Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip
Nejat Society
Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip
© 2003 - 2024 NEJAT Society. nejatngo.org
Iran

Iran will assist Iraq to deal with MKO: Najafabadi

LONDON, August 18 (IranMania) – Iran will be very helpful if Iraq seriously deal with the terrorist Mojaheddin-e-Khalq Organization (MKO), Prosecutor General Qorbanali Dorri-Najafabadi said, MNA reported.

In an interview with the Mehr News Agency on Tuesday the chief prosecutor of the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal (ISCT), Jaafar al-Mousavi, said there is evidence to suggest that the MKO had a hand in murdering Iraqi citizens.

Al-Mousavi stated that an arrest warrant has been issued against 150 MKO members including ringleaders Maryam Rajavi and Mas?oud Rajavi.

The decision made by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal to fight the MKO and the terrorists is very important in establishing peace and security in the country, Dorri-Najafabadi told reporters on the sidelines of the 18th seasonal conference of Iran?s House of Parties.

The crimes committed by the MKO can never be forgiven, the legal official added.

?We are prepared to offer any kind of assistance to the ISCT to confront the MKO group and to establish a peaceful Iraq,? he noted.

Criterion for examining qualification of candidates

In his speech at the conference, Dorri-Najafabadi said that the criterion for approving the qualification of candidates for the 2008 parliamentary elections would be their present status.

A jurist member of the Guardian Council, Ayatollah Abbas Kaabi, told the MNA on Tuesday that candidates who were previously disqualified are still disqualified for the 2008 parliamentary elections. ?The reasons and documents which disqualified candidates in the last election are still in force and the principle stands on the disqualification of these persons.?

The Guardian Council could have made some mistakes in examining the qualifications of certain individuals, thus anyone who becomes a candidate in any election his eligibility should be studied according to his present situation, the prosecutor general stated.

He also stressed that a standard should be formulated for the elections law which has undergone more changes than any other law.

 

IranMania, August 21, 2007

http://www.iranmania.com/News/ArticleView/Default.asp?NewsCode=53609&NewsKind=Current%20Affairs

 

August 22, 2007 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mujahedin Khalq Organization as a terrorist group

Interpol hunting for MKO leaders

Massoud Rajavi assisted Saddam Hussein in massacre of innocent Iraqis.

Interpol is hunting for the leaders of the terrorist group Mojahedin Khalq Organization (MKO) known in Iran as Monafqeen or hypocrites.

The Iraqi newspaper Al-Bayyinah al-Jadidah reports Interpol offices around the world have been notified and are hunting of the Rajavis.

The Iraqi government provided Interpol with evidence of MKO’s role in the massacre of Iraqi citizens, and arrest warrants have been issued to bring Massoud and Maryam Rajavai, the leaders of MKO, to justice.

Jaafar al-Mousawi the Public Prosecutor of the Iraqi High Court has also confirmed that the court has issued arrest warrants for 150 MKO members.

According to al-Mousawi, Baghdad has even taken steps to extradite MKO criminals who are abroad or have fled to Jordan.

Mujahedin Khalq Organization (MKO) assisted Saddam in the massacre of thousands of innocent Iraqis, and it has committed several terrorist acts in Iran.

PressTV – Tue, 21 Aug 2007

August 22, 2007 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Iraqi Authorities' stance on the MEK

Iraqi Judge: MKO Indicted

Jafar al-Mousavi, the head of Iraq’s high criminal court, stressed that the Iranian opposition group Mojahedin-e khalq would be informed of its charges for its involvement in suppression of Sha’banieh uprising during 1991 in Iraq’s Southern and Northern provinces.

In a press conference, he said: "One of the charges is plundering the properties of Iraqi people. The high criminal court of Iraqi is to start discussing the case of uprising of 1991 in Basra and Meysan provinces next week. Fifteen defendants, including Mohammed Aribi al-Khalifah, would stand before the court. On the other hand, the council of Meysan province has established a committee to receive people’s complaints about the uprising.

 

Buratha news –  2007/08/20

August 22, 2007 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Elaheh Iranian singer

The Death of a Defector

Once leading a successful career as an Iranian singer during the reign on Pahlavi’s monarchy, Elahe, leaving Iran after 1979 revolution, returned to her home country just a few months ago to die at home. For whatever reason, she had joined NCRI, alias MKO/MEK, and started a close cooperation with the group in the Europe. She announced her separation from the terrorist cult just in the last year and disclosed untold truths especially on Maryam Rajavi’s luxurious life in Auvers sur Oise. Her disclosures infuriated Mojahedin to such an extent that she had to suffer insults, threats, various labels and tongue-lashing of the so-called democratic organization.

But she had made her decision and returned to Iran and repented of her past mistakes and apologized for deserting people when she had to stand by them. Elaborating on the reasons for her return to Iran she said:

I had to return to my home country to show in action what I had to tell by words. I want to pass my last hours of my life in my country beside the honourable, brave Iranians. It is not too late to redeem the past even if you have one day to live.

Addressing the members of MKO she stated:

I speak to those who are mentally captivated in the clutches of a cult whose leaders only follow their egocentric ambitions. When I see this gang fall in with the aliens against national interests to accomplish the cult’s interests, I say to myself they cannot possibly be Iranian.

Regretting her past, she also referred to the time when she was by MKO acting as Saddam’s accomplice against her nation and wished for the freedom of the remaining Iranian artists still in the bonds of the Mojahedin terrorist cult.

 

mojahedin.ws – 19/08/2007

August 22, 2007 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Nejat Publications

Nejat NewsLetter NO.14

Nejat News LetterIssue 14 – August, 2007

INSIDE THIS ISSUE:

1.    Exile Group Stays on EU terror List

2.    East French Lines in Terror Alert

3.    The presence of MKO in Iraq is against the law

4.    Four more defectors of Rajavi’s Cult repatriated

5.    Breaking the ties that bind

6.    Rajavi name in Mojahedin propaganda sails a cult spiraling towards disaster

7.    Elaheh, the singer of flowers passed away

8.    Coordinator of MKO terrorists arrested

9.    Status of MKO members held in Iraq prompts debate

10. Anne Singleton interview with BBC

11. Two postings from NIAC about MKO

12. NIAC Makes Progress in Defamation Case with VOA

13. NIAC rebuts MKO and Front Page Magazine

14. Iraq will spare no effort to help Iran

Download Nejat NewsLetter-ISSUE NO.14
Download Nejat NewsLetter-ISSUE NO.14

August 20, 2007 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
The Ideology of the MEK

The Arranged Ideological Revolutions (1)

The Arranged Ideological Revolutions; the Passage of Mojahedin-e-Khalq Organization (MKO) from a Political Group to a Religious Cult

Based on Dr. Massoud Banisadr’s “Memoirs of an Iranian Rebel”

The translated text of Hojjat-ollah Aflaki’s speech made at the Symposium of the Link between Cults and Terrorism held in Isfahan. He is an expert and researcher on Iranian history.

Introduction

Structural Characteristics of Cults:

Considering proposed definitions of a cult, its purpose, nature and structure, it is revealed that all cults share certain characteristics which distinguish between them and nations, religions and religious sects. Cult formation is based on such shared characteristics, intentionally or unintentionally, which continuously develop even when the cult is declining.

Such characteristics consist of ideas, rituals, rules, doctrines and unique theories which distinguish a certain cult from other cults and the society. It has to be noted that this stage is determined intentionally by cult leaders, founders and ideologues.

There are some cases in which cult formation has not been predetermined and leaders were to bring about religious and social reforms. However, as a result of inferring new ideologies, they have separated themselves from others thus forming a cult faced with opposed ideologies on the part of the society.

Another characteristic of cult is the factor “devotion” and blind obedience of devotee toward mentor or leader. Such a characteristic is not present in the fundamental definitions of cult but the fact is that during history, cultists have not denied such a factor rather they are proud of it and consider their membership in a cult as a bliss and honour. They regard themselves as sheep protected by cult leader. For example, the factor of devotion in the cultist structure of Sufism, Isma’ilie Alamout (followers of Hasan Sabbah), Isma’ilie Mahallati (in Iran, Tajikistan, India, England, and Africa) is the main characteristic to the point that followers of Agha Khan Mahallati presented him equal in his weight gold and diamond. (Schpigel Journal, 1949, No.29, 33).

Cults have other characteristics which are either the result of above-mentioned features or complement them. First, from a cultist viewpoint, people are either insider or alien and the latter are misled. Second, cultists have to observe the factor “keeping secret” carefully so they never let others participate in their circles. For example, Sufis scarcely let others participate in their sessions of invocation or “Sama” Or leftist groups in Iran shook hand with each other in a special way and called it revolutionary as opposed to imperial one. They called each other “comrade” and “brother” and attired in contrast to common norms. As such, it may be necessary to study such cult characteristics in Mojahedin-e-Khalq Organization (MKO) in order to discover corresponding similarities within the group compaired wit other known cults.

B. Cult Conducts within MKO

MKO has internal and external aspects which are somehow contradictory referred to by its former members. The emphasis put by the organization on factors such as honesty and keeping secret confirms this fact since MKO is not merely a guerilla or political group rather its leaders consider it as a cultural, religious, and social group aimed at improving all aspects of human life. As such, keeping secrets in the organization involves security issues as well as instructional, ideology and inter-organizational conducts. Finally, as a result of ideological revolutions in the organization, this political group turned into a dogmatic cult.

It seems that most ideological revolutions formed by Massoud Rajavi, MKO’s leader, against Islamic republic of Iran have been preplanned and then revealed as separate revolutions to justify the organization’s actions. Eventually, all such ideological revolutions turned MKO into an ideological and religious cult and enhanced Massoud Rajavi from the stance of a guerilla leader to an ideological one who appointed his wife as the ideological mother of MKO. Below, a number of the organization’s approaches are listed.

1. Ideological revolutions concerning the relation between men and women:

The process in which Maryam Azodanloo (Maryam Rajavi) turned into ideological mother of MKO is very interesting. Such a process is a clause of ideological revolution and reveals cult formation process clearly. It has to be pointed out that such a process includes various stages of ideological revolution and has happened over years. (Memoirs of an Iranian Rebel, 478).

Some of the clauses of the revolution which promoted Maryam Rajavi to the position of the ideological mother of the organization are as follows: only Maryam Rajavi can participate in female sessions since she is their mother. Massoud Rajavi is not only the ideological leader of MKO but occupies the position possessed by a Shiite Imam. The insiders’ heart had to be enamored with his love and submit to him in total obedience. (Memoirs of an Iranian Rebel, pp.242, 428,478).

Gender revolution aimed at making members far from sexual inclinations which make men consider women as subjects of trading who lure them and try to attract the attention of men by showing off. Therefore, such a revolution was brought about in order to overcome gender crisis intensified in recent years in the organization despite separation of men and women. One of the main approaches in this regard was absolute separation of men and women to the point that men were not allowed to participate in women sessions nor vice versa. Even a man could not sit on a chair on which a woman was sitting before. However, Maryam Rajavi was an exception to these rules. (Memoirs of an Iranian Rebel, 379).

Gender attachment is human grave from which Mojahedin have to flee. They can do so through above-mentioned ways and also professing their sinfulness before Maryam and Massoud. It means that all people are sinful, wives are witches and marrying them is forbidden. (Memoirs of an Iranian Rebel, pp.342-5). In many sessions, Massoud Rajavi and associate cadres acted offensively toward other highly educated members some of whom represented the National Council of Resistance in countries such as the U.S. For example, once Massoud Banisadr, the representative of the National Council of Resistance in the U.S., was about to speak and Massoud Rajavi introduced him as follows: “a dead man speaking deep from his grave”. Anyway, profess of sinfulness was one of the major characteristics of this clause of revolution, i.e. all members are sinful and it is only Maryam Rajavi who is innocent. Therefore, Maryam and he have to be relied upon in all matters. Since nobody deserves knowing Massoud except Maryam, he has to pass this way along with Maryam. Therefore, members have to follow Massoud Rajavi and Maryam Rajavi fighting against Islamic republic of Iran both politically and ideologically. As such, the presence of Maryam Rajavi as the single ideological member of the organization was vital to understand Massoud Rajavi, his love to God and members and his detestation of Khomeini, the Islamic revolution leader. (Memoirs of an Iranian Rebel, pp.347, 354).

In fact, the main objective of all ideological revolutions is winning absolute obedience of members, the most fundamental factor for running the cults. Therefore, Mojahedin have to be absolute devotees and stop doing common practices like jesting, free study, working out of the organization, unless it is an act of fundraising, non-organizational relations, attachment to personal property and sexual relations out of organization, keeping their personal books and the like. (Memoirs of an Iranian Rebel, pp.207, 214).

The process of divorce revolution was as follows: Massoud Rajavi was considered as imam of the time and nobody was worthy enough to see him since the members and their partners were themselves the veils. Therefore, women were told their husband and men were their barrier. So couples got divorced. Even single members underwent such a revolution promising not to get married in the future. All divorce papers were signed and delivered to Massoud Rajavi over one week. Any doubtful member was punished severely. For example, a member called Yaghubi who was a ranking member lost his status as a result of having relation with his wife. Or other members such as Karim Haqqi and his wife Maryam Babaee were subject to severe torture over years which ended with the wife’s suicide.

In fact, the main reasons behind such revolutions, and divorce revolution in particular, were not those acknowledged by the organization’s leaders, rather, they were as follows: winning complete obedience of members, solving marriage problem in the organization (in which men were 3 times more than women) (Memoirs of an Iranian Rebel, p.238) and also a terrible monopolism to the point that according to a foreign reporter, Massoud Rajavi could not endure members loving anybody except him. Consequently, children were sent to orphanages so as not to see their parents.

In fact, divorce and gender revolutions were complementary. It is worth noting that before divorce revolution, members were said to marry each other to compensate for emotional problems of those members losing their partner in Forugh operation. (Memoirs of an Iranian Rebel, 326). Moreover, in divorce revolution, couples were forced to perform three-fold divorce in which they could never possibly remarry. Such a divorce is against Islamic rules. Such actions by MKO turned it into a religious cult exceeding human rights.

Ideological revolution of MKO considered men as wild and passive creatures so that it was believed that men should be replaced by women in the organization. Moreover, they were ordered to criticize each other openly and even call their friends murderer. Otherwise, Massoud Rajavi and other officials got angry, offended them, and called them rubbish, dirty mouse, traitor, hypocrite since they did not criticize others. (Memoirs of an Iranian Rebel, pp.392, 426-7,).

This stage of revolution aimed at expelling opposed members and replacing them with women. In addition, they made members admit to guilts they have done before in the presence of Massoud Rajavi and Maryam Rajavi and Tahereh. Once a man complained of his wife being so thin was called by officials as obscene, cuckold, rubbish, fool, etc. it is evident that according to the organization’s ideology, women had superiority over men. (Memoirs of an Iranian Rebel, pp.230, 234).

Massoud Rajavi believed that ideological revolution may increase members” capabilities so they performed such offensive actions toward members. According to one clause, men could not achieve high ranks so 12 female members were selected as key members of leadership council and 12 females were selected as alternative members. All of them declared that Massoud Rajavi is their master and they are his maid. (Memoirs of an Iranian Rebel, pp.380, 421).

It is doubtful why 12 members were appointed. Such a selection seems ideological since 12 symbolizes the number of Shiite innocent Imams. Furthermore, appointing females instead of males confirmed the superiority of women over men. MKO believed that it was necessary to fight against Islamic Republic of Iran so women took responsibilities not based on meritocracy. Such considerations led to so called seat revolution (Memoirs of an Iranian Rebel, pp.285, 283, 414, 482,).

In fact, the issue of feminism in MKO aimed at expelling those male members who criticized the organization, accusing Islamic Republic of Iran of exploiting women, and abuse of women’s tender emotions to secure the leadership of Massoud Rajavi and his wife turned the organization into a cult. Although the organization tried to conceal the issue of divorce revolution which was to the advantage of Islamic Republic of Iran but the memoirs of separated members revealed it (Memoirs of an Iranian Rebel, 368).

It is worth noting that before the performance of forced divorces, all members got divorced in the presence of Abrishamchi, MKO’s number 2 in rank, who had already wedded them all in the name of Massoud Rajavi and Maryam Rajavi. (Memoirs of an Iranian Rebel, 25).

Translated by mojahedin.ws

August 19, 2007 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
The Ideology of the MEK

The Vanished Public Support and the Ideological Revolution (11)

Ideological revolution of Mojahedin has its roots in the lack of public support inside Iran. It seems that Mojahedin have been well aware of the fact even before their internal revolution when they surfaced their opposition in the first mass movement on 20 June in 1981. Of the major causes of the degradation is the group ‘s hysterical adopting of a violent armed warfare. Mojahedin’s blind assassinations and bloody terrorist operations repelled Iranian people and made Mojahedin disappointed of availing itself of the determinative public element inside the country. It has to be noted that Mojahedin’s diplomatic shift towards European parties and organizations to procure support and their associating with the Western ultra-right wings caused its further isolation. The ideological revolution, however, was the chief surge that tossed Mojahedin down the precipice of unpopularity. Here on, from a political point of view, Mojahedin replaced the internal support with a variety of political leverages such as attempts made to escalate the existing tension between Iran and other Western states to advance the strategy of destabilizing and overthrowing the Iranian regime. From the ideological point of view, it tabooed criticism of any kind against organizational hierarchy and thwarted any possible schism and disobedience.

The dissidence of a large number of members who reproved Mojahedin’s failed strategy of relaying on alien support convinced the leaders to consider it a necessity to banish them. The initial phase of ideological revolution, the marriage of Massoud Rajavi and Maryam Azodanloo which was an obvious departure from religiously adopted conventions of Iranian culture, had to be accomplished concealed from the eyes of the public to stop further social aversion. This phase of the ideological revolution, regardless of the adverse aftermath, was in itself a commit of suicide. That is clear that the atmosphere permitted no entrance to the next phase unless Mojahedin relayed not the least on the social support. Moreover, Mojahedin’s move to Iraq is a good verification of the fact that the absolute public rejection had disillusioned the leaders and instigated the group’s bellicose nature.

Many of NCRI’s members had earlier warned the organization of the probability of losing internal support. Although they were accused of falling for the enemies’ disinformation and were stamped by many labels, it was later tacitly accentuated by the leaders that absence of public support left the organization with no other option but resorting to the ideological revolution. Ehsan Shari’ati, a detached member of NCRI, elaborating on roots of discordant political, ideological and strategic views writes:

We criticized Mojahedin of promising short-run overthrow of the Iranian regime, justifying armed warfare, terror and coup d’atat for regime change in Iran and excluding the role of masses. (1)

Hadi Shams-Haeri, once an active member of MKO, finds the roots of the absence of social support in the early years of the Iranian revolution when the organization frenetically fell back on the use of arms:

In the course of the 1979 revolution [Mojahedin] failed to be organizationally associated with people and to bring the ˜social element’ into the stage because of their resorting to application of arms and being filled with a fleeing of superiority while they were totally unfamiliar with political work. (2)

He also elaborates on MKO’s totalitarianism in seeking political power as the main reason of the lack of social support:

The majority of Mojahedin at the time lacked the needed political experience and believed that struggle meant assuming the power. As a result, from the very beginning they abandoned people and intended to seize the power by coup d’tat through infiltrating the regime and disturbing the political atmosphere. (3)

Also, he refers to Mojahedin leadership being under the illusion of rejoicing in widespread support. Rajavi’s unrealistic vision worked as a ploy for his power-seeking ambitions:

Illusionary and nai’ve imaginations of Rajavi to have the support of people and the army personnel made the group dream that in the near future they might achieve political power in Iran and anticipated the overthrow in a term of no longer than one or two months after June 20. In his “summary of one year’ Rajavi has said: ˜Mojahedin enjoy the support of nearly 40 percent of the army personnel’ and even estimated the public support to 50 percent. (4)

Such comments confirm the accuracy of Niyabati’s analyzing strategic and organizational failure of Mojahedin from 20 June 1981 up to 1984. The only difference is that Niyabati tries to relate such failures to international political transitions and an imaginary dominant repression inside Iran. However, he acknowledges the fact that the main cause for such a failure has been the lack of support, calling it in his own terms a ‘strategic bolt’:

The fact was that Mojahedin were still facing the problem of mobilizing masses for armed struggle that was known to be a locked strategic bolt and the three-year-long plan to overthrow the regime proved to a an absolute failure. (5)

Niyabati considers the occurrence of the ideological revolution as the sole solution for the survival of Mojahedin. He maintains that strategic failure of MKO as a result of the lack of internal support had to be replaced by radicalization in the form of an ideological revolution:

We had to either submit to the existing political conditions or engage in politics and changed to the position of the radicals of the left and resorted to armed warfare for the violent overthrow of the regime with all its internal and external aftermaths. (6)

The point worth noting is that Niyabati is well aware of the public reactions against MKO’s ideological revolution; however, he points to a fact that in such a condition people were of no significance for Mojahedin. It was an absolutely proven fact that ideological revolution was initiated as the sole solution to prevent the total dissolution of MKO. He maintains that the external public reactions to the ideological revolution had no legitimacy for Mojahedin and that, “the outsiders have for long lost their legitimacy in the eyes of Mojahedin” (7).

And finally he asserts that the main objects of the ideological revolution were not people or the social element; it was rather an immediate response by the leaders to an ever-increasing crisis flustering MKO from the inside. Although he makes an effort to theoretically justify such a strategy, but what is implied is that at the present time Mojahedin have to find a solution for their survival rather than elaborating on the absence of mass support. According to Niyabati, ideological revolution is the inevitable aftermath of such a strategic challenge caused by the lack of public support:

Therefore, internal ideological revolution of Mojahedin may be considered as the leadership’s advocated solution to the confronted challenges as well as a step to the next complicated phase; its short-term targets were not Iranians but Mojahedin themselves. (8)

References

1. Shari’ati, Ehsan; The ups and downs of National Council of Resistance. Abroad publication, p.20.

2. Shams-Haeri, Hadi; The Swamp, Abroad publication, p.17.

3. Ibid, p.6.

4. Ibid, p.12.

5. Niyabati, Bijan; A different look at the Internal Revolution of Mojahedin, 2005.

6. Ibid, p.17.

7. Ibid, p.43.

8. Ibid, p.33.

Bahar Irani – Mojahedin.ws – August 17, 2007

 

August 19, 2007 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mujahedin Khalq; A proxy force

Move America Forward: Softballs on Hardball

Chris Matthews does not know how to play hardball. When he interviewed Sal Russo (Move America Forward), Chris Matthews proved that he could toss softballs better than Larry King does.

Move America Forward’s blog contains postings from its blogger that she went to Paris, in June 2007 to meet with Maryam Rajavi, leader of the Iranian Communist MEK (MKO, PMOI, NCRI, Rajavi Cult, or Pol Pot of Iran) terrorists. The MEK is a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO). The MEK has murdered American military officers, Rockwell International employees, and large numbers of Iranians and Iraqis. The MEK has committed a terrorist act in New York City . The American government is prosecuting MEK members who collected large amounts of money at Los Angeles International Airport for the MEK.

Chris Matthews limited his questions to Sal Russo (Move America Forward, ) and to Jon Soltz (Vote Vets) to whether war with Iran is really on the table.

Russo called Iran a sponsor of terrorism. Russo failed to mention (and Chris Matthews failed to ask) that the White House’s September 2002 background paper on Iraq listed the MEK as one of three of Saddam Hussein’s sponsored terrorist organizations in Iraq. In September 2002, the White House used the MEK as a pretext for the Iraq War. In 2003, American and coalition military forces attacked Camp Ashraf, , killing some of the MEK terrorists.

Russo claimed that President Reagan bankrupted the Soviet Union and ended communism. Russo did not mention (and Chris Matthews failed to ask) that Move America Forward’s blogger is promoting Iranian communist terrorists.

Russo told Jon Soltz that Vote Vets is a Democratic Party organization wanting to pick on Vice President Dick Cheney. Soltz responded that Russo is a Republican communications specialist.

Russo claimed that it will take years for Iran to develop nuclear weapons. Hence, Russo concluded that a pre-emptive strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities will be the task of the next President. However, Chris Matthews and Jon Soltz were unable to obtain any criticism by Russo of Cheney’s neo-conservative (neo-Trotskyite) desires for war with Iran .

Soltz framed the issue as not Democrat versus Republican but as whether Russo is willing to sign a stop war on Iran petition. Russo did not respond that he would sign any such online petitions.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20297013/

In the future, Chris Matthews can start asking presidential candidates and other guests whether they have signed a stop war on Iran petition. The following is an example of such an online petition:

Stop the war on Iran before it starts!

In Farsi En Espaol

Sign the statement View signers

It is with grave concern that we observe the growing threat of a new US war–this time against the people of Iran .

The media is filled with reports of an alleged nuclear threat posed by Iran and the assumed need for the US to take military action. These reports recall the”Weapons of Mass Destruction”stories issued in the months leading up to the war on Iraq.

In the lead up to the illegal invasion of Iraq , the Bush Administration asserted that Iraq possessed massive stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction and that it was capable of launching an attack – nuclear, chemical and biological – on U.S. the within 45 minutes.

President Bush said that the had to attack immediately, and could not”wait for the final proof — the smoking gun — that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud.”We all know now that this propaganda campaign was a complete fabrication created to justify a war of aggression.

Now we see reports that are all too similar being made to justify military action against the people of Iran. Taking Iran to the UN Security Council is a prelude for unilateral action. Just as in the case of Iraq, none of the claims made by the U. S. government stand up to unbiased scrutiny. Iran has submitted to the most intrusive and humiliating inspections, above and beyond what is required by Nuclear Weapons Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). None of the inspections have found any evidence that Iran is developing a nuclear weapons program.

There is only one government that has used nuclear weapons against civilian populations, and that same country has the largest stockpile of weapons of mass destruction on the planet. Most dangerous and incredible it is at this very moment developing a new generation of tactical nuclear weapons that it intends to use, not merely to threaten. That country is, of course, the United States. Shouldn’t any real discussion of the dangers of nuclear weapons include the weapons stockpiled by the Pentagon and the history of U. S. aggression and interventions?

Iran has suffered greatly at the hands of the U.S. We recall the U. S. overthrew the democratically elected government of Dr. M. Mossadegh and returned the Shah to the Peacock Throne “ the proudest achievement of the CIA”. For 25 years the Shah ruled Iran with an iron fist for the benefit of U. S. oil corporations before the people of Iran, in the millions, overthrew his tyranny at a terrible cost in lives. For the past 27 years U. S. sanctions have impeded Iran’s right to development and brought great suffering to the people.

It is essential that all voices opposed to the devastation of a new war in the Middle East speak out now. We urge an immediate end to Washington’s campaign of sanctions, hostility, and falsehood against the people of Iran. We oppose any new aggression against Iran. We need funds for human needs, not endless war for empire.

http://www.stopwaroniran.org/statement.shtml

As a former elected member of the Los Angeles County Republican Central Committee and as a former Republican candidate for California State Assembly (endorsed by the California Republican Assembly, http://www.californiarepublicanassembly.com/ and co-endorsed by United Republicans of California, http://www.unitedrepublicansofcalifornia.org/), I have signed this Stop War on Iran statement and am opposed to the neo-conservative (neo-Trotskyite) values of chickenhawk Vice President Dick Cheney.

Future Republican candidates need to be aware that real Republicans will not contribute to or vote for any future Republican candidates promoted by Move America Forward or by Sal Russo.

Real Republicans do not promote communist terrorists.

Move America Forward and Sal Russo have proven that ‘s worst enemies are not in the Middle East .

Paul Sheldon Foote, August 16, 2007

http://360.yahoo.com/paulsheldonfoote

August 19, 2007 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Human Rights Abuse in the MEK

Cult leaders extent of misuse of their members

Cult leaders decide the sell-by date and extent of misuse of their members The case of Hussein, Fatemeh and Hassan Daioleslam

A brief look at the literature produced together with the internal reports from a cult can clearly show the extent of danger that society is faced by vis-e-vis cults. A group or a political organisation which adopts armed struggle as a strategy will soon end up with cult characteristics rooted in its basic and fundamental relations. In this respect, the members of these organisations are themselves among the vast number of victims of such groups.

Cult leaders need obedient followers as the tools they use to push forward their violent ideological agenda. And in this way those who do or even could pose a threat to the execution of such orders, and especially who pose any threat to the position of the leader should be, and usually are, the first victims to be got rid of and silenced. This is particularly evident at every point of history of the Mojahedin Khalq Organisation following the Internal Ideological Revolution which began in 1985 and evolved to its peak with forced divorces in 1989. The leader made sure that no one would or could prevent him from changing a political organisation into a pure cult.

Now the internal relations inside Mojahedin Khalq Organisation has deteriorated to the point that people (members) have changed their use from creative elements to consumable elements. One such example could be Hussein Daioleslam.

Hussein Daioleslam (aka Ali Ghaderi) is a long serving executive member of the Mojahedin Khalq who had served prison sentences during the reign of the late Shah of Iran. He was released after the fall of the Shah and began his responsibilities in the Mojahedin’s newly created Social Department under Mohammed Zabeti.

After the failed coup by the Mojahedin Khalq in June 1981 and Massoud Rajavi’s escape from Iran, Daioleslam, together with Mehdi Fatolah Nejad (captured by US forces in Iraq during the fall of Saddam in 2003) and Mansour Bazargan (killed in an insurgence by the Mojahedin Khalq into Iran by order of Saddam Hussein) under the supervision of Ebrahim Zakeri (later the head of Mojahedin intelligence services who died of brain tumour), started the military wing of Mojahedin Khalq in Iranian Kurdistan and later went to Iraq. In 1985 he became the head of Mojahedin Khalq logistics under the command of Mehdi Abrishamchi (the first husband of Maryam Rajavi before she left him for the leader, Massoud Rajavi), who was the main contact between the Iraqi regime and the Mojahedin Khalq. The main office then was in Baghdad.

After the forced divorces in 1989 Daioleslam was placed under severe pressure by the leaders and was rapidly excluded from any serious position and/or creative role.

His shelf-life ended there and then. Hussein Daioleslam was demoted and his sister Fatemeh Daioleslam became a member of the Mojahedin’s Central Council, later to be promoted to the all-women Central Leadership Council. Hussein was demoted because he did not, or could not, convince his wife to love Rajavi more than her husband. (She refused to give in to the divorce orders in that time.) And Fatemeh was appointed to the Central Council as proof of Rajavi’s claims for his Ideological Revolution. She was a good example to show the ‘liberation of women” was a result of the forced divorce order, but the real reason was something that I may explain in a separate article.

Now after all these years, the claim for and the use of the concept ‘liberation of women’ has also lost its sell-by date and is no longer useful for the cult leader. Even the recently selected members, men or women, have been involved long enough and know enough not to be trusted any more. They usually end up in the kitchen or are used in construction and building work or similar positions.

After Hussein Daioleslam and Fatemeh Daioleslam now has come the turn for the consumption of their brother Hassan Daioleslam.

Hassan Daioleslam, who is also considered as a member of the Mojahedin Khalq Organisation (Rajavi Cult) had been under harsh criticism for a long time by the cult leader Massoud Rajavi because he would not leave the USA and join the cult under the rule of Saddam Hussein in Iraq. But now, in the new circumstances in which the remnants of the Rajavi cult after the fall of Saddam Hussein find themselves in western countries, Hassan’s social position and his ability to speak English has grabbed the attention of Rajavi. He seems to be next in line to be consumed. This time in the United State of America where both the Mojahedin Khalq Organisation and its alias the National Council of Resistance have been maintained on the list of dangerous terrorist entities for more than a decade.

This trend of using one-time sympathizers of the Mojahedin in western countries in the place of long serving executive members of the organisation who now have no skills which match the needs for consumption in western countries, is now evident in every European and North American country. Those who were under pressure and were demonised regularly under the pejorative label “Supporters”, are now the real executive members of the Mojahedin Khalq Organisation and are treated by Maryam Rajavi as such. This change of place, this change of use and this change of Rajavi’s relationship with both ex-executive members who now serve in the kitchen and ex-supporters in western countries who now run the cult’s offices in London, Washington and Paris, has one specific reason. That is, the fall of Rajavi’s benefactor Saddam Hussein and his new pursuit to find a new benefactor; this time in the west. The situation has changed so the consumable tools need to be changed accordingly.

No doubt the remains of Hassan Daioleslam, like his brother and sister and many before them, will be rejected after consumption by the cult leader. In the United States of America itself there are many examples of rejected consumed members and ex-members of the cult who at one time carried exciting titles like Doctors, Sport champions, Artists, Political Activists with Decades of History, and even National Heroes. People who now have nothing left for themselves and no energy even to be heard.

Certainly the future for Hassan Daioleslam and similar cult members is not bright. While the shelf-life of cult representatives in the USA, Alireza Jafarzadeh and Ali Safavi is reaching its end, Hassan Daioleslam is being presented as a “Religious, Nationalist Personality” in limited circles in the USA to be consumed under this label for a short time before these circles are forced to accept the revelations about him and his family and their membership of the blacklisted Mojahedin Khalq Cult. He will be used so much in the near future that his shelf-life will certainly not be more than a fraction of the shelf-life of his brother or his sister in the terrorist cult’s propaganda machine.  

Mohammad Sobhani, Ghalam Association

Sobhani_m_h@hotmail.com

August 19, 2007 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Iraqi Authorities' stance on the MEK

Names of Iraqis Killed By MKO Released

"The Organization for Protection of Iraqis’ Rights" called on the Iraqi government to prosecute the MKO leaders, who have been involved in killing more than 780 Iraqis during their presence in Iraq.

 

This organization asked the families of martyrs to go to the court.

 

The names of some of the martyrs, according to judicial references, are as follows:

 

1. Fazel Ghambar Jabooli

2. Mohammed Joma Hamoor

3. Ali Mohammed Mostafa

4. Abbas Mohammed Ali

5. Sabrieh Ghambar Samin

6. Abdulkarim Qader Mohammed

7. Nabil Abdulqader Mohammed

8. Ahmed Shaker

9. Sorieh Mohammed Zein Al-Aabedin

10. Isor Hamid Mostafa

11. Somayeh Zein al-Aabedin

12. Ali Mohammed Javili

13. Nabil Nour Hassan

14. Abdi Mohammed Sadeq

 

The above martyrs were all from Tuz Khormato region

 

15. Salah Sadeq Jafar, from Kut

16. Adnan Hasan, from Baghdad

17. Mohammed Kazem Abd, from Baghdad

18. Abdullah Al-Abudi, from Baghdad

19. Sadegh Kateh Jafar, from Baghdad

20. Saeed Majbal Abdullah, from Kut

21. Yusef Mohan Zalmi, from Nasserieh

22. Ghanbar Mohammed Ghanbar, from Baghdad

23. Yusef Kheirallah, from Nasserieh

24. Ghasem Boozi, from al-Emareh

25. Taleb Joma al-Ezzah Ali, from Al-Mahmoodieh

26. Salem Jabr Awad, from al-Mahavil

27. Sadeh Amir Alavi, from Al-Anbar

28. Aani Salman al-Ka’bi, from al-Kut

29. Shandi Mohammed Zaghir, from al-Kut

 

The newspaper will soon publish the names of other martyrs killed by the MKO in 1991 during the uprising of Sha’banieh.

Al-Bayenah al-Jadideh

 2007/08/16

http://www.albayyna-new.com/global.htm

August 19, 2007 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Recent Posts

  • Pregnancy was taboo in the MEK

    December 22, 2025
  • MEPs who lack awareness about the MEK’s nature

    December 20, 2025
  • Why did Massoud Rajavi enforce divorces in the MEK?

    December 15, 2025
  • Massoud Rajavi and widespread sexual abuse of female members

    December 10, 2025
  • Farman Shafabin, MEK member who committed suicide

    December 3, 2025
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Youtube

© 2003 - 2025 NEJAT Society . All Rights Reserved. NejatNGO.org


Back To Top
Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip