Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip
Nejat Society
Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip
© 2003 - 2024 NEJAT Society. nejatngo.org
France

78 signatories: Mojahedin Khalq terror group are threatening to kill us in your country

Open letter to François Hollande, President of the French Republic

Dear President of the French Republic,

Seventeen French citizens, victims of freedom of expression, have just been killed in Paris. Over two centuries, France has paid dearly for this freedom. Yet the flag of freedom remains hoisted in France; this is why it is called the cradle of freedom. We, former members of the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI, aka MEK, MKO, Rajavi cult), unequivocally condemn this crime and express our solidarity with the French people and the families of the victims of upholding freedom of expression.

M. President, we are former members of the PMOI who were able to free ourselves from this repressive cult. We are trying to reveal the true nature of this group by organizing permitted activities and meetings in Paris. Yet we continue to be attacked and beaten by the Fedayeen of Massoud Rajavi (leader of the PMOI who lived in France between 1981 and 1986), who has publicly called for the deaths of former members of the organization. In meetings held in 1995 in Iraq for the rank and file members, Rajavi explicitly ordered his followers to assassinate former members wherever they are. Since then he has missed no opportunity to repeat that order. The most recent time was November 2, 2014 when, during a Shiite religious holiday, in a video message along with their photographs, he demanded the deaths of 40 former PMOI members. Released in Camp Liberty in Iraq, this message continues to circulate on the Internet.

President of the French Republic,

These former members who are subjected to death threats, reside legally in France, Europe and elsewhere. The wife of Massoud Rajavi, and other PMOI commanders who reside in France, have been tasked with executing this order. The message itself violates French national sovereignty and constitutes incitement to commit murder.

President of the French Republic,

Unfortunately, the headquarters of this dangerous cult is in France, in the department of Val d’Oise, not far from the capital. For three decades the headquarters of the PMOI has been protected by the French government. Enforced segregation, with no contact with the outside world, has allowed the PMOI to conduct sectarian indoctrination and terrorist training in this headquarters, just as in its military bases in Iraq. The self-immolation of several PMOI members following the arrest on 17 June 2003 of their leader (Maryam Rajavi) and a dozen of their senior commanders on terrorism and money laundering charges is just one example of the violence of this organization. Through these acts of violence in the streets of Paris and other European capitals, the PMOI tried to intimidate the French Judiciary to abandon its investigations. An indication of the PMOI’s ongoing violent beliefs is their support for other terrorist groups, even Islamic State which Maryam Rajavi hails as “nomadic and revolutionary Iraqi people.”

President of the French Republic,

The former members of the PMOI have not committed any crime. We have only spoken out about what we lived and suffered for years under the hegemony of this Islamic fundamentalist cult. Like the terrorists who have just murdered French journalists, Massoud Rajavi tries to suppress any dissent to prevent the truth from emerging. We are French citizens as well as residents of Europe and elsewhere. Our lives and our freedom of expression are now threatened by the head of the PMOI and his wife in France.

As you focus on the firm commitment of your government to protect the lives of French citizens and to defend freedom of expression, we draw your attention to the danger posed by this cult training base in Auvers-sur-Oise in the Val d’Oise.

Please accept, M. President of the Republic, the assurance of our highest respect and consideration.

CC:

Ministry of Interior of France

– United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees – Geneva

– The French media

– Amnesty International

– The International Committee of the Red Cross – Geneva

– European Union chief foreign policy

– Speaker and Members Europe

– Prime Minister of Iraq

– Iraqi Media

–

Signatories:

1-Mohammad Karami

2-Ghorbanali Hossenjad

3-Mehrdad Sagharchi

4-Hamid Sistani

5-Ghafor Fatahian

6-Ali Jahani

7-Majid Rohi

8-Ahsan Bidi

9-Niaz Salimi

10-Nilofar Sarfraz

11-Batol Soltani

12-Homeira Mohammadnejad

13-Zahra Moeini

14-Nasrin Abrahimi

15-Shirzad Jalili

16-Hassan KHalaj

17-Eadel Asami

18-Aliakbar Rastguo

19-Seid Amir Movasghi

20-Jamshid Tafrishi

21-Advard Tornado

22-Mahmod Sepahi

23-Mseod KHodabandeh

24-Anne KHodabandeh

25-Mitra Yosefi

26-Visha Karami

27-Ali reza Nasrolrhi

28-Mohammad reza Najarian

29-Mehdi KHoshhal

30-Karim GHolami

31-Abdolkarim Abrahimi

32-Farzad Farzinfar

33-Mohammad hosin Sobhani

34-Milad Ariaiy

35-Mansor Nazari

35-Mehdi Sajodi

37-Shahroz Tajbakhsh

38-Ahmad Mohamadi

39-Ebrahim KHodabandeh

40-Eatefe Nadalian

41-Karim Haghi

42-Mahtab Alipor

43-Daryosh Majlesi

44-Habib KHorami

45-Homayon Kehrzadi

46-Ali GHashghavi

47-Arash Sametipor

48-Nader Naderi

49-Seba SHekarbigi

50-Mojtba Reshdi

51-Saed Soltanpor

52-Hamidreza Solymani

53-Mehdi Nikbakht

54-Mir Baghr Sedaghi

55-Rabeh SHahrokhi

56-Mostfi Mohammadi

57-Mahbobe Hamze

58-Horie Mohammadi

59-Mohammad Mohammadi

60-Morteza   Mohammadi

61-Parvin Haji

62-Hassan Ezizi

63-ALF .Mino sephr

64-Vahid Saeidi

65-Mohammad Eraghi

66-Hassan Piransar

67-Mohammad R,,,,,

68-Mohammd reza Armankhah

69-Mina Kermani

70-Emidvar – E.M

71-Hsin Serabi

72-Sadegh Rezaei

73-Hammid Yossefi

74-Soria Ebdoleziz

75-Ebrahim Nasif

76-Sead Samir Ebdolah

77-Ahmad reza SHafiei

78-Hamidreza Bikas

Faryad Azadi, Paris,

February 7, 2015 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Iran Interlink Weekly Digest

Iran Interlink Weekly Digest – 84

++ Somayeh Mohammadi was again made to publicly swear at her family by the MEK. From this week the whole Mohammadi family are trying to push the issue; Somayeh’s father Mostafa, Mahboubeh her mother and her sister Houriyeh and brother Mohammad. They have written heartbreakingly about their long quest to rescue Somayeh from captivity by the Rajavis in the hope these missives would somehow reach her. Mahboubeh wrote ‘Tired of Not Seeing You’ and ‘Houriyeh is Impatient’. Mostafa wrote a long article titled ‘Tell a story to wake your children up, not to send them to sleep!’

++ J Salvar’s article compares Massoud Rajavi’s Harem with that of King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia and concludes that Rajavi had more wives. Salvar says the MEK’s shared mentality about women is shown by their excessive praise for Abduallah.

++ Reactions to last week’s news of the MEK’s publication of receipts showing payments to members of the NCRI attracted both ridicule and serious comments: ‘if this is true then their support is based on buying people, if not they are simply liars’. Others remind existing members of the NCRI that they are paid with the bloody money from Saddam Hussein’s Iraq which is soiled with the deaths of children. Those who were named on the receipts – Mohammad Reza Rowhani and Karim Ghassim – have also spoken out. Ghassim says he believes the reason the MEK published his name is because he exposed the price paid to Patrick Kennedy and the source of the agency which the MEK hires from. This counts as retaliation by the MEK; how ridiculous.

++ Two more people died, one in Iraq, one in Albania. This is becoming a weekly feature. Hanif Mohahmmad Nejad an internal critic has pointed out in an open letter to Rajavi that “whenever anyone dies, you [Rajavi] embark on a story of how Iraq didn’t help and the US didn’t help and the UN people stopped him or her from visiting the doctor, and this and that agent of the regime stopped the medicine. I have never seen these people dying from any other reason. The more I think about it the more I can’t believe you expect us to believe that the whole world – the US embassy, the Red Cross, the UN, etc – are all working together to kill people in the camp. It would be interesting if you would give a reason why you expect people to believe this.”

++ Sahar Family Foundation addresses people in Europe. The article says that in Baghdad there is clear evidence that Camp Liberty is in chaos with infighting and disobedience. The MEK have turned some parts of the camp into prisons and hold people there for up to two weeks if they have not obeyed orders or have said something leaders didn’t like. Victims have to apologise and beg for mercy. The worst crime is to approach the Iraqi posts, which is punished by beatings.

On other hand MEK leaders are on overdrive in name calling all the agencies. The UN says that when they go in the MEK pretend to use wood to cook their food and claim they are denied fuel. The latest delivery of fuel was immediately emptied into a tank at the back of the Camp and the MEK claimed they didn’t receive it. Similarly medicine, which is freely available on request and paid for by the UN, is signed for but the next day the MEK claim they don’t have it. Medicine is being used as a weapon to make people obey. The camp residents see the UN coming and going and although they are forbidden from approaching them, this has given them courage. There is now a power struggle as people are beginning to shout back at the commanders and refuse to obey orders.

Sahar asks people in Europe and Iraq, including ex members, as well as the MEK’s internal critics like Rowhani, Ghassim and Mesdaghi who perhaps have some leverage, to do more. Sahar says they should put pressure on the MEK and its backers in the West to end this humanitarian disaster. Sahar invites everyone to visit Baghdad and see the situation for themselves if they think we are lying.

++ Several letters have been written to the people in Albania encouraging them to keep their spirits up and not to be afraid. They say, your situation is now different from what you left behind. For the sake of those still in Camp Liberty and those who died, stay strong and don’t give in for the MEK’s 500 dollars, that won’t last long.

In English:

++ A review authored by Massoud khodabandeh and Anne Khodabandeh (Singleton) from Middle East Strategy Consultants has been published in Asian Politics and Policy, Media Reviews. (Volume 7, Issue 1, January 2015). The article titled ‘The Iranian Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK) and Its Media Strategy: Methods of Information Manufacture’ looks at the MEK’s historical manipulation of various media over thirty years. Other terrorist entities such as Al Qaida and ISIS have only recently shown themselves media savvy and have been able to create artificial reputations through exploiting both media and internet communications. In this review the authors demonstrate that the MEK has long pursued this propaganda strategy.

++ Mohammad Razaghi in France writes to Ambassador Dritan Tola of Albania to bring his attention to the desperate plight of those refugees from Camp Liberty who are now still in MEK hands in Iraq. “I thank you and the government of Albania for your humanitarian efforts in accepting some of the members of this organisation which has removed these people away from the dangers of remaining in Iraq. You government has demonstrated its commitment to human rights by taking this important step to save to lives of these unfortunate people.

“But what we hear from Tirana is somehow disturbing. We hear that that Maryam Rajavi is sending her top known agents from Paris and these agents, who are from her ‘Leadership Council’, are now trying to control the lives of the recently arrived people as they did in the Iraqi camps. The pressure on these survivors of Camp Liberty camp who are now in your country is constant.”

++ Mazda Parsi writing in Nejat Bloggers says the MEK leader colludes with Israel when she calls the murdered Argentinean special prosecutor Alberto Nisman a “martyr to peace and freedom”. Parsi examines Gareth Porter’s allegations about the MEK’s involvement in blaming Iran for the bombing of a Jewish community center in Buenos Aires in 1994.

“As well as Al Jazeera, Porter believes that the repetitious claims and unfounded testimonies of MKO affiliated witnesses in Nisman’s arrest warrant just help the propaganda against Iranian government continue. Porter writes, “Nisman’s rambling and repetitious report cites statements by four members of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), which is the political arm of the MEK, as the sources for the charge that Iran decided on the AMIA bombing in August 1993… Although Nisman called his MKO witnesses as “completely truthful”, Gareth Porter criticizes his arrest warrant for lacking any evidence or reason to believe that any of the MKO members were in a position to have known about the high-level meeting between Iranian officials for the so-called plot against AMIA… Considering Nisman as “pro-Israel, anti-Iran” political figure, Porter believed that the special prosecutor’s “readiness to base the crucial accusation against Iran in the AMIA case solely on MEK sources and his denial of their obvious unreliability highlights the fact that he has been playing a political role on behalf of certain powerful interests rather than uncovering the facts.””

++ In an open letter to François Hollande, 78 signatories say the Mojahedin Khalq are threatening to kill them in France and other countries.

“These former members who are subjected to death threats, reside legally in France, Europe and elsewhere. The wife of Massoud Rajavi, and other PMOI commanders who reside in France, have been tasked with executing this order. The message itself violates French national sovereignty and constitutes incitement to commit murder… Unfortunately, the headquarters of this dangerous cult is in France, in the department of Val d’Oise, not far from the capital. For three decades the headquarters of the PMOI has been protected by the French government. Enforced segregation, with no contact with the outside world, has allowed the PMOI to conduct sectarian indoctrination and terrorist training in this headquarters, just as in its military bases in Iraq. The self-immolation of several PMOI members following the arrest on 17 June 2003 of their leader (Maryam Rajavi) and a dozen of their senior commanders on terrorism and money laundering charges is just one example of the violence of this organization. Through these acts of violence in the streets of Paris and other European capitals, the PMOI tried to intimidate the French Judiciary to abandon its investigations. An indication of the PMOI’s ongoing violent beliefs is their support for other terrorist groups, even Islamic State which Maryam Rajavi hails as “nomadic and revolutionary Iraqi people.””

February 6, 2015

February 7, 2015 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mujahedin Khalq Organization's Propaganda System

The Iranian Mojahedin-e Khalq and Its Media Strategy

The Iranian Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK) and Its Media Strategy: Methods of Information Manufacture

In his book Manufactured Crisis: The Untold Story of the Iran Nuclear Scare (Porter, 2014b), American journalist Gareth Porter identifies the role played by the Iranian Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK) organization in Israel’s decade-long attempts to prevent a negotiated settlement between Iran and the P5+1 (the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Russia, China, and Germany), on the former’s nuclear program. When the negotiations hit a difficult phase in Vienna in May 2014, Porter suggested in an article for Al Jazeera that “If the talks fail … it will be the result of the toxic combination of wilful U.S. self-deception and deliberate falsification of intelligence by the Israelis” (Porter, 2014a).

In this context, this overview seeks to demonstrate how and why, through a sophisticated and persistent media campaign, the MEK has created a place for itself on the Iranian political scene totally disproportionate to its capabilities and support base; and how from this aggrandized position the MEK has exerted a negative influence over Western opinion and policymaking toward the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) and Iraq, which began long before and reaches far wider than its role in Tehran’s nuclear dossier. Also, this review seeks to indicate that while this propaganda campaign has been highly successful for the MEK, it has been deliberately detrimental to the growth of a civil opposition movement in Iran as well as significantly affecting Western foreign policy toward the IRI in adverse ways.

The MEK stands out as perhaps a unique example of a belligerent entity that exploits to the maximum a range of propaganda methods and outlets in the West to project itself in the international community as a constructive, almost benign, force. Far from avoiding publicity, the MEK has done everything in its power to maximize what can be described as its virtual presence. In addition to its native Farsi, the group disseminates information about and projects an image of itself in English, French, German and Arabic, in print, in broadcast and on Internet media. But insofar as it has no popular support among indigenous or diaspora Iranians, its image as a popular resistance movement has been largely invented.

Historically the group’s leader, Massoud Rajavi, as the MEK’s spokesman, enjoyed a reputation as a charismatic speaker. As such, he was fully cognizant of the power of publicity in shaping a public image. After the MEK was forced into exile to Paris in 1981, Rajavi assumed sole leadership and appointed his wife, Maryam Rajavi, second-in-command. Since then, the MEK’s raison d’être has remained in its own words “the downfall of the mullahs’ regime in its entirety and the establishment of a democratic republic based on the separation of the church and the state” (Rajavi, 2014), under a Rajavi government. Rajavi understood that he would depend on both political and financial support from the West. He established public relations departments in MEK bases in the major Western capitals. With help from sympathizers, an increasingly sophisticated and expensive propaganda strategy was devised with multiple aims. Primarily, it was used to market the MEK as the “main opposition” and the “only alternative” to the IRI to attract sponsorship. But to ensure the MEK was the only group to garner this support, Rajavi also needed to eliminate all other exiled Iranian opposition groups. This was achieved in the 1980s through physical intimidation and character assassination. This ranged from ostracizing former Iranian president, Abolhassan Bani Sadr (Gessler, 2004), to gate crashing meetings of other groups such as the communist Fedayeen, and beating up attendees. It was also necessary over the years to continuously demonize the Islamic Republic to prevent any possibility of rapprochement. MEK propaganda sculpted Western perceptions of Iran as evil and incapable of reform or moderation.

In its quest to solicit Western support, the MEK morphed its public persona several times to appeal to various Western foreign policymakers and sponsors, but maintained as pivotal its claim to be the main opposition and only alternative. While helping Saddam Hussein’s war effort during the Iran-Iraq War (1980–1988), the glossy print magazine NLA Journal promoted the National Liberation Army; photographs of combatants and armaments projected an image of military might. After losing support during the First Gulf War, a replica of Iran’s Majlis populated by these same combatants posing in Western clothing was advertised as a parliament-in-exile in The Lion and The Sun magazine (print edition in Iran-Interlink archive) and distributed to parliaments and press in the 1990s. Over time, the MEK’s image building was upgraded through emailed PDF publications like Iran Liberation and Iran Liberty Association Newsletter, which reflect the current incarnation of the group. This PDF-manufactured reputation as a democratic opposition enabled the MEK to undertake information laundry for Israel as purveyors of nuclear intelligence on Iran (Nuclear Control Institute, 2014). By extension, this adaptive, mercenary role proved persuasive among American neoconservative regime change pundits who campaigned to remove the group from the U.S. terrorism list (Symonds, 2012). This in turn, after the 2013 election of President Rouhani introduced the possibility of a negotiated settlement of Iran’s nuclear status, allowed for the MEK to be promoted as human rights advocates (Iran News Update, 2014).

The MEK’s ability to maintain its public relations platforms through the vagaries it has suffered over three decades is based largely on one propitious factor: its target audience. Western power brokers have been sympathetic and arguably myopic. Western parliamentarians, if not governments, were looking for “evidence” that the IRI was dangerous and unpleasant—whether as a state sponsor of terrorism or later as a nuclear weaponized state. They were also looking for an opposition to promote as an antithesis to the Iranian government. The MEK, a listed terrorist group for much of this time, used its chameleon-like ability (Bahari, 2007) to adapt its image to mirror Western concerns. That it did this purely for its own survival does not detract from the fact that the MEK has provided a very palatable narrative for those wanting to depose and attack the IRI.

While the Iran-Iraq War was under way, Rajavi was expelled from France but was welcomed in Iraq by Saddam Hussein to help his war effort against Tehran. Saddam provided training for MEK members to form a National Liberation Army, an adjunct to the Iraqi army, and also a generous propaganda budget. Saddam’s purpose was to bolster support for his own war effort by having the MEK present itself as a military force capable of overthrowing the Iranian regime. This became the MEK’s unique selling point, singling it out from among the remaining Iranian opposition groups.

Rajavi micro-managed the MEK’s public relations from his headquarters in Baghdad. International media were monitored for coverage, and he ranked this activity according to how important he believed it was, with “A” bearing any mention of him, “B” if the MEK was mentioned, “C” for Iranian opposition and so on. In addition, the MEK gleaned news published inside Iran for information such as numbers of arrests and executions, which it would then claim to have gathered covertly through its own network of supporters. Although this information was publicly available, the MEK claimed to a non-Farsi-speaking audience to have informants inside the IRI system. In this way, it was able to build a reputation among Western reporters, which would finally draw them to the MEK’s press conference in 2002 to expose Iran’s secret nuclear enrichment site at Natanz (Nuclear Control Institute, 2014). Indeed, it was the group’s media and political contacts that made it an ideal conduit for intelligence originally garnered by the Israeli intelligence organization Mossad on Iran’s nuclear program, not its credibility as an opposition group. The revelation led the United States to push for a United Nations (UN) investigation and subsequent sanctions against Iran. After 2003, having lost Saddam Hussein’s patronage, the MEK abandoned any attempt to build popular support with Iranians and chose instead to work for Israeli and neoconservative interests. Alejo Vidal Quadras, a former member of the European Parliament, admitted that the Friends of a Free Iran group in the European Parliament had benefited from association with the MEK whose “ ‘lobbying activity’ performed for more than 20 years … has been fundamental” (Vidal Quadras, 2014) in promoting its agenda.

A media campaign-employed lobbyists such as the Iran Policy Committee, generously paid speakers (Wilkie, 2011), and took photographs with politicians to try to recast MEK history and present itself as a democratic alternative to an exclusively Western audience. Underpinning any understanding of the MEK’s media strategy is that, according to Steve Hassan’s BITE Model (Freedom of Mind, 2014), it operates as a cult and can therefore utilize an unpaid, dedicated labor force willing to spend every waking hour in pursuit of fulfilling its leader’s requirements. Far from alienating support, this aspect has been instrumental in the creation of an indispensable tool for regime-change pundits in the West. With this free labor, the MEK was able to inundate political and media circles with a continuous flood of literature, information, films, statements, and press releases. Currently, the group ensures a daily presence in PR Newswire and engages in “Google wars,” with its forces performing keystrokes to push MEK items up the search engine scale. It also maintains a physical presence in Western parliaments characterized as “extremely persistent and aggressive” by Eldar Mamedov (2014), who is in charge of the delegation for inter-parliamentary relations between the European Parliament and Iran.

A recent example of the MEK’s efforts to control the narrative of an event through its cyberspace presence came in 2013 with the tragic attack on 101 MEK members based in Camp Ashraf in Iraq (Sen, 2013). Within hours the MEK began to take control of the media narrative by sending real-time video of the attack filmed by the MEK themselves (YouTube, 2013), to newsrooms. On the ground, however, the MEK were uncooperative with UN and Iraqi government investigators. Crucially, 42 survivors who were moved to another MEK base (U.S. Department of State, 2013), were subsequently prevented from speaking to investigators (Khodabandeh, 2013), and the investigating process stalled. Instead, mirroring the agenda of MEK advocates in the European Parliament, the MEK blamed the Iraqi prime minister, Nouri al Maliki (NCRI Foreign Affairs Committee, 2013), for the attack. An Internet search of the event now throws up a variety of articles, resolutions, and statements published by the MEK, which variously attribute blame for the massacre to the Iraqi government of al Maliki, the Iraqi army, President Rouhani of Iran and Iranian special forces, which have taken on the aspect of factual reporting simply through repetition.

In the autumn of 2013 when the nuclear negotiations between Iran and the P5+1 got under way, the regime-change narrative shifted to attacks on Iran’s human rights record. Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen now specifically referred to Maryam Rajavi as a “human rights advocate” (Ros-Lehtinen, 2014). On May 8, 2014, the MEK paid for a quarter-page advertisement in the British print edition of The Guardian in which a smiling Maryam Rajavi accuses Iranian President Rouhani’s government of “massacring 56 Iranian opponents in Camps Ashraf & Liberty in Iraq” (print edition in Iran-Interlink archive).

The MEK’s media and cyberspace presence is manifest in both positive and negative terms. What is most remarkable is that this group’s narrative is so pervasive and persuasive. The MEK has been instrumental in the manufacture of a false but dominant narrative concerning Iran, but other exiled opposition groups and individuals depict Iran in a very different manner, which is arguably more nuanced and closer to reality. Iranian writer and activist Akbar Ganji, imprisoned in Tehran between 2000 and 2006, describes “How the West gets Iran wrong” (Ganji, 2014). Any indigenous Iranian opposition has two fronts to fight. Not only do they have to challenge the IRI on civil rights, religious freedom, human rights, etc., but will also have to distinguish themselves with a different identity and a different narrative from the MEK’s “regime change” discourse and persuade a skeptical West to listen to them. And while Iran certainly has problems with civil and political freedoms and with its economy, the country has made many advances in important fields, such as literacy, polio eradication, aids education, birth control, and prevention of drug trafficking, which rarely get reported by a skeptical Western media. The root of this hostility deserves greater examination and exposure to enable negotiators, foreign policymakers and the media to dismantle the “wilful US self-deception” (Porter, 2014b) and to approach dialogue and diplomacy with greater realism.

References

  • Bahari, Maziar. (2007). Cult of the chameleon.
  • Freedom of Mind. (2014). The BITE model.
  • Ganji, Akbar. (2014). How the West gets Iran wrong.
  • Gessler, Antoine. (2004). Autopsy of an ideological drift: Analysis and background of the People’s Mojahedin Organisation of Iran. Translated by Thomas Robert Forstenzer.
  • Iran News Update. (2014). Maryam Rajavi: At the UN in Geneva.
  • Khodabandeh, Massoud, (2013). Where are the 42 missing Mojahedin Khalq eye witnesses from Camp Ashraf?
  • Mamedov, Eldar. (2014). The MEK’s influence in EU Politics matters.
  • NCRI Foreign Affairs Committee. (2013). Iraq: Sham investigation to whitewash Maliki’s crimes in Camp Ashraf.
  • Nuclear Control Institute. (2014).
  • Porter, Gareth. (2014a). Demonising nuclear Iran.
  • Porter, Gareth. (2014b). Manufactured crisis: The untold story of the Iran nuclear scare. Charlottesville, VA: Just World Books.
  • Rajavi, Maryam. (2014). Hundreds of Iranian associations support Maryam Rajavi Ten-Point Plan for future Iran.
  • Ros-Lehtinen, Ileana. (2014) The security situation in Camps Ashraf and Liberty is getting worse every day; The Iraqi government and the UN must keep their promises and provide adequate security, says Ros-Lehtinen.
  • Sen, Ashish Kumar. (2013). 52 Iranian exiles killed at Iraq’s Camp Ashraf.
  • Symonds, Peter. (2012). US Removes Iranian MEK from terrorist list.
  • U.S. Department of State. (2013). Relocation of remaining individuals from Camp Ashraf to Camp Hurriya in Iraq.
  • Vidal Quadras, Alejo. (2014). Alejo Vidal-Quadras, el mejor amigo de los muyahidines.
  • Wilkie, Christina. (2011). Mujahideen-e Khalq: Former U.S. officials make millions advocating for terrorist organization.
  • YouTube.com. (2013). The bravest cameraman in 2013 Camp Ashraf.

First published on onlinelibrary.wiley

February 5, 2015 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mujahedin Khalq; A proxy force

Nisman: Common “Martyr” for the Israel-MKO alliance

Last week the leader of the Mujahedin Khalq Organization once more found an opportunity to attack Iranian government and to dishonestly represent herself and her so-called resistance as the “Iranian People”. After the Paris attack –when Mryam Rajavi expressed solidarity with Charlie Hebdo— she followed the Israeli pattern to call the murdered Argentinean special prosecutor Alberto Nisman as “Martyr for peace and humanity”.   

Nisman had been set to speak to Congress the following day to outline his latest complaints regarding the alleged complicity of President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner and other officials in covering up the also alleged complicity of Iran in the 1994 bombing of the Argentine Israeli Mutual Association (AMIA) in Buenos Aires, reported Belen Fernandez of  Al Jazeera. [1]

The Argentinean special prosecutor is glorified by Israeli and MKO authorities because he could manage to run a not so credible propaganda against Islamic Republic to give the wrong impression that Iranian official were behind the AMIA terror attack. As Belen Fernandez asserts, “The case against Iran – which has been repeated so unceasingly that the allegations are often passed off as fact – goes something like this: As part of its ongoing hobby as a US-designated "state sponsor of terrorism", the Islamic republic conspired with Lebanon’s Hezbollah to deal a blow to the Argentine Jewish community.” [2]

In 2005, as special prosecutor in Argentina’s AMIA probe Nisman spent the remainder of his life defending his own “version of events”. Predictably, some in the Israeli media took advantage of the recent opportunity to crown him a "martyr in the fight for justice", Al Jazeera correspondent notifies. [3]

Why such a coincidence in MKO and Israel reaction to Nisman’s death. One may think that it is due to their common hostility towards Iran but the case seems more complicated, and the MKO-Israel relationship sounds to be more friendly.

In august 2013, the award winning American journalist and historian Gareth Porter, published an article in Inter Press Service revealing the role of the MKO agents in the AMIA file. Argentine prosecutor Alberto Nisman based his 2006 warrant for the arrest of top Iranian officials in the bombing of a Jewish community center in Buenos Aires in 1994 on the claims of representatives of the armed Iranian opposition Mujahedin E Khalq (MEK), the full text of the document reveals, Garth Porter wrote. [4]

As an investigative journalist and a historian, notifying the MKO’s terrorist background, Porter suggests, “the document, recently available in English for the first time, shows that his only sources for the claim were representatives of the MEK or People’s Mujahideen of Iran.” [5]

As well as Al Jazeera, Porter believes that the repetitious claims and unfounded testimonies of MKO affiliated witnesses in Nisman’s arrest warrant just help the propaganda against Iranian government continue. Porter writes, “Nisman’s rambling and repetitious report cites statements by four members of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), which is the political arm of the MEK, as the sources for the charge that Iran decided on the AMIA bombing in August 1993.” [6]

Although Nisman called his MKO witnesses as “completely truthful”, Gareth Porter criticizes his arrest warrant for lacking any evidence or reason to believe that any of the MKO members were in a position to have known about the high-level meeting between Iranian officials for the so-called plot against AMIA.

Considering Nisman as “pro-Israel, anti-Iran” political figure, Porter believed that the special prosecutor’s “readiness to base the crucial accusation against Iran in the AMIA case solely on MEK sources and his denial of their obvious unreliability highlights the fact that he has been playing a political role on behalf of certain powerful interests rather than uncovering the facts.” [7]

This fact is highly supported by the reports on the MKO-Israeli cooperation to launch propaganda about the Iranian nuclear program and their joint operations to assassinate the Iranian nuclear scientists. It seems that the evil alliance between MKO and Israel is just getting more and more ostensible.

 Mazda Parsi

 Sources:

[1] Fernandez, Belen, The mysterious ‘martyrdom’ of Alberto Nisman, Al Jazeera, 28 Jan 2015

[2] ibid

[3] ibid

[4] Porter, Gareth, Indictment of Iran for ’94 Terror Bombing Relied on MEK, IPS, Aug 7 2013

[5] ibid

[6] ibid

[7] ibid

February 4, 2015 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Albania

Mr. Razaghi Open letter to Ambassador Dritan Tola of Albania

Dear Excellency,

I am Mohammad Razaghi. I have been a member of the Mojahedin Khalq (Rajavi cult) for about 20 years, spending the best years of my life in the military camps of Saddam Hussein and Massoud Rajavi under conditions of brainwashing and physical abuse. I can say from first-hand experience that Massoud Rajavi and Maryam Rajavi have created a new version of slavery in the camps which were gifted to them by Saddam Hussain, and have used the enslaved members for purely personal benefit.

We were imprisoned at their hands in their camps. Massoud and Maryam Rajavi were personally responsible for creating the rules and regulations, and these ‘laws’ were implemented by their henchmen against us. Unfortunately now even after the fall of the dictator of Iraq, Saddam, this practice is still ongoing. The enslaved hostages are not allowed to move freely and walk out of the camp (now Camp Liberty). They are not allowed to send or receive mails or emails to and from their families and friends.

The so-called ‘members’ are not allowed to talk about their problems. All they are allowed to say is what has been dictated by the leaders. They are forced to repeat this and not to say anything else.

Inside the cult, men and women are not allowed to have any normal human relationship with each other. On the other hand, private conversations between even two men or two women are forbidden and can be seen as “plotting” by the leaders and hence punishable.

Members have no right to decide for their own future and the leaders choose everything, even things like what they should eat, drink or wear, etc.

Dear Ambassador Tola,

I thank you and the government of Albania for your humanitarian efforts in accepting some of the members of this organisation which has removed these people away from the dangers of remaining in Iraq. Your government has demonstrated its commitment to human rights by taking this important step to save to lives of these unfortunate people.

But what we hear from Tirana is somehow disturbing. We hear that Maryam Rajavi is sending her top known agents from Paris and these agents, who are from her ‘Leadership Council’, are now trying to control the lives of the recently arrived people as they did in the Iraqi camps. The pressure on these survivors of Camp Liberty who are now in your country is constant.

The Rajavi cult leaders threaten the newly arrived people and do not let them come out of the camp so they are now still fully under cult control in Albania. People have to ask for permission and with acceptable reasons to get exit visas from the commanders.

Some of the well-known torturers of Saddam’s Private Army (MKO) like Hassan Ezati (aka Nariman) or Mokhtar Janat Sadeghi (aka Mokhtar) or Hooshang Doodkani, have now been sent to Albania. These people are trained by Saddam’s forces and are now using their expertise to make the newly arrived people to submit the leaders’ demands.

The names of some of the people who have lost their lives under torture in the prisons of Saddam and Rajavi at the hands of these henchmen are:

Gharban ali Torabi Killed under torture

Jalil Bozorgmehr killed under torture

Parviz Ahmadin killed under torture

Dear Ambassador Tola,

I am not the only victim of torture carried out on the direct order of Massoud and Maryam Rajavi in Saddam’s camps and at the hands of these torturers who are now stationed in Albania. I am asking you to allow us to attend a court of law in your country to present our claims and allow us to seek justice.

While I was imprisoned on the direct order of Rajavi, I also witnessed the torture and murder of others in these cells. I would like to have the opportunity to provide witness statements about these crimes.

I would also like to warn your government that this cult is certainly capable of ordering its members under the influence of drugs as well as brainwashing to carry out self-immolation or to burn others – as they demonstrated clearly in the streets of European capitals in 2003 where some of them lost their lives and several others were left permanently scarred and disabled.

I would also like to warn you that some of these people now in your county have received high level training in explosives from Saddam’s Republican Guards.

Dear Ambassador Tola,

I believe that the only solution to these threats is not to allow the cult leaders to continue keeping their hold on these people. (At the simplest level they keeping control of them by paying 500 dollars per month in exchange for their cooperation.) Otherwise you will face having a dangerous cult take root in your country.

I would like to say that I and my other friends with similar experiences are ready to give evidence in a court of law.

Yours sincerely,

Mohammad Razaghi

France

Cc

Interior Ministry of Albania

Foreign Ministry of Albania

Albanian Refuge Centre

UNHCR in Tirana

February 3, 2015 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Former members of the MEK

Reza Rajabzade among Mazandarani families of MKO hostages

Reza Rajabzade was prisoner of war when the Mujahedin Khalq destructive cult brainwashed and deceived him into joining the Cult. After a while when Reza understood the deceitful substance of the group, they kept him within the group by threat and violence.

Mr. Reza Rajabzade managed to escape the cult after about 28 years of being enslaved within the Cult. Reza who was separated from his family during all these years, having no news of them, now tries to help families of those who are still behind the bars of the Cult to liberate their beloved family members.

Mr. Rajabzade lives in Guilan. the photos belong to his meeting with families who are members of NejatNGO Mazandaran branch.

Reza Rajabzade among Mazandarani families of MKO hostages
Reza Rajabzade among Mazandarani families of MKO hostages
Reza Rajabzade among Mazandarani families of MKO hostages
Reza Rajabzade among Mazandarani families of MKO hostages
Reza Rajabzade among Mazandarani families of MKO hostages
Reza Rajabzade among Mazandarani families of MKO hostages
Reza Rajabzade among Mazandarani families of MKO hostages

February 2, 2015 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Missions of Nejat Society

Rajabzade, MKO ex-member meets families of ex-comrades

Reza Rajabzade was prisoner of war when the Mujahedin Khalq destructive cult brainwashed and deceived him into joining the Cult. After a while when Reza understood the deceitful substance of the group, they kept him within the group by threat and violence.

Mr. Reza Rajabzade managed to escape the cult after about 28 years of being enslaved within the Cult. Reza who was separated from his family during all these years, having no news of them, now tries to help families of those who are still behind the bars of the Cult to liberate their beloved family members.

Mr. Rajabzade lives in Guilan. the photo belongs to his meeting with families who are members of NejatNGO Mazandaran branch.

Reza Rajabzade among Nejat families of Mazandaran branch

February 1, 2015 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Maryam Rajavi

Maryam Rajavi – Cheerleader for Israel

The Mojahedin Khalq’s exclusively Western backers and admirers like to present themselves as totally unaware that the terrorist cult and its leaders Massoud and Maryam Rajavi are held in absolute contempt and

are regularly ridiculed by all Iranians – outside and inside of Iran – except for a few hundred of their brainwashed followers.

Perhaps it is this astounding – or practiced – ignorance which allows the Council of Europe to allow use of their buildings as a platform to introduce Maryam Rajavi as an ‘Iranian opposition leader’ who speaks as some kind of expert on the danger of only one specific source of terrorism while at the same time, without any sense of irony, she demands that the Americans re-arm her own illegal terrorist group in Iraq. Clearly she says what the Europeans want to hear or they wouldn’t invite her to speak. (In English she claims that the reason Daesh (ISIS) exists at all is because the Islamic Republic of Iran managed to repress the remnants of Saddam Hussein’s regime – Saddamists – and deny them power in Iraq. In Farsi she blames America for killing Saddam Hussein and praises Daesh (ISIS) as ‘tribal revolutionaries’.)

Still it cannot be established whether all her eager hosts are aware of Maryam Rajavi’s long dark history of terrorism – cunningly masked apparently by a skirt and a grin. Nor whether they know, or care, that even last month she not only spoke out in support of Daesh (ISIS), but threatened to assassinate her critics in Europe as well.

(Interestingly, the only outlets which covered this meeting are some far right newspapers in Iran which cited it as further evidence to dismiss Western claims to be fighting terrorism.)

For the rest of us, it is no longer necessary to listen to Rajavi speak to know what she is saying because her basic repeated message is identical to that of Israel’s PM, Netanyahu. That is: ‘Iran is the West’s number one enemy; don’t talk with Iran; only bomb Iran’.

Meanwhile in Washington, Rajavi’s henchman Ali Safavi – who is also culpable for terrorist crimes – has also been wheeled out for the same purpose: to say to a Western audience that ‘in order to show support for Israel you have to bomb Iran’. Safavi sets the scene with a bit of scaremongering to get the word nuclear in: Iran’s long-range missiles are super threatening “whether they are nuclear or not”! Before dismissing Iran’s missile capacity as irrelevant because Iran is just very, very threatening.

Unfortunately he doesn’t go on to explain how, as Rajavi demands, giving small arms to the sick and needy former MEK combatants – currently being held incommunicado by their own leadership in the MEK’s camp in Iraq – will help stave off this dire threat. Even Israel with all its weaponry now finds Iran too strong to bomb and must be satisfied with attempts to slow down rather than prevent Iran from becoming the next major regional power.

Parading this deeply unpopular and defunct terrorist group to convey a defunct message demonstrates that Israel is scraping around the bottom of an empty tool box. Instead of a screwdriver Netanyahu found a hairbrush, and is wielding that in the hopes somebody somewhere will take the MEK and their flaky representatives seriously.

When none of the protagonists have any principles or morals, there will inevitably be negative repercussions. Europe and America have yet to see how damaging these kinds of shows are for their national interests.

January 31, 2015 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Iran Interlink Weekly Digest

Iran-Interlink Weekly Digest – 83

++ Internal critic Esmail Vafa Yaghmaei wrote to expose the MEK’s deception of an English activist and friend Belinda McKenzie. The MEK took money from her through unethical influence after persuading her to re-mortgage her house and hand over around £300,000 which they promised would be repaid “after the overthrow of the Iranian regime”. Yaghmaei tells the MEK he will sue if they don’t return her money now. The MEK responded through the NCRI to say ‘these are the actions of the Iranian Intelligence Ministry’, and accused Yaghmaei and McKenzie of being part of a conspiracy to start a new court case against the MEK.

(There is an ongoing, unrelated court case in Paris which accuses the MEK of wrongfully using the name and identity of Zia Abdolrazaghi for money laundry and fraud. The MEK claims this is also being pursued by Iran’s Intelligence Ministry.)

The MEK also published tens of receipts and cheques made out to Yaghmaei and two other former NCRI members, Karim Ghassim and Mohammad Reza Rowhani, saying they have received thousands of pounds from the NCRI, but with no further explanation. The MEK admits it took McKenzie’s money but said it agreed to pay this back after the MEK “topples the Iranian regime”. The MEK also offered a veiled threat by accusing McKenzie of having worked with Iran Aid charity – which was closed by the Charity Commission – with the implication that she had been involved in its wrongdoing [money laundry].

Yaghmaei responded to the MEK/NCRI saying “the receipts and cheques were for the rent of an apartment which I shared with one of your MEK members. At the same time we gave our social security payments to you.” He adds sarcastically, “those payments were for a few thousand French Franks in those times. Now suddenly you say you have paid me hundreds of thousands of Euros, yet offer no evidence and no explanation; what would I possibly do for you for this amount of money?” He finishes with a dig; “Anyway, what is the source of your money, and have you paid tax on it in France?”

In Farsi sites the main reaction to this exchange was that “here is an admission of guilt by the MEK that Iran Aid was a fraudulent charity”. Some comments point out that “you clearly fooled this English woman into giving money and now won’t pay her back”. On the other hand it is clear the MEK/NCRI have to pay people for their support. But “how can lobbyists and other people trust you if you give them money then publish the receipts on your website”.

++ Jahangir Shadanlou, a prominent opposition figure residing in Paris, was interviewed by Simaye Rahai TV channel. The first half of the programme was devoted to broadcasting in full an MEK video posted on Youtube about what it calls ‘The Pentagon Report’. Following this, Shadanlou dissected the film revealing that the outrageous allegations made by the MEK were withdrawn after only a few days so that such a report does not exist beyond a PDF created by the MEK itself. Yet, the MEK continue to reference it in attacks on critics as an official Pentagon document. Shadanlou likens this action to the book produced for Yves Bonnet which a court ordered to be withdrawn following a libel case. The book is no longer published but the MEK continue to reference it. The MEK method, he says, is to “repeat a lie until it sounds like the truth. In fact, insisting on repeatedly telling lies means they have no truth to tell.” Shadanlou says the video “is an insult to the intelligence of the public. They think everyone is as dumb as their own members. They can neither tell the truth, nor can they make programmes.”

++ This week Maryam Rajavi worked along three clear lines: pursuit of the anti-Iran attacks designed to disrupt the nuclear negotiations and encourage war against Iran; going into overdrive to praise the late King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia as a moderate and saviour of the region [After Israelis, Saudis have been among the major sponsors of the MEK over the years]; demanding to be re-armed by the Americans while vigorously glorifying an armed robber as a political dissident. This latter propaganda stunt concerns the execution of a criminal in Iran who, along with two others had attempted to rob a jewellery shop. Two robbers were killed at the scene in a shootout with police in which several police and the shop owner were also killed. The third robber was tried and convicted and sentenced to death for his part in the crime. MEK propaganda however glorifies him as ’a political activist who had led an armed uprising against the Iranian regime’.

++ Maryam Rajavi’s reaction to the death of King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia has been widely ridiculed. One article states ‘we have condolences and we have condolences’. The article points out that the whole world has criticised Western heads of state for paying their obsequious condolences, but look at Maryam Rajavi, she is ten times worse than them. Some critics used the context of women’s rights to comment. They reveal that Rajavi’s people are busy gathering MPs and MEPs to be paid to attend a rally in Berlin on 7th March to commemorate International Women’s Day on 8th March. The MEK’s method is to use pseudonyms to send people to parliament to canvass and recruit, particularly among Eastern European country MPs who may not have historical savvy about the MEK. Anyone who responds positively is next contacted with the offer of money to attend the rally but on no account do they mention that Maryam Rajavi will be there as she is too toxic. Some former MEK members based in Germany wrote to warn their government about the Berlin rally. They say that Rajavi is using the rally as a pretext to leave France and take up residence in Germany. Other comments particularly from women say ‘How dare you presume to talk about women’s rights in Berlin while praising King Abduallah, one of the most misogynist of men who had so many wives and headed the only country in the world in which women are not allowed to drive.’

In English:

++ Anne Khodabandeh in Iran-Interlink wrote to alert Albanian authorities of the need to protect the new arrivals from Camp Liberty: “Albania’s efforts to improve its human rights and bring them into line with European and international standards could be seriously undermined if it does not take action to curtail the activities of the terrorist Mojahedin Khalq cult organisation in that country. There is strong evidence that the MEK has bought land and property just outside Tirana in order to create a closed cult enclave similar to ones in Iraq, and that it is using coercion to keep refugees captive there where they are subject to systematic human rights abuses outside the supervision of the Albanian authorities.”

++ Press TV reported on Argentinian President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner’s rejection of allegations that prosecutor Nisman committed suicide. “I’m convinced that it was not suicide,” said the president in a statement posted on her Facebook page. Nisman’s death happened hours before he was to testify in a congressional hearing about AMIA. The “real move against the government was the prosecutor’s death… They used him while he was alive and then they needed him dead. It is that sad and terrible,” Iran-Interlink expanded on this with an article by Gareth Porter which revealed that “Nisman’s rambling and repetitious report cites statements by four members of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), which is the political arm of the MEK, as the sources for the charge that Iran decided on the AMIA bombing in August 1993.” Apparently this was his only source for accusing Iran of involvement in the incident.

++ Former MEK member and outspoken critic Mohammad Karami, who is resident in France, wrote an Open Letter to President Hollande asking for guarantees of safety for himself and other MEK critics. This follows renewed calls by MEK leader Massoud Rajavi for his followers to kill all his critics in Europe whenever and wherever they can.

++ Iran-Interlink issued a bit of a rant to waken up complacent Europeans who it says are yet to see the damage to their national interests by allowing Maryam Rajavi to appear in the Council of Europe buildings ‘cheerleading’ for Israel. “Parading this deeply unpopular and defunct terrorist group to convey a defunct message demonstrates that Israel is scraping around the bottom of an empty tool box. Instead of a screwdriver Netanyahu found a hairbrush, and is wielding that in the hopes somebody somewhere will take the MEK and their flaky representatives seriously. When none of the protagonists have any principles or morals, there will inevitably be negative repercussions. Europe and America have yet to see how damaging these kinds of shows are for their national interests.”

January 30, 2015

January 31, 2015 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Camp Liberty

Six Camp Liberty residents escaped MKO Cult

Six Camp Liberty (Temporary Transit Location) residents have managed to run away the Camp and handed over themselves to the Iraqi police, Mohammad Karami- the MKO ex-member reported on his blog.

Following the Massoud Rajavi’s last message, internal brainwashing meetings and torturous rules has escalated and hence the dissatisfaction has increased within the members.

The cult leaders coerce members to sign different forms of obligations, the report reads.

January 29, 2015 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Recent Posts

  • The black box of the torture camps of the MEK

    December 24, 2025
  • Pregnancy was taboo in the MEK

    December 22, 2025
  • MEPs who lack awareness about the MEK’s nature

    December 20, 2025
  • Why did Massoud Rajavi enforce divorces in the MEK?

    December 15, 2025
  • Massoud Rajavi and widespread sexual abuse of female members

    December 10, 2025
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Youtube

© 2003 - 2025 NEJAT Society . All Rights Reserved. NejatNGO.org


Back To Top
Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip