Mujahedin Khalq 's Function

Attacking Iran, The Only Solution for MKO

While tens of western civil humanitarian organizations, 22 physicist and nuclear scientists, political and academic figures in the US and other western countries, and even American generals are warning Bush about hiss policies on Iraq and the Middle East and his plans for possible attack on Iran, remnants of Rajavi claim that Iran’s refusal to accept US’s conditions is a defiance of world community’s requests. They also talk about "nuclear ceremony" in Iran to instigate the US to attack Iran.

In this regard, Mohammed Mohaddessin issued a statement yesterday, asking the US to adopt a firm policy against Iran and to support the terrorist group of Mojahedin-e Khalq:

"Delaying the adoption of a firm against the regime of Mullahs inspirits this reme in pursuing its nuclear program. Therefore, applying broad oil, arm, diplomatic and technological sanctions against this regime is becoming increasingly urgent. Only a firm policy against this regime’s nuclear project can save the international community and the Middle East from a humanitarian disaster."

It should be noted that the criminal gang of Rajavi is trying to pave the way for pressurizing Iran- through sanctions and preventing scientific developments by Iranians- to create internal dissatisfaction.

 

Irandidban –  2007/02/07

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Missions of Nejat Society

A Just Decision to Keep Terrorists on the List

The European Council announced on 31st January following the 2778th Council meeting of Economic and Financial Affairs that it has "decided to provide the PMOI with a statement of reasons for keeping it on the EU’s ‘asset freeze list’ of persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts, and to give the PMOI one month to present its views, together with any supporting documentation".

Nothing is violated and the council has decided to comply with the judgment of the Court of First Instance. That is exactly what MKO had claimed to have been deprived of, yet the group is frustrated over the council’s decision because the outcome contradicts what they expected.

As a reaction, reported by Iran Focus, a number of European parliamentarian advocates of MKO including Alejo Vidal Quadras, Luisa Morgantini), Manuel Dos Santos, and Edward McMillan-Scott accused the European Union of breaching a ruling by Europe’s Court of First Instance saying that the decision is “violating the rule of law and placing the Council’s opinion above that of the highest EU courts’ and called it “both scandalous and shameful”.

How a legal decision adopted by a body those parliamentarians are its members turns to be “scandalous and shameful”, terms commonly found in MKO’s literature, is a paradox that has to be explained by them. What do they have to say about other decisions taken by the council?

The decision, above all, has acted as a crushing blow over the body of the cult especially at a time when the insiders were being convinced to have achieved a big success. For sure, none of its European advocates can possibly influence the council’s decision since the council is wise enough not to unleash a dangerous terrorist cult and it is well aware that in no way can the cult exculpate itself of the provided reasons keeping it on the EU’s list.

Here is the council’s decision:

Terrorist list – Follow-up to court ruling in OMPI case

The Council, following the judgment by the Court of First Instance on 12 December 2006 in the OMPI case (Organisation des Modjahedines du Peuple de l’Iran), decided to provide OMPI with a statement of reasons for keeping it on the EU’s asset freeze list of persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts, and to give OMPI one month to present its views, together with any supporting documentation.

The Council will consider any reaction by OMPI within this period of time, before taking a final decision.

It is recalled that on 12 December 2006, the Court of First Instance, in case T-228/02-, OMPI, v. Council, annulled Council Decision 2005/930/EC insofar as it had imposed an asset freeze on OMPI following its inclusion on the terrorist EU list. The Court found i.a. that the decision ordering the freezing of OMPI’s funds had not contained a sufficient statement of reasons and that the right to a fair hearing had not been respected.

The Council therefore decided to take the necessary measures to comply with the judgment.

 

mojahedin.ws  – 05/02/2007

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Missions of Nejat Society

On the occasion of the anniversary of the fall of Saddam’s Regime.

Nejat Society shall be pleased to receive any developing information on the issues mentioned bellow:

 

1- Surveillance on MKO’s relation with Saddam Hussein’s Regime.

2- Analytic report on the last days of Saddam’s Regime and the investigation on MKO’s positions.

3- MKO’s position while US and UK invasion to Iraq by the forces.

4- Disarming of MKO after the cult’s forces bombed by the American forces.

 

Please send your postings through Nejat Website email.

 

Nejat Society

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mujahedin Khalq Organization as a terrorist group

Terrorism Isn’t Freedom Of Speech

Captain Ed tips us off to a story that ran in the LA Times today, and we should have known it was just a matter of time before terrorists and their supporters tried this route in the courts:

The Supreme Court refused Monday to block the trial of seven Los Angeles residents charged with raising money for an Iranian opposition group that was designated a "foreign terrorist organization" by the U.S. government.

Lawyers for the seven had argued the charges were unconstitutional because they had a free-speech right to raise money for a political group. That claim was rejected by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, which noted the Iranian opposition group — Mujahedin Khalq, also known as the MEK — had a record of supporting assassinations and bombings.

"Sometimes money serves as a proxy for speech, and sometimes it buys goods and services that are not speech. Guns and bombs are not speech," said Judge Andrew J. Kleinfeld for the appeals court.

In their appeal, the lawyers said the accused deserved the right to challenge the group’s designation as a "foreign terrorist organization" as part of their defense.

Although the justices turned down the appeal without comment, they could take up the issue later if the seven are convicted of the charges.

"We are very disappointed the court decided not to hear this case. We believe the decision poses a threat to the civil liberties of any person who wants to contribute to a political organization in this country," said Stacey M. Leyton, a lawyer in San Francisco.

Excuse me, but I have to agree with Judge Kleinfeld. Weapons of war bought with money supposedly given as charity hardly rates as free speech. And it’s not like their attorneys can claim stupidity regarding the organization. Mujahedin-e Khalq, or MEK, has been on State’s watchlist since 2001. So I’d better not here a schmoozy lawyer claiming that they didn’t know this group was on our radar when it came to terrorism. Additionally, Captain Ed points out that MEK was one of Saddam’s favorite terrorist groups:

The fall of Saddam Hussein‘s regime affected the circumstances of the designated foreign terrorist organization Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK). The MEK was allied with the Iraqi regime and received most of its support from it. The MEK assisted the Hussein regime in suppressing opposition within Iraq, and performed internal security for the Iraqi regime. The National Liberation Army was the military wing of the National Council of Resistance of Iran.

Point being, the "freedom of speech" argument doesn’t fly. These guys are going to have their criminal trial, and hopefully be found guilty of conspiring with a known terrorist organization. We’re not fans of the 9th "Circuits" Court, but when they get things right, it’s right to give them some level of praise.

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
William Scott Ritter

Scott Ritter’s Views on MKO

Part of Foaad Khosmood’s Interview with Scott Ritter,

FKh: Let’s now turn to Iran and your new book Target Iran. Who is the MEK?

SR: MEK is the Mojahedin-e-Khalq [1]. It’s an Iranian Marxist organization that came into being in the 1970’s. It was a force that was opposed to the rule of the Shah of Iran. It was primarily a military opposition group to the Shah and it carried out a number of attacks against the governmental institutions and the military and American military advisors in Iran.

When the Islamic revolution took place in 1979, the MEK initially allied with the Ayatollahs but soon fell out of favor with them. MEK went into exile and they took root first in Europe and later in Iraq where it became a very powerful military wing of the Iraqi Mukhaberat or the intelligence service. Today it’s funded by the CIA in their policy of using this organization to be a stick in the side of Iran. Even now, the MEK continues to be listed by the State department as an international terrorist organization.

FKh: OK, so this is a terrorist organization that is responsible for attacks against American civilians. There are many negative things against this group, especially in this political climate. Yet it has managed to have favorable public relations in Washington. Is this all because of CIA backing or are there other benefactors?

SR: Well, if you’re dealing with a population that is pre-programmed to accept at face value anything that is put forth by the mainstream media or other punditry which opposes the Islamic Republic, as being good, then all these negatives go away.

The MEK also has the support of the state of Israel. It has the support of the powerful pro-Israeli lobby here in the United States. It has the support of many members of congress, whether they have arrived at their position independently or as a result of intensive lobbying. The MEK does have a base of support among the anti-Tehran groups in Washington.

FKh: In your new book, Target Iran you say that Israeli intelligence was the true source of the new information on Iran’s hidden nuclear facilities. You also say that Michael Ledeen and some Washington neocons arranged for MEK to be the conduit of this information. Why was it important for another organization to be the deliverer of this news?

SR: The answer is twofold. One, Israel has a PR problem if it comes out as the lead element in tackling Iran’s nuclear program. Two, if your goal is regime change and one of the organizations that you’re backing is the MEK “ you would also like to. As you say, there are a number of negatives to this organization, so you would position the MEK as an organization that is capable of getting quality information on Iran. This was the same strategy that was used with the Iraqi National Congress and Ahmad Chalabi.

FKh: You also write that this information was known to George Tenet ahead of time. Does this mean Washington is once again engaged in manipulation of intelligence by withholding and strategically releasing information?

SR: I don’t think this was premeditated by Washington. I have written that the United States was almost 100% focused on the Iraqi problem and barely concerned about this particular issue. Tenet was aware of this information, as were many other people concerned about the Iranian nuclear program, but he did not treat this information as credible.

I don’t think this is part of a conspiracy trying to manipulate data. This was simply the United States putting this information on the back burner and not giving it the attention it needed which is why the Israelis needed to find more dramatic, publicly accessible means of giving this data to the mainstream press. This is one of the reasons they chose the MEK.

FKh: So what happened to these sites? Were there inspections of the specific sites that were revealed by the MEK?

SR: These sites were inspected by the International Atomic Energy Agency. Some of the sites like Natanz have emerges as having been involved in a uranium enrichment program. None of the sites have been found to have been involved in a nuclear weapons program. In fact there has been no evidence found of a nuclear weapons program existing in Iran, just a nuclear enrichment program for the peaceful use of nuclear energy.

Some of the information the MEK later put out turned out to be false. Basically the release of this information – which was debunked – was an effort to take control the headlines and interpretation of what’s going on to take out voices other than those who detest Iran by providing information that is not accurate.

This happened a lot when I was a weapons inspector. We dealt with Israel. Israel provided outstanding information up front. But later on, as the investigation went on, the well dried up. No more information could be provided while the Israeli data turned out to be inaccurate.

Zmag.com – January 31, 2007

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Ann SingletonFormer members of the MEK

BBC world interview with Anne Singleton and Gordon Corera

BBC world interview with Anne Singleton and Gordon Corera about Mojahedin Khalq

Anne Singleton

Back in the early 1980s, Anne Singleton was a rebel with a romantic streak, entranced by the selflessness, as she saw it, of a group of Iranians who were trying to bring democracy and a secular government to their country. The People’s Mujahideen, as they were known, had helped to overthrow the Shah but had been rejected by Ayatollah Khomeini and his followers and were allowed to seek refuge in Irag by Saddam Hussein. Anne met some of their members through a boyfriend in the north of England where she lived, and eventually joined them. Only later did she realise their true nature and she spent the next three years trying to escape their clutches. She is now trying to help other members who want to escape. Outlook hears Anne’s story and Heather Payton also speaks to the BBC’s Security Correspondent, Gordon Corera.

 

Link to outlook/BBC:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/programmes/outlook.shtml

 

Listen to the interview:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/mediaselector/check/worldservice/meta/tx/outlook_fri?nbram=1&nbwm=1&size=au&lang=en-ws&bgc=003399

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mujahedin Khalq 's Function

MKO Shows Its Inferiority Complexes

Remnants of Rajavi’s cult, along with a number of Iraqi Sunni representatives, held a press conference in Brussels to attribute the unrest in Iraq again to Iran.

This comes while Khalf Al-Ayan and Adnan Al-Dulaimi, who accompanied terrorist MKO member Mohammed Mohaddessin in the conference, are themselves involved in the unrest in Iraq and in creating ethnic clashes. While ago, a number of cars prepared with bombs were found in Dulaimi’s house but the results of investigations were not made public because Americans didn’t want to!

Khalf Al-Ayan is known as "Instigator Sheikh". These two men want the situation back to that of Saddam era.

What’s important about these two men is that they have no political influence even among the Sunnis, and no credit is given to them in Sunni communities because of their extremist positions. It’s clear, therefore, why they support a foreign terrorist group like the MKO: because the MKO gives false credit to discredited people.

A reference was made to the Sunnis but it must be clarified that, as Mr. Abdul Aziz Al-Hakim said, what’s being done in Iraq under the name of Sunnis is the interference of some Arab states who are concerned about losing the fate of their countries to people. Wanting to get the past advantages, they boast about the dangers of Shiite power and allow themselves to interfere under the name of Sunnis.

Terrorist group of Mojahedin, with its pro-Saddam supporters, tried to stage its new scenario by revealing so-called list of Iranian agents in Iran. According to Mohaddessin, they revealed the names of 31960 members of Badr Organization!

It’s clear that the MKO intelligence agents have failed to get the names of 120000 members of Badr and SCIRI and they have sufficed to only 32000, who have asked for the expulsion of MKO from Iraq or have writing about dangers of MKO in the past four years.

It should be noted that the membership of 120000 in Badr and SCIRI- as one of Shiite anti-Saddam groups- from the total population of Iraq (29000000) is amazing in itself. By revealing the names of 32000 people, the MKO only shows how small it is- with 3500- while claiming to be the biggest resistance and alternative force for Iran (with 75000000 population)!

Apart from this, MKO has shown in the past that its stupid behavior in the past 27 years has not been incidental, but it all came from the stupid mind of its leader, Massoud Rajavi.

For instance, with this given issue, while the US wants to start a broad-based psychological war against Iran in Iraq, the MKO suddenly comes to the scene with intelligence gestures to reveal the names of 32000 Iranian agents as if the Americans don’t know where the SCIRI and Badr were founded and which country supported them! As if they are unaware of friendly ties between Iran and Shiites that the stupid propaganda system of MKO wants to expose Shiite members of Iraqi parliament as Iranian agents for the US?!

Now anyone in the place of Americans (even Neocons who are seeking a war with Iran) would find out that the MKO is only a puppet stimulated by the psychological war of Americans that comes to the scene to reveal the intelligence (again formed by the psychological war), and this means political prostitution and ….

There may be people who get higher interpretations from these gestures by MKO (for instance, they may think that this is an effort for survival or in the best form, it’s a tactic to get closer to the US), but what’s clear is that no one takes these gestures seriously.

Earlier also, when the MKO were acting on the nuclear issue to satisfy their American masters and volunteered to devote themselves for American spies, after a while they complained that why the IAEA and European powers didn’t pay attention to their so-called intelligence! Thy will experienced the same situation about Iraq.

The conclusion is that in a political analysis, such MKO moves only proves this group’s inability to influence Iran’s political scene and shows their isolation and their need to show their inherent inferiority complexes.

Irandidban – 2007/02/01

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mujahedin Khalq Organization's Propaganda System

Illegality, Fundamental Crisis for Rajavi’s Gang

After Saddam, no government is going to accept the MKO. As it seems, there’s a consensus against this group. This is the reality of this group’s political position which puts it on the top of discredited political groups.

Rejecting its appeal in the US, the decision of Iraqi government to expel the group from the country and finally the recent decision by ECOFIN Council to keep the MKO on the list of groups whose assets have been frozen is part of this consensus.

This consensus is not because of MKO’s political importance (which totally lacks), but it’s because of group’s efforts to impose itself on a country.

Western governments, particularly the US and Western Europe, have concluded that the gang of Rajavi is a criminal cult whose claims of democracy are all meaningless and that it’s an anti-democratic movement. Therefore, they try to avoid supporting such a cult. They also repeat their positions occasionally to warn the supporters and agents of the group about their positions.

With a brief review of MKO’s efforts during past 20 years, it could be easily understood that the diplomacy of MKO is self-deceptive.

By collecting the signatures of Parliamentarians and those unaware of group’s status and by boasting about these signatures, the MKO has practically proved that its claims and behaviors are all unreal.

For instance, on the issue of Iraqi government’s decision to expel the terrorist cult from the country, the MKO tries to put the US army in front of Iraqi government in order to pretend that the American army is responsible for their case while the position of Iraqi government is in full coordination with the Coalition.

It’s natural that the issue that is decisively expressed by the Iraqi government has been discussed multilaterally and that American officials have assigned the Iraqi government with solving the issue. They are, in fact, approving such decision by remaining silent on the issue.

On the other hand, Rajavi’s remnants try to resist the order of Iraqi govnerment by continuing to collect signatures. However, this method has also proved to be useless for taking the group out of terror list.

Resorting to such methods shows that the MKO is discredited around the world and that no one wants to help them.

Only deals with warmongers and Zionist lobby has helped them survive, which in current situation, seems to be ineffective for the group.

 

Irandidban –  2007/02/04

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Ann SingletonFormer members of the MEK

‘How I was brainwashed by the Tank Girls’

Anne Singleton said ordinary British Muslims were increasingly vulnerable to recruitment by extremists

A white British woman who was sucked into an extremist Muslim terror group warned yesterday of the dangers of”brainwashing”by radical groups operating in the .

Anne Singleton said ordinary British Muslims were increasingly vulnerable to recruitment by extremists, who use psychological tricks to turn them into unquestioning followers prepared to carry out atrocities for their cause.

The 48-year-old mother of one, who lives in Leeds, became involved with fanatics while studying at Manchester University in the 1970s.

Her boyfriend at the time, an Iranian called Ali, was interested in a radical group known as the People’s Mujahideen of Iran, or MKO, which was formed a decade earlier and aimed to free from “capitalism, imperialism, reactionary Islamic forces and despotism.

Today Miss Singleton recalls with horror how the group, which is based in Iraq and wants to overthrow Iran’s current regime, was able to convince her to give up her life in the UK and travel abroad with them as a brainwashed slave.

Her indoctrination, conversion and submission to the MKO happened gradually over a period of ten years.

She now regards the group “ known as the”tank girls”because there are so many women in its ranks “ as a dangerous cult which uses psychological manipulation.

“I thought I was a saviour of the world and would have done anything for the Mujahideen. I worshipped those people. I thought they were of a higher order.”

In 1992, Miss Singleton was asked to go to for military training.

“I loved the camp and it felt liberating to obey orders, because you lose all responsibility for yourself,”she said.

But a year later she began to have doubts.

At this point she met her husband Massoud, another disillusioned MKO member, and in 1996 they made the decision to leave. It took them a further three years to break free.

Miss Singleton and her husband are involved in the campaign group Iran Interlink highlighting the dangers of groups such as the MKO.

She works as a computer programmer while raising her six-year-old son.

Yesterday, she warned that many British Muslims are at risk of suffering the same brainwashing as she did.

“Look at the young men in West Yorkshire who are being targeted by the terrorist organisations.

“Psychological manipulation can happen to anyone, any time. If you’re lucky you end up with a timeshare. If you’re unlucky you end up blowing up yourself and innocent people on the Tube.”

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts