Missions of Nejat Society

A German delegation discuss HR affairs with Nejat

A German delegation discuss human rights affairs with Nejat Society

Nejat society’s correspondent – Isfahan – a German delegation with 17 lawyers, legal experts, judges and scholars came to the historical city of Isfahan to discuss human rights affairs with their Isfahani counterparts.

After continuous efforts, the representative of Nejat society was able to meet some of them. This brief meeting was held in "Chehelsetoon Garden" on December 16.

In the meeting, Mr. Hashemi who runs Nejat society in Isfahan first talked about why the society was formed and then gave pamphlets to the guests. These pamphlets, translated to English, contained a brief history of the cult of Mojahedin and how they resorted to terrorist operations before and after Revolution, pictures of victims, history of Isfahan, a list of assassinations by MKO in Isfahan province, how the society was formed, the goals of the society, a part of society’s monthly magazine, and also a CD containing the pictures of former MKO members returning home; This CD had English subtitles.

In the meeting, Mr. Hashemi asked the delegation to accept society’s invitation to travel to Iran and become more familiar with the activities and purposes of this non-governmental society.

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mujahedin Khalq Organization as a terrorist group

Killing generations of Kurds

Morvarid Operation

Morvarid (pearl) is the name of a chain of mountains in a frontier region in Kermanshah province of Iran and Kurdistan of Iraq, where suppressing operation and massacre of Kurds took place. "Morvarid Operation" is a given name by Rajavi’s cult.

An American journal wrote: "the only and main invasion of NLA during the last six years happened in 1991 right in the aftermath of Gulf War while Saddam Hussein ordered Rajavi to help him with suppressing Kurds’ uprising in the north of Iraq."

To cover their crimes against Kurds, Mujahedin claimed that they repelled the attack of Iranian forces to their bases and called the alleged anti – attack,"Pearl Operation".

The MKO’s leader, chief and members of the council, commandant and the army general staff disappointed of a new war between Iraq and Iran, who observed the return of Iraqi government from Kuwait in the fall of 1990, after a chain of staff meetings, held a public meeting to determine their strategy in which they investigated rotation of the affairs in the region. Since the cult can’t consider any reality except the atmosphere ruling its own situation, it was obvious that they choose the war and then they loose it.

To compensate this loss, Rajavi used his entire mercenary forces to keep and maintain their main sponsor – Saddam Regime – and they set out to rescue the dictator from falling in that period of time. Thus they started their dreadful crimes of which you will see the description as follows:

The procedure of conveying the strategy

Masud and Maryam attended the meeting of Iraq Revolution and Leadership Council in person and were informed of all the details of that important situation. According to Rajavi’s justifications, the Baath regime knew the US would invade them, so they would be obliged to take all their forces to Kuwait boundary , there was an internal danger from the opponents: Kurds in the north and Shiites in the South.

The only force to oppose these oppositions was MKO since it saw its presence in the absence of the others and Saddam charged it with this duty (the Suppression of Kurds)

Conveyance and settlement

In the fall of 1990, Masud and Maryam, brought about division and distribution of the forces as the followings:

1. In the first part they organized and settled about 40 armour plated divisions and mechanized infantry in a region called "Kefri". The district of Kefri, reaches Solaimanieh Province from north and Kirkuk Province from North West and Hamrin Mountains up to qaneqein and Agh Dagh Mountains up to Qasr Shirin, Iran, from East. As a matter of fact, this way of the settlement of the forces had made a separating line between Kurdish areas and central Iraq.

2. The second part included three infantry battalions of the most devoted members of MKO in Saddam’s guards’ disguises who were dispatched to Karbala and Najaf provinces. They were under the order of Saddam’s guards to suppress the Shiites.

3. The third part of the forces included 200 to 300 patrolling teams armed with automatic machine – guns that were under the order of a woman named Sara. She was the commandant of the seventh axis in Nader Afshar base, in 1991. The so – called forces were charged to control and suppress the Shiites around Bagdad. According to one of the commandant, named "Hamid Hadi Beigi, they machine-gunned any gathering day and night.

4. Rajavi used the "ideology" trick to stimulate his forces. In order to justify his deceit he held a meeting with "cross" code where he stated the theory of "killing people". He said:" if a person is negligent to do so, and our system can not keep the Land Lord (Saddam), necessarily the opponents are winners and if so, they will crucify all of us and I am the first one. Now if anyone wants me to be crucified, can hesitate". He penetrated the organizational manufactured feeling of members and put them against the Iraqi people, although they were not willing to do so, at heart.

Allocation of forces

Rajavi owned almost a thousand foreign forces (workers) from Arabic countries especially Sudan. They organized all of them to bring supplies and munitions, and act as the supporting forces. The Iraqi army gave a group of bombardiers to each unit of Rajavi’s cult. And even the army issued a circular for Rajavi according to which they authorized Rajavi to command the entire dispersed forces of Baath army and to try them in case of disobeyance.

Therefore, MKO – Saddam’s Private Army- which claimed the liberating fight to free its own people, opposed the meek people of Iraq. And prevented their victory and caused the frustration of their entire struggle.

The Spark of War:

With the first shooting from the US forces, in that morning, I remember the Mujahedin who started to fight from the first moments. All Rajavi forces were already designed and settled through a line from Khosravi frontier to Syria frontier which was the separating axis between Kurds and the center of Iraq, but in the South and Center of Iraq Rajavi’s forces were under the order of Saddam’s guards and brought about the suppression of the opponents directly. In this stage, several divisions were sent to Qader Karam in the South of Suleimanieh in order to reach Kirkuk and prevent the fall of the city. In the last justifications of Rajavi about the so-called units, Izad Ibrahi praised the intrepidity (cruelty) of Mujahedin in a meeting in April, 1991.

The first confrontation with Iraqi people took place in Kirkuk tee, under the direct order of Maryam. The direct commandant of the fight was the commandant of 26th division of Rajavi’s forces – Ali Naqi Hadadi (Kamal) who was taken on a one way ride because he hesitate to kill the people hard-heartedly. Thus he was discharged in the same location and a woman named Behjat was appointed instead of him.

In this location many of Kurdish Pishmargs and civilians were killed and prevented from advancing toward Tooz, Khormatou and Kirkuk.

The second team was going to Sulaiman Beg and AlAzim then Kefri and Kellar in the North West of Khaneqein in the same direction; they were responsible to occupy the cities and the surrounding areas. The third team contained several divisions which were advancing toward Jlula and Khaneqein in the South West of Qasr Shirin Iran.

Pre War Steps:

To prevent the minds of the members, the cult used the following tricks:

1. To hidden more than a thousand of Iranian POWs while the Red Cross was exchanging the POWs. (The cult of Rajavi, first kept the mentioned people in a base called Sardar, near Kirkut and then took them to Hanif Camp in Nozhvel and used them as slaves to dig rifle-pits and operate other preparation processes, a month before the settlement of the forces.)

2. Through a message, Rajavi told the NLA that this time "Forough 2" is through Kurdistan direction and stated the reasons including cooperation of the whole forces in Kurdistan of Iran. They pretended that some Kurdish province of Iran have stated their solidarity with MKO. Therefore they justified the legitimacy of their campaign toward Kurdistan, Iraq.

3. Rajavi explained leaving of their battalions to Karbala and Najaf as only taking care of the MKO’s cemetery in Karbala.

4. They sent a dozen of professional teams to Kuwait to transit the booties of war. While trafficking one of the officials of MKO named Shaban Esrafilian was wounded.

As I said the war was started in Qader Karam Tee in the North of Tooz while the north of Iraq was completely fallen and the people of Iraq had set out to control the roads and make military departments. The cult captured and disarmed all of them and shot many of them. MKO could control the region and seized the both ways to Baqdad and prevented the Kurds from advancing toward Bagdad. In this situation several groups of Kurds called on the MKO’s commandant to negotiate with them but they were crushed under the tanks and the city of Tooz Khor Matou, the place of negotiation was bombarded. The description of such crimes is shown in the propaganda and films of Morvarid in the proper organization. Rajavi bombarded the meek Kurds hypocritically and said:" we want to enter our country through Kurdistan and you are the obstacle against our victory." In that cold weather, the citizens of Tooz sought refuge in the mountains behind the city, Rajavi and Saddam didn’t have pity on them and used Napalm bombs to kill them. Through this tragedy many children were killed and Rajavi kept his mandate in Iraq.

Besides killing and massacre, Rajavi used other tricks to deceive the members:

1. He sent some of his forces, under the order of Qasam Bour Bour, to Iran, in order to take some boys as hostages. They threatened them to death unless they confess that they are captured near Ashraf Camp and they are the agents of Iranian Regime.

2. They shot some of their own watchmen, since they were about to being captured by the opponents, including Shahriar Shojaati, from Shiraz.

Later they recalled him as a person who committed suicide. In fact he was shot under the order of Efat Javadi who herself acted under the direct order of Maryam who was patrolling above the area in her helicopter and was ordering to kill people.

3. they lay some of their own members as baits in wait for Kurdish opponents to stimulate other members and give them motives to kill more and more ( Zhila Tolou executed this plan)

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mujahedin Khalq 's Function

The People’s Mojahedin of Iran:A Struggle for What?

Indeed, until the coalition’s armed intervention in Iraq, Massoud and Maryam Rajavi had succeeded in creating and violently enforcing a cult of personality on their dwindling band of ageing followers sheltered by Saddam Hussein on his territory. Until then, there were those in the West willing to turn a blind eye to these practices or gullible enough to accept the lie that PMOI was a democratic movement.

First hand accounts by former members and victims presented here allow us to probe the reality behind the Moujahedin’s well financed propaganda machine. They uncover a military-political movement which has acted simultaneously as a political party, a mercenary force, an intelligence bureau, a cult and a heavily armed gang of common criminals.

Although dying, the PMOl may show some spasms of rage here and there. For this reason, the two authors of this investigation have decided to write under the joint pseudonym of Victor Charbonnier. One is a journalist for a major weekly magazine. The other is a former international television correspondent.

Download The People’s Mojahedin of Iran:A Struggle for What?
Download The People’s Mojahedin of Iran:A Struggle for What?

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
UK

UK- MKO has long history of terrorism

A debate in the House of Lords on recent comments made by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Israel was raised by Labour peer, Lord Corbett, a renowned supporter of the Mujahiden-e Khalq terrorist group, who urged the UK government to treat the outlawed group as a "friend."

But Foreign Office minister Lord Triesman rejected the call, saying that the MKO was proscribed under the country’s Terrorism Act 2000 and that the government had "no plans to carry out such a review."

"Its claims to be a democratic party, fighting for a better Iran, are hard to square with its history of violence and authoritarian acts," he said.

A similar call made by Conservative MP Brian Binley, a self-confessed paid supporter of the MKO’s alias group, the National Council of Resistance, was also rejected by Foreign Secretary Jack Straw in the House of Commons.

Triesman told parliament the MKO has "a long history of involvement in terrorism in Iran and elsewhere and is, by its own admission, responsible for violent attacks that have resulted in many deaths." He admitted that relations with Iran was "difficult" that there was no "quick or easy resolution," but emphasized that "all means" must be deployed to keep lines of communications open.

"When one looks at the range of options before us, it is a matter of building carefully with those who are our friends in Iran, who are part of the future of Iran, and not finding ourselves in an escalating position where the steps that we take generate more conflict, rather than making an attempt to resolve matters by peaceful and diplomatic means," Triesman told his fellow peers

Quotes from Hansard

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mujahedin Khalq Organization as a terrorist group

MEK Fixed on US Terror List

Notorious Mojahedin-e khalq organization has been put on US permanent list of terrorist organizations. So, the MKO can no longer wait for a new list, two years from now but after this time it should try to convince US officials that the situation which led to the designation of the group have completely changed. Meanwhile, new list proves that all US officials, leaders, political figures and parties have consensus on the fact that the Mojahedin-e khalq is a terrorist organization.

It’ notable that according to State Department documents, MKO’s terrorist designation includes NLA, PMOI, NCRI, and Muslim Iranian Student’s Society (front organization used to garner financial support).

***

U.S. Department of State

October 11, 2005

Fact Sheet

Office of Counterterrorism

Washington, DC

October 11, 2005

Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) are foreign organizations that are designated by the Secretary of State in accordance with section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), as amended. FTO designations play a critical role in our fight against terrorism and are an effective means of curtailing support for terrorist activities and pressuring groups to get out of the terrorism business.

Identification

The Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism in the State Department (S/CT) continually monitors the activities of terrorist groups active around the world to identify potential targets for designation. When reviewing potential targets, S/CT looks not only at the actual terrorist attacks that a group has carried out, but also at whether the group has engaged in planning and preparations for possible future acts of terrorism or retains the capability and intent to carry out such acts.

Designation

Once a target is identified, S/CT prepares a detailed "administrative record," which is a compilation of information, typically including both classified and open sources information, demonstrating that the statutory criteria for designation have been satisfied. If the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, decides to make the designation, Congress is notified of the Secretary’s intent to designate the organization and given seven days to review the designation, as the INA requires. Upon the expiration of the seven-day waiting period and in the absence of Congressional action to block the designation, notice of the designation is published in the Federal Register, at which point the designation takes effect. By law an organization designated as an FTO may seek judicial review of the designation in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit not later than 30 days after the designation is published in the Federal Register.

Until recently the INA provided that FTOs must be redesignated every two years or the designation would lapse. Under the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (IRTPA), however, the redesignation requirement was replaced by certain review and revocation procedures. IRTPA provides that an FTO may file a petition for revocation 2 years after its designation date (or in the case of redesignated FTOs, its most recent redesignation date) or 2 years after the determination date on its most recent petition for revocation. In order to provide a basis for revocation, the petitioning FTO must provide evidence that the circumstances forming the basis for the designation are sufficiently different as to warrant revocation.If no such review has been conducted during a five year period with respect to a designation, then the Secretary of State is required to review the designation to determine whether revocation would be appropriate. In addition, the Secretary of State may at any time revoke a designation upon a finding that the circumstances forming the basis for the designation have changed in such a manner as to warrant revocation, or that the national security of the United States warrants a revocation. The same procedural requirements apply to revocations made by the Secretary of State as apply to designations. A designation may be revoked by an Act of Congress, or set aside by a Court order.

Legal Criteria for Designation under Section 219 of the INA as amended

1. It must be a foreign organization.

2. The organization must engage in terrorist activity, as defined in section 212 (a)(3)(B) of the INA (8 U.S.C. ? 1182(a)(3)(B)),* or terrorism, as defined in section 140(d)(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989 (22 U.S.C. ? 2656f(d)(2)),** or retain the capability and intent to engage in terrorist activity or terrorism.

3. The organization’s terrorist activity or terrorism must threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security (national defense, foreign relations, or the economic interests) of the United States.

Legal Ramifications of Designation

1. It is unlawful for a person in the United States or subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to knowingly provide "material support or resources" to a designated FTO. (The term "material support or resources" is defined in 18 U.S.C. ? 2339A(b)(1) as " any property, tangible or intangible, or service, including currency or monetary instruments or financial securities, financial services, lodging, training, expert advice or assistance, safehouses, false documentation or identification, communications equipment, facilities, weapons, lethal substances, explosives, personnel (1 or more individuals who maybe or include oneself), and transportation, except medicine or religious materials.? 18 U.S.C. ? 2339A(b)(2) provides that for these purposes ?the term ?training? means instruction or teaching designed to impart a specific skill, as opposed to general knowledge.? 18 U.S.C. ? 2339A(b)(3) further provides that for these purposes the term ?expert advice or assistance? means advice or assistance derived from scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge.??

2. Representatives and members of a designated FTO, if they are aliens, are inadmissible to and, in certain circumstances, removable from the United States (see 8 U.S.C. ?? 1182 (a)(3)(B)(i)(IV)-(V), 1227 (a)(1)(A)).

3. Any U.S. financial institution that becomes aware that it has possession of or control over funds in which a designated FTO or its agent has an interest must retain possession of or control over the funds and report the funds to the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Department of the Treasury.

Other Effects of Designation

1. Supports our efforts to curb terrorism financing and to encourage other nations to do the same.

2. Stigmatizes and isolates designated terrorist organizations internationally.

3. Deters donations or contributions to and economic transactions with named organizations.

4. Heightens public awareness and knowledge of terrorist organizations.

5. Signals to other governments our concern about named organizations.

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Human Rights Abuse in the MEK

Human Rights Abuses in the MEK

Women, Children and Human Rights Abuses in the Mojahedin-e Khalq, Press Conference Saturday in Stockholm

283 words

6 December 2005

U.S. Newswire

English

2005 U.S. Newswire. Provided by ProQuest Information and Learning. All rights reserved.

News Advisory:

A press conference will be held to introduce the Family Network Association. Based in Sweden, this new association has been formed to research and publicize the situation of women and children inside the Iranian Mojahedin-e Khalq organization. In a press conference taking place on Saturday, Dec. 10, at 3:30 p.m. in Stockholm, the Family Network Association will reveal that many of the human rights abuses perpetrated by the MKO have taken place in western countries. In 1991, Scandinavia became the main base for children evacuated from the MKO’s Iraqi army bases. Children were fostered and adopted outside the control of governmental agencies in those countries and this led to suffering and abuse for many of the children.

Critically, the conference will establish that human rights violations carried out by the Mojahedin in Europe were ordered directly by the leaders of the sect, Massoud and Maryam Rajavi.

A panel of speakers will address the press conference:

— Alain Chevalerais, French journalist and author of the book ‘Burned Alive’;

— Anne Singleton, British former member of the MEK and author of the book ‘Saddam’s Private Army’;

— Batoul Ahmadi, family of MEK members and founding member of the Family Network Association;

In addition, former members will be available to answer questions on the MEK.

Entry to the press conference is by invitation or press card only.

For further information, please contact: Ms Batoul Ahmadi, Tel: 00 46 707 444258, Email: radda(under)fn(At)yahoo.se

http://www.usnewswire.com

Contact: Ms Batoul Ahmadi, 00 46 707 444258 or radda(under)fn(At)yahoo.se

Document USWIR00020051206e1c60025t

Newswire, 6 December 2005

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Duplicity of the MEK nature

MKO’s New Tricks in Iraq Revealed

The terorrist cult of the Mojahedin-e khalq in Iraq, which has been strongly destabilized since the formation of new government, resorts to all tricks to create division among people, but it has recently started new efforts that are wholly against the national interests of Iraqis.

1. supporting remnants of Baath party and putting them face to face with Badr Brigade and eventually the Shiites. In its websites, the cult of Rajavi is trying to introduce all accidents and events as the “plots” of Badr brigade against Sunnis. They attribute all terrorist acts in Iraq to Shiites, in order to win the attraction of Americans beside softening the anti-MKO atmosphere in Iraq.

In an analysis on the activities of terrorist groups in Iraq , including the MKO, to exaggerate the issue of a detention center in the Interior ministry, an Iraqi political expert said: “This plot was planned to weaken the Iraqi coalition list and Iraq’s enemies try to demonize Shiites and weaken their position, by attributing these illegal affairs to them.”

Speaking on the condition of anonymity due to terrorist threats, this expert stressed: “Iraqi people know well that the illegal acts have nothing to do with Shiites and Iraqi officials. The Iraqi coalition list will win the majority votes and with its victory, the Iraqi people, who have been under torture and pressure of Saddam for years, would be able to get to their rights. Also, Iraqi people will take part in all social-political affairs of their country.”

“There’s no doubt that, as Prime Minister and the President said, those who committed crimes must be punished. However, it’s astonishing that those behind the Abu Ghraib scandal, those who stayed silence despite seeing the crimes against Iraqis, those who have imprisoned and tortured tens of their own dissidents now make noise about the detention of 70 people and try to take advantage of this case for getting to their own goals,” he said.

It should be noted that 70 percent of MKO TV programs have been allocated to Iraq’s internal affairs. MKO interferes in Iraq affairs and still claims that it has not been involved when Saddam was in power.

2. Rajavi’s cult is also spending a lot of energy to extend the presence of Americans in Iraq. For instance, they repeat this claim that Iranian regime will take the control of Iraq in the case that the US retreats from this country. With these stupid claims, they create a kind of legitimacy for the continuation of occupation.

3. Exploiting the criticisms of officials and party leaders towards each other; MKO uses their comments to show that they are working against US interests in Iraq.

4. Spreading baseless propaganda and claiming that some groups and figures have ties to the Iranian regime. They try to engage officials in futile conflicts to take advantage.

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Former members of the MEK

I Was Freed From Rajavi’s Claw

I’m a victim freed from Rajavi’s claws; please hurry to help other victims.

In a message to Entekhab News Agency, Aghil Barani, a former member of the MKO who has been freed from this terrorist organization, called for efforts in order to help and rescue other victims still captive of the Rajavis.

He wrote:

“Yesterday, when I was reviewing my calendar, I was taken away from this world by an occasion. You may ask what occasion! Those who know me can guess easily.

I’m Aghil Barani. I had gone to Turkey for a job when I was deceived by agents of Mujahideen-e Khalq and I was taken to Iraq. After years of wasting my life, I could return home.

Yes, you’re right. The occasion on the calendar was December 10th, when Human Rights Charter was approved in the United Nations. I was preoccupied by thinking about the reasons why some people in the world are still deprived of their basic rights, despite this charter!

It’s like a film moving before my eyes: how a group chooses a popular name like Mojahedin for itself and then, after recruiting members and pushing them through strange filters, resorts to various inhumane scientific and non-scientific methods to isolate its members. I was myself a member of this group, and the reality shocks me.

We celebrate Human Rights day while a group of miserable victims are in the captivity of Mojahedin cult headed by the Rajavis.

As a freed former member of this dark and anti-human organization, and regarding the new situation in Iraq, I ask all free peoples to help our compatriots, taken hostage under different covers in Rajavi’s camp. I hope we can reveal the ugly face of Rajavi and his mercenaries in order to help the freedom of human beings.”

Entekhab.ir

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Duplicity of the MEK nature

Repeating the Mistake!

A number of sources in US intelligence community revealed that some information revealed by the Mujahideen-e Khalq, particularly on Iranian nuclear activities, has been wrong. This is exactly what has seen reflected in the IAEA’s recent reports.

US intelligence authorities had earlier become suspicious about the accuracy of Chalabi’s information on Iraq and had warned about the issue. This time, authorities warn that MKO’s information can’t be trusted.

As the debate heated on Iran’s Nuclear program and Tehran-Washington ties worsened, the MKO leaders tried to flatter US officials in order to convince them that they have important information from inside the Iranian regime and that this information proves that Tehran has been enriching uranium in a wide range. This brought new discussion to the White House on the issue of support for this group and its possible role in applying US policies against Iran.

The Bush administration sees itself now in a situation similar to that of pre-Iraq war. At that time Ahmed Chalabi, the head of Iraq National Congress, had close relations with senior officials in the US, such as Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz. He had convinced them that Saddam Hussein’s regime possessed weapons of mass destruction and that Iraqi people would receive US liberators warmly.

Today, Maryam Rajavi, so-called president-elect of the NCRI, wants to repeat the scenario again by repeating this claim that “Mujahideen-e Khalq is ready to give urgent valid information on nuclear activities of Iran to Washington.”

Some White House officials believe that the MKO is able to serve the goals of Americans and that it is an opposition group with thousands of militants with many supporters.

These officials say that the MKO has proved its ability in giving information with revealing Iranian nuke sites in Natanz and Arak. They ask for the removal of MKO’s name from terror lists and stress that the members of this organization would give necessary information to the US and besides, they can play an important role in disrupting the order in the Iranian government with their supporters.

It should be noted that the MKO was added to the US terror list in 1997 by the State Department. This decision emphasizes that the MKO was involved in attacks on Americans, including the kidnapping of US ambassador to Iran in 1971, bombings of 1972 in US companies in Iran such as Pepsi Cola, General Motors and Marin Oil. They were also involved in robbing 6 banks, assassinating Colonel Lewis Hawkins, and attacking US and British airways offices and the Israeli company of Alal.

During his military trial in 1972, Massoud Rajavi, the head of the MKO, confessed to the violent operations of himself and his organization. he believes that the future of Iran should be determined by armed resistance and that political forces can’t bring changes to the fate of this country. He had accused the US of being the major reason behind all problems of the world. He called it Iran’s main enemy because the US was behind coup against Mosaddeq.

Those who oppose the MKO and removing its name from terror list have numerous historical evidences to prove that this organization is full violence. Some people try to ignore the violence and ideological differences in the organization.

MKO, with its Marxist ideas and anti-democratic theories, has tried in recent years to appear as a pro-democratic organization beside all other Iranian opposition groups. They pretend to defend the rights of women and minorities as well as democratic rights. The head of the group, Massoud Rajavi, has elected his wife Maryam as the president of National Council of Resistance (NCRI).

This organization suffers from its past and its violent operations. The Iranian people never forget these issues.

This is not true to think that the US, by supporting the MKO, would improve its position as opponent of the Iranian regime among Iranians. Cooperating with the MKO will never allow the US to become closer to the Iranians.

Now the question is: Didn’t the US take lessons from Iraq? Is the Bush administration going to repeat its mistake?

Abdullah Saleh/AlAsr (in Arabic)

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Missions of Nejat Society

meeting on the”massacre of Iraqi Kurds by MKO”

REPORT ON Nejat Society’s meeting on the " massacre of Iraqi Kurds by MKO"

A meeting was held in Sanandaj – Kurdistan, on December 2nd, to investigate the role of MEK in the massacre of Iraqi civilians Kurds. A group of separated members of MEK were invited by Nejat Society.

During the meeting, 25 defectors of MKO declared their memories and presented concrete evidences about the Suppressing Operation to kill Kurds in Iraq (Morvarid Operation) and denounced one of the thousand crimes of Rajavi and stated their viewpoints.

The meeting included three parts:

1-       Defectors stating memories of savage killing Kurds Operation, named Morvarid Operation.

2-       The Q & A by reporters and journalists who participated the meeting.

3-       Interviewing and speaking to returnees.

The extra programs of the meeting were as followings:

1-     Presenting the photos, articles, documents of "Morvarid Operation" especially the photos of Iraqi Kurdish Martyrs who were about 79 people with the evidence of their martyrdom which attired the attention of reporters and journalists.

2-     Showing a brief documentary in which the savage Morvarid Operation was presented.

3-     Delivering Nejat Society’s Publication, and three CD’s (including the interview with Kurdish martyrs’ families who described the way their relatives were killed by MEK), a news bulletin which included the memories, documents such as the plan of the operation, to the reporters and journalists.

The participants were as follows:

1-     Arash Sametipour

2-     Taleb Jalilian

3-     Asad Pak

4-     Mohammad Ardalan pour

5-     Houshyar Seifie

6-     HabibAallah Almasih

7-     Hussein Karamie

8-     Ali Akbar Amin Abbasi

9-     Ahmad Jomhourie

10- Fazel Farhadie

11- Hussein Jannat Nezhadian

12- Abou Alfazl Yahyaee

13- Davoud Heidarie

14- Hadie Shaabany

15- Abbas Karamy

16- Asghar Farzin

17- Soleiman Rah Anjam

18- Ali Biglary

19- Ghasem Baba Safarie

20-Ramezan Saeedi

21-Mahmud Aseman Panah

22-Ali Karimie Fard

23-Ronak Dashti

24-Varya Dashti

25-Shokr Allah Gorgi Zade

And the representative of National Union of Kurdistan – Mr. Diari Marouf Hussein also participated the meeting and addressed a speech on the subject of the meeting.

At the end of the meeting, the separated members attending the meeting signed a statement:

"Through this statement, we- the former members of MKO and the signatories of the following text­- who were under pressure and threatened to participate Morvarid Operation declare that:

1-     At first, according to the fake stories and justifications of MKO’s leader  Masud Rajavi – who had induced his forces that the Iranian Pasdaran in Kurdish disguises were planning to attack Mujahedins’ bases, but later we realized that nobody was there but Iraqi Kurds and what we were told about Pasdaran’s infiltrating was pure lie.

2-     Masud Rajavi and his wife Maryam Qajar Azdanlou commanded the operation directly and through a radio message which was sent to all forces, she ordered clearly to destroy the houses of Kurdish villagers and civilians by bombarding them.

3-     Saddam Hussein had evidently asked the forces of Baath army to cooperate with Mujahedin-e-Khalq during the operation.

4-     The commandants and high ranking members of Mujahedin bombarded the Kurds’ houses and also opened fire against women and children and captured the Kurds. Under the order of high commandants especially, Mehdi Abrishamchi and Mahvash Sepehri, they were tortured seriously, and were delivered to Iraqi Military Intelligence Service (Istikhbarat) later.

5-     We, as the eye witnesses of the crimes of Rajavi against Kurds, according to our conscience, ask for bringing justice and trying Rajavi and Saddam as the cooperators of suppressing and killing the civilians and we found it necessary to attend their trial to witness.

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts