Progress in democratic cults
The Anti-Freedom Cult
"MKO’s expulsion from Iraq is underway," said Iraqi ambassador to Iran, Mohammed Majid Al-Sheikh in an interview with Mehr News.
Following a meeting with the secretary general of Habilian Association in Mashhad Seyed Javad Hasheminejad, Mr. Sheikh talked to Mehr News and said:
"The scheduled plan of the government to restrict the terrorist MKO and expel its elements from Iraq shows the faithfulness of the government to its promises on fighting terrorism."
Mehr News, – August 19, 2006
The websites of terrorist group of MKO have quoted UK MP Brian Binley saying:
"We asked Jack Straw only two months ago to de-proscribe the NCRI and the answer was a definite ‘no’. He said they were a terrorist organization. I then asked if he could point to one incident when the National Council or the MeK harmed Western interests, and he could not give me an answer, he could not point out even one incident. And indeed I believe there aren’t any."
The major question for Mr. Binley is that "should we say a group is a terrorist group only if it has damaged the western interests?"
And more importantly: "What’s Mr. Binley’s idea about the figures and statistics of MKO terrorist operations inside Iran, provided by this group itself?"
Mr. Binley and people like him either have entered the scene of politics and the issue of Iran very late (that’s not true) or intentionally want to insist on UK’s dictatorial policy of interfering in Iran’s internal affairs! These policies only deprive Iranians from their basic rights.
According to MKO’s own documents and confessions, this group has conducted more than 12000 successful assassinations, 1000 operations, several border operations jointly with Saddam forces, several cases of torture and killing and … what’s this if it’s not terrorism?
For Mr. Binley’s, and other MKO partners’, information, we should remind that Iranian people didn’t wait for colonialists and toppled the puppet regime on February 11, 1979.
If you are seeking the repetition of history, you’re only showing your flawed understanding although this is the financial gifts of a terrorist group that shows its function in the stances of MKO’s partners and associates.
2006/08/20
In response to Iraqi officials and their comments against the MKO, remnants of Rajavi’s gang have dispatched their lawyers to the scene to fight the decision of Iraqi government (on the expulsion of this group).
Following the comments of Iraqi ambassador to Iran Majid Al-Sheikh (on the MKO), Marc Henzelin who introduces himself as the legal advisor of MKO members in Camp Ashraf, in a threatening letter to Mr. Sheikh, has asked him to withdraw his comments otherwise he will be sued in international courts on war crime charges!
That the terrorist MKO has decided to create a threatening situation weeks after the comments of Iraqi PM and other officials (including Iraqi ambassador to Iran) on the expulsion of this group is a result of two factors:
1. Disarray in MKO leadership following the comments of Mr. Nuri Al-Maliki: it took weeks for MKO leaders to come to an agreement on current move (threatening Iraqi officials).
2. Political nature of Henzelin’s position is basically invalid from legal viewpoint; it’s rather a propagandistic effort by the gang of Rajavi to create fear among Iraqi officials otherwise it should have been expressed right at the time the comments of Mr. Maliki and Mr. Zebari on the MKO were announced. Apart from this, one could expect the terrorist MKO’s war against the Iraqi government to start soon over the occupation of part of Iraqi soil.
There’s no ambiguous point in this. Occupiers have transferred power to Iraq’s legal government and decision making on MKO should be done by the Iraqi government. It has announced its determination to expel the MKO from Iraq and this means not granting the group with political asylum and it has no sign of forced transfer of members.
Therefore, both occupiers (who have granted the forth Geneva convention status to MKO members) and Red Cross (that should control the observation of this convention) have not seen any violation of rules by Iraqi government, nor can they impose an illegal request on it. The time of taking advantage of the names of coalition forces, US army and international organization (used by MKO during past 3 years to justify their illegal presence in Iraq) has come to an end and the legal position of democratic Iraqi government (refused by MKO) is the main obstacle for MKO’s ambitions; they should either accept it or fight with it.
MKO leaders have decided to preserve restricted MKO members in Iraq at all cost. There’s no other option for this group and in any other case, this group that seeks war and crisis to survive will be destroyed; the only hope for this group is to be used by Neocons in a possible war on Iran and this requires staying in Iraq; this dream will never come true.
The treacherous gang of Rajavi in Europe, who are living in the best conditions and have seemingly escaped from Iraq conflict, insist on staying in Iraq at the cost of sacrificing all MKO members (with different methods including self-immolation, committing suicide in masses and …).
Apart from organizational destruction, MKO’s insistence has another reason: Massoud Rajavi’s detention that, in the case of execution of Iraqi government’s decision, will lead to his extradition and trial as a war criminal. And this means the historical destruction of a movement that solely relies on this guy.
So, we should expect more propagandistic moves by the gang of Rajavi against the Iraqi government. Iraqi government will certainly respond to these moves and such efforts only open the hands of government for broader reaction to MKO’s illegal presence in Iraq.
Irandidban, August 19, 2006
Eternal Light Operation
Freedom Aspiration
Rhinoal Operation
There’s no doubt that by supporting New Middle East plan, US Neocons try to secure the aggressive goals of Zionist regime: establishing Jewish state from Nile to Euphrates. Such a goal won’t be achieved without the destruction of a number of countries and massacre of Muslims.
Israel’s Zionist officials and their Neocon supporters have declared Iran to be the main obstacle for their goals and therefore they want to destroy Iran.
Weakening and isolating Iran is one of the plans they are following. One of their major plans to reduce the power of Iran in the region, destroying Iran, was a failure.
Following the scandalous withdrawal of Israel from Lebanon in 2000, US and Israeli officials planned for an "orange revolution", which was also thwarted by the gathering of 1.5 million people in favor of Hizballah.
Then, Syria came under heavy pressure from Zionist warmongers. They believe that the destruction of Syria will change the equation of Lebanon in favor of Israelis and that Hizballah will lose its main supporter. Therefore, they resorted to the UN Security Council and diplomatic pressures to force Syria to withdraw from Lebanon. Along these pressures, there was a plot for coup in Syria, which was blown up. Still, Israel tries to drag Syria into an international or regional struggle in order to destroy this country.
Understanding this strategy of warmongers and looking for a war against Iran, notorious gang of Rajavi shouted the slogan of "expanding democracy, from Iraq to Syria"!
Israel believes Syria is a factor that can direct the US towards a fight against Iran and that this element should be eliminated. On this issue, terrorist MKO agrees with Israel and therefore openly takes position against Syria. The comments of Mohaddessin last year on the role of Syria in the assassination of Rafiq al-Hariri were supposed to stoke the fire of plots against Syria.
Now that Israel and its supporters have failed in their month-long aggression against Lebanon, they try to increase pressures on Syria; these pressures can be applied through diplomatic means, among other things.
While the treacherous gang of Rajavi prefers to stay silent on the moves of countries like Canada, Turkey, Netherlands, Germany, Norway and … (which extradite runaway criminals and illegal refugees to Iran on a daily basis), extradition of Abdullah Mansouri (who plotted terrorist bombings in Ahwaz, killing innocent Arab innocent people of Khuzestan) has made them upset, and they ask for more international pressure on Syria.*
Now, it has become clear that Rajavi’s gang follows anti-human policies of Zionists in order to survive, with efforts to instigate the US to attack Iran at top.
However, due to the new developments (resulting from the brave resistance of the Lebanese), Israel and the gang of Rajavi are the main losers of this battle whose crimes in Iraq and Lebanon are going to be stopped soon.
—————————————
NCRI’s statement on the extradition of Abdullah Mansouri
Irandidban – 2006/08/16
Reading Daniel M. Zucker’s Getting It Right in Iraq published in Global Politician, I was taken aback to learn why a Zionist Rabbi so vehemently supports a terrorist group like Mojahedin Khalq Organization (MKO). No doubt, Mr. Zucker is a disciple of Leo Strauss theory of “constructive chaos”. Strauss, whose media branch is better known under the name of “neo-conservatives”, theorized that “the real power cannot be exerted from if one remains in the status quo, but only, quite the contrary, in the act of destroying all forms of resistance. It is by plunging the masses into chaos that the elites can aspire to ensure the stability of their position”.* The theory of “constructive chaos” is the same “remodeling of the Greater Middle East,” to use the expression of George W. Bush.
To preliminaries to prepare for reshaping of the Greater Middle East has already begun, namely, establishing a western style democracy in the concerned countries of the region. Whether or not the dream might come true is another question. It is through the theory of “constructive chaos” that the desired democracy can be established. Having failed in establishing a western style democracy in Iraq, Mr. Zucker as an advocator of chaos and disorder broaches a new suggestion:
If we really want to bring a democratic revolution to Iraq, which is something that will become increasingly difficult – given Teheran’s rising influence in Baghdad-we will have to work with all those different groups that oppose a Shiite religious state. Some of our potential allies are those Sunni insurgents that we are fighting now.
In his opinion, the dissident and terrorist groups, wearing the mask of pro-democracy, have to be unleashed as the most favored instruments to carry out the mission of shedding the needed blood to build up the Western approved democracy in Iran as well:
There is one other thing that we should be doing, given the overwhelming evidence of Iranian interference and influence in Iraqi politics. It is time to empower the Iranian resistance to aid the long-suffering Iranian people to rise up in revolt to overthrow the tyrannical Teheran theocracy. Specifically, this means removing the Mojahedin-e Khalq (MeK) and the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) from the State Department’s list of foreign terrorist organizations.
It was abundantly clear for Iranian from the very beginning that what MKO really meant by the American and Zionist dictated “third option”. Mr. Zucker’s suggestion of reactivating Mojahedin as a means of furthering the shared interests leaves no doubt that MKO is the US-Zionists’ chosen potential dissident ally to implement threats against Iran:
If the egalitarian NCRI and MeK can once again become active in the field, Iran could soon become a secular democracy, exactly of the type that we’ve been trying to establish in Iraq. Now wouldn’t that be novel-allowing a Middle-East nation to set new regional standards in the development and establishment of secular democracy.
They made a miscalculation about Iraq; the elected government was in absolute contrast to what they expected and advocated. Iranian people would never consent to a secular democracy as the Iraqi people didn’t.
*. The Neo Conservatives and the Policies of Constructive Chaos
mojahedin.ws – Sattar Orangi, August 15 2006