Open Letter to President Nicolas Sarkozy To President Nicolas Sarkozy Dear Mr. President The Global war on terrorism calls for prompt action against terrorist moves wherever they might threaten people’s peace and tranquillity. For long a blacklisted terrorist group, Mojahedin-e Khalq Organization (MKO), has taken safe haven in your country. Recently, the EU has maintained MKO on its terror list, but simultaneously the group organized a rally in the vicinity of Paris as a show of objection to the decision and demanded to be removed from the list. It is so paradoxical that a banned terrorist group is at the liberty to gather a claimed number of 50,000 supporters at Park De Expositions Villepinte, north of Paris. In spite of the fact that MKO continues to be on the EU list, its activities have neither been restricred nor barred. Such negligence is expected to be legally investigated in your government. Legally adopted countermeasures like that of freezing assets hardly seem to be productive against a terrorist cult that none of its financial sources is legal. Has the coalition forces’ control of MKO Camp Ashraf proved to have contributed to group’s ceasing suspicious terrorist moves and interfering in Iraq’s domestic affairs? In fact, MKO’s unpredictable and circumstantial solution findings to confront a crisis make it a hard task to counteract it by the means of conventional precautionary measures. It is a typical tactic exploited by MKO to take advantage of the escalated political discordances between parties and factions in Western countries to advance its political ambitions. It takes position in the front of any party that it has an iota of hope to advocate the group’s stances whether it considers any political or ideological affinity with the party or not. An evident example can be traced during French presidential campaign when the group enthusiastically campaigned in the favour of the Socialist Party. But now the group has changed position seeing your rival’s defeat. Once more it takes a chance, being disappointed in the past, to provoke your government against Iran to take a hostile position, to halt the process of the June 17th dossier accusing it of terrorist allegations, to demand removal of its name from the French list of terror and consequently, and to unfreeze its assets in France. MKO has proved that it has the potentiality to take advantage of a variety of terrorist leverages and cult-like moves to accomplish its ends. A clear example of such moves is a wave of self-immolations committed by the group’s members in 17 June 2003 following the detention of Maryam Rajavi. Indeed, similar moves can challenge your government as in her 30 June speech Rajavi states that her group’s uses all “means and resources to force the Council to accept the Court ruling and remove the PMOI from the list”. Not paying the least respect for democracy and democratic approaches, MKO takes shelter behind the democratic potentialities practiced in your country as a granted strategy to move on. In fact, it is an organizationally adopted strategy to hypocritically adapt to the political, cultural and social milieu of the country the group chooses to situate a bastion. Once its leaders shook hands with the ousted Saddam and colluded with him against the Iraqi people but now it organizes shows of solidarity with those same victimized people utilized as tools to survive in Iraqi soil. It seems to be for the first time that a globally proscribed terrorist group defiantly challenges the world and impudently engages in political manoeuvres not only in the Western countries but in a country that is located in a region enflamed in turmoil for decades. It is hard to believe that the West can give any justification for the remiss and negligence that might be a result of disregarding to abide by internationally adopted resolutions to combat terrorism. At the present, MKO insidiously attempts in three fronts of Iraq, Europe and America to muster advocates. In the US, in spite of being re-designated as a terrorist group, MKO is creeping into the inconsequential rifts between the Neocons, the Pentagon and the State Department, in the Europe, in spite of being maintained on the EU list of terror, is misleading a number of former political activists or opposition parliamentarians, and in Iraq, despite the Iraqi government decision to expel the group from the country, it colludes with dissident and insurgent groups and factions against the Iraqi legitimate government to intensify the tension in the region so as to secure its stay in Iraq. To what extend MKO achieves success depends on the amount of the cost the West has to sustain. There are evidences that the world never consents to another terrorist phenomenon similar to al-Qaeda, but can the West’s double-dealing concerning MKO can in any way minimize the threat of emerging another al-Qaeda? The cost, for sure, would be much greater for the West to sustain. Currently, MKO’s strategy is aimed at a vast media and propaganda blitz in Iraq and the Europe to provoke the democratic capacities of these countries to show inevitable reactions that ensue from a loose of tolerating the group’s blasphemies. That can be defined as the zero-point where MKO can justifiably apply violent means to defend what it believes to be its democratic rights. The strategy is explicitly put into practice when Maryam Rajavie in her speech flagrantly uses a disrespectful tone whenever addressing the EU Council of Ministers calling them with many names, as it always does when referring to its opponents and critics, and accusing them that their just decision is the outcome of an attempt to appease the Iranian regime. Moreover, she blatantly makes a mockery of the EU’s decision when saying “Nevertheless, the mountains finally labored and they have given birth to a mouse”. Mr. President, It seems that at this juncture a close monitoring of MKO’s run media deem necessary to develop an exactly calculated judgment of MKO’s positions and its long-term objectives concerning your government. The daily publicized maladroitly political positions against Western countries in general, and your government in particular, bear between the lines the existential threats of the organization. Recurrently expressed in MKO leaders’ speech and messages, the group poses an “existential threat” to Iran. It can be considered as a warning posed to whoever sides in a front against MKO and, of course, nobody sides with terrorists. Consequently, a close watch of the group to counteract its terrorist threats before they are put into practice is the least counter-terrorist move your government can conduct to make sure that a prompt decision was made before it was too late Mojahedin.ws – July 8, 2007
Mujahedin Khalq Organization as a terrorist group
The United States Department of the Treasury has published a June 28, 2007 list of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons. This list includes many of the aliases being used by the Rajavi Cult (Pol Pot of Iran). If you can document any financial transactions in any of the following names, please post and report that information.
OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL
SPECIALLY DESIGNATED NATIONALS AND BLOCKED PERSONS
June 28, 2007
(…)
MEK (a.k.a. MKO; a.k.a. MUJAHEDIN-E KHALQ; a.k.a. MUJAHEDIN-E KHALQ ORGANIZATION; a.k.a. MUSLIM IRANIAN STUDEN’S SOCIETY; a.k.a. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF RESISTANCE; a.k.a. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF RESISTANCE (NCR); a.k.a. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF RESISTANCE OF IRAN; a.k.a. NCRI; a.k.a. NLA; a.k.a. ORGANIZATION OF THE PEOPLE’S HOLY WARRIORS OF IRAN; a.k.a. PEOPLE’S MUJAHEDIN ORGANIZATION OF IRAN; a.k.a. PMOI; a.k.a. SAZEMAN-E MUJAHEDIN-E KHALQ-E IRAN; a.k.a. THE NATIONAL LIBERATION ARMY OF IRAN) [FTO] [SDGT] MEK (a.k.a. MKO; a.k.a. MUJAHEDIN-E KHALQ; a.k.a. MUJAHEDIN-E KHALQ ORGANIZATION; a.k.a. MUSLIM IRANIAN STUDENT’S SOCIETY; a.k.a. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF RESISTANCE; a.k.a. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF RESISTANCE (NCR); a.k.a. NLA; a.k.a. ORGANIZATION OF THE PEOPLE’S HOLY WARRIORS OF IRAN; a.k.a. PEOPLE’S MUJAHEDIN ORGANIZATION OF IRAN; a.k.a. PMOI; a.k.a. SAZEMAN-E MUJAHEDIN-E KHALQ-E IRAN; a.k.a. THE NATIONAL LIBERATION ARMY OF IRAN); including its U.S. representative offices and all other offices worldwide [FTO] [SDGT] MEK (a.k.a. MKO; a.k.a. MUJAHEDIN-E KHALQ; a.k.a. MUJAHEDIN-E KHALQ ORGANIZATION; a.k.a. MUSLIM IRANIAN STUDENT’S SOCIETY; a.k.a. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF RESISTANCE; a.k.a. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF RESISTANCE (NCR); a.k.a. NLA; a.k.a. ORGANIZATION OF THE PEOPLE’S HOLY WARRIORS OF IRAN; a.k.a. PEOPLE’S MUJAHEDIN ORGANIZATION OF IRAN; a.k.a. PMOI; a.k.a. SAZEMAN-E MUJAHEDIN-E KHALQ-E IRAN; a.k.a. THE NATIONAL LIBERATION ARMY OF IRAN); including its U.S. press office and all other offices worldwide [FTO] [SDGT] MEK (a.k.a. MKO; a.k.a. MUJAHEDIN-E KHALQ; a.k.a. MUJAHEDIN-E KHALQ ORGANIZATION; a.k.a. MUSLIM IRANIAN STUDENT’S SOCIETY; a.k.a. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF RESISTANCE; a.k.a. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF RESISTANCE (NCR); a.k.a. NLA; a.k.a. ORGANIZATION OF THE PEOPLE’S HOLY WARRIORS OF IRAN; a.k.a. PEOPLE’S MUJAHEDIN ORGANIZATION OF IRAN; a.k.a. PMOI; a.k.a. SAZEMAN-E MUJAHEDIN-E KHALQ-E IRAN; a.k.a. THE NATIONAL LIBERATION ARMY OF IRAN); including its U.S. press office and all other offices worldwide [FTO] [SDGT]
http://www.treas.gov/offices/enforcement/ofac/sdn/t11sdn.pdf
Link to the Office of Foreign Assets Control:
http://www.treas.gov/offices/enforcement/ofac/
The State Department Office of Coordinator for Counterterrorism on April 30 released the list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations in which Muajhedin-e-Khalq Organization continues to occupy its previous status according to the documented reasons ,you will consider the main points as follow:
-MKO is a violent organization, responsible for the assassination of several American military personnel and civilians in the 1970’s (MKO terrorized American consultants in Tehran)
-The US confirms that MEK leadership and members across the world maintain the capacity and will to commit terrorist acts in Europe, the Middle East, the United States, Canada and beyond.
-MEK had been one of the most violent movements opposed to Pahlavi Dynasty and its close relationship to the United States (fighting America was along with their fight against Imperialism and appeasement of communism )
– The US considers MEK’s ideology has gone through several iterations and blends Marxism, Islam and Fenatism.
-The group has launched its world wide champagne against Iranian government leading its terror operations from Iraq and Europe.
-Activity in order to solicit financial and social aid in Europe (Money Laundering)
-MKO has terrorist capacity and cult-like characteristics.( the report has pointed to brainwashing, forced divorces, separating the parents from the children and weekly meetings)
-Maryam Rajavi has established a “Cult of Personality” she claims to be the “Iranian President in Exile”.
-MKO’s hostility against Iran under Saddam Hussein’s sponsorship.
-bombing against central office of Islamic Republic Party and Prime Minister’s office (1981)
-MEK continued to wage its terrorist champagne from its headquarters in Paris (1981-1986)
-MEK leaders turned to Saddam Hussein’s regime for basing, financial support, and training.(1986)
-Heavy suicidal, military, terrorist attack with Iraqi equipments against Iranian forces (1989-1988)
-Keeping their relationship with Iraqi Regime until 1990.
– Bloody crackdown on Iraqi Kurds and Shia uprisings. (1991)
– Terrorist campaign against 13 Iranian Embassies or installations in 13 countries (1992)
-Assassination of the Deputy Chief of the Iranian Armed Forces General Staff, Brigadier General Ali Sayyad Shirazi.(1999)
Assassination of the commander of Nasr headquarters and a dozen attacks against Iran including a major Iranian leadership complex in Tehran.(2000)
– Regular mortar attacks against military and law enforcement personnel.(2000 and 2001)
– The FBI arrest of 7 Iranians in the US who funneled 400,000 its purchase weapons in UAE.(2001)
-installation of about 3400 MEK members in Camp Ashraf (2003)
-The arrest of 160 MKO members by French Police (2003)
– The MKO members engagement in Self-immolation due to the arrest of Maryam Rajavi by French counterterrorism Police.(2003)
– MEK received millions of dollars in Oil-For-Food program subsidies from Saddam Hussein (1999-2003)
-Evidences, documents and video on Saddam’s handing over suitcases of money to MKO leaders and video of MEK operatives receiving training from the Iraqi military.
There are a lot of evidences and documents on MKO terrorist nature. Considering all the reasons of MKO’s stay in FTO list one can realize the measure of pursuing MKO’s case and also its terrorist background since its foundation. Therefore, designating MKO as a terrorist organization is not to appease Iran and neither to treat MKO unjustly. The criterion is their black file of violating human right against Iranian and Iraqi people.
The Black File, June 15th, 2007
Translated by Nejat Society
Last night, Iranian National TV aired a documentary on Mojahedin-e Khalq Organization (MKO). The program called “The Wolves”, the first part of a serial, scrutinizes into MKO’s history following the Islamic revolution in Iran and its armed and terrorist activities since its declaration of armed struggle against the newly established Islamic government.
Notoriously known as Monafeqin (hypocrites) among Iranian, Mojahedin-e Khalq have been faded into the oblivion and have no place among Iranian today and people prefer not to recall the group’s atrocities and bloody crimes perpetrated especially in the first years of the revolution. But the documentary is believed to be prepared for the Iranian young generation to get acquainted with one of the most brutal and atrocious terrorist groups of Iranian history and who are still engaged in a hostile and anti-national war under the protection of alien powers.
The documentary is aired on the anniversary of one of the first bloody terrorist moves of MKO, the 7th of Tir incident (June 28th). On the evening of June 28th, 1981, while a regular meeting of the Islamic Republic party was in progress, a bomb exploded in the meeting hall. Ayatollah Beheshti was at the podium and about 90 persons were present in the hall when the explosion occurred. The explosion killed more than 72 personalities including Dr. Beheshti, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Deputies of the Majlis, ministers of the cabinet, their assistants and many more. MKO believed it was a striking blow and a final coup to overthrow the newly formed Islamic republic ruling.
It was the beginning of a bloody chapter in Iranian history that contains numerous pages of violence and terror perpetrated by MKO. Following many scattered instances of terrorist operations resulting in the killing of many innocent civilians and Iranian ranks, the next second blow came in August 30. The explosion of an incendiary bomb which had been planted by MKO in one of the prime ministry conference rooms resulted in killing of the newly appointed Iranian President, Raja’i and the Prime Minister, Dr. Bahonar.
Following the internal ideological revolution within MKO and the hegemonic leadership of Rajavies, the group has developed more dangerous features. Now it has metamorphosed into a dangerous political and personal cult notoriously referred to as the cult of Mojahedin.
Mojahedin WS, June 26, 2007
As you are aware, on June 17, 2007, about 50 members of the proscribed terrorist entity, Mojahedin Khalq Organisation (MKO) who had been dispatched from Britain, Belgium, Switzerland, Netherlands and Germany, attacked a seminar organised by the Association for the Protection of Iranian Immigrants. The venue was at FIAP in the 14th District of Paris. The attackers used knives, broken bottles, etc and injured many of the guests as well as some of the organisers. More than 13 people were injured seriously – which was reported by local and international media. After intervention by the police, all the Mojahedin members were arrested and taken into custody.
We have been informed that already a serious investigation has begun in the French Judicial system to find out about the depth of involvement of leaders of the Mojahedin Khalq currently residing in north of Paris.
The following information has been revealed to us:
1 – This terrorist act had been approved and arranged at the highest levels of Mojahedin Khalq Organisation and National Council of Resistance leadership and the cult leader Maryam Rajavi was involved in every detail of the operation. Mr. Alaedin Tooran and Ms. Shahrzad Haj Seied Javidi have acted as the "intelligence officer" and "operational officer" for this operation, conducting every detail from Ms. Maryam Rajavi residence in the north of Paris. The operation had been named operation "Destruction of the Nest of Snakes".
2 – The "executive field officer" of the operation has been Mr. Mohammad Hayati (aka: Siavosh) who has been a military leader of MKO from the time of the Shah and who is currently a member of MKO as well as the National Council of Resistance. He conducted the attack using his men and had communication with them through mobile phones. During the years 1981 to 1986, Mohammad Hayati was a member of executive committee of Mojahedin in France and after the departure of Massoud and Maryam Rajavi (cult leaders) to Baghdad; he was transferred to Iraq and took the position of head of one of three military bases given to the Mojahedin by Saddam Hussein. He has directed major military operations in suppressing the uprising of the Iraqi Kurds and Shiites as well as insurgencies inside Iranian territory.
According to news received from the Americans as well as the disaffected members of Ashraf Camp in Iraq, the name of Mohammad Hayati has been registered in the list of Mojahedin members in the camp and up to 6 months ago, he has had regular contact with the American forces in charge of the camp.
We believe that Mohammad Hayati has specifically been sent from Iraq after the announcement by our association. He has been sent by Massoud and Maryam Rajavi and has been appointed to command this terror operation in Paris. He had been present at the scene from 12:00 on Sunday June 17 and had coordinated every movement by mobile phone. He had been in constant contact with the Mojahedin HQ in the north of Paris and had been reporting every step directly to Maryam Rajavi.
Mohammad Hayati was arrested by the police inside the FIAP building and was transferred to the police station. The police after examining his documents clearly were aware of his false ID and false passport which was used to travel from the Netherlands.
We alert the International Committee of the Red Cross and the American forces in charge of camp Ashraf that the terrorist Mojahedin Khalq Organisation has been transferring some of its military forces from Iraq (Camp Ashraf) to European countries to carry out similar attacks.
All this is happening at a time that about 200 people, who have clearly renounced terrorism and the Mojahedin Khalq Organisation after the fall of Saddam, are still being kept under extreme conditions by the American forces and do not have the right to asylum or to leave the place.
3 – thanking all the Iranians and other peace loving people who have been in contact in the last few day to lend their support, we would like to bring to your attention that contrary to the propaganda of the cult through its massive propaganda machine which has been lent to this proscribed terrorist organisation (Mojahedin Khalq), the cult has been clearly demonstrating its true face and its deeply rooted belief in violence and terror.
Pictures and films which we have received to date are attached.
A picture of Mohammad Hayati standing among some policemen is among these pictures.
Also a clip shows one of the women with the organisational name of "Effat" who is apparently from the leadership of MKO approaches Mr. Firoozman and gives a message from Maryam Rajavi to him which translates:
"We wish we had executed you in 2001 when we arrested you and got rid of this trouble".
The clip can be seen at the end of the film No. 1, with her face and comments clearly discernable.
At the end we wish to remind Massoud and Maryam Rajavi that we are now on French soil and France would never change into Iraq for you even in your wildest dreams.
Paris. June 21, 2007
Association for the Protection of Iranian Immigrants
Association for the Protection of Iranian Immigrants – Paris, 21 June 2007
According to a report by Iran Ghalam Association (Pen) in Germany, the attack by around fifty thugs associated with the Mojahedin Khalq Organisation (MKO) to disrupt a seminar in Paris on Sunday June 17th was planned and orchestrated from the Mojahedin Khalq (Rajavi cult) HQ in Paris.
Mr. Mohammad Hussein Sobhani, a human rights activist, who was invited to give a speech at the meeting, was attacked by four members of the cult. The four attackers were led by Mr. Mohammad Hayati who three months ago had been in an Iraqi camp under the control of the American Army in Iraq.
The known terrorist Mohammad Hayati is a leader in the Mojahedin Khalq Organisation with a history of violence going back to the time of the late Shah of Iran. Mohammad Hayati has also been named as a torturer during the rule of Saddam Hussein in Iraq.
Mohammad Hayati sent from Iraq to Assassinate Human Rights Activist Mr. Sobhani, who has survived the infamous Abu Ghraib prison where he was incarcerated for opposing the internal human rights violations of Massoud and Maryam Rajavi, was deliberately targeted by Mohammad Hayati and three other cult members who were waiting for his arrival at the FIAP building where the meeting was to be held.
He was rescued by French Police and spent the next three days in a Paris hospital where he was treated for injuries to his head and his back.
Mohammad Hussein Sobhani was a witness in the Human Rights Watch report "NO EXIT" published in May 2005
http://hrw.org/backgrounder/mena/iran0505
Mr. Sobhani frequently appears in the media and in reports by human rights organisations. He was a guest speaker in the European Parliament in February 2007.
http://www.iran-interlink.org/?mod=view&id=1863
According to Pen Association, Mr. Sobhani who was released from hospital yesterday, has filed a complaint with the French judiciary against Mr. Hayati and three other cult members emphasising the deliberate, organised attacks orchestrated by Maryam Rajavi from the cult HQ in Auvers-sur-Oise, north of Paris.
The arrival of Mohammad Hayati in Paris and the subsequent terrorist operation he headed has been raising serious questions about the capability and the possible role of the American Forces in Iraq who claim to have been keeping the terrorist organisation confined to Camp Ashraf since 2003.
following pictures are taken a couple of days later in the hospital (with the permission of Mr. Sobhani):
Iran Ghalam (PEN) Association, June 21, 2007
It is much disappointing to come across accounts that, to appease terrorists for certain personal or political concerns, try to justify blatant terrorist moves perpetrated by a globally proscribed terrorist group as “a just armed resistance”. No doubt, the composers of these accounts can hardly differentiate between terrorism and resistance.
Mojahedin-e Khalq Organization has recently started a new move in Scandinavian countries against the EU to remove its name from the terrorist list. Of course, many of those who concur with MKO to antagonize its proscription, are not fully or at all acquainted with the group’s past history of bloody terrorist moves against innocent Iranian civilians and have not developed a good understanding of its hypocritical nature.
For instance, a Danish columnist, Ole Damkjær, in an article released in Berlingske Tidende, criticizes the EU’s approach to keep MEK in the terrorist list. The writer states that:
Opposition in the Danish Parliament along with other oppositions in EU countries have criticized the government for not abiding by the ruling of the EU Court as well as not presenting any evidence on the reason for inclusion of MEK in the list. The Foreign Minister Per Stig Muller has yielded to Parliament’s European Committee and sent them a top secret letter which specifies the reasons for inclusion of MEK in the terrorist list.
This document which Berlingske has obtained lists five violent activities between 1980 and 2001 and MEK renounced violence in 2001. In none of these 5 operations of the Iranian organization any terrorist activities such as those of Al-Qaeda’s have been utilized. The first reason the EU presented for including the Mojahedin in the list is concerning that MEK in 1980 that carried out operations across the border from their bases in Iraq. Other reasons are as follows:
In 1992 MEK had terrorist operations against 13 Iranian embassies and establishments.
In 1993 right before the Presidential election in Iran, the organization claimed the responsibility for attacks on Iranian oil facilities such as Iran’s largest refinery.
In 1999 MEK assassinated deputy commander of Iran’s armed forces.
In 2000 and 2001 MEK announced that its members were involved in attacks on Iranian armed forces, police and governmental offices near Iran Iraq border.
These are activities that EU lists in a document and emphasizes on and calls them terrorist activities. But their reasons are questioned not only by MEK but increasingly by a great number of EU Parliamentarians. They say MEK has only carried a just armed resistance against the brutal mullahs’ regime.
I do not know if these Danish advocates of MKO would maintain the same idea about “a just armed resistance” in case a group carried out the same “questioned” operations in a European country. The terrorists that demolished the Twin-Towers in 9/11 or blasted the London Subway had also justifiable reasons for themselves. Then, why a global war on terrorism is declared? If all dissidents and resistances were engaged in armed moves, what the world would be like?
Besides, the above mentioned reasons compared with the group’s unmentioned black file of terrorist atrocities are of no significance. A look at some counter-MKO websites, mojahedin.ws, iran-intrlink, irandidban and …, that present instances of the group’s terrorist operations will contribute to further information. For instance, MKO claim it has denounced terrorist activities since 2001. Can you believe it? Here are evidences that are excerpts from the group’s organ, Mojahed.
Furthermore, I do not think anybody can challenge the State Department’s recent report on MKO. Either all those countries that have proscribed MKO as a terrorist group are mistaken or MKO is lying to dupe the world. It is betrayal of moral standards to take safe refuge behind the globally accepted counter-terrorism laws to chant in favor of terrorists. One should choose to stand either in the former or the latter front.
The U.S. State Department supplied over 30 reasons for classifying the Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization (MEK) as a terrorist organization. Among those reasons, "[S]tresing the ability and the will of MKO members and leadership to conduct terrorist operations across the world." Yet, U.S. Army Military Police guard the organization’s bases in Iraq and maintain control over the traffic and supplies heading in and out.
This parallel cooperation/condemnation has long been criticized by news agencies such as Al Jazeera, and rose to prominence in 2003. That year, many allege the CIA promoted MEK-sponsored attacks along the Iraq/Iran border.
The Pentagon and White House seem happy to use this group to their own end. In 2002, The National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), the public arm of the MEK, was cited as the prime source for revealing Iran’s nuclear program. At the time, Bush and other officials denied their praise of NCRI and MEK signaled a shift in the United States’ official position toward the organization, but it didn’t stop the praise.
Of course this is nothing new. Supporting groups like the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan or the Kurds in Northern Iraq has long been considered a foolproof formula for maintaining a strict foreign policy without getting our hands dirty. However, it seems foolhardy to pick our terrorist organizations. Just because an organization is using terrorist tactics to unseat power in Iran doesn’t make it any less terrorist.
Who separates a terrorist from a freedom fighter? Depends on the context, I suppose.
The White House is peopled by students of Kissinger, so it comes as no surprise the White House and Pentagon are using Kissinger’s doctrine to make lemonade out of their Iraq-war lemons. Just as the U.S. normalized relations with China (effectively ending the cold war in the east), relations with Iran will eventually become more friendly (particularly if the U.S. can count on cooperation from the likes of Turkey and Saudi Arabia). If our foreign policy follows history, the first people who will suffer for those normalized relations will be the MEK in southern Iran and (perhaps) the Kurds in Northern Iraq.
It’s happened before:
When Kissinger arrived in China, one of the first demands met was that all covert military actions against China cease immediately. Perhaps that came as solace to the family of Stephen "Gip" Kasarda Jr., who had given his life supporting CIA missions into Tibet, where many Tibetans, who had been trained at Fort McHale, Colorado, were waging a guerilla war against China. It probably came as no small consolation to the Tibetans, however, as the U.S. immediately withdrew official support and the Chinese army moved in to many locations that had been taken and held by the Tibetan freedom fighters.
How many more U.S. soldiers and operatives will be sacrificed "fighting freedom"? How many more groups who have counted on U.S. support over the years will be stranded and forgotten as the U.S. makes compromises across the world? Foreign policy is a complex issue, and no doubt many who gave their lives understood it was a distinct possibility—maybe even a guarantee. However, shouldn’t the United States’ war on terror extend to all terrorist organizations? If not, why not? And who will provide us the classification system that enables us to tell the good guys from the bad?
Independentreport.org – June 05, 2007
According to Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung Mojahedin along with EU Parliamentarians arranged a conference in Copenhagen where Lord Slynn of Hadley who is a former Judge of the EU court sharply criticized the decision of EU Council of Ministers.
After September 11th terrorist acts, EU countries coordinated their activities against terrorism and one of their decisions was to block bank accounts of those in the list. Decision on the inclusion in the terrorist list is made in “Clearing House” where representatives of security agencies meet. It then is discussed in the Conference of Ambassadors and eventually is passed in the EU Council of Ministers. Normally they should present documents on the group’s recent acts of terrorism. The decision is reviewed every 6 months. MKO was included in the EU terror list in May 2002 and remained since then.
Although MKO sued and won a case against the seizure of its assets by the EU in an EU court in December 2006, at end of January 2007 the Council of Ministers announced that the verdict applied to December 2005 assessment and the subsequent decisions, starting May 2006 by the Council of Ministers still held. The EU Council of Ministers informed Mojahedin of the decision on why they were remaining “in the list of individuals and organizations participated in acts of terror”. But PMOI attorneys claimed that the stated letter and documents by the EU Council of Ministers did not include any evidence on acts of terrorism by MKO especially after June 2001.
Exposed in a report by the State Department on April 30, MKO has been indulged in terrorist activities even after June 2001. Interestingly, these acts were perpetrated in the European countries rather than in the US but the European advocates of the group insist to close their eyes on what their people witnessed with open eyes in the streets. These advocates believe that ignoring the ruling of EU Court to remove MKO from the terrorist list is a disaster, but the EU Council of Ministers are well aware of the fact that the real disaster might germinate when the terrorists, now transformed into a cult, are unleashed.
The State Department Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism on April 30 released the list of designated terrorist organizations. Once again Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization (MEK) continues to occupy the status it has been designated since 1997. ina part we read: "MEK leadership and members across the world maintain the capacity and will to commit terrorist acts in Europe, the Middle East, the United State, Canada, and beyond."
