Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip
Nejat Society
Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip
© 2003 - 2024 NEJAT Society. nejatngo.org
Duplicity of the MEK nature

Mujahedeen, the master of bluffing

The Europe governors, who are going to put impact on their negotiation with the regime of Iran, utilize the Mujahedeen specially Maryam Ghajar who has a black dossier in terms of terrorist actions as the entertainers through the retired political factors.

Whenever the Mujahedeen perform the political projects optionally, they propagandize for some weeks, but in this case there was no advertising.

It is notable that when the political factors became aware about their mistakes, they deported Maryam immediately, but the Mujahedeen who have been completely disgraced tried to issue some peculiar bluffs.

The Mujahedeen have been brought to parliament suddenly and forcefully, so they had no special scenario.

Bluffing is a characteristic of the members of Mujahedeen which has been taught by their leader. Rajavi, who put all his attempts for Saddam in his everlasting lie, now tries to present his content victory and declares that they were able to get to Tehran, but there had been some reasons to avoidance.

During the deporting from France in 1995, Maryam declared that there was no need to do political activities, and they should continue with army activities.

When the Mujahedeen were captured by Americans and lost all their weapons they began to talk about the cease-fire with Americans to prevent their disloyalty.

The other bluffing by Mujahedeen was their backward point of views in spying and acting against the national interests of Iran. They regarded their spying as a kind of duty and a symbol of glory.

During the student movement in Tir 18, 1378 the Mujahedeen represented a funny bluffing. They introduced some unreal names and claimed that they have headed that movement. According to some of the detached members of the Mujahedeen, at first they introduced the names of some of prisoners. Then these prisoners were left in the frontier to be arrested by the regime. In this way, they could claim that they had been active in the Student Movement. What a plenty of crimes!

the black file  – 2006-07-11

July 16, 2006 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Duplicity of the MEK nature

Saddam Devotees Hail Community of Strategy with Iraqis

It is common in political sphere for two political currents to concur in a community of strategy when they have mutual political axes to grind. The alliance does not necessarily mean that they have to reconcile with each other’s different ideologies. Years before the Islamic revolution, for instance, Mojahedin Khalq Organization (MKO) and People’s Fedayan Militia, two ideologically different campaigning anti-monarchical movements, formed an alliance against Shah’s regime and the US imperialism.

Iraqi people in general, regardless of being Kurds, Shiite and Sunni, advocated a community of strategy in their struggle to topple Saddam’s regime. Even the pro-Saddam factions in creating post-Saddam disorders moved on a line of consensus strategy.

With these preliminaries in mind, it was shocking to hear Dowlat Nowrouzi, the MKO’s representative in UK, saying “Mojahedin-e Khalq have a community of strategy with Iraqi people”. Before going any further, it should be noted that MKO have developed a comprehension of the magic role the numbers and statistics play in today’s political world and the adopted Western policies according to these figures. As a result, MKO have developed a talent of digging statistics out of any performed tasks. The significance lays in the fact that rarely the tally of these figures, being multiplied by a favored coefficient, are reliable as authentic. That is to say, the promulgated figures are too much exaggerated to be accepted.

MKO has been on this path from the beginning. Once, soon after the Islamic revolution, they announced that more than 150,000 rallied in Amjadieh soccer stadium in Tehran. The stadium in full capacity, according to mathematical evaluations, could entertain a crowd of not exceeding 30,000. Later, on the anniversary of the 20 June event, MKO’ TV reported a rally of 200,000 in the same place. Even on the 20 June 1981, the day MKO organized a protesting rally in different Iranian cities, MKO announced a swarm of 500,000 sympathizers in Tehran’s streets never thinking of the destructive potentialities of such a crowd if they really existed; demonstrators were easily dispersed and the irritated MKO announced armed struggle against the Islamic Republic.

Last year, MKO reported the declaration of 2,800,000 Iraqi people issued in support of MKO. This year, the number has increased to 5,200,000. Regardless of the authenticity of so big a figure, the Iraqi supporters of MKO are nearly multiplied, that is to say, a nearly 100 percent increase. More above that, according to reports broadcasted on 8 July by the group’s TV, as any single vote of this big figure represents an Iraqi family of five, consequently, it can be multiplied by 5 to reach a total figure of 26,000,000 supporters.

On 20 June, MKO reported that 300,000 French citizens had urged support for Maryam Rajavi. Then, they concluded that as any single vote of these French citizens represented a French family of three, so the number of supporters reached a total 900,000.

At the present, MKO claims the Islamic Republic has so far executed 120,000 members of the group. The number of the executed in 1987, the year they settled in Iraq, did not exceeded 20,000. It is not amazing to see the number jumping to such an extent because the “martyrs” have gone through the coefficient system of the organization. In another instance, Ebrahim Khodabandeh, a high-ranking separated member, admitted that once in a meeting of the European parliamentarians he had claimed, as was dictated by the organization, that about 300,000 political prisoners were under regular and daily torture in Iranian prisons. As he said, he never thought of a simple fact that if any of these prisoners were to be tortured by nothing more than a quick slap, what a great number of guards and torturers had to be provided! There are more and more examples of these kinds.

Accordingly, depending on case and place, they make the most of the words rather than the numbers. Seemingly suffering hypomnesis to remember what they have stated or done earlier, or maybe they think people are inattentive and unmindful, MKO expatiate on something they had controverted before. An organization commonly known to have formed a close alliance with Saddam, leaps forward to proclaim they “have a community of strategy with Iraqi people”. The words indicate that they have been in the same front along with Iraqi people in their struggle against the ousted dictator! That they too were victimized and oppressed under the tyranny of Saddam and the Baathists! That they are naturally democratic and advocates of freedom!

If uncertain about anything of Mojahedin’s past, the world vows that MKO was the most enthusiastic, strategic alliance of Saddam. The evidence? They were given land to establish a “city” of their own. With Saddam’s donated dollars in their pockets, armed with Iraqi weapons, and trained under Iraqi officers they recurrently violated Iranian borders at a time when Iranian were busy dealing with Saddam’s assault. Any body in doubt? They were the most trustworthy forces cooperating with the terrible Iraqi intelligence system. They had the permission to freely move around Iraq carrying arms. They gladly accepted the mission to have a key role in suppressing the insurgent Iraqi Kurds. They put their unsatisfied insiders in the same gruesome, terrific cells of the notorious Abu-Ghorib prison where the dissidents of Saddam’s regime had been consigned to oblivion. A look at videotaped secret meetings of Saddam’s high-ranking officers with MKO’s heads seems to suffice.

To “have a community of strategy with Iraqi people”, Mojahedin have to prove they have been their brothers in hardship. They proved it, not for people, but for Saddam. They were ready to sacrifice their life for Saddam. Once Maryam Rajavi announced that all girls and women under her command were ready to fight shoulder to shoulder with Iraqi forces to die for the great leader Saddam Hussein as she did.* Of course, no body can blame them for what they fail to remember!

To achieve their objectives, Mojahedin never care whose body they crush under their feet. The advocates of Machiavellianism deny the relevance of morality in political approaches and strictly hold that collusion, treachery and deceit are justified in pursuing and maintaining political objectives. They needed and need to survive. Once they colluded with Saddam and today they move on a treacherous line to deceit Iraqi people. The fact is that they have no community of strategy with anyone.

*. Daily Mail, England, August 17, 1990.

Omid Pouya, July 10, 2006

July 16, 2006 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mujahedin Khalq Organization as a terrorist group

A”nice-sounding”name won’t change terrorist nature of MEK

A reliable source has informed Iran-Interlink that neoconservatives in the US administration directly instructed the Mojahedin Khalq (MEK) several weeks ago to create "some nice-sounding NGOs" so that they can be funded under the 75 million dollars funding project which was approved to "promote democracy" in Iran.

America knows, historically, that creating and supporting terrorist groups is not in the long-term interests of that nation. It is not possible to use ‘good terrorists’ to fight ‘bad terrorists’. The problem with the MEK is not that they don’t have money and not that they are not already getting money from various sources. The problem is that they are too dirty so that after twenty five years everyone knows them. They are hated throughout the world by Iranians and non-Iranians alike.

Even if the MEK were to receive the full 75 million dollars – which is of course supposed to be distributed among several ‘opposition’ groups – this would still not be a fraction of the support they received from Saddam Hussein for over two decades, and for which they have absolutely nothing to show as a result.

Iran-Interlink,  July 14, 2006

July 16, 2006 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
France

‘The Association of Criminals’

Mojahedin / National Council of Resistance of Iran – ‘The Association of Criminals’

The judge in France, who is prosecuting Rajavi’s gang for illegal and criminal charges, has rightly called this group”The Association of Criminals”.

This, above all, shows the depth of the judge’s recognition of the nature and behavior of the MKO.

Abulghassem Rezaee, one of 17 members of this association, has given some explanation about the recent decision of the appeals court (to lift some restrictions on MKO), which itself displays the critical situation of MKO in France.

Rezaee, as the one who is fully aware of the case’s details, while trying not to reveal much, admits that:

 

1. MKO’s case is still open. He says that the case is practically open and that regime (read”French Judiciary”) will try again to keep it open.

2.”Our lawyers had asked the judge to lift the restrictions and bans. As we expected, the judge refused and we took it to appeals court”. So, the judge of the case is opposed to lifting these restrictions.

3.”Chief of France’s Counter-Espionage Office said it was right to destroy a terrorist organization.”This means that France’s intelligence services are wholly against the Rajavi’s band, which is the result of 25 years experience of countering the deceptions of MKO.

4.”Those countries whose security services investigated MKO supporters know that they can do nothing; they can’t stop our political works and resistance against theocracy in Iran. During past 3 years, we have won all courts we were taken to.”This means that Europe’s security officials are opposed to MKO’s illegal activities and that Mojahedin have been forced to accept to only do political works and avoid from violence.

 

Despite these confessions, MKO’s propaganda system tries to boost the morale of its desperate members by relating the decision of appeals court to the case itself; they stupidly claim:

“The case was based on the claim that some people in France are doing terrorist activities. They had even coined the name of”The Association of Criminals”for the MKO. With baseless charges, they created some restrictions for the officials of resistance to cut their relations with activities. When the court cancels the ruling it means that whole charges were baseless.”

This claim is so invalid that Rezaee himself admits to the hatred of European officials for the MKO and says:

“Informed sources quoted a European government saying that when MKO is bombed, more than half of them will go to Iran and others will disperse; then we can deal with remaining small groups”.

In addition, Rezaee refers to the measures taken by the US and Europeans after 9/11 and that how, in line with fighting terrorism, they controlled the group. However, MKO still tries to attribute all this global opposition (to Rajavi’s group) to Iran!

July 16, 2006 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
The cult of Rajavi

How to organize a cult

How to organize a cult

How to organize a cult

July 16, 2006 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Iraq

MKO and Sharing Strategic Interests with Iraqis

In a speech made in a rally organized by NCRI, Mojahedin Khalq Organization’s (MKO) political wing active in France, in Paris on July 1, 2006 Dowlat Nowrouzi, NCRI’s UK representative, referred to the organization’s widely advertised claim of 5200000 Iraqi people’s supporting MKO’s presence in Iraq and stated that “the organization shares common strategic interests with Iraqi people in accomplishment of peace and democracy”. Her words, a clear MKO’s paradoxical stance, are an affront to Iraqi people. She seems to have a weak memory to remember that MKO’s settlement in Iraq was the outcome of a made alliance with Saddam who led a dictatorial, tyrannical rule over Iraq and that, MKO acted as his mercenaries to suppress peoples’ freedom-seeking moves in Iraq.

How she has found “common strategic interests” is a question Nowrouzi should give an answer to, something she never does as it is Mojahedin’s convention. If it means sympathizing with Iraqi people’s struggle to accomplish demands of democracy and freedom pursuant to the country’s religious, cultural, and traditional conventions, no doubt, MKO’s strategy has proved to be in absolute contradiction with that of people. The group’s stance towards Iraqi political bodies and parties after Saddam’s fall and its policy of advocating disorder to survive in no way comply with peoples demands.

Before anything else, Iraqi people in an abundantly clear voice cry out for Saddam’s just trial for his overt and covert crimes done against the nation. MKO have yet shunned taking a clear position meaning they, too, bore the sin of a close collaboration with the fallen dictator whom they regarded, according to evidences, brother beyond a patron. The existing evidences unveil that Nowrouzi’s words are exactly the same as those that once were addressed to Saddam and his generals by Massoud Rajavi. At timely, regular meetings with Iraqi army and intelligence officials, Massoud Rajavi again and again paid homage to Saddam and talked of the necessity of close cooperation to safeguard common interests. In the irrefutable videotaped meetings between Massoud Rajavi and General Saber, the head of Saddam’s Intelligence Services, once Rajavi stated:

As far as we are concerned I have only one thing to say. In my mind and in my heart, I cannot separate the account of our interests from your interests. They are exactly matching each other….The reality is that our interests match each other and are closely mixed together. *

For sure, the interests of MKO in the reign of Saddam matched that of the dictator which was in contrast to the interests of people. In fact, the only thing Saddam did not account and had no concern for were people and their interests. It is not amazing to see MKO undergoing a sudden change overnight; they call it “strategy”.

Who can deny Saddam’s horrible, gruesome cells in Abu-Ghurib prison where MKO enjoyed possession of a few granted cells to utilize as suppressive means against its dissidents? Dissidents were a challenge both for Iraqi regime and MKO and as Rajavi once stated:

Whatever is against you, it is obviously against us, and vice versa. Our security is one. When we receive a blow, it is to both of us.*

The notorious opportunist MKO fish in troubled waters not caring the least for the interests of Iraqi peoples. At the time when the presence of foreign troops has negatively affected Iraq and has escalated turmoil and disorder, MKO is under the protection of the US army. Known as uninvited gusts, MKO intrude in Iraq’s internal affairs and even meddled in the process of elections the same as the remnants of the ousted regime did. Once General Saber appreciated MKO’s standing by Saddam’s regime saying:

We have an Arabic proverb that says: Brothers show themselves in hardship. You supported us with the bodies of your fighters.*

Thus, they had proved to be pro-Saddam fighters. Can they now provide any proof of sharing common interests with Iraqi people? Neither Nowrouzi nor any other MKO insiders can possibly give a distinct answer to the question. Somebody should tell MKO that when the broad day reveals the facts, it is unproductive to bury your head in the sand.

 

*. The quotes are all from the English transcript of videotaped meetings between Massoud Rajavi and General Saber delineated by Iran-Interlink.com.

mojahedin.ws  – Bahar Irani – July 8, 2006

July 13, 2006 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Europe

The West cannot take the Mojahedin seriously

In an article by James Graff, “Are The PMOI Iran’s last Hope For A Peaceful Solution?”, TIME Europe has discussed the position of the MKO in the west. Graff wrote:

“…But there are also reasons why Western governments remain wary: among them are the group’s ideological origins in a mixture of Marxism and Islam, the aid they offered to and received from Saddam Hussein, and charges, which they deny, implicating them in terrorist acts in Iran. Many independent analysts, such as Paris-based sociologist Farhad Khosrokhavar, say the group has few supporters inside Iran.

The PMOI’s terrorist listing was first secured nine years ago as a concession to the reformist government of Mohammed Khatami, but it has been consistently renewed since then. A legal challenge to the designation was denied in 2004 by the D.C. Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals, in a judgment written by John Roberts, now the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. At Le Bourget, a number of sympathetic politicians spoke in support of the organization, but none who have the ear of sitting governments.

The widow of President François Mitterrand, Danielle, headlined the French contingent, which also featured Edith Cresson, whose stints as prime minister and European Commissioner brought her little credit. And so the battle continues. The Le Bourget gathering had the harmless character of a political rally-cum-family reunion rather than the menace of a terrorist conclave. But the PMOI represents a Third Way the West is still unlikely to embrace — even if it has no other good options either.

 

Full article:

http://www.time.com/time/europe/eu/article/0,13716,1211079,00.html

 TIME Europe, July 10, 2006

July 12, 2006 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mujahedin Khalq Organization's Propaganda System

Source of Legitimacy of MKO’s Presence in Iraq!

Following the comments of Mr. Mahmoud Al-Mashhadani on the situation of MKO in Iraq, which showed the unanimous attitude of Iraqi government toward the illegal presence of MKO in Iraq, Rajavi’s gang hurriedly resorted to a weak and ineffective person to decrease the effects of Mr. Mashhdani’s comments.

MKO, trying to use an interview in order to justify their illegal presence in Iraq, virtually confirmed this Mr. Mashhadan’s comments that occupiers’ support is the major reason for this group’s presence in Iraq.

MKO’s stupid propaganda system called the statements of the head of Iraqi parliament "fake" and by asking guided questions from a man called "Khalf Al-Ayan" tried to follow the old line of dividing Shiites and Sunnis so as to calm down desperate members.

In a cunning move, MKO officials claimed that Iranian press have announced that Mashhadani has canceled asylum rights of MKO members in Iraq (MKO has never been granted such a right, neither by the US nor Iraqi government) and then asked Khalf Al-Ayan to comment!

In this regard, Al-Ayan said:

"Regarding the issue of MKO’s presence in Iraq and its status for the time being, we should say that Mojahedin have been in Iraq for more than 20 years since the former government granted them political asylum right… but at the current situation, Iraqi government has no control over this because it’s under the occupation; and occupying forces have confirmed asylum right of Mojahedin and are protecting them. When the Iraqi government becomes independent and occupying forces leave the country, then it would be different and the government will independently deal with this issue."

So, it becomes clear that:

1. MKO’s presence in Iraq is rooted in Saddam Hussein’s support for this group and has nothing to do with Iraqi people and current government. In addition, Saddam’s government had not signed any of international conventions on refugees and the MKO that has been in Iraq for 24 years has no related case in UNHCR and other institutions. Saddam had in fact given shelter to Mojahedin and this is not related to political asylum rights.

2. According to Mr. Mashhadani, and confirmed by Al-Ayan, Iraqi government can’t decide on this group currently because of the interferences of occupiers.

3. The claim of getting asylum right from occupiers is a sheer lie. Occupiers have only granted them protected status until the Iraqi government can decide about them. In addition, according to international regulations, occupiers are not authorized to do so. Besides, occupiers that don’t observe any of international laws have been major reason behind the presence of this group in Iraq.

4. The head of Iraqi parliament put it clearly that the Iraqi government can’t expel the MKO from Iraq until the occupiers are in Iraq, and this is what Al-Ayan has pointed to!

Irandidban –   2006/07/10

July 12, 2006 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Homa Khodabande

Interview with Homa Khodabandeh

Extracted from "Shaqayeqhaye Zakhmi" (Wounded Peonies) By Mehdi Khoshhal

I was looking for Mrs. Homa Khodabandeh, calling wherever I knew until I could contact with her by the help of his uncle, Mr. Masud Khodabandeh. Since Mrs. Khodabandeh couldn’t speak Persian well, Mr. Masud Khodabandeh translated her words to me. I started my interview:

Mrs. Khodabandeh, I was researching on Mujahedin’s children and the cruelty they suffer, when I visited Iran-Interlink website reading some of your father, Mr. Ibrahim Khodabandeh’s articles, in which one important point attracted my attention:

The issue he presented about his daughter, I mean you.

Mr. Ibrahim Khodabandeh wrote about you regularly weather when he was a member of MEK and he was forced to ignore you or when he was in Prison and needed your love to make his pains tolerable.

Therefore I would like to have an interview with you since  I khow you have a lot to tell about yourself, your father, mujahedin and Iran where you traveled to visit your father. My first question:

 when you were born, your father was sent on duty to Sweden by MKO and your mother who was a British woman and had married your father when they were students, went to Sweden to show her daughter to her husband and asked to meet your father. Meanwhile your father demanded his responsible to visit his daughter, the responsible replied that he can go but they have a lot of works to do. Then your father felt ashamed and blamed himself because of his demand .I’d  like to know, during these twenty years while your father was a member of MKO, how many times could he meet you?

 

–         When my father was a Mujahed he could visit me only four or five times. In fact, I could find my father in Sweden or Iraq and visit him for a very short time.

–         When your father was arrested in Syria, in April 2003 and was sent to Iran, what was your reaction to his arrest and what did you do in order to liberate him?

–         As soon as I heard the news of his arrest and imprisonment I called the "Amnesty International" from London. Unfortunately they told me why I contacted with them after the transfer of my father from Syria to Iran. You know that MKO had hidden the arrest of my father and his friend from any source that could do something, for two months. I really doubt about their act since they play with the fate and security of their own members. 

–         If the organization had informed you of your father’s arrest, what could you do in order to liberate your father?

–         The Amnesty International told me that if I had informed them before my father’s transfer to Iran, they could inform the international organizations and then the Syrian officials so that they could help the liberation and transmission of my father to Britain which was possible since I am British and my father has political refugee in Britain.

–         While you couldn’t do any thing in order to liberate your father in Britain, what did you do?

–           Here, I have to appreciate my uncles Masud Khodabandeh and Mr. Win Grifth, since they really helped us. Mr. Win Grifth Contacted with the Iranian Embassy and arranged several visits with my father, therefore my husband and children and I could travel to Iran to meet my father. A few days later, Mr.Win Grifth, Mrs. Ann Singleton, my uncles’ wife and Sir Teddy Taylor from British Parliament also came to Iran to visit my father. Besides, Mr. Win Grifth did some efforts to apply amnesty for MEK’s leaders from Iranian Government, of which I don’t know the details and my uncle was acquainted with what was going on. Yes, I traveled to Iran to visit my father seeing what I could do.

–         Would you please explain what did you get when you saw your father and Iran?

 

–         On June 10th 2004, I went to Iran with my family. Several daily and private visits were arranged with my father, in different places especially in his paternal house.

–         It seems that you were able to visit your father in the prison of Islamic Republic more than the time your father was working with MKO. I’d like to know how the MKO described the story while your father’s arrest and mutually what they asked you to do.

–         Giving wrong information about my father, they asked me to go to London and set myself on fire in front of British Parliament.

–         What was the wrong information and how did you feel mentally and physically during those days?

–        The wrong information was that my father has been tortured excessively in Iranian prison and has been supposed to be executed the next morning. I had a terrible spiritual condition since I had recently given birth to my baby.

–         What was your reply to MKO, finally? 

–         My response was Negative (NO)

–         When you replied them that self-immolation is not a logic solution to save your father, what was their reaction? 

–         When they found that I objected their need for self-immolation and their other needs, and I don’t act as a Mujahed member, they insulted me disgracing my personality. When they realized that not me, not my mother and nobody from my father’s family would be caught in their net, they began to forge my family. A person claimed to be my father’s wife instead of my mother and MEK used her to represent its terrorist organization. They also brought an orphan to their 10-15 people gathered demonstrations that they hold with their communist flag and claimed that she was my father’s daughter. Of course I think the only stupids who believe this were themselves and no one else. .

–         Mrs. Khodabandeh through your father’s writings and speeches I got an interesting point where, in an interview, he said:" during the first year I was in Evin Prison, I read more books, such as political, social and even novels and story books than my whole life; it was my first experience to think, relieved of   " Current Operation", " Weekly Baptism", the forced organizational atmosphere, responsible and ideological despises." Now I guess that during the years your father was in Islamic Republic prison, his personality changed and learned while being in MKO for a hundred years he couldn’t get this mutation. Of course, I’d really like your father to be liberated from prison and return to his family. However, what did you get of your father’s new situation? What’s your message on your father’s past, present and future?

–         As you know, my father, Ibrahim Khodabandeh, has asked me to act as his representative in Britain or other places, until he is in prison. As it concerns to me ,as a Muslim British woman, although I knew my father was working for MKO, I, personally, had no information on MKO and I wasn’t even interested in knowing them or the Iranian Political scene and my little information was limited to what I read in the newspapers. Therefore, when in June 2003, I found that my father was arrested in Syria and after two months sent to Iran, I got worried and scared. The same day MEK called my house saying that my father is under torture and will be executed soon. They insisted me to go to London and burn myself in front of British Parliament saying this is the only hope to save my father. As you know this suggestion made me more terrified. My lawyer says that according to British laws such acts are considered as crime. I’m investigating the case now to prevent such actions in my country. Imagine how shocked I got when a few weeks later, I heard some members of MEK set themselves on fire, and consequently two of them died. I even heard that they were given narcotics before setting themselves on fire.

I appreciate the efforts of Iran – Interlink to help me during that delirious atmosphere. They helped me follow correct canals to find the truth and then help my father.

 

During last year, I received contrary reports and suggestions. MKO always insisted that my father was still under torture and would be executed soon so, when he called me last September, I was still suspicious about what was going on but while I kept on contacting with him during the following months I found out that he is really treated well.

The good thing is that he can visit his parents whenever and as many times as he wants.

I also have to thank Mr. Win Grifth for his activities in Britain in order to help me contact the Iranian Embassy accompanying me to visit the Ambassador in London. I really appreciate him for accepting the ambassadors’ invitation to Iran to visit my father and check his situation. The visit was made with Sir Teddy Taylor who was especially an important help to my father spiritually assuring him of a just and rapid trial. I would like to thank Iran- Interlink, especially due to encouraging me and strengthening me spiritually in order to travel to Iran and visit my father in prison.

I traveled to Tehran with my husband and three children, this June. At first, my husband and I were worried about our situation there. Mujahedin had continually told us terrible stories and we expected to see a Mullah in each street suppressing women. Actually the condition in Iran was very much different from what we expected.

My father was with us, in his mother’s house, where we were staying, everyday. Since my father had joined MKO, this period was the longest during one which I could see my father and be with him. He told me that as a member of MKO he wasn’t allowed to meet his own family or contact with them except the times he was ordered to force me to participate in a demonstration in order to raise the number of their participants. Internally terrified he remembered a time when I was only thirteen, he convinced my mother to bring me to Brussels for a demonstration. My mother stayed in hotel and my father and I went to the city centre. But at the same time he received an order to go to Paris. My father told me that he had been in a dilemma. He even had thought of taking me to Paris without informing my mother. Finally he decided to leave me alone in the streets of Brussels since he had to abbey the order of MKO.

My father has asked me several times why I still love him considering the years of separation and the way he treated me during those years. It doesn’t really have an explanation. I think the love among the members of a family is stronger then everything and since I believe in Islam which guides me in all domains, I could forgive my father in spite of all the difficulties he caused me and my mother. While my trip to Iran, it really became clear to me that my father didn’t do any of those works with his own will and choice. He was under the influence of mind controlling methods of a cult that had prevailed over him severely, so he was in fact a victim of MKO too. That’s why when my father was arrested in Syria; he denounced the truth about MKO’s smuggling activities clearly, but MKO is still insisting that he had gone to Syria to visit his family.  My father knows well at whom points accusingly. Although he is ashamed and puts faults on himself in front of me, he repeatedly has told me that MKO had told lies to him and his friend and deceived them. He asked me to send this message to those of his ex-colleagues who can listen. Especially he said that Elaheh Azmifar, his former wife who is still with MEK, shouldn’t listen to them and should come to Iran in order to reveal the issue. He said:" I guarantee her health and security in here. She doesn’t have to stay here but she can come and meet me and Jamil Bassam and find out that we are safe and well." He said that his friends in MKO shouldn’t listen to the lies the leaders tell them. He said that he believes in a secular and non-ideological but now that he has seen the reality and various political parties of Iran closely, he thinks that Rajavi has been removed of Iran political scene for years. He didn’t see any sympathy or support for MEK’s terrorist operations in Iran; he didn’t see anyone who has forgiven Mujahedin for being mercenaries of Saddam Hussein during Iran-Iraq war, either. He said that at the beginning of his imprisonment the guards took Jamil Bassam and him to the streets of Tehran telling them to ask anyone they want to give his or her opinion on MKO. My father said that this was really a useful experience. The few people who knew MKO, hated them due to their cooperation with Iraq during the war.Because of that, both of us ,are really happy that all the ones who met my father including  an independent journalist, saw what is going on in Iran with their own eyes . I think all of us got familiar with the real and new life in there. For example I found the Iranian women enjoying more individual freedom than all the other Middle Eastern countries I’ve ever seen

Once  I had gone shopping in a middle class quarter of the city. It was interesting to my father when the salesperson found out that I wasn’t Iranian and got surprised. He said:" but she is the only woman wearing a perfect Hijab in the whole street." At the end, the total message my father wanted me to send, was his thanking to the ones who have helped him and tried for him; especially Iran-Interlink, Barroness Ema Nickelson, Sir Teddy Taylor, Mr. Win Grifth.

My father is really hopeful to his own future and the future of all those people who are the victims of MKO and he believes that finally a way will be opened to liberate them. Even if to find this way they’ll need to go to prison.

My own message is again thanking you. I should definitely thank all the Iranians who treated us unexpectedly respectfully and kindly.

–         I’d really appreciate you, Mrs. Homa Khodabande, because of the information you gave us.

–         I also thank you.

–         Homa Khodabande was born in Newcastle in 1978. Her father, Ibrahim Khodabande was one of the founders of MKO in abroad, he was practically separated from his family from the beginning of his struggle and his daughter, Homa, was grown up by mother, under the protection of her grandparents. Before the beginning of Gulf War, her grandmother took Homa to Baqdad. She could arrange an exceptional visit between Homa and her father in MEK’s Camp. The little Homa who was interested in Islam from her teens, started to study Islamic studies while studying in the College. Meanwhile she got familiar with a person named Taher. Taher who came from a religious family and had graduated a few years ago working as an electric engineer, fell in love with Homa. The fruits of their marriage are three children two boys and a girl. They are a religious family who is opposed to fundamentalism seriously and Taher (who is the manager of railway projects of Alstum Company in Britain and is living with Homa and their kids in Birmingham) fights any stupid ideology like this according to his Islamic duty. Homa says that she never allows a person like Rajavi misguides and corrupts her children under the cover of Islam. She says :"I tasted enough of the bitter poison of such people during my childhood"

 Published by Aawa Association – NEJATNGO translation

July 12, 2006 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
The MEK; Baath Party Accomplice

A Ba’ath Party Replica

Mojahedin Khalq Organization (MKO) left France to settle in Iraq with the aim to utilize Saddam and Baath Party’s potentialities to form an alliance against Iran. Saddam, too, had the same idea in mind and could venture on MKO in its war with Iran. The close strategic, political collaboration furthered a brotherhood between Saddam and Rajavi; it may explain why MKO yet avoid taking any clear position against Saddam and his crimes. As a proof of their loyalty, MKO sided with Saddam in suppression of Iraqi insurgents in 1991. They had to because, as Rajavi made it clear in his meeting with Iraqi generals, they moved on the same line of interest with Saddam:

As far as we are concerned I have only one thing to say. In my mind and in my heart, I cannot separate the account of our interests from your interests. They are exactly matching each other. [1]

In the same meeting, General Saber, the Head of Saddam’s Intelligence Services, appreciated MKO’ worthwhile assistance the same as brothers’:

We feel ashamed in front of your speech. And in front of your leadership and your organisation,and you and your army and your fighters and your political stands. Exactly in a situation that a common danger was threatening us and this common danger has put us in the same line of defence. We have an Arabic proverb that says: Brothers show themselves in hardship. You supported us with the bodies of your fighters. [2]

General Saber unequivocally points to MKO’s hand in glove with Iraqi forces’ crackdown on insurgent Iraqis:

Also many thanks to the brothers in the National Liberation Army and their big role in the process of the past uprisings and revolts… The other issue is that during these uprisings that we faced and what we fought against together and defeated… and that was the second phase of the attack and the programs and the plans and plots in this respect. [3]

Regardless of all these corroborated evidences on MKO and Saddm’s close collaboration to secure mutual interests, what really augmented the alliance were the shared political, organizational, and ideological tenets projecting in both MKO and Iraqi Baath Party. The first remarkable and dominant feature in both is the leadership hegemony. Both Saddam and Rajavi were the predominant influence atop occupying a permanent leading seat. Far above a leadership position, they both besought a highly acclaimed position with the potentialities far above those of earthly men and were indulged in practice of discrimination against people and insiders on the grounds of the Party and group’s ideological priority.

Iraq’s political-social state structure, under Baath Party’s hegemony, heavily influenced by Stalinist Parties, was running under Sadam’s hegemony. The bloody internal clearance, the commonly practiced method in Stalinist Parties, emboldened Saddam as the authoritative state power in perpetrating covert group slaughters and blood bathes. It was also so celebrated an idea in MKO with the exception that the authority was limited in the framework of an organization perpetrating atrocities against the insiders and staging violent and terrorist acts against the outsiders. Of course, it projected a future Iran should it succeed to power. In fact, MKO in Iraq were practically testing an ideology they were to administer once in power. Bijan Nyabati, a MKO left element, believes:

MKO’s strategy being stabilized in Iraq, they got the opportunity to test their revolutionary theory in the laboratory of their self-controlled community far from the outside influential magnetic field of ruling systems. [4]

In other words, the Iraqi soil, because of Saddam’s totalitarian and hegemonic control over all aspects of Iraqi people, served to form a microcosm of future Iran:

The formed microcosm had to contain all the political features of a real society. A legal state with a president atop, a parliament in exile, army and police forces, judiciary and prison, a state-run TV-radio station as well as media and news agency, diplomatic bodies, extensive financial institutions and logistics to feed was all the component elements of the microcosm. [5]

There are more fundamental elements shared by MKO and Baath Party. Both justify their hegemonic leadership to survive. The difference lies in geographical and political conditions. The Baath Party and Saddam justify their existence and leading potentialities according to blood and tribal relations. Above that, in a broader extent of advocating nationalism, they chanted slogans of creating a Great Iraq to further the authoritative hegemony. That is in this way that the party mesmerized peoples and exploited peoples’ soul and body to serve its interests; there immerged Saddam Devotees Squads who are ready for suicidal operations on the master’s order.

Somehow the devotedness may seem to be a result of apprehension of punishment for disobedience. Saddam’s inter-Party executions are more disobedience punishments rather than having political and national causes. In MKO, first it is the ideology and then patriotism that serve recruit sympathizers to preserve the organization. The ideology in MKO does the same influential factor of blood and tribal relations in Baath Party. That is the ideology that compels devotees to commit self-destruction operations as ordered. The same as Baath Party, MKO insiders are under the illusion of being led by a heavenly blessed guide. The similarity between MKO and Baath Party is emphasized by Rajavi addressing General Saber in this way:

I think that the relations between us and you and Iraq, being the government of Iraq or the Baath Party and at the top of it Mr President [Saddam], and on the other side, the Iranian Resistance and the Mojahedin and the National Liberation, is not a purely political relation and one cannot interpret our relations like that any more. I think that the brotherhood relation has been completed. Such brothers that would not come short of anything for each other…. And that was how our fates were tied together. Our fates have become one and our bloods have been mixed together. And you know that there is no exaggeration in this. [6]

Thus, whatever threatens the Baath Party might be a threat to MKO as well, that is to say, any democratic and freedom movement could sounded the alarm. That is a fact Rajavi admitted:

Whatever is against you, it is obviously against us, and visa versa. Our security is one. When we receive a blow, it is to both of us. And when there is progress, it affects us both. [7]

Moreover, the alliance between MKO and Baath’s Party before being a pragmatic and tactical one was based on cult-like similarities. Both attempted to develop a community that evolved the ideological tendencies of the party and the cult. The core of all these ideological teachings was expansion of an absolute totalitarian influence on society and insiders under a hegemonic leadership. Elaborating on the importance of these ideological teachings Nyabaty states:

The final solution to the issue of leadership that could put an end to a problem known to be the Achilles’ heel in most contemporary revolutions and movements was only evolution of a stabilized theory of imamate inside the organization that could lead the new revolution. [8]

The mere difference between the two was that MKO had succeeded to assume a classified order of these ideological teachings, a task that Saddam failed to accomplish because of tribal and historical infrastructures. In practice, however, the Baath Party was moving in the same line with MKO.

 

Notes

 

[1]. “To be Judged in History”; English Transcript of Videotaped Meetings Between Massoud Rajavi and the Head of Saddam’s Intelligence Services, Iran-interlinl.com.

[2]. ibid.

[3]. ibid.

[4]. Nyabati Bijan; “A distinct look at Mojahedin’s internal revolution, slightly from inside, slightly from outside”,109.

[5]. ibid.

[6]. “To be Judged in History”; English Transcript of Videotaped Meetings Between Massoud Rajavi and the Head of Saddam’s Intelligence Services, Iran-interlinl.com.

[7]. ibid.

[8]. Nyabati Bijan; “A distinct look at Mojahedin’s internal revolution, slightly from inside, slightly from outside”, 90.

 

By Omid Pouya, –  Mojahedin.ws, July 5, 2006

 

July 10, 2006 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Recent Posts

  • Why Neither Pahlavi nor the MEK Can Claim to Represent Iran?

    October 31, 2026
  • Tactical Links Between the MEK and Separatist Groups in Iran

    October 26, 2026
  • Echoes in an Empty Room: MEK Propaganda, Western Media Silence, and the Cuneo Case

    October 24, 2026
  • Various Aspects of Massoud Rajavi’s Disappearance

    October 20, 2026
  • MEK agents near schools in Tirana, Albania

    October 17, 2026
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Youtube

© 2003 - 2025 NEJAT Society . All Rights Reserved. NejatNGO.org


Back To Top
Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip