Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip
Nejat Society
Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip
© 2003 - 2024 NEJAT Society. nejatngo.org
Maryam Rajavi

Maryam Rajavi – the real message following the Haiti disaster

Maryam Rajavi, number one wife of cult leader Massoud Rajavi, who escaped from Iraq in 2003 just before the allied invasion, issued a statement from her residence in Auvers-sur-Oise today. Rajavi offered her condolences to the people of Haiti.

On the surface one could assume that Rajavi is playing her role as the ‘president-elect of the new Iran’. A closer reading of this incongruous message will expose the real message Rajavi is passing to her followers.

A source inside the Mojahedin organisation’s headquarters in the affluent Paris suburb has reported that the earthquake in Haiti has been tagged as a fundraising opportunity.

In an Open Letter to British PM Gordon Brown, Massoud Khodabandeh of Leeds based MESC Ltd, warned that the MKO’s use of London as the base for its satellite and financial had cast doubt on the UK’s stance toward terrorism.

Now the MKO financial heads are being urged to use the Haiti disaster to fundraise for the group’s own use. In 1998 the Charity Commission closed the Iran Aid charity because it could not be proved that the funds were actually being used for the purpose for which they were raised.

Under the patronage of western supporters, the MKO’s bogus charity was immediately reinvented under other names – in particular those fundraising for Camp Ashraf in Iraq. Over the years Iran Aid had claimed to be fundraising for various disasters – earthquakes, floods, and war. None of the money reached these victims but was used to help fund the MKO’s violent activities against the Iranian nation.

January 18, 2010 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
The MEK; Baath Party Accomplice

Iraq Finds Evidence of MKO’s Involvement in Public Massacre

Different Iraqi groups in a statement announced that they have found substantiating documents on the massacre of 25,000 Iraqis by the anti-Iran terrorist Mojahedin-e-Khalq Organization (MKO) during Saddam Hussein’s despotic rule over the country.

"In the documents found at Iraq’s intelligence ministry and other security offices after the toppling of Saddam, the leaders of the terrorist organization have announced that they slaughtered 25,000 Iraqi people on different occasions and over various issues," different Iraqi groups in the eastern province of Diyala said in a statement released to the country’s Prime Minister, Nuri al-Maliki.

Addressing the Iraqi government in their statement, the groups urged an immediate expulsion of the MKO members from their province and from the country.

The statement has been signed by various groups and people from different walks of life, including university professors, elites, tribal leaders, religious figures, artists, poets, sportsmen and sports federations, influential figures, students’ union and city councils of the Diyala province.

The MKO has been in Iraq’s Diyala province since the 1980s. The Iraqi government and parliament have also underlined on different occasions that they would not tolerate the group anymore and that they are seeking to expel the group from the country in the near future.

The anti-Iran terror group has been blacklisted as a terrorist organization by many international entities and countries.

The MKO is behind a slew of assassinations and bombings inside Iran, a number of EU parliamentarians said in a recent letter in which they slammed a British court decision to remove the MKO from the British terror list. The EU officials also added that the group has no public support within Iran because of their role in helping Saddam Hussein in the Iraqi imposed war on Iran (1980-1988).

A May 2005 Human Rights Watch report accused the MKO of running prison camps in Iraq and committing human rights violations.

According to the Human Rights Watch report, the outlawed group puts defectors under torture and jail terms.

The group started assassination of the citizens and officials after the Islamic Revolution in Iran in a bid to take control of the newly established Islamic Republic. It killed several of Iran’s new leaders in the early years after the Revolution, including the then President Mohammad Ali Rajayee, Prime Minister Mohammad Javad Bahonar and Judiciary Chief Mohammad Hossein Beheshti who were killed in bomb attacks by MKO members in 1981.

The group fled to Iraq in 1986, where it was protected by Saddam Hussein and where it helped the Iraqi dictator suppress Shiite and Kurd uprisings in the country.
The terrorist group joined Saddam’s army during the Iraqi imposed war on Iran (1980-1988) and helped Saddam and killed thousands of Iranian civilians and soldiers during the US-backed Iraqi imposed war on Iran.

The MKO was put on the US terror list in 1997 by the then President, Bill Clinton, but since the 2003 US invasion of Iraq, the group has been strongly backed by the Washington Neocons, who also argue for the MKO to be taken off the US terror list.

January 18, 2010 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
The MEK; Baath Party Accomplice

Al-Mutlak standing with the oppressed Mojahedin Khalq

Salah al-Mutlak, the newly-banned Iraqi politician had an interview (in Arabic) in Sot al-Iraq (Voice of Iraq). Mutlak says the decision to exclude him from the March 7 parliamentary elections is political, designed to avoid what he calls a”sweep”by his Iraqi coalition. He calls the de-Ba’athification commission a”political body,”rather than a judicial body.

He says he has no involvement with the Ba’ath Party, but he defends what he calls the”oppressed”members of the Ba’ath party, and the Mujahedin-e Khalq, whose members residing in Camp Ashraf are waiting to be relocated to a desolated camp as decided by the Iraqi Government.

In answer to a question concerning his visiting camp Ashraf and contact with designated MKO he did not reject it and claimed it has had its impact on his exclusion by the involvement of Iranian regime: “Yes my visit to camp Ashraf affected Iran, and my relationship with MKO never change. They are real Mujahids and I will continue my contact with them and respect them and I think they are oppressed; and I am naturally standing with the oppressed. I stood with Shiite when wronged at a time, and I will stand with the oppressed regardless of being Ba’athists or MKO and whoever is at home or abroad”.

Reported by Mojahedin WS

January 18, 2010 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mujahedin Khalq Organization as a terrorist group

Mujahedeen-e- Khalq Dossier

Center for Policing Terrorism “CPT”

Led by husband and wife Massoud and Maryam Rajavi, the Mujahideen-e Khalq (MEK) is the primary opposition to the Islamic Republic of Iran, its military wing is the National Council of Resistance of Iran, its military wing is the National Liberation Army (NLA) and its political arm is the National Council of Resistance of Iran(NCRI). The US State Department designated the MEK as a foreign terrorist organization in 1997, based upon its killing of civilians, although the organizations opposition to Iran and its democratic leanings has earned its support among some American and European officials.

To view the full Document click here

Prepared by: Nicole Cafarella For the Center for Policing Terrorism – March 15, 2005

January 17, 2010 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
USA

US Congressional Research Service on PMOI

Iran: U.S. Concerns and Policy Responses
Congressional Research Service

7-5700
RL32048

People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI)/Camp Ashraf

Of the groups seeking to replace rather than moderate the regime, one of the best known is the Iran: U.S. Concerns and Policy ResponsesPeople’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI).5 Secular and left-leaning, it was formed in the 1960s to try to overthrow the Shah of Iran and advocated Marxism blended with Islamic tenets. It allied with pro-Khomeini forces during the Islamic revolution and supported the November 1979 takeover of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran but was later driven into exile. Even though it is an opponent of Tehran, since the late 1980s the State Department has refused contact with the PMOI and its umbrella organization, the National Council of Resistance (NCR). The State Department designated the PMOI as a foreign terrorist organization (FTO) in October 19976 and the NCR was named as an alias of the PMOI in the October 1999 re-designation. The FTO designation was prompted by PMOI attacks in Iran that sometimes kill or injure civilians—although the group does not appear to purposely target civilians. In August 14, 2003, the State Department designated the NCR offices in the United States an alias of the PMOI, and NCR and Justice Department authorities closed down those offices. The regime accuses the group of involvement in the post June 2009 presidential election violence.

The State Department report on international terrorism for 2007 asserts that the organization—and not just a radical element of the organization as the group asserts—was responsible for the alleged killing of seven American defense advisers to the former Shah in 1975-1976. The report again notes the group’s promotion of women in its ranks and again emphasizes the group’s “cultlike” character, including indoctrination of its members and separation of family members, including children, from its activists. The group’s alliance with Saddam Hussein’s regime in the 1980s and 1990s has contributed to the U.S. shunning of the organization.

Some advocate that the United States not only remove the group from the FTO list but also enter an alliance with the group against Iran. The FTO designation was up for formal review in October 2008, and, in July 2008, the PMOI formally petitioned to the State Department that its designation be revoked, on the grounds that it renounced any use of terrorism in 2001. However, the State Department announced in mid-January 2009 that the group would remain listed; the next review of the FTO list is in October 2009.

The group is trying to build on recent legal successes in Europe; on January 27, 2009, the European Union (EU) removed the group from its terrorist group list; the group had been so designated by the EU in 2002. In May 2008, a British appeals court determined that the group should no longer be considered a terrorist organization on the grounds that the British government did not provide “any reliable evidence that supported a conclusion that PMOI retained an intention to resort to terrorist activities in the future.” Currently, the governments that still list the group as a “terrorist organization,” include the United States, Canada, Australia. In June 2003, France arrested about 170 PMOI members, including its co-leader Maryam Rajavi (wife of PMOI 5 Other names by which this group is known is the Mojahedin-e-Khalq Organization (MEK or MKO) and the National Council of Resistance (NCR). 6 The designation was made under the authority of the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (P.L.104-132). founder Masoud Rajavi, whose whereabouts are unknown). She was released and remains based in France, and is occasionally received by European parliamentarians and other politicians.

The issue of group members in Iraq is increasingly pressing. U.S. forces attacked PMOI military installations in Iraq during Operation Iraqi Freedom and negotiated a ceasefire with PMOI military elements in Iraq, requiring the approximately 3,400 PMOI fighters to remain confined to their Ashraf camp near the border with Iran. Its weaponry is in storage, guarded by U.S. personnel. In July 2004, the United States granted the Ashraf detainees “protected persons” status under the 4th Geneva Convention, meaning they will not be extradited to Tehran or forcibly expelled as long as U.S. forces have a mandate to help secure Iraq. Another 200 PMOI fighters have taken advantage of an arrangement between Iran and the ICRC for them to return to Iran if they disavow further PMOI activities; none are known to have been persecuted since returning.

The U.S.-led security mandate in Iraq was replaced on January 1, 2009, by a bilateral U.S.-Iraq agreement that limits U.S. flexibility in Iraq. The group fears that, now that Iraqi forces have taken control of the camp, Iraq will expel the group to Iran. The Iraqi government tried to calm those fears in January 2009 by saying that it would adhere to all international obligations not do so, but that trust was lost on July 27, 2009, when it set up a police post in the Camp, which was resisted by PMOI residents. The PMOI says about a dozen were killed in the clashes. Some observers say Iraq might move the camp to Iraq’s interior, away from the Iran border. The EU “de-listing” might help resolve the issue by causing EU governments to take in those at Ashraf.

——————————————————————

5 Other names by which this group is known is the Mojahedin-e-Khalq Organization (MEK or MKO) and the NationalCouncil of Resistance (NCR).
6 The designation was made under the authority of the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (P.L.104-132).

Kenneth Katzman – Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs – www.crs.gov

January 17, 2010 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
The cult of Rajavi

Who dares to criticize MKO?

In cult-like cultures, there is no way for criticizing the policies because the relationships are based on absolute power and absolute obedience.
In Mujahedin Khalq Organization as well as any other cult, no one is allowed to criticize the group
In Mujahedin Khalq Organization as well as any other cult, no one is allowed to criticize the group. If the member criticizes the leaders and their policies, she or he will be labeled as the agent of Intelligence Ministry of Islamic Republic. The group leaders never present any evidence or document to accuse dissident or critic members but they call them mercenaries of Islamic Republic titling them with humiliating labels. This policy is exactly the one used by the Communists during Stalin era when the government of Soviet Union used to see itself as the unique socialist government on the Earth. They believed that a communist is a person who supports the Soviet Union without questioning or criticizing it. They also used to call their critics as “Social Fascist” or “fifth Column of Imperialism” and execute them on the charge of “spying for Imperialism”.

The MKO is going on the same way that led the Soviet Union to its collapse. Totalitarian organizations believe that absolute truth belongs to themselves so they should fight any person or group who do not accept their strategy and ideology. The logic of MKO leaders is based on what the conditions impose on the organization and the consequent policies they choose. They think they have never made a wrong decision and the policies have always been progressive and leading to victory!

In the belief system of MKO, no one is found that criticizes the group but is not the agent of IRI.

The leaders of MKO never try to respond the critics reasonably. Their only policy to reply critics includes insulting and slandering. They never dare to face the critics logically.

When an organization sees political power as its absolute right and justifies any mean to achieve such a goal, then it is not able to criticize its own practices. Absolute power is not able to extract its own rightfulness from the history since historic process contains logic and reasoning. You cannot change yourself to an essential historical phenomenon without logic arguments. Such a power system uses all its efforts to make an ideal historic rightfulness using the ideology as the main axis.

The Rajavis believe that defectors of their cult do not have the right to criticize MKO. Therefore, the Iranian nations do not have the right to criticize National Council of Resistance and Mujahedin-e-Khalq for their treasons, according to the Rajavis.

Besides the members who are isolated in the cult and are forced to obey the leaders blindly, have been deprived from the ability of criticizing because their minds are solidified under sever manipulation practices of the cult. The only type of criticism they have been taught is self-criticism in which the members have to criticize themselves instead of the leaders!

By Mazda Parsi

January 16, 2010 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
UK

Mojahedin Khalq lobby clutching at straws

Written answers and statements, 13 January 2010

Lord Maginnis of Drumglass (Crossbench)
To ask Her Majesty’s Government further to the Written Answer by Baroness Kinnock of Holyhead on 16 December 2009 (WA 246), whether their position on alleged injustices against residents at Camp Ashraf by the Iraqi authorities takes account of their representations to the Government of China in the case of Akmal Shaikh

Lord Brett (Government Whip (technically a Lord in Waiting, HM Household); Labour)
The UK opposes the death penalty and takes action in all cases to try to prevent UK nationals being executed. Akmal Shaikh was the first EU/British national to be executed in China in 50 years. Twenty-seven high level representations were made to the Chinese authorities dating back to November 2008 by my right honourable friends the Prime Minister, the Foreign Secretary and other Ministers. The basis for these representations mainly centred on Mr Shaikh’s mental health. Mr Shaikh’s mental health was a crucial aspect of evidence that the Government believed the courts should have considered before they delivered the sentence.

Camp Ashraf is part of a sovereign and democratic Iraq and the situation there is a matter for the Government of Iraq. We regularly discuss Camp Ashraf with the Iraqi Government, including with the Iraqi Prime Minister and Ministers for Human Rights, Internal Affairs and Foreign Affairs. We continue to underline the need for the Iraqi authorities to deal with the residents of Camp Ashraf in a way that meets international standards.
There is no link between the two issues.

House of Lords, London

January 16, 2010 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Iraq

Ancient Iran association letter to Prime Minister of Iraq

Mr. Nuri Al Maleki, Honorable Prime Minister of Iraq,

With our best greetings and hails to your Excellency, The Prime Minister – Elect of Iraq,

The settlement of Iraqi forces in presented garrison called Ashraf, New Iraq, was the first step which was taken to help stranded captives in the cult’s clutches and of course , the leaders and operatives of this felon and criminal cult have lost their ability to implement suppression and inquisition of thoughts and beliefs against their own members behind closed gates of this notorious and abominable garrison like before during Saddam Hussein’s reign, because now , they are deprived of support of cussed and unblessed Saddam Hussein, but this first step which has been positive and very helpful for the captives , is not enough and it should be other steps taken to expedite and accelerate the freedom of these captives from the cult’s clutches and according to our own experiences which is the outcome of over two decades captivity in this garrison, New Iraq, former Ashraf, the next step should be begetting and making camp or camps which are run and controlled under direct supervision UNHCR and ICRC and Iraqi government and in these camps which the rank and file of this notorious cult are completely separated from the cult’s leaders and operatives so they can freely and without any pressure and religious – political indoctrinations from the cult’s leaders decide and make up their minds about their own future and finally after spending and wasting many years in this garrison and away from any religious indoctrinations and brain washing , they specify their future life – path and rescue themselves from the putrid swamp and lagoon of this felon cult then they can sip the taste of freedom , family , and real life which Rajavi,the traitor , had deprived them of all those things for decades .

The wave of opposition and unwillingness with violent and brutal ideology and politics of this cult have been increased and escalated among the rank and file and writing slogans and distribution of leaflets and pamphlet by the dissidents inside the garrison has started but establishing and making new camps with serenity and tranquility and away from cultic relations and the cult’s leaders , will expedite the freedom of the cult’s captives. The camps which the family and loved ones of the cult’s captives can visit and meet them without any confinement and limitation and a way from the cult’s leaders and operatives’ supervision in particular.

MR. Prime Minister , it is necessary to remind your Excellency that according to decades of captivity of those victims and stranded people in this garrison and the rest and the lack of communication with the free world and in our expression ,life in cave, there is fear and disappointment among the residents of this garrison which if they decide to separate and defect the cult , where should they go ? and what should they do outside?, which the existence of the mentioned camps and their freehand in those camps and having access to internet , satellite ,television to communicate with the modern and free world and getting in touch with their family and loved ones via phone or meeting face to face with them , will help and assist all those victims and captives to find themselves and decide for their own future.

The Ancient Iran Association , urge your Excellency ,The Honorable Prime Minister -Elect of Iraq , not to allow the cult’s leaders and operatives to beget and create humane catastrophe through brain washing and religious and political indoctrinations of those victims and captives who are stranded in there . The Cult’s leaders take advantage of their life for their own cultic interests.

In this regard , The Ancient Iran Association proclaims that is ready to help those victims who are stranded in the felon Rajavi cult’s clutches.

With our sincere hails and greetings to you and the honorable people of Iraq.

Ancient Iran association, Paris

January 14, 2010 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Maryam Rajavi

Maryam Rajavi and 12 months to overthrow

“…the government would fall within 12 months if foreign powers remain neutral in the crisis” said Maryam Rajavi, in her interview with AFP.

This is not the first time and certainly not the last time either, that Maryam Rajavi as well as her fugitive husband Massoud Rajavi promise the overthrow of the Iranian regime in a particular period of time. This is not the first time and certainly not the last time either, that Maryam Rajavi as well as her fugitive husband Massoud Rajavi promise the overthrow of the Iranian regime

As a matter of fact it has always been a special policy in MKO history to determine a time for the fall of IRI. The use of the policy is that the leaders of the cult find a new topic for their manipulative sessions, they entertain the members injecting them the hope for the victory of their so-called struggle, especially in the current declining situation of the group in Iraq. Once the members are promised and given the hope of victory, they will stop their hesitations about leaving the group and will be persuaded to stay at camp Ashraf, in the hope of their alleged victory against Islamic Republic.

But the history recalls that thirty years ago (!) when Massoud Rajavi fled Iran to France he claimed, in his interviews, that he would get back to Iran in six months!

He repeated these words regularly during the past three decades since in various phases of MKO history the members were stuck in depression and disappointment due to failures of the cult, including failure in Eternal Light Operation (in which MKO attacked Iran), failure in their civil war and terror acts, their designation as a terrorist organization in the world and the fall of their main financial and military supporter, Saddam Hussein.

Now, Maryam Rajavi’s claim for the overthrow of IRI in 12 months is the latest use of their old policy. It is worth to know that this time Mrs. Rajavi has made a condition in her prediction and that’s:”if the foreign powers remain neutral in the crisis.”

The condition is certainly used as a safety valve to put the blame on the other governments in case that her prediction will not come true. Then this will be used as an appropriate pretext to present the members after her next failure.

From the other side, the condition she makes is not only deceitful but unrealistic, experts say. Regarding the Islamic Revolution in 1978, when the Shah of Iran was enormously backed by the West especially the United States, the protesters could prevail Shah’s tyranny and its many supporters who were not neutral on the case. Therefore the condition Mrs. Rajavi makes is not only meaningless but also funny.

By Mazda Parsi

January 14, 2010 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
USA

MKO still deserves its terrorist listing

Terror Group Swears It’s Changed Its Ways. Scouts’ Honor

WASHINGTON-The People’s Mujahidin is sick and tired of being called a terrorist organization by the U.S. government. So leaders of the terrorist group settled on a uniquely American strategy for handling this problem: They sued.
The People's Mujahidin is sick and tired of being called a terrorist organization by the U.S. government
Yes, the group has done its share of assassinations, bombings, embassy attacks and killings of U.S. troops. But that was long ago, and now the People’s Mujaheddin wants to let bygones be bygones. It says it has devoted itself to democracy and nonviolence, and it would like very much to be taken off the State Department’s list of international terrorist groups.

Friends of the People’s Mujaheddin Organization of Iran-a k a MEK, a k a Mujaheddin-e Khalq, a k a National Liberation Army of Iran, a k a National Council of Resistance, a k a Organization of the People’s Holy Warriors-assembled Tuesday at the U.S. courthouse here to hear Andrew Frey of the firm Mayer Brown plead their case.

"Today’s PMOI is unique among foreign terrorist organizations," the lawyer told a three-judge appellate panel. "The organization has foresworn violence. We walk the walk. There have been no terrorist acts by PMOI for eight years."

But couldn’t the attacks resume? "The fact that terrorist activities are bad if they happen could be said of the Girl Scouts," Frey reasoned.
The People’s Mujaheddin as Girl Scouts. Only in America.

People’s Mujaheddin fighters were old-school terrorists who once battled the shah of Iran. They then went to Iraq and, with Saddam Hussein’s help, attacked the ayatollahs. They allegedly killed hundreds of people, but now they call themselves a nonviolent Iranian opposition movement. About 3,400 of them and their family members still live at Camp Ashraf in Iraq-and they have plenty of friends in the United States, including former Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., who watched Tuesday’s proceedings from the front row.

The government’s lawyer, Douglas Letter, wasn’t about to negotiate with "an organization that for at least 30 years has been involved in terrorism, violence, assassination, et cetera."

He admitted the public record was not sufficient to demonstrate that the group still poses a threat, but he said "it was the classified material" that made it clear that the group still deserves its terrorist listing.

Here the People’s Mjuaheddin has a problem: The group is allowed to respond to the classified evidence but is not allowed to see it. "Due process," Letter explained, "is a flexible concept."..

But if the proceedings seemed stacked against the People’s Mujaheddin, consider this: How many other countries would allow a terrorist organization to sue the government for name-calling?

In a bonus for the group, it had its day in court on the same day a grand jury in the very same courthouse was hearing from two hairstylists about their conversations with Tareq and Michaele Salahi, the White House state dinner crashers. A bank of television cameras stood sentry outside the courthouse-not for the terrorists, but for the stylists, who arrived in a Hummer limousine.

An overflow crowd was in the courtroom, where some men standing in the back passed notes in what looked to be Farsi. The clerk called up case 09-1059, <I>(ital) People’s Mujaheddin Organization of Iran v. U.S. Department of State, et al</I> . (end ital) She struggled with the pronunciation, starting with "People’s Mooha" before correcting herself.
Frey assured the judges that his client "rejects the sharia," or Islamic law, and renounced its Marxist past. He said the group is "totally committed" to a democratic and secular Iran.

Judge Karen Henderson asked if the lawyer could provide "affirmative evidence that supporters who may be anywhere in the world have foresworn violence."
"I can’t speak to individual members," Frey admitted.

Frey was asked about the accusation that the group was behind plans for bombing in Baghdad. "That kind of thing does not constitute substantial evidence," he replied. And the accusation that the group was training women to be suicide bombers? "Utterly implausible," he said.

"We’ve got eight years, I believe, of a clean record," he pleaded, citing such "powerful evidence" as the "disbanding of the National Liberation Army."

Maybe so, but it will probably take more than a lawsuit to solve their image problem. In the hours before Tuesday’s hearing in Washington, a bomb went off in Tehran, killing a nuclear scientist. Iranian authorities, naturally, blamed the United States, Israel-and the People’s Mujaheddin.

Dana Milbank

January 13, 2010 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Recent Posts

  • Rebranding, too Difficult for the MEK

    December 27, 2025
  • The black box of the torture camps of the MEK

    December 24, 2025
  • Pregnancy was taboo in the MEK

    December 22, 2025
  • MEPs who lack awareness about the MEK’s nature

    December 20, 2025
  • Why did Massoud Rajavi enforce divorces in the MEK?

    December 15, 2025
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Youtube

© 2003 - 2025 NEJAT Society . All Rights Reserved. NejatNGO.org


Back To Top
Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip