Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip
Nejat Society
Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip
© 2003 - 2024 NEJAT Society. nejatngo.org
Mujahedin Khalq; A proxy force

Mojahedin a bargaining chip

Mojahedin a bargaining chip in Iran – US negotiations transcribtion of BBC 2- News Night program on MKO

For two decades it was one of the oddest armies on the earth.

Prevailed to overthrow the ayatollahs in Iran, The widow Maryam Rajavi stuck amongst fanatical devotion. She is accused by some of running a crew, a manipulative cult.  Maryam Rajavi is accused of running a crew,amanipulative cult

The America which protects the now-disarmed fighters in Iraq can’t decide what to do about them, it runs the people Mujahedin, also known as MEK or MKO as terrorists but according to some politicians it is still a potential ally.

  Bob Filner ;Democrat MP

Bob Filner (Democrat):

I know the MEK supports a secular democratic, non nuclear Iran. What’s there to oppose them? We should be a help to them in any way we can.

The Mujahedin’s position in Iraq now is a desperate uncomfortable one. Just north of Baqdad you find Ashraf in a vast desert. This land was given to them by Saddam Hussein but the new Iraqi government wants them out. And even though President Bush has so far rejected propose to talk to Iran. American policy makers believe the Mujahedin would actually have to be scarified for better relations with Iran.  This land was given to them by Saddam Hussein but the new Iraqi government wants them out

Keneth Polak: Iran and the US need to work together to stabilize Iraq Keneth Pollak:

Iran and the US need to work together to stabilize Iraq which will be disastrous for both countries if it’s led to civil war. We also have the nuclear negotiations which are very very delicate and we don’t want the MKO to make muddy those already troubled waters. The other matter is that the US does need to take charges against the MKO that is a terrorist organization.

  Ann Singleton and her husband Masud also are ex-Mujahedin activists who now campaign against the movement

We are in a house in the suburb of Leeds.

Ann Singleton and her husband Masud also are ex-Mujahedin activists who now campaign against the movement that commanded them absolute loyalty for twenty years. She joined MKO when she was a student in Manchester University in the late 1970’s when the students believed that they can change the world.

 

Ann Singleton :

The only organization which I had access to directly and that would actually going out to doing something was the Mujahedin. They would ask for donations of course and that is how they recruited the crew I guess. The process started with me. They would ask for money and I would give them more than that they asked for to show them my commitment.

  Ann Singleton She joined MKO when she was a student in Manchester University in the late 1970's .

Mujahedin began as a guerrilla group fighting the shah of Iran. Along side the followers of Ayatollah Khomeini, they succeeded to overthrow the Pahlavies in 1979.

But afterwards ayatollah Khomeini was not willing to share the power with them. Mujahedin rose to debate him but they were defeated.

From then on the organization was bored with the Islamic Republic. Hundred of Iranian officials were killed or wounded by Mujahedin’s bombs. In one attack the country’s current supreme leader Ayatollah Khameneiee lost his right arm.

In several times in the 1980’s these fighters invaded Iran from Iraq. Meanwhile thousands of Mujahedin members were executed in Iranian jails. The leader of the organization and many supporters fled to the West.

Ali Safavi who works for Muajhedin’s umbrella organization, NCRI, he has convinced many politicians that this movement which has left violence is a democratic alternative to the Islamic Republic:”All accusations against them”he says”are organized by Iran”.

 

 Ali Safavi ; Member of NCR

Ali Safavi:

“they view the people ‘s Mujahedin as an existential threat because they know that the Mujahedin has a large support among the Iranian people and that is why they have spent no effort in fight to illegalize the Mujahedin by engaging in a massive expensive propaganda Campaign to demonize the Muajhedin.

 

But there is no evidence that Abbas Sadeqinejad relates to Iranian intelligence. This former Mujahedin member who now lives in Germany with his family that he thought he had lost for ever when he fled Iran. The years when he stayed in Camp Ashraf he believed what the Mujahedin had told him that his wife and his new born daughter were dead.

  They told my wife that I was killed by the Regime as I was leaving the country.

Sadeqi:

“they told me that they set two people to find my wife and one of them was killed by the Regime but they said that they persued my case with a second and they found out that my wife had died when giving birth to my daughter . That’s how they cut my ties with my family. Same time, they told my wife that I was killed by the Regime as I was leaving the country.

“Psychological manipulation”as described to Newsnight by many interviewed former members. This part of the system of control by Masud Rajavi and his new wife Maryam was established in Iraq in the 80’s and 90’s. They launched what they called”Ideological Revolution”. The women got key jobs. The announcement of sexual feelings became forbidden and divorce became obligatory.

 

Singlton:

 they decreed that every member should divorce. All your thought and feeling and energy, your whole being have to be devoted to the Rajavis. That was a forced system of reporting, any erotic fantasy they had for example they have aroused by sister so so or by what’s his name brother. They were expected to tell everything totally open, any thing was in your mind or you feel with your heart.

 

Reporter: were all members forced to divorce?  Safavi: No, every individual member of the Mojahedin decided on his own to forget family life, those who were married of course.

 

Reporter: all of them?  Safavi: yes. Yes. All of them.

 

– So every single married member in Ashraf at that time made the voluntary decision to divorce or forget the family life?

-yes

 

-How many people where there?

-I don’t exactly know what the number was but hundreds people ,yes every member of the hundreds.

 

– Hundreds?

-yes

– Hundreds. Every single one voluntarily to divorce!

– Yes.

 

– Isn’t it implausible to see that hundreds of members, all voluntarily take a decision to divorce?

-Not at all.

 

The level of devotion expended to the members’ squirm of suicide feared European citizens in 2003. To protest the temporary arrest of Maryam Rajavi

. The Newsnight has serious accounts that in the 1990’s those who seemed less reliable were tortured in the confinement of the organization’s Camp in Iraq.

 

Sadeqi: they hit my knees so hard. “ He pulled my hair and said that he would teach me a lesson I would never get. He put handcuff on me and hung me from my right hand”. I shouted why you are hitting a member of the organization. But they hung me like that for twenty minutes”

 

Mujahedin were the guests for Saddam Hussein in 1980’s when he was the ally in war with Iran of the West. He offered them the most convenient bases. It was certain that their association with the Iraqi traitor would become their big terrible trouble. In the 1990’s after the Iraq invaded Kuwait, Saddam became the West’s enemy. Meanwhile in 1997,when the new reformist president Muhammad Khatami was elected in Tehran, in that year America listed the Mujahedin as terrorists, something that weakened their abilities to work on fund raising in West. Some believe that the move was a coquetry just to appease Iran.

 

Kenneth Polack:

There was definitely a debate within the US government. As to whether or not the MKO should be added to the list but the ultimate decision that was made was that the US needs to be consistent at the application of its standards. That no country would take the US seriously if the only groups that are put on the list of terrorists were the groups who are at war with the US and its allies.

 

In 2001, the US attacked Afghanistan. Both America and Iran after the remove of Taliban had a reason to talk. One of the deals the officials looked around was that the US and Iran talk about the existence of Mujahedin.

  Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson

Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson:

We had some intelligence, indicated that some key senior officials of AlQaida might have gone to Iran. Just casual conversations suggested that Iran should be willing to turn over those AlQaida figures and we had to give them a probe and whenever speaking of the pre-proposed proba MEK was there. It happened around discussions almost all the time because it was clear that Iran is very concerned about the MEK.

 

Laurence Wilkerson and his boss Collin Powell weren’t sure how high in the Iranian government the approach came from. They didn’t listen to the offer but a year and a half later there was a better chance to deal.

 

After the US-led invasion of Iraq, Iran sent Washington a secret letter proposing talks.

Here, we have a copy of the letter; it’s not signed but the State Department understood that it came with the approval of the highest authorities in Tehran and that offers exactly what many in Washington, believe America should have been seeking from Iran.

Tehran offered to use its influence to support stabilization in Iraq and to have full transparency on its nuclear programme and remarkably end the military support to the militant Lebanese group Hezbollah and aid to the Palestinian Hamas. In return it wanted t US to halt hostile behavior, abolition of all sanctions and specifically pursuit of the Mujahedin and repatriation of their members.

 

Wilkerson: and we thought, it was precious moment to do that. I think the Secretary of State and Deputy of the Secretary of State just thought at the same time but when it got to the White House and to the Vice-President’s Office, the old mantra that we don’t talk to the evils which includes the guy of Pyongyang, North Korea and includes the guy of Tehran, Iran. Reasserted itself and to our embarrassment, State as far as I’m concerned the cable that I saw go back to the Swiss, ashly upbraided the Swiss to being so bold and audacious to present such a proposal to us on behalf of Iran.

It was the Zenith of American strength in the region, a natural time for republicans of the White House to wonder if the regime change in Iraq could be followed by the regime change in Iran

Mujahedin obvious allies in a research campaign have been bombed by the US during the invasion in Iraq and afterwards the State Department ordered Them to be disarmed but the especial Pentagon forces sent to perform that task found out so instantly how useful the exiled fighters could be. 

 Tthey were a formidable fighting force there,it sounds like almost fiction

Military Lawyer (Vivian Gembara): they were a formidable fighting force there, I mean but it was not the best equipped force that we have ever seen. A Force which is led by women. It’s such a unique: I mean it sounds like almost fiction.

And the US army’s instant infatuation with Muajhedin fully were recruited a very pragmatic force that was so loyal to Saddam, now apparently wanted to serve America in any way it could.

 

Military lawyer: we wanted to disband them essentially and that was what we had a problem with because they still wanted to work with us.

 

Back in Washington the state of Department wasn’t interested”

 

Wilkerson: everyday from Monday to Friday we had meetings at the State Department from 8:30 and one of the questions that came up almost everyday was what we have to do with the MEK, the MEK were still wondering around Iraq, still they had their arms .they are still a cohesive body of people saying what’s happening? They’re a terrorist organization we declare them ourselves. The President, himself does agree that we should do something about the MEK but nothing is happening. The Defense Department doesn’t do any thing. By their actions, I must say that Secretary of Defense and his underlings and the Vice President’s Office must have thought that the MEK might prove the fruitful instrument in the future and therefore they don’t want to take any drastic action against the MEK.

 

President Bush has now relinquished the services of the former Defense Secretary Donald Ramsfeld but Newsnight understands that still the strong pro-Mujahedin lobby within the administration, one of the possibilities ,apparently have been concerning is to use the group as a go-between to help American forces reach outs to Sunni insurgence.

  The Mujahedin have just wanted the Judgment of European court of justice on freezing their assets

Meanwhile in Europe the charismatic leader of the Iranian resistance Maryam Rajavi has been rallying among her supporters with talking of victory. The Mujahedin have just wanted the Judgment of European court of justice on freezing their assets that they believe it’s the first step to removing the terrorist tag, that still haunts them. Though their last attack was in 1999 and they have since renounced any military role.

 

Ali Safavi: Instead of tying engaged with Mullahs in Tehran the international community has to reach out to the democratic opposition and the very opposition which by the key reveal allegations on the Iran’s nuclear weapons program. In some sense really the international community and the Western countries owe a huge debt of gratitude to the Mujahedin.

In fact there’s no more much sign of support for the Mujahedin in Iran. Since they moved to Iraq they’ve been widely regarded as traitors. The disbanding of the group plays as the key goal for Tehran. In the short term chances of the US-Iranian relations is very little. President Ahmadinejad and President Bush both talk with the language of confrontation but many in Washington regret that.

 

Wilkerson: I think the failure of the US to make some sort of meaningful overtures to Tehran has been a terrible mistake that has put Iran in a strategic position in the Middle East that she couldn’t have gained by her own magi. We have through our inaptitude and our refusal of the talk, it is certainly giving Iran the cat-bird seat in the region.

  The 3500 remaining residents of Ashraf deprived of their military role enjoy a cultural life in the middle of the Iraqi desert.

Published by the Mujahedin’s latest promotional material, the 3500 remaining residents of Ashraf deprived of their military role enjoy a cultural life in the middle of the Iraqi desert. They even revived their own form of dance.

 

The organization believe that they can survive here under the protection of Geneva and again one day play a big role in the Iranian political scene but as Tehran strengthens its influence in Iraq and the US runs an eventual plan the Mujahedin’s time must have been running out.

 

BBC 2- News Night program

Download Mojahedin a bargaining chip in Iran – US negotiations

January 23, 2007 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mujahedin Khalq; A proxy force

Timmerman’s New Plan for Regime Change

Despite being a strong supporter of Israel, at least Kenneth R. Timmerman antagonizes MKO’s seizing the power in Iran, indicating that the group is not at all a pro-democratic activist as it advertises. A journalist, policy advocate, and activist, R. Timmerman directs the Foundation for Democracy in Iran, which he founded in 1995 with two other neoconservatives, Joshua Muravchik and Peter Rodman. The National Endowment for Democracy provided the initial funding to the group.

Strongly denouncing the recommendation of the Baker-Hamilton Iraq Study Group that the United States should engage in direct talks with Syria and Iran, Timmerman praises the Bush administration’s increased commitment to Iran regime change through support of dissidents inside and outside of Iran and believes that the United States must devote serious assets to helping pro-democracy forces to help the regime change. Seeing that the administration still has no plan of how to do it, Timmerman has recently proposed a new plan released in Front Page Magazine on January 18. He states:

I believe the United States should be prepared to commit a minimum of $300 million over an initial six month period if we are to have any hope of a successful outcome.

The very first step must be the appointment by the President of a Special Envoy for Iran, with full presidential authority to convene a loyal type meeting of several hundred prominent Iranian leaders. The majority of those able to attend such a meeting will of necessity come from the diaspora; some will come secretly from the inside.

In his drafting a detailed game plane, he suggests organizing massive non-violent protests against the current Iranian rule in Tehran. But he does not throw caution into the wind to warn about MKO’s potential exploitation of opportunities. He also draws the strategy for “preventing the Islamic-Marxist Mujahedin Khalq from exploiting the situation and seizing power in a putsch’.

Mr. Timmerman’s strategy for establishing democracy through a regime change plan in Iran utilizing the Iranian themselves does not, however, mean that he and his colleagues are really concerned about Iranian people but that it is the easiest and most sensible strategy to avoid confrontation while ensuring the best results for the US.

Supporting regime change by Iranians, while containing Syria, not only makes the best strategic sense for America, it is the right thing to do.

Mojahedin.ws -Sattar Orangi -January 21, 2007

January 22, 2007 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mujahedin Khalq 's Function

Sad News for the Cult

While the stupid propaganda system of Mojahedin has focused on warmongering and repeating the confused policies of Bush to deploy more troops to Iraq and threatening other countries, the reports published around the world represent the image of opposition to US’s fascist warmongering policies; of course, the cult of Rajavi censors all such reports so as to prevent them from being heard by its desperate members.

Tom Lantos, the head of Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee said on Wednesday, Jan. 17, that he’s ready to go to Iran along with a delegation.

Speaking in Foreign Relations Committee, Tom Lantos, Dem. From California, added that Iranian officials have so far refused to issue visas for Congressmen.

He also added that Americans should also be blamed for obstructing the process of talks to the US.

"I’m ready to take a delegation from Foreign Relations Committee to Tehran at any time in order to talk on all issues without conditions," he said.

Madlin Albright, former US Secretary of State during the presidency of Clinton, who was also in the meeting, said: "The US should sit to talk with Iran without any conditions". (1)

"By preparing a draft resolution that will be put to voting next week, three senior Senators protested to Bush’s policy of deploying plus 20000 more troops to Iraq and said that it was not good for national interest of the country.

Chuck Higel, along with influential congressmen Karl Levin and Josef Biden, announced in a press conference that their resolution is aimed at convincing the president to give the duty of establishing security and stability to Iraqis themselves instead of increasing the number of US troops". (2)

"Opposition to the war in Iraq has extended to US troops so that 1085 soldiers have initiated "War Against War" campaign.

The more it passes, the more the number of anti-war US troops becomes. They say that the war was both wrong and futile. They also want to use legal ways available to make their protests public." (3)

Since the MKO leaders believe in another war for the survival of the group, and since they have already started supporting military clashes between the US and Iran (they have put their members in Camp Ashraf in "ready" situation), therefore they censor all reports on moves against US policies."

However, since the remnants of Rajavi want to convince the members in Camp Ashraf that "Americans have gotten their message and are following them"!, and regarding the facts above, it should be said that "opposition to war and Zionist policies of Neocons is increasing and also, those who support unconditional talks with Iran (called by MKO as "compromisers) have formed a stronger front and declare this policy louder than ever before.

———————————————–

1. Radio Farda

2. BBC

3. Radio Germany (Deutewelle)

Irandidban -2007/01/20

January 22, 2007 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
USA

US using MKO terrorists as bargaining chips, says BBC

Nearly four years after overthrowing of Saddam Hussein’s regime, the US are still using some 3,500 MKO terrorists at Ashraf camp in Iraq as a bargaining tool in its relations with Iran, BBC reported.

Britain’s state-funded broadcaster said the US cannot decide what to do in its hypocritical policy, with some statesmen in Washington still seeing the MKO as potential allies even though the grouplet is officially branded as terrorists.

A documentary for Newsnight, screened on Wednesday, suggested there was a split between the US State Department and Defence Department, where there was said to be a "strong pro-MKO lobby" despite the removal of Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.

Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, former Secretary of State Colin Powell’s chief of staff, expressed regret that the terrorist group had been used as a US source of confrontation against Iran.

"I think failure of the US for six years to make some meaningful overture to Iran is a terrible mistake," Wilkerson told the program.

Kenneth Pollack of the Brooking Institute said that the US and Iran needed to work together to stabilize Iraq and on nuclear issues and that he did not want the MKO to be used "to muddy trouble waters." The documentary introduced the MKO a "cruel and manipulative cult" that had killed and wounded hundreds of Iranian politicians and civilians for more than two decades.

Former members were interviewed describing the psychological warfare and torture used by the Iraq-based terrorist organization as part of its system of control.

A spokesman for the MKO front group in London, Ali Safavi, even admitted that all members were asked to divorce to show their devotion to the organization that had led to the break up of their families.

From Iraq, where the terrorists had been given their military base as guests of Saddam, numerous invasions of Iran were carried out.

But since Saddam became an enemy of the west, they had become a terrible liability with the new Iraqi government wanting the MKO removed from Ashraf.

The report suggested that the US had missed opportunities to make deals with Iran first during its war in Afghanistan and then following its invasion of Iraq.

But it now believed that time was finally running out for the MKO and that they would be "probably be used as bargaining chips in a diplomatic game" by the US for better relations with Tehran.

London, Jan 18, IRNA

January 22, 2007 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
USA

The BBC television program on the Communist MEK

The BBC’s January 17, 2007 television program on the Iranian Communist MEK (MKO, PMOI, NCRI, Rajavi Cult, Pol Pot of Iran) included an interview with Lawrence Wilkerson, a top aide to former Secretary of State Colin Powell. Wilkerson revealed that the State Department supported a plan to disband the Iranian communist cult at Camp Ashraf, Iraq. However, Vice President Dick Cheney’s office rejected the plan. The television program included also an interview with Congressman Bob Filner (Democrat-California and son of a Communist Party candidate for Congress) who supports this communist cult.

Hopefully, the American media will follow the lead of the BBC and examine in depth why a Republican Vice President supports a communist ult. Unfortunately, this is not the first time in American history that American political leaders have supported communist monsters. For example, there were members of the American government who supported Pol Pot in Cambodia. America has some responsibility for the killing fields of Cambodia. Some Iranians refer to Masoud Rajavi as the Pol Pot of Iran.

Americans need to continue to vote out of office the neo-conservatives (neo-Trotskyites) in the Democratic and Republican parties who support communist cults.

The following is the Comment of Paul Sheldon Foote on the group

The Iranian Communist MEK (MKO, PMOI, NCRI, Rajavi Cult, Pol Pot of Iran)has a long history of terrorism. In the 1970’s in Iran, the MEK murdered  American military officers and Rockwell International employees. During the American hostage crisis, to show that the MEK is more anti-Western than the Islamic leaders, the MEK clamored for the murder of the American hostages at the American Embassy in Tehran. In 1991, these Saddam Hussein-supported terrorists committed major war atrocities against Kurdish and other Iraqi  civilians. Around the world, the MEK has committed terrorist acts, even in New York City.

While this BBC segment contained an interview with Congressman Bob Filner (Democrat-California and son of a Communist Party candidate for Congress), viewers need to know that hundreds of members of Congress (including Republicans) have supported the MEK or have accepted political campaign contributions from MEK supporters. While this segment was a good, brief introduction to the MEK, BBC needs to go into more depth in future segments about the real reasons why many neo-conservatives (neo-Trotskyites), the Iran Policy Committee (staffed by a former CIA employee and former American military officers), and so many members of Congress have betrayed America by supporting this evil communist cult.

Viewers can learn more about the MEK by reading Anne Singleton’s book, Saddam’s Private Army, available from Iran Interlink.

January 22, 2007 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Iran

Iran offered to cut off Hezbollah in overture to US in 2003: BBC

Iran offered to cut off aid and support for the Lebanese Shiite militia Hezbollah and the Palestinian group Hamas, and promised full transparency on its nuclear program in a secret letter to the United States soon after the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the British media reported.

According to the BBC, the letter, which it obtained, was unsigned, but the US State Department understood that it came with the approval of the highest Iranian authorities.

The Islamic republic also offered to use its influence to support stabilisation in Iraq, and in return asked for a halt in hostile American behaviour, an abolition of all sanctions, and the pursuit and repatriation of members of the Mujahedeen Khalq (People’s Mujahedeen MKO).

The MKO is an exiled Iranian opposition group which fought alongside former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein’s army in the eight-year Iran-Iraq war, and is currently based in Iraq.

Initially, the State Department was positive on the offer, according to Lawrence Wilkerson, former US secretary of state Colin Powell’s chief of staff, who spoke to the BBC.

"As soon as it got to the White House, and as soon as it got to the Vice-President’s ( Dick Cheney) office, the old mantra of ‘we don’t talk to evil’ … reasserted itself," Wilkerson told the broadcaster.

"To our embarrassment at State … the cable that I saw go back to the Swiss actually upbraided the Swiss for being so bold and audacious as to present such a proposal to us on behalf of the Iranians."

According to Wilkerson, the State Department was also offered a deal by the Iranians after it led the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 which involved Iran giving up senior Al-Qaeda terror network figures in return for help pursuing the MKO.Powell and Wilkerson were unsure how high in the Iranian government the approach came from, however, and did not pursue the offer, the BBC said.

Iran offered to cut off Hezbollah in overture to US in 2003: BBC

LONDON (AFP) – January 18, 2007

Iran offered to cut off aid and support for the Lebanese Shiite militia Hezbollah and the Palestinian group Hamas, and promised full transparency on its nuclear program in a secret letter to the United States soon after the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the British media reported.

According to the BBC, the letter, which it obtained, was unsigned, but the US State Department understood that it came with the approval of the highest Iranian authorities.

The Islamic republic also offered to use its influence to support stabilisation in Iraq, and in return asked for a halt in hostile American behaviour, an abolition of all sanctions, and the pursuit and repatriation of members of the Mujahedeen Khalq (People’s Mujahedeen MKO).

The MKO is an exiled Iranian opposition group which fought alongside former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein’s army in the eight-year Iran-Iraq war, and is currently based in Iraq.

Initially, the State Department was positive on the offer, according to Lawrence Wilkerson, former US secretary of state Colin Powell’s chief of staff, who spoke to the BBC.

"As soon as it got to the White House, and as soon as it got to the Vice-President’s ( Dick Cheney) office, the old mantra of ‘we don’t talk to evil’ … reasserted itself," Wilkerson told the broadcaster.

"To our embarrassment at State … the cable that I saw go back to the Swiss actually upbraided the Swiss for being so bold and audacious as to present such a proposal to us on behalf of the Iranians."

According to Wilkerson, the State Department was also offered a deal by the Iranians after it led the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 which involved Iran giving up senior Al-Qaeda terror network figures in return for help pursuing the MKO.Powell and Wilkerson were unsure how high in the Iranian government the approach came from, however, and did not pursue the offer, the BBC said.

LONDON (AFP) – January 18, 2007

January 22, 2007 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
UK

Mojahedin Assets still frozen in EU and UK

UK Secretary of State: Mojahedin Assets still frozen in EU and UK

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what assessment she has made of the implications for the UK of the European Court Judgement of 12 December 2003 to annul the Council’s decision to freeze the funds of the People’s Mojahedin of Iran; and if she will make a statement.

Margaret Beckett (Secretary of State, Foreign & Commonwealth Office) | Hansard source

On 12 December 2006, the Court of First Instance (CFI) of the European Community annulled the Council of the European Union’s decision to add the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MeK, also known as l’Organisation des Moudjahiddines du peuple iranien or People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran) to its list of terrorist organisations subject to an EU-wide asset freeze.

The specific Council Decision of December 2005 annulled by the Court has been replaced by a subsequent Council Decision of May 2006. The EU-wide asset freeze against MeK is therefore still in force. The EU keeps its entire terrorist asset freezing decisions under regular review.

The assets of this group are also frozen under UK domestic law. This is not affected by the CFI judgement, which is a technical decision on EU procedures. The Court did not rule on the substantive question as to whether the MeK is a terrorist group.

 

Source: Hansard, Thursday, 18 January 2007

Written answers, Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, Iran

William Hague (Richmond (Yorks), Conservative) | Hansard source

January 22, 2007 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Iraqi Authorities' stance on the MEK

Presence of Armed Opposition in Iraq Unaccaptable

In a meeting with Deputy Iraqi Interior Minister for Security Affairs"Shirvan Al-Vaeli", Iranian Foreign Minister "Manouchehr Mottaki" said that in the light of good relationships between the two countries, the presence of Iranian opposition groups in Iraq is not acceptable and that Iranian government and people are waiting for the extradition of criminals and the expulsion of enemies from Iraq.

In the meeting, Vaeli stated: "We are satisfied with the good ties between Islamic Republic and Iraq. Iraqi officials are willing to strengthen bilateral relations and Iraqi PM stresses the development of ties with the Islamic Republic."

Referring to the efforts of enemies to intensify unrest in Iraq, he said: "Enemies of Iraqis seek to disrupt the process of establishment of Iraq’s legal institutions. Iraqi government is strongly determined to boost its security plans in order to establish security and stability in the country."

 Mehrnews – 2007/01/18

 

January 22, 2007 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Nejat Publications

Nejat NewsLetter-ISSUE NO.7

  • Download Nejat NewsLetter-ISSUE NO.7

    January 21, 2007 0 comments
    FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
  • The cult of Rajavi

    The Gradual Evolution in Cults

    The Gradual Evolution in Cults

    The Gradual Evolution in Cults

    January 21, 2007 0 comments
    FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
    Newer Posts
    Older Posts

    Recent Posts

    • Rebranding, too Difficult for the MEK

      December 27, 2025
    • The black box of the torture camps of the MEK

      December 24, 2025
    • Pregnancy was taboo in the MEK

      December 22, 2025
    • MEPs who lack awareness about the MEK’s nature

      December 20, 2025
    • Why did Massoud Rajavi enforce divorces in the MEK?

      December 15, 2025
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • Youtube

    © 2003 - 2025 NEJAT Society . All Rights Reserved. NejatNGO.org


    Back To Top
    Nejat Society
    • Home
    • Articles
    • Media
      • Cartoons
      • NewsPics
      • Photo Gallery
      • Videos
    • Publications
      • Books
      • Nejat NewsLetter
      • Pars Brief
    • About Us
    • Contact us
    • Editions
      • عربي
      • فارسی
      • Shqip