Page 211 – Nejat Society

Photo Exhibition Press Club, Brussels –International Terrorism Mojahedin Khalq

A Photo Exhibition was held at the Press Club in Brussels between 3 – 7 December, 2018. The exhibition was formally opened by a panel of speakers who outlined the content and purpose of the photo exhibition. The exhibition aims to enlighten reporters and media to the dangerous consequences of blind support for the MEK. Three of the participants gave interviews in English afterwards in which they explained why the MEK is a danger to Europe and that although they joined MEK to fight for freedom and democracy in Iran, they soon discovered this was a lie, but were trapped inside the MEK by imprisonment and torture.

Anne Khodabandeh, Open Minds De-Radicalization Consultant placed the MEK’s current survival in the context of Neoconservative support. This means that in spite of well documented severe human rights violations, the MEK’s ‘regime change’ narrative is supported by paid advocates. The danger however is that the MEK will escalate their false flag ops in Europe which are blamed on Iran, only this time Europeans may be killed.

Reza Jabelli, Service Etat Civil et Population – Aawa Association, related his history with the MEK from his teenage years to the time he managed to escape the cult in Iraq when the US army guarded the MEK camp. He said that when he joined the MEK he believed it was fighting for freedom and democracy. When he discovered this was a lie, the MEK held him captive for many years, sometimes in solitary confinement, in an attempt to force him to change his mind. Jabelli said that when Maryam Rajavi was arrested by French counter terrorism police in Paris in 2003, she ordered her followers to set fire to themselves. This example shows that the MEK can pose a serious threat to peace and security in Europe because the group has not given up its belief in violence and terrorism.

Edvard Termador introduced himself as anArmenian-Iranian and a Christian. He explained how he had been a Prisoner ofWar in Iraq for nine years as a result of the Iran-Iraq war. Although he hadthe opportunity to return to Iran at the end of the war, he chose to join theMEK because he believed they would bring freedom and democracy to Iran. When herealised this was a deception, he was imprisoned inside MEK camps before beinghanded over to the Abu Ghraib political prison of Saddam Hussein. He warnedagainst believing the MEK’s false presentations of democracy.

Anne Khodabandeh, Open Minds,De-Radicalisation Consultant, PHOTO-EXHIBITION in Bruxelles

(International Terrorism Mojahedin Khalq, MEK, NCRI, Rajavi cult)

Reza Jabelli, Service Etat Civil et Population, PHOTO-EXHIBITION in Bruxelles

(International Terrorism Mojahedin Khalq, MEK, NCRI, Rajavi cult)

Edward Termado, Christian, Armenian-Iranian,PHOTO-EXHIBITION in Bruxelles

December 9, 2018 0 comments

Iran Interlink Weekly Digest

Iran Interlink Weekly Digest – 248

++ Several MEK survivors have published accounts of recentevents, in particular Mohammad Azim Mishmast and Gholamali Mirzaei. The news isabout the people who have left MEK but are still paid by the group on conditionthey remain silent and do not speak about the group. This week when they wentto collect their MEK money they were shown photographs of Mishmast, Mirzaei andsome others alongside their families and children who are not in Albania. MEKtold them, ‘If you talk to these people you will get no money’. They were thenbriefed on behalf of Maryam Rajavi that ‘the enemy’ are the ex-members. Theyare the forefront and we are keeping our bullets for them. The writing of thesurvivors say it is obvious that even their supporters in America no longergive a damn about them, so in order to keep people on board they threaten themlike this to divert attention from the main issue which is that even as amercenary force they are not needed.

++ Zahra Mirbagheri from Nejat Association has published a screen shot from an MEK site which shows Maryam Rajavi, Struan Stevenson and a couple of other permanent lobbyists, with the title ‘They meet each other, they take pictures and they pretend it’s a discussion’. Mirbagheri gives links to every one of these people who have openly lobbied for MEK for years and who each head different organizations which have been created by MEK. Mirbagheri goes on to say that this is the level they have been reduced to after they have achieved nothing. They have even lost the actual support of the likes of McCain and Bolton etc.

++ A week-long Exhibition and introductory Speakers panel were held at the Press Club in Brussels this week, organised by Aawa Association of Germany. The panel was chaired by Reza Jabelli, Service Etat Civil et Population. Panellists were Anne Khodabandeh, Open Minds, De-Radicalization Consultant, and two female MEK survivors, Batoul Soltani and Homeira Mohammad Nejad.

In English:

++ Arron Merat’s Long Read article for The Guardian ‘Terrorists, cultists – or champions of Iranian democracy? The wild wild story of the MEK’ was released as a podcast. The article says MEK are promoted by Trump White House hardliners as tools for regime change, but ex members accuse Maryam Rajavi of coordinating routine sexual abuse inside the cult.

++ After Sokol Balla, a presenter on Vision Plus TV in Albania, was taken to the camp in Manez by the MEK, several people wrote objecting to his report. The writers accused Balla of taking part in a whitewash of MEK history and gave accounts of their own experience inside the MEK. One said, “I suggest that the next time you want to report about the MEK, it would be better to ask them about their past, about forced divorces, working with Saddam Hussein, and imprisonment and torture inside Camp Ashraf. And in addition, invite investigative delegations to establish the truth.”

++ Mazda Parsi of Nejat Bloggers writes about the interview by Der Spiegel with MEK survivor Gholam Reza Shekari who left thegroup in Albania in 2017. Parsi refers to the 2005 Human Rights Watch report‘No Exit’ which detailed torture and murder of internal dissidents in the MEK.Shekari is one of those victims who can now recount his experience andknowledge of what the MEK did at that time. “Shekari spent 27 years of his lifein the cult-like MKO. He was only 20 years old and willing to find a good jobin Europe when he was recruited by the MKO in Iraq. The MKO agents promised tohelp him get the European visa only if he stayed in their camp for a fewmonths.

As soon as he entered the organization, they confiscated his ID documents and never gave him back. ‘whenever I asked for my ID, they would say that they had no idea where it was’.

Thus, Shekari had no way out of the MKO camp but he frequently used to ask the leaders when he could leave the cult. This question was considered a sin by the leaders. Departure from the MKO was forbidden and showing your willingness for leaving the group would be faced with suppression, imprisonment and torture. So he was imprisoned in solitary confinement.”

++ James Carden with Dr. Trita Parsi, The Nation, ‘The Trump Administration Rattles the Saber at Iran’ This is a Q&A with Dr. Trita Parsi, author of Losing an Enemy: Obama, Iran, and the Triumph of Diplomacy. Parsi analyses current US policy toward Iran, saying he believes Trump does not want war or regime change, but wants ‘regime collapse’ in which Iran is plunged into chaos but America is not responsible for creating an alternative government. According to Parsi, MEK’s role in this scenario is thus: “Whereas the MeK is of little use if the objective is regime change, due to their immense unpopularity in Iran, the Trump administration seems to believe that they can be helpful for regime collapse and a potential Civil War, mindful of this terrorist organization’s extensive experience in sabotage, terrorism, assassinations, and even regular warfare.”

http://iran-interlink.org/wordpress/iran-interlink-weekly-digest-december-07-2018/

December 9, 2018 0 comments

Mujahedin Khalq; A proxy force

The Trump Administration Rattles the Saber at Iran

A Q&A with Dr. Trita Parsi, author of Losing an Enemy: Obama, Iran, and the Triumph of Diplomacy.

In a recent speech to the International Institute for Strategic Studies Manama Dialogue in Bahrain, US Secretary of Defense James Mattis went on the (rhetorical) offensive against Iran. Said Mattis:

Like-minded nations here today do not seek war or conflict, yet, we cannot ignore the malign influence and destabilizing behavior pursued by violent extremist organizations and by Iran’s “outlaw regime”…The Iranian regime does not speak for the Iranian people, who have a right to live and prosper in a safe, secure and peaceful region…. An Iranian regime that ignores the needs of citizens feels free to escalate and initiate costly conflicts that serve no one’s interests.

Mattis also claimed that “Nothing is more emblematic of Iran’s malign activities in the Middle East than its support for Assad’s murderous regime,” a line of thinking that was seconded by US Presidential Envoy for the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS Brett McGurk.

In Manama, McGurk seemed to be signaling the Trump administration’s willingness to confront Iranian fighters in Syria. According to McGurk, “No one wants them there. We even hear from the Russians that they shouldn’t be there. We’ve taken that and said for a stable Syria these forces must leave.” Still more, according to McGurk, “We will not help reconstruct any of the areas that were retaken by the Assad regime with the help of the Iranians and the Russians.”

Worryingly, these comments by Mattis and McGurk echo all too clearly the regime-change rhetoric employed by successive US administrations dating at least as far back as the late George H.W. Bush, whereby American politicians attempt to conceal their true intentions (regime change) in the soft language of human rights. In the lead-up to any of the seven regime change wars initiated by the United States over the past 25 years, one can find instances of high US government officials repeating, as though a mantra, the claim that America’s quarrel is not with the people of (insert name of about-to-be-invaded-country), it is with the government of (insert name of about-to-be-invaded-country).

To help make sense of the current round of saber rattling by the Trump administration, I spoke with Dr. Trita Parsi, author of Losing an Enemy: Obama, Iran, and the Triumph of Diplomacy.

James Carden: I was struck by how closely Mattis’s bill of indictment against Iran in Manama echoed the rationale used by previous administrations to sell regime-change wars. Is the Trump administration setting the stage for an actual military conflict with Tehran, or is this more bluff and bluster from a strategically and intellectually shallow administration?

Dr. Trita Parsi: I think the way to understand this is that Trump, his administration and the entities pushing him on this—from Sheldon Adelson, to Saudi Arabia to Netanyahu—ultimately agree that the goal is to weaken Iran and shift the balance of power away from Iran and towards Israel and Saudi Arabia. The paths to that goal can vary; from crippling sanctions, to regime change, to regime collapse, to war or a combination of these policies.

But they have different preferences. Donald Trump, I believe, neither wants war nor regime change. Not out of humanitarian concerns, but because he knows that both war and regime change are very costly. So I suspect they will gravitate towards the one option that is the least costly but yet achieves their goal of shifting the balance of power in the region: regime collapse.

Unlike regime change, a policy of regime collapse is less costly, because you don’t take responsibility for setting up the next government in Iran. In fact, you don’t want a new government. You want chaos and even civil war. In that scenario, Iran’s power would be consumed internally and it would no longer have the ability to project power in the region. Consequently, the balance of power would shift away from Iran and towards Israel and Saudi Arabia—but without the cost of war or regime change.

Of course, this would destabilize much of the region and send massive refugee flows towards Europe. But that appears not to be much of a concern for either Trump or the rulers in Tel Aviv and Riyadh.

JC: I want to ask about Syria. When US Envoy Brett McGurk said the US will not help with Syrian reconstruction in areas freed from the terrorists by Russia and Iran and, further, that the Iranian-backed forces “must leave,” what is he signaling here? Is he giving an advance preview of the administration’s justification for a wider war in Syria if Iran doesn’t “get out”?

TP: I think Syria scholar Joshua Landis has explained this best: Trump’s Syria policy is not to win, but to deny Russia, Iran, and Assad their victory. To achieve that objective, the United States will do everything it can to prevent the reconstruction of Syria. Rather than signaling justification for war with Iran in Syria, I think this is reflective of the policy of keeping the civil war going as long as possible and ensuring that neither Assad, Russia nor Iran can have a true victory, even if this comes at the expense of the destruction of the entire country.

JC: Picking up on the theme of regime collapse. Such a policy—as opposed to regime change—would seem to imply that Trump would prefer not to effectuate a change in Tehran through direct military action but rather to try and destabilize the country from within. If so, it would seem that anti-regime elements such as the terror-cult MeK would have a role to play. You’ve written about MeK, notably in an essay in The New York Review of Books. For readers unfamiliar with them, could you explain, broadly, who they are and how they came to acquire such a powerful US domestic lobby?

TP: Yes, my assessment is that Trump prefers to achieve his objectives without taking military action because of the cost. Note, not because of any particular humanitarian concerns. And that will drive him towards regime collapse instead of war or regime change, because regime change too is costly.

Whereas the MeK is of little use if the objective is regime change, due to their immense unpopularity in Iran, the Trump administration seems to believe that they can be helpful for regime collapse and a potential Civil War, mindful of this terrorist organization’s extensive experience in sabotage, terrorism, assassinations, and even regular warfare.

The MeK is a violent terrorist cult that first started killing Americans and officials of the Shah’s regime back in the 1960s and ’70s. They were in support of the Islamic revolution but had a fallout with Ayatollah Khomeini and ended up seeking refuge with Saddam Hussein during the Iraq-Iran War. They ended up siding with Iraq during the war, which cost them almost all of their support inside of Iran.

Once the war ended, Saddam started using them as his personal ethnic-cleansing army against Shia in the south of Iraq and Kurds in the north.

While fighting for Saddam, the MeK began establishing a very strong lobbying presence on Capitol Hill by giving extensive campaign funds to Democratic and Republican members of Congress alike. Flush with financing from Saudi Arabia, they of course pushed an open door because their meagre was that the regime in Iran is bad and needs to be overthrown. Despite betting on the US terrorist list, they were still free to engage in this extensive lobbying effort which culminated in them lobbying to get off the terror lost in 2012.

JC: Another pillar of the regime-collapse strategy is clearly sanctions. The neocon operative who now serves are the US special representative for Iran, Brian Hook, recently said, “Our goal remains getting countries to zero imports of Iranian oil.” Meanwhile, the administration’s decision to reimpose nuclear-related sanctions in October has prompted an outcry from the Europeans, who are taking specific action (via the “special-purpose vehicle”) to circumvent US efforts to completely isolate Tehran from the global financial system. Seems the effort to re-isolate Iran is going to be trickier this time around, what do you think accounts for that?

TP: The effort has essentially failed. Trump was forced to issue eight waivers because oil prices would shoot up if he didn’t. The effort to get the Saudis to replace Iranian oil failed. Oil demand may come down next year, which may enable trump to get a bit more oil of of the Iranian market, but he’s neither going to reach zero or a small enough amount of Iranian exhorts to cause the collapse of the Iranian economy.

This failure has also caused Trump to lose the psychological war. Had he succeeded, the calculation was that it would instill panic in the Iranian population and cause them to lose faith in the government’s capacity to weather the same storm. That in turn would have led to a critical mass of people taking to the streets and pushing for the regime’s collapse, the calculation was.

By failing to live up to his promise of eliminating Iranian oil exports, Trump also failed to instill panic and cause the population to lose faith in the government’s capacity to handle the sanctions for the thanks to years.

That said, this does not mean that he’s not hurting the Iranian economy. On the contrary, it is extremely painful and the population is hurting immensely due to the sanctions. But pain alone is not going to cause the collapse of the economy or the regime.

JC: Expectations are that probably 20 or so Democrats will enter the 2020 presidential primaries. As the author of a book, Losing an Enemy, that gave the inside story of the Obama administration’s efforts to secure the JCPOA, what advice would you give the next Democratic president in order to get back on the right diplomatic track with Iran and, importantly, the other signatories of the JCPOA, whom Trump gone out of his way to offend?

TP: If the JCPOA survives for the next two years and Trump loses in 2020, then the next administration must seek to reenter the agreement. There needs to be strong support for this in Congress, in fact, this should be part of the Democratic Party platform.

Any renewed engagement with Iran will be tricky. The Iranians will have reasons not to trust the commitments of the US. But it can still be fruitful, but only if the US approaches it with realistic goals and a diplomatic strategy that is centered on both incentives and disincentives rather than being solely focused on coercion.

James Carden with Dr. Trita Parsi, The Nation

December 8, 2018 0 comments

Mujahedin Khalq Organization members' families

To my dear sisters

Mr. Abdolreza Dolfi visited Nejat Society members of Khuzestan branch. His two sisters; Lela & Maryam, are members of the Mujahedin-e Khalq cult. They were deceived into joining the group. They have had no contacts with their family members during the years of membership to the MKO Cult.

Mr. Abdolreza Dolfi says:” my dear sisters, we love you and missed you a lot. Our mum died heavy-heartedly. She was always waiting to see you once more. Why didn’t you call her even once?!

I want you to decide for your fate independently. I wish you to live a happy life far from the cult affairs. Please think about your life and destination.

December 6, 2018 0 comments

Mujahedin Khalq Organization members' families

Tell my son; your mum is very sick

The photo shows the mother of one of the Mujahedin-e Khalq cult members; Asadollah Fayaz dyzaj.

The ailing, aged mother is at the hospital now. She has been unaware of her son’s conditions and well-being for many years. She is sick of her son’s being far away.

She says:” tell my son; Asadollah, your mum is very sick. Let her hear your voice. .. I am a mother. This is my certain right to hear my son’s voice.. “

To the cult leaders:”

If you are right and Asadollah is not captivated behind your cult’s physical and mental barriers, let him contact his ailing mother.

December 4, 2018 0 comments

Mujahedin Khalq Organization's Propaganda System

Objections to whitewashing human rights abuses by MEK in Albania by SOKOL BALLA, Vision Plus TV

1- Mansour Nazari, Iran Interlink, France, December 02 2018:

http://iran-interlink.org

Mr SOKOL BALLA

President of Vision Plus TV in Albania

Mansour Nazari

I am Nazari Mansour, a former member of the MEK organization who separated many years ago from the Mojahedin-e Khalq.

You recently provided a report on the Mojahedin camp in Albania, but this report is not real. Why?

The MEK are trying to whitewash their past. Surely they have not told you anything about their past. Why?

This organization has a black history and for this reason the MEK organization is trying to erase it. Why? Because they have a terrible past of violence and terrorism.

Its terrorist operations targeted American-owned businesses, and it killed six American citizens, in addition to its far more numerous Iranian victims.

After the victory of the Iranian revolution and the beginning of the war between Iran and Iraq the MEK joined Saddam Hussein in Iraq. The Iraqi dictator also gave the group weapons, cash, and a compound called Camp Ashraf in return for its continuing attacks inside Iran as well as helping Saddam suppress his own domestic opponents.

Within this organization are many things that you have not been told, for example: compulsory divorce, meetings to confess dreams in which everyone must describe their dreams, family contact is forbidden, having a phone was forbidden. If anyone wanted to leave the organization, they would have to spend two years imprisoned in Ashraf, then eight years in Abu Ghraib prison, then be handed over to the Iranian government. WHY? Just because they want to leave the MEK organization.

I suggest that the next time you want to report about the MEK, it would be better to ask them about their past, about forced divorces, working with Saddam Hussein, and imprisonment and torture inside Camp Ashraf. And in addition, invite investigative delegations to establish the truth.

Yours Sincerely

Mansour Nazari

–

2- Mir Bagher Sedaghi, Vatanam association, Switzerland, December 02 2018

Dear Mr Sokol Balla, presenter of the Real Story in Vision Plus in Albania.

Mir Bagher Sedaghi

Your program was brought to my notice in which you visited the Mojahedin Khalq (MKO, MEK, NCRI, PMOI and many other pseudonyms) terrorist organisation and held an interview with Mr Hassan Naybagha.

I noted that Hassan Naybagha falsely claimed that all foreign media are now trying to mislead the international community and claimed not only that the group is not a military group but the group and its members in the camp are from among the intellectuals of Iranian society, who have only resisted the regime in Iran by intellectual means (not military).

As an ex-member of the Mojahedin Khalq Organisation (MEK, MKO, or more properly known as the Rajavi cult),I can testify to you that the MEK is nothing more or less than a terrorist group. When I was with the group, I was regularly encouraged to carry out violent acts of terrorism. I have also been witness to the despatch of MEK terror teams from Iraq to Iran to carry out bombing campaigns, using mortars to attack buildings in residential areas. I am available to testify in any court of justice should there be the opportunity.

Please don’t be fooled by the charm offensive of this terrorist cult. Due to the defeat of Saddam Hussein who was the benefactor and the main strategic ally of Mojahedin Khalq, the group is now incapable of taking up arms. But make no mistake, they still have the dangerous potential to start terrorist operations should the time and the place by favourable to them.

Mir Bagher Sedaghi

–

3- Ghafoor Fatahin, Peyvan Rahaee, Paris, December 02 2018

To officials of the Albanian Vizion Plus television network,

Respectful greetings,

Ghafoor Fatahian

I am Gafoor Fatahian, a former member of the Iranian People’s Mojahedin Khalq organization (MEK). I spent twenty years in the headquarters of this organization in Iraq and I am an eyewitness to this organization when they were sending terrorist teams into Iran to kill innocent civilians.

Moreover, MEK has eliminated many of its own members who opposed its leadership’s policies. They also imprisoned and tortured others. Many of my ex-comrades were killed inside the organization’s headquarters in Iraq by order of the leaders of the organization and by its executioners who are now in the headquarters of the organization in your country, Albania.

I am an eyewitness to the repressive practices against members within the organization. They isolated them from the outside world, especially from their families in Iran and other countries.

In fact, the real MEK is not the one spoken of by Maryam Rajavi in Europe in the present, using the buzzwords of the free world to say her organization is committed to democracy, freedom and human rights in an attempt to win support from America and European countries.

What is going on behind the scenes and behind the barbed wire surrounding the headquarters of this organization is very serious and terrible and is intended to keep the members of the organization as prisoners held inside its headquarters in Albania.

This organization is no longer a political organization fighting for the establishment of democracy and freedom in Iran, but it has been transformed into a special community by its leaders, headed by Maryam Rajavi with beliefs, ideas and duties contrary to the principles and norms of humanity and universality in the present age. For this reason and for many other reasons, including the cooperation of the organization and its alliance with the regime of Saddam Hussein and its army and its financial, military and political dependence on foreigners, the MEK has lost its popular base among Iranians inside and outside Iran, even active opponents against the regime in Iran.

Hatred toward this organization and the atmosphere of alienation and opposition prevailing within the ranks of the organization among its members, has also led to the separation of more than two thousand members of the Organization over the past thirty years. In particular after the expulsion of the organization from Iraq and transfer to Albania whereby hundreds of members have now separated from the organization and are living in the Albanian capital, Tirana. And, if you want to prove your journalistic neutrality, you can interview these members who are separated from the organization in your country. They can tell you many facts about this organization so that you will discover that everything in your report about the organization’s headquarters in Albania is nothing but fabricated lies, artificial acts and false statements uttered by the leaders of the organization who wanted to display a fiction in front of your cameras.

This dangerous terrorist community has never renounced its violent ideas and terrorist tendencies because its ideas were built on the basis of terrorism, armed struggle and violence, not freedom and democracy, which it praises in its hollow slogans.

Gafoor Fatahian is a former member of the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran.

Paris – 30 November 2018

–

4- Easa Azadeh, Yaran Iran, France, December 02 2018

(Automatic Google translation)

Mr. SOKOL BALLA

President and director, vision Plus TV and host of the real story in Albania

Easa Azadeh

I am Easa Azadeh – from officials and former commander of the MEK. I’m more than thirty years in different parts of it have activity and Camp Liberty in Iraq, with the help of a UNHCR higher refugees, and the Office of the UN special of the cult, isolated and now in French I live in.french.

MEK with a history of terrorist is very dangerous, in the sight of the people of Iran, sorely hated. From the other side of the MEK by becoming a cult fanatics member himself about the most violent vexation, Singapore, gives, implying that members of the Liberator, had cut the minimum rights of members to ignore and not recognize. Even allowed to meet with the families and their loved ones to make excuses, wishful thinking has forbidden.

This cult saccate, mind control, continuous members, them, thought herself has Tank would have made that the leadership of this cult to put in place of God, and the aura of worship.

This cult basic transition operation a tehari in the world has gotten 38 years before the venture into operation a tehari in Iran and Europe.

The cult communities of the Iranians inside the country and out of country no place, and from the perspective of the people of Iran, this cult acutely unpopular and treacherous can be considered. Officials of the MKO with the costs of operation and through the media tried to downplay and white storage past full of killing and bloody. The case touts that in any way with the water hundred the sea of time, the White will not. This cult lacks the minimum principles of political is absolutely no Honesty in it, there is no continuous Heart and shanties and lie is trying to show with your silly Red Keep. And black white effects. And by bringing a number of Speaker rental and collecting the hundreds of refugees displaced with the money try to show the social base. The total human capital of this sect of about two thousand members Grime that with an average age of 55 and with cohesion of disease in the garrison the so-called Ashraf3, in the outskirts of Tirana, institutions of society.

I, as one of the commanders and authorities of the denomination to alert you to the tenth, that the lure of these cults do not eat, because these sects in Iraq together with the costs of operation and giving bribes, huge, from, media, started, and then, with the financial support into a terrorist like Al-Qaeda and ISIS to insecurity, the country of Iraq, security Iraq and killing innocent people.

This cult when the explosion of the Twin Towers in America by al-Qaeda in camps in Iraq celebrated introduced, and IT operations support for the terrorists will in time occupy a major part of the territory of Iraq by ISIS, again celebrated, and where can be found the ISIS in Iraq, about the types of support, direct and indirect.

This cult in Albany, too, the machinations of the evil his has to start ولابد you as a journalist Albanian better than we know that this cult how in the political affairs of the country, you can interfere.

This cult before any action should the situation ladder will determine the assignment that Dead or Alive. So politically, the cult of the hand her empty that death ladders the Turkish Al-Faisal, the former chairman of the information Arabia, has announced. Vine cult with tumult, the leader of his dead again, alive and has so far eleven messages appointed to he has published. Is this the same demagoguery and Heart not political?

I ask of you to think that, according to the principle of neutrality of the media, let the servant to accompany a few of my friends also facts related to this cult laid to inform people of Albania note reporters that your responsibility is one-sided and is basically a figment of the device demagogic this cult.

Please and please at least inform yourself, or a number isolated from the community representatives also interview to do. Without a doubt, a journalist, a professional from all angles to check the facts case analysis.

It is necessary to know to inform them that this sect the worst of the stifling and dictatorial toward members herself applies and now also in Albania with isolate out them in a camp context, breakeven is not out of the members unhappy.

The cult due to non-compliance with minimum human rights and transformed the MEK to a cult of terror and fanatic and use the tool parents of members, and such a divorce is mandatory and in celibacy going to be used, women and men, flawed, human rights, and have the crimes of the Ann disclosure, and under the jurisdiction used. Mr. sokol dear an organization sect and mercenary alien no time and can be seen as the opposition to mold. You, as a media can from the communities of Iranians outside through a Facebook survey. Surely more with the facts, and hated being MEK will wake.

With respect, Easa Azadeh

Paris, November 30, 2018

December 3, 2018 0 comments

Human Rights Abuse in the MEK

Traumatic stories of torture in the MKO during the 1990s

When in May 2005 the Human Rights Watch reported on the huge violations of human rights inside the Mujahedin Khalq Organization (the MKO/ MEK/ PMOI/ The Cult of Rajavi), the subtitle “Security Clearance” discussed the conditions in which human rights abuses took place in the group’s camps. “During late 1994 and early 1995, many members of the MKO were arrested by the organization’s operatives inside their camps in Iraq,” the report reads. “They were interrogated and accused of spying for the Iranian government. They were released in mid-1995 after being forced to sign false confessions and stating their loyalty to the leaders.”

The authors of the HRW’s report “NO EXIT”, interviewed five former members of the group Farhad Javaheri-Yar, Ali Ghashghavi, Alireza Mirasgari, Akbar Akbari, and Abbas Sadeghinejad. “According to their testimonies—detailed in the next section—the purpose of these arrests was to intimidate dissidents and obtain false confessions from them stating that they were agents of Iranian government. This period was known as the “security clearance”.”

Human rights abuses carried out by MKO leaders against dissident members ranged from prolonged incommunicado and solitary confinement to beatings, verbal and psychological abuse, coerced confessions, threats of execution, and torture that in two cases led to death.

Based on NO EXIT report, the severe cases of torture ended with the death of at least two people Parviz Ahmadi and Ghorban Ali Torabi. However, after the report was published in 2005, a lot of testimonies and memoirs of defectors were published confirming the HRW’s report and in many cases, numerous facts on the human rights abuses in the MKO were added to those that were stated in the report.

Since the relocation of the Mujahedin Khalq Organization in Albania and the increased defection from the group, more revelations were made on the “Security Clearance” in 1994 and 1995. Gholam Reza Shokri who left the group in 2017 recounted his traumatic experience of torture in the MKO’s jail in an interview with Spiegel.

Gholarmreza Shokri

Shokri spent 27 years of his life in the cult-like MKO. He was only 20 years old and willing to find a good job in Europe when he was recruited by the MKO in Iraq. The MKO agents promised to help him get the European visa only if he stayed in their camp for a few months.

As soon as he entered the organization, they confiscated his ID documents and never gave him back.” whenever I asked for my ID, they would say that they had no idea where it was.”

Thus, Shokri had no way out of the MKO camp but he frequently used to ask the leaders when he could leave the cult. This question was considered a sin by the leaders. Departure from the MKO was forbidden and showing your willingness for leaving the group would be faced with suppression, imprisonment and torture. So he was imprisoned in solitary confinement.

Shokri said that they had closed their eyes and took him to a clandestine jail. “They insulted me calling me spy of the Mullah’s regime,” he recounts. “They beat me in my legs so badly that I could not walk; they were bleeding. They tied my hands with hand coughs for a week. After a week my hands had no sense; I put the fire of a cigarette on them but I didn’t feel it burn. Then they forced me to stand up for one more week. Each time that I fell down out of fatigue, they would beat me so hard that I had to stand up again.”

Shokri recalled that after a week his legs were bruised and turned black. Blood did not circulate to his head so he fainted. He showed the scars on his legs to the interviewer.

He was under torture for 45 days. Finally Massoud Rajavi called on the tortured members and threatened them that if they expose what has happened to them and if they intend to leave the group they would be handed over to Iraqi authorities under the regime of Saddam Hussein. This meant that more torture or death would be waiting for them.

Thus, Shokri stayed in the MKO for another 23 years until September 21^st , 2016 that the group leaders finally let him leave.

Mazda Parsi

December 3, 2018 0 comments

Missions of Nejat Society

why the MKO has taken your love and family

The family of Mr. Valireza Akbari who is captivated behind the bars of the Rajavis’ cult for many years are the active members of Nejat Society Gilan Branch.

Valireza’s brother wrote a letter to his dear brother. Some parts of the letter reads:

My dear brother,

… my dear Valireza, have you ever thought why the MKO has taken your love, your father, your mother , your spouse and your life?! They want to keep you completely in their own control. They want to make you live as they want… their only wish is to gain power in Iran. They make you believe their lies.

December 2, 2018 0 comments

Iran

European support of MKO against Security Council resolutions

Secretary of Iran’s High Council for Human rights said that the current European policies in the blatant support of the terrorists such as MKO are against the resolutions of the United Nations Security Council.

In his meeting with Bulgarian ambassador to Tehran ‘Christo Polendakov”, Mohammad Javad Larijani added, ‘The MKO whose hands are stained with the blood of thousands of innocent Iranian citizens are in fact their nature and function are the same as ISIL of course, with the shell of another type.”

‘Supporting this terrorist group is against human rights standards and a threat to international peace and stability, so the fight against terrorism must be done without neglect, deception, and without partitioning to bad and good,’ he stressed.

Larijani noted, ‘We believe that sincere human rights talks will improve the human rights situation globally, while discrimination, double standards and the cover for terrorist acts under the name of human rights will be an extension of human rights.”

Mohammad Javad Larijani: “MKO is just another version of Daesh terrorists”

Iran Press

The secretary of Headquarters of Human Rights of Iran, Mohammad Javad Larijani, stressed that MKO terrorists are just another version of Daesh terrorists.

Iran press/Irannews: Speaking in Mashhad in north eastern Iran at a commemoration ceremony on Friday, the secretary of Headquarters of Human Rights of Iran emphasized the power of the Islamic Republic within the world of Islam, adding: “The Americans thought Iran’s Islamic revolution will soon wither away, but here we are, four decades later, this same Islamic revolution has scuttled all the plans, plots and schemes of the arrogant powers, and it is for this reason that America is visibly hostile towards Iran. We have scuppered all their plans and schemes. Shia Muslims and the followers of the Prophet’s Ahl-ul-Beit (the Prophet’s household peace be upon them) are bearing the brunt of US attacks.”

In further remarks, Mohammad Javad Larijani said: “The numbers of the followers of the Ahl-ul-Beit (the Prophet’s household peace be upon them) has increased at an unprecedented rate in recent years. The enemies of Islam know that if the followers of the Ahl-ul-Beit have their way, their evil and nefarious objectives will never be realized. The Americans wanted to limit Iran’s power in the nuclear negotiations which went on for many years. Their aim wasn’t just to stop nuclear enrichment in Iran — they didn’t want us to have any nuclear technology at all! They wanted to deprive us of our civilian nuclear industry. Peaceful nuclear technology has at least 150 sub-branches and applications.”

Turning to MKO terrorists Larijani said: “MKO terrorists are just Daeshterrorists (also known as ISIS terrorists) who have shaved off their beards. They truly believe in ‘violence without borders’. They use Saudi money to commit crimes against humanity”.

The secretary of the Headquarters of Human Rights added: “In order to root out the MKO, we need to be very sensitive to any deviation from Islam, and we must be vigilant. There is a narration (hadith) from Imam Ja’far Sadegh (peace be upon him) which says: “Carefully monitor the line taken by Bani Ommayeh; because there is no end to this deviant line”.

Some member of the Mujahideen-e Khalq (MKO) left Iran to stay in Iraq, where Saddam Hussein, who invaded Iran in 1980, gave them a haven. Many took up arms and fought against their Iranian countrymen, earning the group the unofficial nickname monafegheen, or the “hypocrites.” That title has stuck, and most Iranians inside the country, regardless of their political tendencies, refer to them as such.The group is loathed by most Iranians, mainly for the traitorous act of fighting alongside the enemy.

The group was long a fixture on the State Department’s list of terrorist organizations for having killed American citizens. John Bolton, Trump’s national security adviser and others successfully lobbied to have the designation removed in 2012. That did little to change how average Iranians think of the organization.

Bolton’s hawkish views on Iran mirror those of Israel, Saudi Arabia and one of his key ideological partners, the Mujahideen-e Khalq (MKO).

November 29, 2018 0 comments

Mujahedin Khalq Organization members' families

Greetings from many miles away

My dear Mahmoud,

I am your sister. Greetings from many miles away. I wish you to be good and healthy.

We are all good and missed you a lot.

Mum always talks about you … her only wish is to meet you and hug you again.

My dear brother,

While you reside in Camp Ashraf and Liberty we came to visit you several times however, the cult leaders didn’t allow us… they threw stones and sticks.. They insulted us..

Please think about your life.. do you really live a desirable life?!..

Please call us . we are waiting to hear your voice ….

We are waiting to see you

Your sister,

Shirin

November 28, 2018 0 comments

Newer Posts

Older Posts