.S.-designated terrorist group—the Mujahideen e-Khalq (MeK), a.k.a., National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), a.k.a., PMOI—propagating another elaborate pretext for further aggression against Iran, using a one-two punch of a staged attack combined with a fraudulent spin on Iran’s nuclear program.

Mek spokesperson Alireza Jafarzadeh’s latest piece at Fox is another third-person account from a first person’s perspective. [1]

Though he refers to the MeK/PMOI/NCRI (same group, different divisions: e.g., agitprop, militia, covert-ops), he doesn’t bother acknowledging his association with the organization. And when he writes, "according to reports from Iraq," he is referring to the MeK, as in the opening paragraph:

According to reports from Iraq, in a sinister plot hatched at Tehran’s Baghdad embassy by Qods Force commander-turned-ambassador Hassan Kazemi Qomi, Tehran’s proxies launched a missile attack against Ashraf city, the residence of the main Iranian opposition movement, the People’s Mojahedin (PMOI/MEK).

Looks serious, eh? Serious enough that you’d figure Jafarzadeh would provide full attribution to those "reports from Iraq." But he doesn’t.

Perhaps he was referring to the Thomson Reuters "Factbox" report on the incident, dated May 27, 2008, which states:

ASHRAF – Gunmen fired missiles at camp Ashraf, on the Iranian border, which houses Iranian refugees and the exiled opposition People’s Mujahideen Organisation of Iran (PMOI). A PMOI spokesman said they hit the camp, but U.S. military officials in the area said they missed. No one was hurt. [2]

That’s the only major news wire report on the alleged incident thus far. Only a few bloggers and pundits who support the MeK have "covered" the incident; all their spiels appear to be from the same script, and as such, none of them cite a credible source for the charges against Tehran and the Iranian Embassy in Iraq.

The only sources cited by Reuters are the PMOI (MeK) and "U.S. military officials." Those officials have released no further statements and there is nothing from Tehran. The only sources are Jafarzadeh’s organization (Mek/NCRI/PMOI) and its keepers ("U.S. officials"). Keep in mind that no one was injured and that the "U.S. military officials" from the Reuters report said that no projectile hit the camp. So, how do we know that it was "a sinister plot hatched at Tehran’s Baghdad embassy"?

The MeK ("reports from Iraq") said so; that’s how.

But just for argument’s sake, let’s assume the incident actually occurred at all. Would the elite Iranian Revolutionary Guard (IRGC), or even an Iranian-employed militant group, fire several guided missiles at such a huge target and not land one hit within the perimeter? And are we really supposed to believe that the alleged culprits (Iranian government officials) would leave a signature on an invitation for the U.S. and its proxies to officially bomb and invade their country?

But Jafarzadeh and his fellow cult members are a step ahead: they have rock-solid evidence! "The Iranian-made missiles were engraved with the Persian date of manufacture ’24-5-1384,’ which corresponds to August 15, 2005," says the career quisling.

But when you watch the video provided by MeK agents on YouTube, you might think someone went to the supply room or local hardware depot, picked up an engraving gun, and etched the numerals and characters onto the exploded shell. Since Jafarzadeh is obviously making things up, for all we know, the shell was planted or was fired by the MeK. Most likely, the entire incident was staged.

Either way, no authoritative evidence has been offered to support the charge against Tehran and the Iranian Embassy in Iraq. Mr. Jafarzadeh is tooting his own trumpet, as usual.

The IAEA-MeK-Neocon Report

Just in time to keep the reader from thus putting two and two together, Jafarzadeh switches quickly to the subject of Iran’s nuclear program and the latest pertinent report from the U.N.’s International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). As usual, it’s the typical drum-beating based on conjecture, phantom evidence, and straight-faced lies. A couple of fantasy sequences stand out, e.g., another first-to-third-person episode:

The agency’s frustration with Tehran’s stonewalling and evasiveness, only thinly disguised in the report, centers on a set of 18 documents based on intelligence provided by different sources, which strongly point to a robust and ongoing nuclear weapons program.

Again, Jafarzadeh refers to his own organization without mentioning his involvement. He, like the IAEA and its report, conceals MeK’s role as one of the "different sources" mentioned as the origin of the "18 documents." The other "different sources" include Israeli and U.S. entities. [3]

Fox’s favorite U.S.-designated terrorist spokesperson continues:

The nine-page report . . . said that "Iran has not provided the Agency with all the information, access to documents and access to individuals necessary to support Iran’s statements" that its activities are purely peaceful in intent.

Which on the surface seems troubling, until you actually read the agency’s report and find out Mr. Jafarzadeh is a conniver. As it turns out, the IAEA and its "intelligence" sources (MeK & Co.)—not Iran—are guilty of not providing substantial information, documents, and so forth. [4]

—The Agency received much of this information only in electronic form and was not authorised to provide copies to Iran. (para. 16)

— Although the Agency had been shown the documents that led it to these conclusions, it was not in possession of the documents and was therefore unfortunately unable to make them available to Iran. (para. 21)

— It should be noted that the Agency currently has no information – apart from the uranium metal document – on the actual design or manufacture by Iran of nuclear material components of a nuclear weapon or of certain other key components, such as initiators, or on related nuclear physics studies. (para. 24)

So, how can Iran be expected to provide information to refute the charges if the evidence allegedly supporting the charges isn’t made available to Iran? Total fraud. Next, the liar cites a lie by the New York Times:

[T]he agency bluntly accused it of a “willful lack of cooperation, particularly in answering allegations that its nuclear program may be intended more for military use than for energy generation,” according to the New York Times.

This falsehood was easily exposed by reading the IAEA report, wherein you’ll not only find the words "willful lack of cooperation" absent from the text, but you’ll also find statements quite to the contrary.

— All nuclear material at FEP, as well as all installed cascades, remain under Agency containment and surveillance. (para. 2)

— All nuclear material at PFEP, as well as the cascade area, remains under Agency containment and surveillance. (para. 4)

— The Agency was, however, able to ensure that all necessary safeguards measures, including containment and surveillance, were in place before UF6 was fed into the newly installed centrifuges. (para. 11)

— Iran provided its response to these questions on 23 May 2008, which is being assessed by the Agency. (para. 15)

— The Agency has been able to continue to verify the non-diversion of declared nuclear material in Iran. (para. 26)

— Iran has agreed to address the alleged studies. However, it maintains that all the allegations are baseless and that the data have been fabricated. (para. 27)

— Iran’s responses to the Agency’s letter of 9 May 2008 were not received until 23 May 2008 and could not yet be assessed by the Agency. . . . It should be emphasised, however, that the Agency has not detected the actual use of nuclear material in connection with the alleged studies. (para. 28)

For a more detailed and eloquent breakdown of this particular aggression against the American and Iranian peoples by the Times, see "NY Times again misrepresents IAEA report on Iran," by Cyrus Safdari. The same fraudulent assertions made by the Times are found in the balance of Jafarzadeh’s fantasy piece, and Safdari smashes them all. [5]

The MeK has a history dotted with elaborate, trumped-up agitprop and deadly military attacks on U.S. and Iranian targets. They have used both tools of their trade as the means to their desired end: regime-change in Tehran via psychological warfare (propaganda) and armed insurrection. So far, since 1979 Islamic Revolution (which they were a part of, but for the wrong reasons), they have been able to secure for themselves, at best, a safe haven in Iraq, as well as material and political support from mostly French and U.S. entities. All they lack to be ultimately successful is the full military support of a powerful state like, say, the United States.

So far, they have the lying corporate media on their side, along with dozens of treasonous politicians and pundits selling their phony image as, for instance, "the largest democratic opposition group in Iran." They pull out all the stops, trying to win the hearts and minds of the already-thoroughly-dumbed-down U.S. corporate media audience, using somewhat elaborate agitprop—like this latest one-two punch of a staged attack and contrived nuclear threats—as a catalyzing pretext.

But don’t be fooled. Those "18 documents"—as well as all outstanding issues referenced by the IAEA’s reports on Iran’s nuclear program—are attributable to the Mek/NCRI/PMOI and Israeli and U.S. neocon-Likudniks who can’t wait to commit another genocide upon innocent millions of Arabs and Persians. Even the sanctions pushed through the U.N. Security Council pertaining to Iran’s uranium enrichment program were based on "intelligence" from the same entities. None of the charges of a clandestine weapons program have been proved to be true; yet, through diplomatic coercion in the U.N., the U.S. delegation has been able to get the sanctions passed, based on the same trumped-up "intelligence." [6]

Armageddon Pushers (AP)

The Associated Press is the most offensive propaganda organ of all when it comes to building the neocons’ case for murdering Arabs and Muslims. As the world’s largest source of "news" AP is expected to report the alleged news in a tepid (fair and balanced) way. This is what they claim anyway, but unfortunately their news "coverage" reads more like an editorial.

AP is throwing its very own one-two combination of trumped-up Iranian military threats and misinterpretations of the IAEA report. Together, the two fear-inducing frauds make a formidable tool for shaping public opinion in favor of illicit aggression. The following excerpts are from a May 31 report titled "UN nuclear agency report puts Iran on defensive." [7]

AP injects basically the same falsehoods and conjecture found in the Times and Jafarzadeh frauds; but instead of offering zero sources for their opinions-disguised-as-facts, AP’s editors simply make up sources:

A senior U.N. official – who demanded anonymity because he was not authorized to comment on the report – told the AP . . .

A diplomat accredited to the IAEA who demanded anonymity for divulging confidential information . . .

The "anonymous/confidential sensitivity" technique is a cornerstone of yellow journalism at AP. But too much of that will lead the reader to start questioning, so AP simply quotes some obscure officials with diplomatic credentials to pacify the readers and prevent the ugly truth from breaking out:

Simon Smith, the chief British delegate to the IAEA, said the language reflected deep "frustration at the lack of cooperation" by Iran.

Pierre Goldschmidt, Heinonen’s predecessor at the IAEA, says . . .

Notice AP only partially quotes the source—another cornerstone in the AP m.o.—which is done so as to be able to lie with great flexibility and subtlety:

Olli Heinonen – the IAEA’s deputy director general in charge of the agency’s Iran file – said Iran’s possession of nuclear warhead diagrams was "alarming."

Iran never was in possession of those diagrams: ownership of them was merely asserted by the "intelligence" cited in the report as "alleged studies." Iran denied the charges. Furthermore, not only did Iranian officials not have those diagrams: neither did the IAEA! From paragraph 21 of the IAEA report:

Concerning the documents purporting to show administrative interconnections between the alleged green salt project and a project to modify the Shahab-3 missile to carry a nuclear warhead, Iran stated that, since some of the documents were not shown to it by the Agency, it could not make an assessment of them. Although the Agency had been shown the documents that led it to these conclusions, it was not in possession of the documents and was therefore unfortunately unable to make them available to Iran.

Not inclined to settle for a psychological fleecing, AP editors throw up a middle-finger to their readers and hurl a long-discredited, warmongering, neocon psychopath’s excretion at them: former U.S. ambassador [sic] to the U.N., John Bolton, is partially quoted by AP as a credible source on matters of conflict resolution. HA!!!

But AP editors don’t want to scare their readers away, so they begin to shift to an almost-anti-war voice of reason from that trusty no-name diplomat:

But "it’s never too late," Goldschmidt said. . . . "I think the Americans should talk to the Iranians directly, bilaterally, multilaterally secretly and (initially) without any preconditions … (and) at the highest level," he said.

Ah! He agrees with about 99% of Americans! His point of view must be marginalized immediately! Send in the "realists"!

Still, Iran may have less reason now than a year ago to compromise, now that its technicians appear to have eliminated most bugs keeping them from full-scale enrichment expansion.

"In the past, Iran has experienced significant problems" with breakdowns and other technical mishaps keeping it from running its enriching centrifuges smoothly, said David Albright, a former IAEA nuclear inspector. But the newest IAEA findings show "that Iran is overcoming these problems," he added.

That is true according to the IAEA, but how the AP editor knows that it means Iran has "less reason to compromise" is a mystery. Lucky for AP, being in bed with the warmongers means not having to bother with objectivity and reasoning. I mean, why bother when there’s all this fun war-fomenting to be done?

But starting last year, the IAEA began focusing on probing for evidence of activities that point more directly to a possible clandestine weapons program.

Based on its own information and intelligence from the U.S. and other board members, it has asked – in vain – for substantive explanations for what seem to be draft plans to refit missiles with nuclear warheads; explosives tests that could be used for a nuclear detonation; military and civilian nuclear links and a drawing showing how to mold uranium metal into the shape of warheads.

Iran remains defiant.

As shown above, that is a total fraud.

And what is a so-called fair and balanced news agency to gain from using obviously gratuitous phrases like "— in vain —" (the em dashes are intended accents in news reports; agencies typically keep them to a bare minimum, as necessary for emphasis when commas are not effective) and "Iran remains defiant" without attributing them to a source? In other words, why does AP editorialize within a so-called news report? News editors edit: they don’t editorialize unless the piece they are editing is their own editorial and is designated as such.

AP nears the conclusion (thank heavens) of the report with that anonymous "diplomat" telling us that "some of Tehran’s most important allies" are turning their backs on Iran. This is done to make it seem like, yeah, we ("the world’s only superpower") should be pimping and exacting naked aggression against this third-world nation for the financial gain of our war-profiteering leaders and their corporate cronies!

A diplomat accredited to the IAEA who demanded anonymity for divulging confidential information, told the AP on Friday that China was not opposing a U.S-backed push to introduce a resolution critical of Iran at an IAEA board meeting starting next Monday.

China – along with Russia – has traditionally opposed strong U.N. action against Iran’s nuclear program and insisted on watering down the three sets of Security Council sanctions now in place against Iran.

Any such resolution would be symbolic, meaning the U.S. and others seeking curbs on Iran’s nuclear activities would have to turn to other options. And those are limited.

Gee, what does that mean? Does it mean that a fraud about the potential for U.S. military aggression on Iran comes next, so as to provide a phony cover for the neocons? Well, duh!

President Bush’s administration is unlikely to opt for a military strike as it counts down to its final days in office.

That leaves Goldschmidt’s options of tougher sanctions and improved incentives – including a direct U.S. overture to the Tehran leadership – as the most realistic possibility.

What a hoot. Gosh. Why don’t the U.S. and Iranian delegates seek counsel from AP more often? They seem to know all the answers with very little information to work from.

AP’s Very Own Two-Punch

The worst offense involving the media build-up to war on Iran is how AP and corporate media continue to tell flat-out lies about the weak president of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad—falsely implying that his tough rhetoric will translate into tough military action, and perpetuating mistranslations and myths which make it easier for media to falsely portray him as hell-bent on suicide and Armageddon.

From another AP report dated June 2 and titled "Ahmadinejad says Israel to disappear" comes the second half of AP’s one-two warmongering campaign this past week. [8]

It opens:

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, known for vitriolic anti-Israeli rhetoric, has again predicted the demise of Israel, according to Iran’s IRNA news agency.

Is the term vitriolic necessary in a news report? Are two or more adjectives in a row ever necessary in a tepid presentation of a subject?

Of course! After all, AP’s job is to zero everything out at Israeli government interests. Who says this is not a tepid, fair and balanced account? You must be an anti-Semite!

Ahmadinejad latest comment on the eventual disappearance of the Jewish state came Monday at a ceremony honoring the late founder of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.

Accusing Israel of decades of aggression, he said the country "has reached the end of its function and will soon disappear off the geographical domain," IRNA reported.

Total fabrication. Here’s the full quote from IRNA via Thomson Reuters:

"You should know that the criminal and terrorist Zionist regime which has 60 years of plundering, aggression and crimes in its file has reached the end of its work and will soon disappear off the geographical scene," he said. [9]

Oh, but AP is not finished lying with the use of creative quoting techniques and sheer disinfo. No truth till the mushroom cloud, goddammit!

Ahmadinejad has repeatedly called for Israel’s destruction. Threatening exchanges between Iran and Israel have intensified since 2005, when Ahmadinejad said in a speech that Israel will one day be "wiped off the map." The Iranian leader has also described the Holocaust as a "myth."

Ah yes. The infamous mistranslation that has been perpetuated in AP’s reportage for over 2½ years despite AP’s being made aware of the fact that it is a dangerous mistranslation. [10]

The "Holocaust/myth" fraud is just as old as the "wiped off the map" fraud and has been just as handily smashed. [11]

AP and corporate media keep those lies going in order to keep the war drums beating and public opinion less informed and more bent on aggressive war. Speak of the devil:

Israel has repeatedly condemned Ahmadinejad’s statements but warned that the country is a serious threat because of its efforts to develop a nuclear program and long-range missiles.

After coming to power in the 1979 Islamic Revolution, Khomeini cut relation with Israel and called it an illegitimate entity.

Right about now, we should be giving our fellow Israel-worshipers a group hug and assuring each other that the world-dominating third-world threat of a figurehead president will somehow be stopped by some conscientious group of good men in charge of thousands of harmless little nuclear weapons and indomitable sanctioning power in the U.N.

Oh! Woe is us!

In the build-up to war on Iraq, so-called Iraqi dissidents conspired with corporate media and neocons to frame Saddam Hussein for WMD possession and manufacture. Pre-invasion WMD inspections turned up nothing on Saddam’s regime; the so-called evidence (contrived by none other than the so-called Iraqi dissident group and its neocon handlers) turned out to be either forged or non-existent; yet, with few exceptions, corporate mass media collaborated with the neocons in lying to the world and sending U.S. men and women into an undeclared aggressive war to die and kill.

The more that things change, the more they smell the same.

Perhaps it is corporate media that should be "wiped off the map."

Notes:

[1] http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,359163,00.html

[2] http://uk.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUKANW75775320080527

[3] http://www.campaigniran.org/casmii/index.php?q=node/4205

[4] http://www.campaigniran.org/casmii/index.php?q=node/5072 (my emphasis)

[5] http://www.iranaffairs.com via http://www.campaigniran.org/casmii/index.php?q=node/5084

[6] http://www.countercurrents.org/ulrich051207.htm

[7] http://apnews.myway.com//article/20080531/D910G4Q80.html (my emphasis)

[8] http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080602/D9127EJ00.html

[9] http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSL0261250620080603 (my emphasis)

[10] http://www.mohammadmossadegh.com/news/rumor-of-the-century/ &

http://www.mohammadmossadegh.com/news/caught-red-handed/

[11] http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article12790.htm

Media With Conscience

June 3, 2008 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Recent Posts

  • A study on the financial mechanism of the Mujahedin-e Khalq

    August 10, 2026
  • A Child behind the Ideological Bars of Massoud and Maryam Rajavi

    August 8, 2026
  • A Comparative Analysis of Psychological Control Mechanisms in Jeffrey Epstein’s Cult and the MEK

    August 3, 2026
  • Operation Mersad: How Iran foiled Saddam’s final gambit 37 years ago

    August 1, 2026
  • Ideology Cannot Prevail over Human Dignity

    July 29, 2026
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Youtube

© 2003 - 2025 NEJAT Society . All Rights Reserved. NejatNGO.org


Back To Top
Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip