Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip
Nejat Society
Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip
© 2003 - 2024 NEJAT Society. nejatngo.org
Iran Interlink Weekly Digest

Iran Interlink Weekly Digest – 78

++ The main focus of Farsi outlets this week has been reaction to the MEK’s threats against critics and former members. The MEK has been in overdrive in the last two weeks following Massoud Rajavi’s order to kill them. This has already led to many physical and verbal threats and intimidation, particularly in France where the MEK now has its main base. Many writers responded by holding France responsible for any trouble rather than the MEK itself, since France hosts the group which is known to promote and use violence. According to many, the recent dropping of the legal case against MEK second-in-command Maryam Rajavi and around 80 of her cohorts has acted as a green light for the group. The MEK now specifically wants to assassinate those who were witnesses in the court case against Rajavi and the others. These people point out they were summoned as witnesses and it is now incumbent on France to protect them. The MEK’s Farsi paper carries an order directly from Rajavi to kill Massoud Khodabandeh. Khodabandeh points out “this is to frighten the recent arrivals from Camp Liberty and stop them from exposing further crimes of the MEK leaders. The real problem is that the French Judiciary is weak in front of Mossad and other MEK backers. But if anything happens to anyone we all know that France is responsible as it hosts the group.”

++ Jahangir Shadanlou has headed an appeal against the decision to drop the court case. In an interview with Rahai TV, Shadanlou said: “Their threats are not new. The MEK have always tried to kill if they can, and if they can’t kill they character assassinate people to the extent of publishing books and reports against them. They will even pay people like Yves Bonnet to write a book. We took him to court for libel and he lost the case. Other incidents like the FIAP knife attacks reveal the MEK’s violent nature. If France doesn’t stop them, this kind of thing can happen anywhere in Europe. The ridiculous dropping of the court case has been taken by MEK as a green light to kill critics as they used to do in Iraq.”

++ An article by Minoo Sepher, a prominent writer, says the only way for the Americans and the French to clear themselves of accusations of supporting terrorism and operating double standards, is to extradite Massoud and Maryam Rajavi to Iran to stand trial for their crimes in an open court.

++ Now the list of new arrivals in Tirana from Camp Liberty is known, many families are trying to establish contact with their loved ones. They have resorted to leaving notices around the area frequented by the refugees with their names and phone numbers. The families have been prevented from contacting their loved ones by the MEK, so they have asked them to make the first contact instead. According to a report by Ebrahim Khodabandeh [in last week’s Weekly Digest] the MEK have created closed camps in Tirana to which they take the arrivals and have re-created the cult conditions which were so destructive in the Iraqi camps.

In English:

++ Nejat Association reported on the participation of Maryam Sanjabi and Ebrahim Khodabandeh in the International Conference on ‘World Against Violence and Extremism’ (WAVE). Held in Tehran by the Institute of Political and International Studies (IPIS) on 9-10 Dec. 2014, the conference enabled hundreds of delegations from 53 countries around the world to share information and views on militarism, terrorism and other forms of violence. During the conference, Sanjabi and Khodabandeh, who represented hundreds of families of residents in Camp Liberty, were able to brief the participants about the latest situation of Rajavi’s mind manipulating destructive cult (MKO) and the need to establish contact between those trapped in Camp Liberty in Iraq in the hands of Rajavi, and their suffering families. In all cases, without exception, the addressees approved the necessity for this basic right to be fulfilled and made promises that they would do everything possible in their capacity to help this human rights issue which is the result of the whim of a violent extremist leader of a cult.

++ An article by Gareth Porter published in Consortium News talks about ‘How the Iran-Nuke Crisis Was Hyped’. In an interview with Porter, former IAEA Director General Han Blix, “said he has long been skeptical of intelligence that has been used to accuse Iraq and Iran of having active nuclear-weapons programs.” According to Porter “a prized weapon in the U.S. geopolitical arsenal is “information warfare,” the ability to promote false or misleading information to heighten the pressure on an adversary, often using supposedly neutral UN agencies as a front, as may have happened on Iran’s nuclear program.”

“The provenance of the largest part of the intelligence documents — the so-called “laptop documents” — was an unresolved question for years after they were first reported in 2004 and 2005. But former senior German foreign office official Karsten Voigt confirmed in 2013 that the Iranian exile opposition group, the Mujahedeen E-Khalq (MEK), gave the original set of documents to the German intelligence service (BND) in 2004.”

“The MEK has been reported by Seymour Hersh, Connie Bruck, and a popular history of the Mossad’s covert operations to have been a client of Israel’s foreign intelligence agency, the Mossad, serving to “launder” intelligence that Mossad did not want to have attributed to Israel.”

++ Mazda Parsi in Nejat Bloggers says the Mojahedin “Adore Hypocrisy on Human Rights”. The article points out that whenever the UN passes a resolution to condemn human rights in the IRI, this gives fuel to the MEK propaganda machine, despite its own horrendous human rights record.

In November, Parsi says, “Dr. Ismail Salami wrote in Global Research: “The not-very-independent UN body has made a mockery of justice by soldering a resolution on the so-called human rights violations in Iran.” He suggests that the double standard over human rights has led the UN to ignore severe violation of human rights by some countries like Israel.”

The article continues, “While the UN ignores serious violation of human rights in Gaza, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and particularly in camps of the cult-like MKO, the Australian Government maintains the MKO and its affiliates in its consolidated [terrorism] list updated on December 15th, 2014.” In spite of this, “although the cult leader Mrayam Rajavi vainly tries to wear the mask of humanity by laying flowers at the floral memorial of the victims of the incident in Sydney, the history will never forget the atrocities of the Cult leaders toward its own members, and the victims’ memories will be always alive.”

++ Another article by Mazda Parsi in Nejat Bloggers talks about the MEK’s propaganda campaign to manipulate American hardliners on the issue of the nuclear negotiations.

December 28, 2014 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mujahedin Khalq Organization's Propaganda System

MKO propaganda to manipulate US hardliners

Last month’s extension of the nuclear talks between Iran and the West provoked American hardliners and warmongers who were already manipulated by the Mujahedi khalq Organization (the MKO). For instance Senator Roy Blunt (R-MO) –who is on the payroll of the MKO propaganda arm—has allegedly said it is "incredibly bad judgment to continue to extend the talks going on with Iran as they continue to do exactly the things we would not want them to be doing."

Another MKO sponsor is John Bolton, former American ambassador at the UN who is a prominent warmonger figure. According to an MKO-linked website, Bolton warned, "Verification does not make a bad deal a good deal. Verification is simply insurance when you think you’ve reached an acceptable agreement to protect against the risk of violation."

“In the war of words on Iran’s domestic issues and controversial nuclear program, the Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK) always is front and center to condemn the country”, wrote Holly Dagres in the Huffington Post . “Through social media, the group spams most Iran-related hashtags with their propaganda, bankroll prominent U.S. officials to advocate on their behalf as the "democratic alternative" to the Islamic Republic of Iran, and even re-opened an office a block from the White House where they hired former Senator Robert Torricelli (D-N.J.) as their legal representative.”

Dagres truly criticizes the US paid advocates of the Cult of Rajavi who seem to be fooled by its propaganda campaign and its multi-million dollar lobbying efforts.  “What makes this realization peculiar is the very people in Congress that cozy up to the group’s leader, Maryam Rajavi, by calling for staunch sanctions–sometimes even war–on Iran due to its nuclear program and particularly human rights violations, seem to turn a blind eye to the activities of the totalitarian cult of Marxist-Islamist Iranian dissidents we know today as the MEK.”

The American- Iranian analyst and commentator of the Middle East affairs warns about the true cult-like substance of the MKO. “Maryam Rajavi’s marriage to one of the original founders of the MEK symbolized the transformation from an organization to a "cult of personality", she points out." With the money provided by Iraqi President Saddam Hussein–they formed an alliance due to a deep disdain for the Iranian regime–to "construct self-sufficient camps" which included: medical clinics, prisons (also known as "reeducation centers"), schools, and training centers, in order for the population not to engage with outside society.”

On the one hand, that MKO propaganda website, the so-called IACA, quotes from Senator Joseph Lieberman as praising Maryam Rajavi and her cult of personality. The biased report reads, “Speaking to the Iranian opposition and the 10-point plan for the future of Iran as articulated by Mrs. Maryam Rajavi, Senator Lieberman said, "You are frontline troops in the fight against radical Islam. You represent the alternative. You’re part of the hope for the future." (!)

On the other hand, Dagres disputes the duplicity of the group’s and its supporters’ claims about the MKO as an alternative to the Iranian government.  “Not only has the Mojahedin-e Khalq lost its support because of its alliance with Saddam during the Iran-Iraq War of the 1980s–an insult to the Iranian people’s nationalism–but also for its position against Iran’s nuclear program, something the average Iranian sees as their legitimate right. Many Iranians convey the group is "worse than the mullahs" or along the lines of what some Iranian democracy activists claim that "if it had had the chance, [the MEK] could have become the Khmer Rouge of Iran", she notes.

Dagres accurately suggests that the MKO is actually “a sham” that is brainwashing not only its own members but also its blind US sponsors.

Mazda Parsi

December 27, 2014 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Human Rights Abuse in the MEK

The MKO Adore Hypocrisy on Human Rights

From time to time, the UN issues a resolution condemning violation of human rights in Iran. This makes the Mujahedin khalq Organization to get some fuel to run its propaganda machine against the Islamic Republic despite its own horrendous human rights record.The MKO Adore Hypocrisy on Human Rights

The self-claimed president of the group, Maryam Rajavi uses this opportunity to describe the 61st resolution adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on December 18, 2014, “as another decisive document on illegitimacy of having economic and political relationship with the ruling clerical regime in Iran.”

Prior to the recent resolution, in November Dr. Ismail Salami wrote on the Global Research, “The not-very-independent UN body has made a mockery of justice by soldering a resolution on the so-called human rights violations in Iran.” He suggests that the double standard over human rights has led the UN to ignore severe violation of human rights by some countries like Israel. [1]

Dr Salimi considers Canada — one of the main sponsors of Israel—behind the resolution against Iran. In May 2014, Canadian Liberal MP Irwin Cotler who served as the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada from 2003 until 2006 embarked on a series of programs known as Iran Accountability Weeks in which they heard  “testimonies highlighting Iranian political prisoners and other victims of Iranian human rights abuses.” Among those who testified was the notorious terrorist MKO leader Maryam Rajavi accompanied by a UN rights official and pundits from a hawkish American think tank. [2]

To comprehend the link between the two sides of the Canadian campaign of advocate both the MKO and Israel, it is worth to read Gareth Porter’s piece on the Middle East Eye that once more exposes warm relationship between the MKO and Israel.

Porter explains how the propaganda against the Iranian nuclear program was first fabricated by Israel and then handed over to the MKO. ” We now know that the documents did not come from an Iranian participant in the alleged project, as the media were led to believe for years; they were turned over to German intelligence by the anti-regime Iranian terrorist organization, Mujahedeen E Khalq, (MEK)” , He writes.” I first reported this in 2008 and have now confirmed from an authoritative German source in my book on the Iran nuclear issue. The MEK was well known to have been a client of the Mossad, serving to launder Israeli intelligence claims that the Israelis did not want attributed to themselves.” [3]

The MKO-Israeli cooperation is not restricted to intelligence laundering and spying operations. “Over the past three decades, the MKO has initiated a series of deadly attacks on Iran and the Iranian population and has so far assassinated 12000 Iranians including the nuclear scientists”, writes Dr. Salimi. “It is interesting to note that the assassinations of prominent Iranian characters including the politicians and scientists are basically conducted in cahoots with Israeli Kidon, the assassination unit within Mossad.”[4]

While the UN ignores serious violation of human rights in Gaza, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and particularly in camps of the cult-like MKO, the Australian Government maintains the MKO and its affiliates in its consolidated list updated on December 15th, 2014. This took place a few weeks after the bloody hostage taking in a cafe in the Australian Capital Sydney.

Although the cult leader Mrayam Rajavi vainly tries to wear the mask of humanity by laying flowers at the floral memorial of the victims of the incident in Sydney, the history will never forget the atrocities of the Cult leaders toward its own members, and the victims’ memories will be always alive.

Mazda Parsi

References:

[1] Salami, Ismail, Human Rights and Double Standards: UN Resolution on Iran Mockery of Justice

Global Research, November 21, 2014

[2] ibid

[3] Porter, Gareth, Guess who credits the Mossad with producing the ‘laptop documents?’, Middle East Eye, Thursday 18 December

[4] Salami, Ismail, Human Rights and Double Standards: UN Resolution on Iran Mockery of Justice

Global Research, November 21, 2014

December 25, 2014 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mujahedin Khalq; A proxy force

How the Iran-Nuke Crisis Was Hyped

A prized weapon in the U.S. geopolitical arsenal is “information warfare,” the ability to promote false or misleading information to heighten the pressure on an adversary, often using supposedly neutral UN agencies as a front, as may have happened on Iran’s nuclear program, reports Gareth Porter.

In a critique of the handling of the Iran file by the International Atomic Energy Agency, former IAEA Director General Han Blix has called for greater skepticism about the intelligence documents and reports alleging Iranian nuclear weapons work and warned that they may be used to put diplomatic pressure on Tehran.

In an interview with this writer in his Stockholm apartment late last month, Blix, who headed the IAEA from 1981 to 1997, also criticized the language repeated by the IAEA under its current director general, Yukiya Amano, suggesting that Iran is still under suspicion of undeclared nuclear activity.

Blix, who clashed with U.S. officials when he was head of the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC) on weapons of mass destruction in Iraq from 2000 to 2003, said he has long been skeptical of intelligence that has been used to accuse Iraq and Iran of having active nuclear-weapons programs.

“I’ve often said you have as much disinformation as information” on alleged weaponization efforts in those countries, Blix said.

Referring to the allegations of past Iranian nuclear weapons research that have been published in IAEA reports, Blix said, “Something that worries me is that these accusations that come from foreign intelligence agencies can be utilized by states to keep Iran under suspicion.”

Such allegations, according to Blix, “can be employed as a tactic to keep the state in a suspect light — to keep Iran on the run.” The IAEA, he said, “should be cautious and not allow itself to be drawn into such a tactic.”

Blix warned that compromising the independence of the IAEA by pushing it to embrace unverified intelligence was not in the true interests of those providing the intelligence.

The IAEA Member States providing the intelligence papers to the IAEA “have a long-term interest in an international service that seeks to be independent,” said Blix. “In the Security Council they can pursue their own interest, but the [IAEA] dossier has to be as objective as possible.”

In 2005, the George W. Bush administration gave the IAEA a large cache of documents purporting to derive from a covert Iranian nuclear weapons research and development program from 2001 to 2003. Israel provided a series of documents and intelligence reports on alleged Iranian nuclear weapons work in 2008 and 2009.

Blix’s successor as IAEA director general, Mohamed ElBaradei, recalled in his 2011 memoirs having doubts about the authenticity of both sets of intelligence documents. ElBaradei resisted pressure from the United States and its European allies in 2009 to publish an “annex” to a regular IAEA report based on those unverified documents.

But Amano agreed to do so, and the annex on “possible military dimensions” of the Iranian nuclear program was published in November 2011. During the current negotiations with Iran, the P5+1 (U.S., UK, Russia, China, France plus Germany) has taken the position that Iran must explain the intelligence documents and reports described in the annex.

The provenance of the largest part of the intelligence documents — the so-called “laptop documents” — was an unresolved question for years after they were first reported in 2004 and 2005. But former senior German foreign office official Karsten Voigt confirmed in 2013 that the Iranian exile opposition group, the Mujahedeen E-Khalq (MEK), gave the original set of documents to the German intelligence service (BND) in 2004.

The MEK has been reported by Seymour Hersh, Connie Bruck, and a popular history of the Mossad’s covert operations to have been a client of Israel’s foreign intelligence agency, the Mossad, serving to “launder” intelligence that Mossad did not want to have attributed to Israel.

Blix has been joined by two other former senior IAEA officials in criticizing the agency for its uncritical presentation of the intelligence documents cited in the November 2011 annex. Robert Kelley, the head of the Iraq team under both Blix and ElBaradei, and Tariq Rauf, the former head of the Agency’s Verification and Security Policy Coordination Office, have written that the annex employed “exaggeration, innuendo and careful choice of words” in presenting intelligence information from an unidentified Member State of the IAEA on the alleged cylinder at the Parchin military facility.

Blix said he is “critical” of the IAEA for the boilerplate language used in its reports on Iran that the Agency is “not in a position to provide credible assurances about the absence of undeclared nuclear material and activities….”

Blix added that it is “erroneous” to suggest that the IAEA would be able to provide such assurances if Iran or any other state were more cooperative. As head of UNMOVIC, Blix recalled, “I was always clear that there could always be small things in a big geographical area that can be hidden, and you can never guarantee completely that there are no undeclared activities.”

“In Iraq we didn’t maintain there was nothing,” he said. “We said we had made 700 inspections at 500 sites and we had not seen anything.”

Blix emphasized that he was not questioning the importance of maximizing inspections, or of Iran’s ratification of the Additional Protocol. “I think the more inspections you can perform the smaller the residue of uncertainty,” he said.

Consortium News,

Gareth Porter, an investigative journalist and historian specializing in U.S. “national security” policy and was the recipient of the Gellhorn Prize for journalism in 2012. His latest book is Manufactured Crisis: The Untold Story of the Iran Nuclear Scare. [This article first appeared at LobeLog.]

December 24, 2014 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Australia

The MKO remain on the consolidated list of Australia

The Australian Government updated its consolidated list on December 15th. The Mujahedin Khalq Organization (the MKO) is again in the list.

The consolidated list of Australia is a list of all persons and entities who are subject to targeted financial sanctions or travel bans under Australian sanctions laws.

The list includes the MKO and its affiliates such as National Liberation Army (NLA) and National Council of Resistance (NCR). The list won’t be reviewed until 2016.

http://dfat.gov.au/sanctions/consolidated-list.html

The MKO was on the list of the proscribed terrorist groups of the US and the EU but its multi–million dollar lobbying campaign succeed to delist the group.

As the Australian government took this proper action to maintain the MKO on its consolidated list, it is expected that other Western states follow the same pattern.

The presence of the cut-like MKO  – with its violent background – in the West makes western citizens concerned over its cult-like attitudes such as self- immolations the group members committed in European Capitals following the arrest of their leader Maryam Rajavi by the French Police in June 2003.

Nejat Society translated Aaawa Association report

December 22, 2014 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Iran Interlink Weekly Digest

Iran Interlink Weekly Digest – 77

++ A group of ex-MEK members wrote an open letter to Hassibeh Haj Sahrai, deputy head of Amnesty International. They say that over the years, as AI publishes its statements, they more and more resemble the statements published by the MEK about Iraq. AI appears to be taking a political stance alongside the MEK without having any idea what is happening on the ground there. There is pretended concern about the situation of Camp Liberty but which actually reveals AI has no knowledge about it. For years, former MEK members say, they have been writing to expose human rights abuses inside the MEK, and have repeatedly asked AI to investigate. But AI has shown no interest whatsoever in doing this. The letter asks, ‘is Amnesty International’s Iraq office part of the opposition to the current government of Iraq, and as pro-Saddamist as it appears to be? If so, even as an opponent of the government AI has a responsibility toward the human rights situation in the camp’.

++ Ebrahim Khodabandeh met with Iraq’s Foreign Minister, Ebrahim Jafari in the International Conference on World Against Violence and Extremism (WAVE) in Tehran last week to ask him to help facilitate family visits for residents of Camp Liberty. In extension to this, Khodabandeh wrote an article for Iran Interlink giving up to date news about the MEK in Tirana and Camp Liberty. According to people who contact him directly, the MEK had forced the delay in transferring the latest two groups of Camp Liberty residents to Tirana while they finalised purchases of land and buildings outside the Albanian capital. The MEK subsequently created two closed camps and forcefully took the new arrivals there. The MEK has re-created Camp Ashraf in Albania, with closed doors and the cult system intact and have vowed to make more camps in Europe and elsewhere. The heads of the MEK quote Massoud Rajavi who promised he would make “a thousand Camp Ashrafs”. Having said that, people say that inside these camps the residents are protesting and rioting and fighting back. They are no longer compliant. The MEK commanders are trying to prevent outside interference. They threaten officials of the UNHCR and other agencies; either they can buy people or they threaten they will lose their jobs. Other news says that the MEK have changed the go-between for Paris to Tirana from Hassan Nayebagha, to Mina Rezai (a younger member who has been groomed for this role) because she is less known.

++ While visiting Iran, Iraq’s FM Ebrahim Jafari said in several interviews that getting help from Iran to fight terrorism in his country is natural because Iran is the natural ally of Iraq. He said the two countries will root out terrorism together.

++ At the time of this week’s session of nuclear negotiations, Maryam Rajavi and her paid lobbyists tried their utmost to somehow make themselves relevant to attract media attention. They came out with all kinds of messages and stances in order to place themselves with the neocons. But this time there was no media coverage at all. It appears the West has given up on them and the MEK has become a burden rather than a useful mercenary force.

++ Maryam Rajavi, desperate to be in news about something, jumped on the bandwagon of the Australian hostage debacle. First she claimed hostage taker Man Haron Monis was “an agent of the Iranian regime”. She then backtracked when this was found to be untrue. Even more ridiculous was sending a delegation to the funerals of the victims to lay a wreath on her behalf, with photographs to advertise this for her websites. The backlash among Farsi commentators hit when everyone started laughing at this. One even joked about being careful the delegation didn’t take some flowers – referencing the incident when MEK officials were caught stealing flowers from graves to take to ornament Maryam Rajavi’s closed camp in Auvers sur Oise outside Paris.

++ Ghalam Iran (Pen Society) challenged Massoud Rajavi. In a recent announcement, Rajavi claims that only seven people have asked to leave Camp Liberty. Ghalam said, “OK. If, in spite of all the pressure you put on people, we accept that seven people have been courageous enough to say they want to leave, you should now tell us who they are. You must name them. We want to know if they will mysteriously end up dead tomorrow, have heart attacks or commit suicide. It is usual for you to kill such people as dissidents. Certainly, the UN officials need to find them and help them before anything bad happens.”

++ In English:

++ An article by Hamid Babaei, head of the Press Office for the Mission of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the UN in New York, published by The Hill, questions why that publication “would make its coveted platform so routinely available to the propaganda of a terrorist cult or its bought off the rack series of front groups and shills”. Babaei asserts that “During the last two years a number of opinion pieces have appeared in The Hill against Iran. These articles serve the interests and are written by the members and affiliates of a terrorist group known as the MEK”, which Babaei argues the State Department has called a “repressive cult despised by most Iranians and Iraqis.”

++ Brian M Downing, a political-military analyst writing in The Asia Times, reviews the current state of the nuclear negotiations. He identifies ways in which Iran has complied with various demands over its peaceful nuclear programme and how the deliberate scuppering of these overtures by America and her allies contributes to a continued perception of threat in Iran. Among these threats, “Israel and the ex-pat Mujahideen-e-Khalq group have assassinated a number of Iranian nuclear scientists, though incidents have diminished owing either to increased security or fewer targets. In October 2014, the nuclear research site at Parchin was rocked by a powerful explosion. Outsiders see these acts simply as efforts to slow down the nuclear program. Iran sees them as a sign of general hostility from outside powers.”

++ Iran Interlink posted an analytical article by Sam Muhho in Global Research titled ‘Terrorism is not a “Threat” to the West. It is a Weapon of the West’. The article has no mention of the MEK, but describes the framework within which the MEK has its Western support.

++ Mazda Parsi writing for Nejat Bloggers lines up Maryam Rajavi with the neocons and Israeli lobby who, “even before the ink dried on the extension agreement in Vienna” were demanding new sanctions on Iran as an attempt to further obstruct the negotiations. Parsi points out however that Maryam Rajavi’s “determination to obstruct nuclear talks and engagement with Iran is not in line with the Iranian people’s longing for independence and security”.

++ Sahar Family Foundation reported on Ebrahim Khodabandeh’s meeting with Iraq’s Foreign Minister, Ebrahim Jafari. Khodabandeh asked him to help facilitate family visits for residents of Camp Liberty. “In this meeting Mr. Jafari emphasized that the MKO is a terrorist cult which has committed many crimes against the people of Iraq and confirmed that it is the wish of all factions and tendencies that they should leave the country and that their leaders be prosecuted. He said that preventing the families from visiting their relatives shows by itself the nature of the leaders of this group.”

++ A detailed article by Gareth Porter in Middle East Eye vindicates the findings of his book Manufactured Crisis, that at least some of the so-called ‘laptop documents’ came from Mossad “using the Iranian opposition as a hopefully credible source” to front these revelations.

December 19, 2014

December 22, 2014 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Former members of the MEK

Khodabandeh asks Iraq’s FM to facilitate family visits for Liberty residents

The Tehran Centre of Nejat Society reported that Maryam Sanjabi and Ebrahim Khodabandeh, former members of the Mojahedin-e Khalq Organization (MKO, aka Rajavi Cult) participated in the International Conference on World Against Violence and Extremism (WAVE) in Tehran on 9-10 Dec. 2014. During this conference, Ebrahim Khodabandeh had an opportunity to speak with Iraq’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ebrahim Jafari. Khodabandeh talked about the problems faced by the families who wish to visit their loved ones in Camp Liberty in Iraq, but who are denied that right by the MKO cult leader Massoud Rajavi.

Nejat Society’s report states that “over the two days of the conference, Sanjabi and Khodabandeh spoke to participants to give a brief report about the latest situation of Rajavi’s mind manipulating destructive cult (MKO). They emphasized the need to establish contact between the individuals trapped in Camp Liberty in Iraq in the hands of Rajavi, and their suffering families. In all cases, without exception, the addressees approved the necessity for this basic right to be fulfilled and made promises that they would do everything possible in their capacity to help this human rights issue which is the result of the whim of a violent extremist leader of a cult.”

According to the report, “Ebrahim Khodabandeh also met Ebrahim Jafari, Iraq’s Foreign Minister, and delivered to him the pleas of the families who anxiously want to visit their loved ones in Iraq. Mr. Jafari expressed his sympathy with the families and promised to try to help them. In this meeting Mr. Jafari emphasized that the MKO is a terrorist cult which has committed many crimes against the people of Iraq and confirmed that it is the wish of all factions and tendencies that they should leave the country and that their leaders be prosecuted. He said that preventing the families from visiting their relatives shows by itself the nature of the leaders of this group.”

Sahar Family Foundation, which represents the suffering families of MKO members trapped in Camp Liberty in Iraq, wishes to thank Ms. Sanjabi and Mr. Khodabandeh, family rights activists, for their efforts and hopes that all those who actively work toward gaining the most basic rights for the families’ success in their good work.

December 20, 2014 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mujahedin Khalq; A proxy force

Guess who credits the Mossad with producing the ‘laptop documents?’

Evidence mounts pointing to the Mossad as the source of dubious claims about Iran’s uranium enrichment program contained in the ‘laptop documents’

In the United States and Europe, it is unchallenged in political and media circles that intelligence documents purporting to be from a covert Iranian nuclear weapons program for which the IAEA long demanded an Iranian explanation are genuine. 

Photo: Benjamin Netanyahu and former Israeli Minister Rafi Eitan (2nd L), who was a member of the Mossad team that captured Adolf Eichmann in Argentina in 1960, look at objects displayed at an exhibition at the Knesset in Jerusalem on 12 December, 2011(AFP)

But evidence has continued to accumulate that the documents – sometimes called the “laptop documents” because they were said to have been on a laptop computer belonging to one of the participants in the program – were fabricated by Israel’s foreign intelligence agency (Mossad).  We now know that the documents did not come from an Iranian participant in the alleged project, as the media were led to believe for years; they were turned over to German intelligence by the anti-regime Iranian terrorist organisation, Mujahedeen E Khalq, (MEK). I first reported this in 2008 and have now confirmed from an authoritative German source in my book on the Iran nuclear issue. The MEK was well known to have been a client of the Mossad, serving to launder Israeli intelligence claims that the Israelis did not want attributed to themselves.

Although it has never been mentioned in news media, former International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General, Mohamed El Baradei recalled in his memoirs that he was doubtful of the authenticity of the documents. “No one knew if any of this was real,” he wrote in reference to the laptop documents. Another former senior IAEA official told me, “It just really didn’t add up.  It made more sense that this information originated in another country.”  And as I have detailed in articles and in my book, key documents in the collection bear clear indications of fabrication.

Support for that virtually unknown part of the Iran nuclear story has come from a surprising source: a popular Israeli account, celebrating the successes of the Mossad’s covert operations. “Mossad: The Greatest Missions of the Israeli Secret Service,” first published in Hebrew in 2010, and then published in English in 2012, was Israel’s best-selling book for months in 2010. But not only does it acknowledge that it was indeed the MEK that delivered the documents, it also suggests that at least some of the documents came from the Mossad. 

The co-authors of the book are far from critics of Israel’s policy toward Iran; One of the co-authors, Michael Bar-Zohar, is a well-connected former member of the Israeli Knesset and former paratrooper, who had previously written an authorised biography of Shimon Peres, as well as the biography of Isser Harel, the Mossad chief who presided over the kidnapping of Adolph Eichmann in Argentina.

Much of what Bar-Zohar chronicled in the book had already been reported earlier by Israeli journalists – especially Ronen Bergman of the daily Yedioth Ahronoth.  In fact, Bergman accused Bar-Zohar of plagiarising his articles for much of the book, while changing only a few words.

But one thing that Bar-Zohar and co-author Nisham Mishal did not get from other Israeli journalists, was the role of the Mossad in regard to the laptop documents.

Although they do not flatly state that the Mossad was the source of the documents, they certainly lead the reader to that conclusion. They begin by establishing the fact that the MEK was fronting for the Mossad in its revelation in August 2002 of Iran’s first enrichment facility at Natanz. The CIA, they write, “appeared to believe that the Mossad and the British MI6 were feeding MEK intelligence they had obtained, using the Iranian opposition as a hopefully credible source”.  And they explicitly confirm CIA’s suspicions. “According to Israeli sources,” they write, “It was, in fact, a watchful Mossad officer who had discovered the mammoth centrifuge installation at Natanz.”

Other sources, including Seymour Hersh and Connie Bruck have reported that the MEK got the intelligence on Natanz from the Israelis, but theirs is the first explicit acknowledgement attributed to an Israeli source that the MEK had revealed Natanz on the basis of Mossad intelligence.  What the Israeli co-authors do not say is that the Mossad was simply guessing at the purpose of Natanz, which the MEK mistakenly called a “fuel fabrication” facility, rather than a centrifuge enrichment facility.

Turning to the laptop documents, they make it clear that western intelligence had indeed obtained the documents from the MEK and suggest that the MEK got them from somewhere else. “The dissidents wouldn’t say how they had gotten hold of the laptop,” they write. They again frame the question of the origins of those documents in terms of CIA suspicions. “[T]he skeptical Americans suspected that the documents had been only recently scanned into the computer,” they write. “They accused the Mossad of having slipped in some information obtained from our own sources – and passing it to the MEK leaders for delivery to the West."

Bar-Zohar and Mishal steer clear of any suggestion that the Mossad fabricated any documents, but their account leaves little doubt that they are convinced that the Mossad should be credited for the appearance of the documents. Their approach of referring to US suspicions, rather than stating it directly, appears to be a way of avoiding problems with Israeli military censors, who often clamp down on local reporting on sensitive issues while allowing references to foreign reports.

The authors further suggest that the Mossad was behind information later released by the MEK on Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, the Iranian physics professor said to be shown in the laptop documents as the man in charge of that purported Iranian nuclear weapons research program. The MEK disclosed such personal details as Fakhrizadeh’s passport number and his home telephone number. But the Mossad chroniclers write: “This abundance of detail and means of transmission leads one to believe that, again, “a certain secret service” ever suspected by the West of pursuing its own agenda, painstakingly collected these facts and figures about the Iranian scientists and passed them to the Iranian resistance.”

I asked Bar-Zohar’s research assistant, Nilly Ovnat, whether he had Israeli sources for those statements relating to the MEK and the laptop documents. She responded by          e-mail: “Professor Bar Zohar had other sources for most of the material concerning MEK and Natanz [and the] laptop, yet they could not be mentioned and cannot be discussed.”

Bar-Zohar and Mishal are little concerned with whether the Mossad’s laptop caper involved fraud or not. They obviously view the Israeli intelligence agency’s use of an Iranian exile group to get out documents that had been central to the international sanctions regime against Iran as a great triumph. But whatever their reasons, their book adds another layer to the growing body of evidence showing that the Bush administration and its allies hoodwinked the rest of the world with those documents.

– Gareth Porter is an independent investigative journalist and historian writing on US national security policy.  His latest book, “Manufactured Crisis: The Untold Story of the Iran Nuclear Scare,” was published in February 2014.

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.

December 20, 2014 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Nejat Publications

Pars Brief – Issue No. 84

Inside this Issue:

  • 115 Liberty residents fly to Albania
  • The MKO remain on the consolidated list of Australia
  • Dear Washington: Kick Out This Iranian Militant Cult
  • Guess who credits the Mossad with producing the ‘laptop documents?’
  • Israeli agents training Mojahedin Khalq terrorists in Jordan: Report

Download Pars Brief – Issue No. 84
Download Pars Brief – Issue No. 84

December 20, 2014 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Former members of the MEK

Sanjabi and Khodabandeh in the Conference on “World Against Violence and Extremism”

Maryam Sanjabi and Ebrahim Khodabandeh Participate in the Conference on “World Against Violence and Extremism”

The International Conference on World Against Violence and Extremism (WAVE) was held in Tehran by the Institute of Political and International Studies (IPIS) on 9-10 Dec. 2014, with the participation of hundreds of delegations from 53 countries around the world.

The Conference was opened on Tuesday Dec. 9 in the Summit Conference Hall with the welcoming remarks of Mohammad Javad Zarif, Minister of Foreign Affairs and the opening remarks of Hassan Rouhani, President of the Islamic Republic of Iran. In the opening session Asif Ali Zardari, former President of Pakistan, Kjell Magne Bondevik, former Prime Minister of Norway, Mohammad Mohaqqeq, Deputy Chief Executive Officer of Afghanistan, and Dominique de Villepin, former Prime Minister of France, also delivered speeches.

The speech makers of the afternoon session included Ebrahim al-Jafari, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Iraq, Walid al-Muallem, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Syria, Adnan Mansour, former Minister of Foreign Affairs and Emigrants of Lebanon, Habib bin Mohammad Alriami, Deputy Foreign Affairs Minister of Oman, Georgios Iacovou, former Minister of Foreign Affairs of Cyprus, Werner Fasslabend, former Minister of Defense of Austria, Budimir Loncar, former Minister of Foreign Affairs of Former Yugoslavia, Ashot Hovakimian, Deputy Foreign Minister of Armenia, Atiqullah Atismal, Acting Foreign Minister of Afghanistan, Teresita Quintos Deles, Ministerial Adviser to the President on Peace Process of Philippines, and Nizomiddin Shamsiddinzoda Zohidi, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Tajikistan.

The various sessions continued on the second day with speeches from personalities such as Kareem Abdullfattah, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Egypt, Esam Alddin Ali Abdullah, Coordinator for Counter Terrorism in the Interior Ministry of Sudan, Thore Ottar Vestby, Mayor for Peace of Norway, Jose Vicente Rangal Avalos, Executive Vice President of Venezuela, Samuel Santos Lopez, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua, Proto-Genes Pinheiro De Queirez, Federal Parliament Member of Brazil, and Abdulhamid Dashti, Chairman of the Human Rights Committee of Kuwait. The final speaker was Dr. Mansoureh Karami, wife of martyred nuclear scientist Massoud Alimohammadi, representing the Association for Defending Victims of Terror in Iran (ADVT). Her attendance and speech were very warmly welcomed by the participants, audience and the media.

Political and executive personalities and diplomats and officials from NGOs from various countries participated in an evening dinner reception hosted by Javad Zarif, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Iran. Maryam Sanjabi, former member of the Leadership Council, and Ebrahim Khodabandeh former official of the International Department of the Mojahedin-e Khalq Organization (MKO, aka Rajavi Cult) participated in the opening session, dinner reception, and most of the fringe meetings of the two day conference and actively spoke with most participants and reporters. They were also interviewed by the Iraqi television network Al-Forat and delivered their points of view about the problems facing the families of Camp Liberty residents in Iraq – who desire to visit their loved ones but are prevented from doing so by MKO leaders – and urged the Iraqi officials responsible for the camp to take immediate action in this regard.

Sanjabi and Khodabandeh, during the two days of the conference while speaking to the participants gave a brief report about the latest situation of Rajavi’s mind manipulating destructive cult (MKO) and emphasized the need to establish contact between those trapped in Camp Liberty in Iraq in the hands of Rajavi, and their suffering families. In all cases, without exception, the addressees approved the necessity for this basic right to be fulfilled and made promises that they would do everything possible in their capacity to help this human rights issue which is the result of the whim of a violent extremist leader of a cult.

Khodabandeh also met with Jean-Marie Guthenno, President of the International Crisis Group, Ali Dabbagh, former Iraqi Government Spokesman, Jan Oberg, Director of Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research of Sweden, Richard Bacon, Member of Parliament of the United Kingdom, Herald Kindermann, German Council of Foreign Relations, Martin Fleischer, Vice President of the East-West Institute of Brussels, Cardinal Theodore Mc Carrick of the USA, Jim Slattery, former Congressman of the USA, and many dignitaries including governmental, non-governmental, international and human rights officials, and briefed them in detail about the Rajavi Cult and the situation of his victims and hostages in Camp Liberty.

Ebrahim Khodabandeh also met Ebrahim Jafari, Iraq’s Foreign Minister, and delivered to him the pleas of the families who anxiously want to visit their loved ones in Iraq. Mr. Jafari expressed his sympathy with the families and promised to try to help them. In this meeting Mr. Jafari emphasized that the MKO is a terrorist cult which has committed many crimes against the people of Iraq and confirmed that it is the wish of all factions and tendencies that they should leave the country and that their leaders be prosecuted. He said that preventing the families from visiting their relatives shows by itself the nature of the leaders of this group.

The Conference ended on the afternoon of Wednesday Dec. 10 with a concluding speech by Mr. Zarif followed by a question and answer session with him.

December 20, 2014 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Recent Posts

  • The black box of the torture camps of the MEK

    December 24, 2025
  • Pregnancy was taboo in the MEK

    December 22, 2025
  • MEPs who lack awareness about the MEK’s nature

    December 20, 2025
  • Why did Massoud Rajavi enforce divorces in the MEK?

    December 15, 2025
  • Massoud Rajavi and widespread sexual abuse of female members

    December 10, 2025
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Youtube

© 2003 - 2025 NEJAT Society . All Rights Reserved. NejatNGO.org


Back To Top
Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip