Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip
Nejat Society
Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip
© 2003 - 2024 NEJAT Society. nejatngo.org
Mujahedin Khalq Organization's Propaganda System

Source of Legitimacy of MKO’s Presence in Iraq!

Following the comments of Mr. Mahmoud Al-Mashhadani on the situation of MKO in Iraq, which showed the unanimous attitude of Iraqi government toward the illegal presence of MKO in Iraq, Rajavi’s gang hurriedly resorted to a weak and ineffective person to decrease the effects of Mr. Mashhdani’s comments.

MKO, trying to use an interview in order to justify their illegal presence in Iraq, virtually confirmed this Mr. Mashhadan’s comments that occupiers’ support is the major reason for this group’s presence in Iraq.

MKO’s stupid propaganda system called the statements of the head of Iraqi parliament "fake" and by asking guided questions from a man called "Khalf Al-Ayan" tried to follow the old line of dividing Shiites and Sunnis so as to calm down desperate members.

In a cunning move, MKO officials claimed that Iranian press have announced that Mashhadani has canceled asylum rights of MKO members in Iraq (MKO has never been granted such a right, neither by the US nor Iraqi government) and then asked Khalf Al-Ayan to comment!

In this regard, Al-Ayan said:

"Regarding the issue of MKO’s presence in Iraq and its status for the time being, we should say that Mojahedin have been in Iraq for more than 20 years since the former government granted them political asylum right… but at the current situation, Iraqi government has no control over this because it’s under the occupation; and occupying forces have confirmed asylum right of Mojahedin and are protecting them. When the Iraqi government becomes independent and occupying forces leave the country, then it would be different and the government will independently deal with this issue."

So, it becomes clear that:

1. MKO’s presence in Iraq is rooted in Saddam Hussein’s support for this group and has nothing to do with Iraqi people and current government. In addition, Saddam’s government had not signed any of international conventions on refugees and the MKO that has been in Iraq for 24 years has no related case in UNHCR and other institutions. Saddam had in fact given shelter to Mojahedin and this is not related to political asylum rights.

2. According to Mr. Mashhadani, and confirmed by Al-Ayan, Iraqi government can’t decide on this group currently because of the interferences of occupiers.

3. The claim of getting asylum right from occupiers is a sheer lie. Occupiers have only granted them protected status until the Iraqi government can decide about them. In addition, according to international regulations, occupiers are not authorized to do so. Besides, occupiers that don’t observe any of international laws have been major reason behind the presence of this group in Iraq.

4. The head of Iraqi parliament put it clearly that the Iraqi government can’t expel the MKO from Iraq until the occupiers are in Iraq, and this is what Al-Ayan has pointed to!

Irandidban –   2006/07/10

July 12, 2006 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Homa Khodabande

Interview with Homa Khodabandeh

Extracted from "Shaqayeqhaye Zakhmi" (Wounded Peonies) By Mehdi Khoshhal

I was looking for Mrs. Homa Khodabandeh, calling wherever I knew until I could contact with her by the help of his uncle, Mr. Masud Khodabandeh. Since Mrs. Khodabandeh couldn’t speak Persian well, Mr. Masud Khodabandeh translated her words to me. I started my interview:

Mrs. Khodabandeh, I was researching on Mujahedin’s children and the cruelty they suffer, when I visited Iran-Interlink website reading some of your father, Mr. Ibrahim Khodabandeh’s articles, in which one important point attracted my attention:

The issue he presented about his daughter, I mean you.

Mr. Ibrahim Khodabandeh wrote about you regularly weather when he was a member of MEK and he was forced to ignore you or when he was in Prison and needed your love to make his pains tolerable.

Therefore I would like to have an interview with you since  I khow you have a lot to tell about yourself, your father, mujahedin and Iran where you traveled to visit your father. My first question:

 when you were born, your father was sent on duty to Sweden by MKO and your mother who was a British woman and had married your father when they were students, went to Sweden to show her daughter to her husband and asked to meet your father. Meanwhile your father demanded his responsible to visit his daughter, the responsible replied that he can go but they have a lot of works to do. Then your father felt ashamed and blamed himself because of his demand .I’d  like to know, during these twenty years while your father was a member of MKO, how many times could he meet you?

 

–         When my father was a Mujahed he could visit me only four or five times. In fact, I could find my father in Sweden or Iraq and visit him for a very short time.

–         When your father was arrested in Syria, in April 2003 and was sent to Iran, what was your reaction to his arrest and what did you do in order to liberate him?

–         As soon as I heard the news of his arrest and imprisonment I called the "Amnesty International" from London. Unfortunately they told me why I contacted with them after the transfer of my father from Syria to Iran. You know that MKO had hidden the arrest of my father and his friend from any source that could do something, for two months. I really doubt about their act since they play with the fate and security of their own members. 

–         If the organization had informed you of your father’s arrest, what could you do in order to liberate your father?

–         The Amnesty International told me that if I had informed them before my father’s transfer to Iran, they could inform the international organizations and then the Syrian officials so that they could help the liberation and transmission of my father to Britain which was possible since I am British and my father has political refugee in Britain.

–         While you couldn’t do any thing in order to liberate your father in Britain, what did you do?

–           Here, I have to appreciate my uncles Masud Khodabandeh and Mr. Win Grifth, since they really helped us. Mr. Win Grifth Contacted with the Iranian Embassy and arranged several visits with my father, therefore my husband and children and I could travel to Iran to meet my father. A few days later, Mr.Win Grifth, Mrs. Ann Singleton, my uncles’ wife and Sir Teddy Taylor from British Parliament also came to Iran to visit my father. Besides, Mr. Win Grifth did some efforts to apply amnesty for MEK’s leaders from Iranian Government, of which I don’t know the details and my uncle was acquainted with what was going on. Yes, I traveled to Iran to visit my father seeing what I could do.

–         Would you please explain what did you get when you saw your father and Iran?

 

–         On June 10th 2004, I went to Iran with my family. Several daily and private visits were arranged with my father, in different places especially in his paternal house.

–         It seems that you were able to visit your father in the prison of Islamic Republic more than the time your father was working with MKO. I’d like to know how the MKO described the story while your father’s arrest and mutually what they asked you to do.

–         Giving wrong information about my father, they asked me to go to London and set myself on fire in front of British Parliament.

–         What was the wrong information and how did you feel mentally and physically during those days?

–        The wrong information was that my father has been tortured excessively in Iranian prison and has been supposed to be executed the next morning. I had a terrible spiritual condition since I had recently given birth to my baby.

–         What was your reply to MKO, finally? 

–         My response was Negative (NO)

–         When you replied them that self-immolation is not a logic solution to save your father, what was their reaction? 

–         When they found that I objected their need for self-immolation and their other needs, and I don’t act as a Mujahed member, they insulted me disgracing my personality. When they realized that not me, not my mother and nobody from my father’s family would be caught in their net, they began to forge my family. A person claimed to be my father’s wife instead of my mother and MEK used her to represent its terrorist organization. They also brought an orphan to their 10-15 people gathered demonstrations that they hold with their communist flag and claimed that she was my father’s daughter. Of course I think the only stupids who believe this were themselves and no one else. .

–         Mrs. Khodabandeh through your father’s writings and speeches I got an interesting point where, in an interview, he said:" during the first year I was in Evin Prison, I read more books, such as political, social and even novels and story books than my whole life; it was my first experience to think, relieved of   " Current Operation", " Weekly Baptism", the forced organizational atmosphere, responsible and ideological despises." Now I guess that during the years your father was in Islamic Republic prison, his personality changed and learned while being in MKO for a hundred years he couldn’t get this mutation. Of course, I’d really like your father to be liberated from prison and return to his family. However, what did you get of your father’s new situation? What’s your message on your father’s past, present and future?

–         As you know, my father, Ibrahim Khodabandeh, has asked me to act as his representative in Britain or other places, until he is in prison. As it concerns to me ,as a Muslim British woman, although I knew my father was working for MKO, I, personally, had no information on MKO and I wasn’t even interested in knowing them or the Iranian Political scene and my little information was limited to what I read in the newspapers. Therefore, when in June 2003, I found that my father was arrested in Syria and after two months sent to Iran, I got worried and scared. The same day MEK called my house saying that my father is under torture and will be executed soon. They insisted me to go to London and burn myself in front of British Parliament saying this is the only hope to save my father. As you know this suggestion made me more terrified. My lawyer says that according to British laws such acts are considered as crime. I’m investigating the case now to prevent such actions in my country. Imagine how shocked I got when a few weeks later, I heard some members of MEK set themselves on fire, and consequently two of them died. I even heard that they were given narcotics before setting themselves on fire.

I appreciate the efforts of Iran – Interlink to help me during that delirious atmosphere. They helped me follow correct canals to find the truth and then help my father.

 

During last year, I received contrary reports and suggestions. MKO always insisted that my father was still under torture and would be executed soon so, when he called me last September, I was still suspicious about what was going on but while I kept on contacting with him during the following months I found out that he is really treated well.

The good thing is that he can visit his parents whenever and as many times as he wants.

I also have to thank Mr. Win Grifth for his activities in Britain in order to help me contact the Iranian Embassy accompanying me to visit the Ambassador in London. I really appreciate him for accepting the ambassadors’ invitation to Iran to visit my father and check his situation. The visit was made with Sir Teddy Taylor who was especially an important help to my father spiritually assuring him of a just and rapid trial. I would like to thank Iran- Interlink, especially due to encouraging me and strengthening me spiritually in order to travel to Iran and visit my father in prison.

I traveled to Tehran with my husband and three children, this June. At first, my husband and I were worried about our situation there. Mujahedin had continually told us terrible stories and we expected to see a Mullah in each street suppressing women. Actually the condition in Iran was very much different from what we expected.

My father was with us, in his mother’s house, where we were staying, everyday. Since my father had joined MKO, this period was the longest during one which I could see my father and be with him. He told me that as a member of MKO he wasn’t allowed to meet his own family or contact with them except the times he was ordered to force me to participate in a demonstration in order to raise the number of their participants. Internally terrified he remembered a time when I was only thirteen, he convinced my mother to bring me to Brussels for a demonstration. My mother stayed in hotel and my father and I went to the city centre. But at the same time he received an order to go to Paris. My father told me that he had been in a dilemma. He even had thought of taking me to Paris without informing my mother. Finally he decided to leave me alone in the streets of Brussels since he had to abbey the order of MKO.

My father has asked me several times why I still love him considering the years of separation and the way he treated me during those years. It doesn’t really have an explanation. I think the love among the members of a family is stronger then everything and since I believe in Islam which guides me in all domains, I could forgive my father in spite of all the difficulties he caused me and my mother. While my trip to Iran, it really became clear to me that my father didn’t do any of those works with his own will and choice. He was under the influence of mind controlling methods of a cult that had prevailed over him severely, so he was in fact a victim of MKO too. That’s why when my father was arrested in Syria; he denounced the truth about MKO’s smuggling activities clearly, but MKO is still insisting that he had gone to Syria to visit his family.  My father knows well at whom points accusingly. Although he is ashamed and puts faults on himself in front of me, he repeatedly has told me that MKO had told lies to him and his friend and deceived them. He asked me to send this message to those of his ex-colleagues who can listen. Especially he said that Elaheh Azmifar, his former wife who is still with MEK, shouldn’t listen to them and should come to Iran in order to reveal the issue. He said:" I guarantee her health and security in here. She doesn’t have to stay here but she can come and meet me and Jamil Bassam and find out that we are safe and well." He said that his friends in MKO shouldn’t listen to the lies the leaders tell them. He said that he believes in a secular and non-ideological but now that he has seen the reality and various political parties of Iran closely, he thinks that Rajavi has been removed of Iran political scene for years. He didn’t see any sympathy or support for MEK’s terrorist operations in Iran; he didn’t see anyone who has forgiven Mujahedin for being mercenaries of Saddam Hussein during Iran-Iraq war, either. He said that at the beginning of his imprisonment the guards took Jamil Bassam and him to the streets of Tehran telling them to ask anyone they want to give his or her opinion on MKO. My father said that this was really a useful experience. The few people who knew MKO, hated them due to their cooperation with Iraq during the war.Because of that, both of us ,are really happy that all the ones who met my father including  an independent journalist, saw what is going on in Iran with their own eyes . I think all of us got familiar with the real and new life in there. For example I found the Iranian women enjoying more individual freedom than all the other Middle Eastern countries I’ve ever seen

Once  I had gone shopping in a middle class quarter of the city. It was interesting to my father when the salesperson found out that I wasn’t Iranian and got surprised. He said:" but she is the only woman wearing a perfect Hijab in the whole street." At the end, the total message my father wanted me to send, was his thanking to the ones who have helped him and tried for him; especially Iran-Interlink, Barroness Ema Nickelson, Sir Teddy Taylor, Mr. Win Grifth.

My father is really hopeful to his own future and the future of all those people who are the victims of MKO and he believes that finally a way will be opened to liberate them. Even if to find this way they’ll need to go to prison.

My own message is again thanking you. I should definitely thank all the Iranians who treated us unexpectedly respectfully and kindly.

–         I’d really appreciate you, Mrs. Homa Khodabande, because of the information you gave us.

–         I also thank you.

–         Homa Khodabande was born in Newcastle in 1978. Her father, Ibrahim Khodabande was one of the founders of MKO in abroad, he was practically separated from his family from the beginning of his struggle and his daughter, Homa, was grown up by mother, under the protection of her grandparents. Before the beginning of Gulf War, her grandmother took Homa to Baqdad. She could arrange an exceptional visit between Homa and her father in MEK’s Camp. The little Homa who was interested in Islam from her teens, started to study Islamic studies while studying in the College. Meanwhile she got familiar with a person named Taher. Taher who came from a religious family and had graduated a few years ago working as an electric engineer, fell in love with Homa. The fruits of their marriage are three children two boys and a girl. They are a religious family who is opposed to fundamentalism seriously and Taher (who is the manager of railway projects of Alstum Company in Britain and is living with Homa and their kids in Birmingham) fights any stupid ideology like this according to his Islamic duty. Homa says that she never allows a person like Rajavi misguides and corrupts her children under the cover of Islam. She says :"I tasted enough of the bitter poison of such people during my childhood"

 Published by Aawa Association – NEJATNGO translation

July 12, 2006 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
The MEK; Baath Party Accomplice

A Ba’ath Party Replica

Mojahedin Khalq Organization (MKO) left France to settle in Iraq with the aim to utilize Saddam and Baath Party’s potentialities to form an alliance against Iran. Saddam, too, had the same idea in mind and could venture on MKO in its war with Iran. The close strategic, political collaboration furthered a brotherhood between Saddam and Rajavi; it may explain why MKO yet avoid taking any clear position against Saddam and his crimes. As a proof of their loyalty, MKO sided with Saddam in suppression of Iraqi insurgents in 1991. They had to because, as Rajavi made it clear in his meeting with Iraqi generals, they moved on the same line of interest with Saddam:

As far as we are concerned I have only one thing to say. In my mind and in my heart, I cannot separate the account of our interests from your interests. They are exactly matching each other. [1]

In the same meeting, General Saber, the Head of Saddam’s Intelligence Services, appreciated MKO’ worthwhile assistance the same as brothers’:

We feel ashamed in front of your speech. And in front of your leadership and your organisation,and you and your army and your fighters and your political stands. Exactly in a situation that a common danger was threatening us and this common danger has put us in the same line of defence. We have an Arabic proverb that says: Brothers show themselves in hardship. You supported us with the bodies of your fighters. [2]

General Saber unequivocally points to MKO’s hand in glove with Iraqi forces’ crackdown on insurgent Iraqis:

Also many thanks to the brothers in the National Liberation Army and their big role in the process of the past uprisings and revolts… The other issue is that during these uprisings that we faced and what we fought against together and defeated… and that was the second phase of the attack and the programs and the plans and plots in this respect. [3]

Regardless of all these corroborated evidences on MKO and Saddm’s close collaboration to secure mutual interests, what really augmented the alliance were the shared political, organizational, and ideological tenets projecting in both MKO and Iraqi Baath Party. The first remarkable and dominant feature in both is the leadership hegemony. Both Saddam and Rajavi were the predominant influence atop occupying a permanent leading seat. Far above a leadership position, they both besought a highly acclaimed position with the potentialities far above those of earthly men and were indulged in practice of discrimination against people and insiders on the grounds of the Party and group’s ideological priority.

Iraq’s political-social state structure, under Baath Party’s hegemony, heavily influenced by Stalinist Parties, was running under Sadam’s hegemony. The bloody internal clearance, the commonly practiced method in Stalinist Parties, emboldened Saddam as the authoritative state power in perpetrating covert group slaughters and blood bathes. It was also so celebrated an idea in MKO with the exception that the authority was limited in the framework of an organization perpetrating atrocities against the insiders and staging violent and terrorist acts against the outsiders. Of course, it projected a future Iran should it succeed to power. In fact, MKO in Iraq were practically testing an ideology they were to administer once in power. Bijan Nyabati, a MKO left element, believes:

MKO’s strategy being stabilized in Iraq, they got the opportunity to test their revolutionary theory in the laboratory of their self-controlled community far from the outside influential magnetic field of ruling systems. [4]

In other words, the Iraqi soil, because of Saddam’s totalitarian and hegemonic control over all aspects of Iraqi people, served to form a microcosm of future Iran:

The formed microcosm had to contain all the political features of a real society. A legal state with a president atop, a parliament in exile, army and police forces, judiciary and prison, a state-run TV-radio station as well as media and news agency, diplomatic bodies, extensive financial institutions and logistics to feed was all the component elements of the microcosm. [5]

There are more fundamental elements shared by MKO and Baath Party. Both justify their hegemonic leadership to survive. The difference lies in geographical and political conditions. The Baath Party and Saddam justify their existence and leading potentialities according to blood and tribal relations. Above that, in a broader extent of advocating nationalism, they chanted slogans of creating a Great Iraq to further the authoritative hegemony. That is in this way that the party mesmerized peoples and exploited peoples’ soul and body to serve its interests; there immerged Saddam Devotees Squads who are ready for suicidal operations on the master’s order.

Somehow the devotedness may seem to be a result of apprehension of punishment for disobedience. Saddam’s inter-Party executions are more disobedience punishments rather than having political and national causes. In MKO, first it is the ideology and then patriotism that serve recruit sympathizers to preserve the organization. The ideology in MKO does the same influential factor of blood and tribal relations in Baath Party. That is the ideology that compels devotees to commit self-destruction operations as ordered. The same as Baath Party, MKO insiders are under the illusion of being led by a heavenly blessed guide. The similarity between MKO and Baath Party is emphasized by Rajavi addressing General Saber in this way:

I think that the relations between us and you and Iraq, being the government of Iraq or the Baath Party and at the top of it Mr President [Saddam], and on the other side, the Iranian Resistance and the Mojahedin and the National Liberation, is not a purely political relation and one cannot interpret our relations like that any more. I think that the brotherhood relation has been completed. Such brothers that would not come short of anything for each other…. And that was how our fates were tied together. Our fates have become one and our bloods have been mixed together. And you know that there is no exaggeration in this. [6]

Thus, whatever threatens the Baath Party might be a threat to MKO as well, that is to say, any democratic and freedom movement could sounded the alarm. That is a fact Rajavi admitted:

Whatever is against you, it is obviously against us, and visa versa. Our security is one. When we receive a blow, it is to both of us. And when there is progress, it affects us both. [7]

Moreover, the alliance between MKO and Baath’s Party before being a pragmatic and tactical one was based on cult-like similarities. Both attempted to develop a community that evolved the ideological tendencies of the party and the cult. The core of all these ideological teachings was expansion of an absolute totalitarian influence on society and insiders under a hegemonic leadership. Elaborating on the importance of these ideological teachings Nyabaty states:

The final solution to the issue of leadership that could put an end to a problem known to be the Achilles’ heel in most contemporary revolutions and movements was only evolution of a stabilized theory of imamate inside the organization that could lead the new revolution. [8]

The mere difference between the two was that MKO had succeeded to assume a classified order of these ideological teachings, a task that Saddam failed to accomplish because of tribal and historical infrastructures. In practice, however, the Baath Party was moving in the same line with MKO.

 

Notes

 

[1]. “To be Judged in History”; English Transcript of Videotaped Meetings Between Massoud Rajavi and the Head of Saddam’s Intelligence Services, Iran-interlinl.com.

[2]. ibid.

[3]. ibid.

[4]. Nyabati Bijan; “A distinct look at Mojahedin’s internal revolution, slightly from inside, slightly from outside”,109.

[5]. ibid.

[6]. “To be Judged in History”; English Transcript of Videotaped Meetings Between Massoud Rajavi and the Head of Saddam’s Intelligence Services, Iran-interlinl.com.

[7]. ibid.

[8]. Nyabati Bijan; “A distinct look at Mojahedin’s internal revolution, slightly from inside, slightly from outside”, 90.

 

By Omid Pouya, –  Mojahedin.ws, July 5, 2006

 

July 10, 2006 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Iran

Iraq to Expel MKO

During a press conference in Tehran, government’s spokesman Gholamhussein Elham, referring to the issue of extradition of MKO members, which has been requested by Iran from Iraq, said: "Iraq also has been a victim of terrorism and both countries seek to eradicate terrorism in the region".

He expressed hope that Iraqi government will take decisive and determined steps toward the issue and said: "supporting this terrorist group won’t benefit any administration. If the problems for the establishment of Iraqi government are resolved, there will be no problem in countering this terrorist movement".

Irna  –  2006/07/04

July 10, 2006 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
UK

Do the majority of UK MPs really support Mojahedin’s terrorist agenda?

Below is the text of a letter sent to UK Prime Minister, Tony Blair by Anne Singleton asking whether "the majority of members of the House of Commons and over 160 members of the House of Lords" support Maryam Rajavi, leader of the terrorist Mojahedin Khalq organization. The constituents of such MPs are surely entitled to know whether their local MP supports a terrorist agenda or not.

Dear Prime Minister,

One year ago, on the very same day as the London bombings, representatives of a globally proscribed terrorist organization were being entertained in the House of Lords by Lord Corbett. Such a regrettable misuse of Britain’s democratic institutions by Lord Corbett is not new, and complaints have frequently been made to the relevant authorities, including the Home Minister.

Yet now, as the anniversary of London’s terrorist atrocity approaches, and the country is taking stock of the terrorist threat from extremists, Lord Corbett has again flouted every normal boundary of decency and again shown his contempt for democracy by once more inviting representatives of the terrorist Mojahedin Khalq into parliament to celebrate their ideology of violence.

A Persian language communiqué from the National Council of Resistance of Iran (which is universally recognized not as the ‘political wing’ but as the front name for the Mojahedin Khalq Organization, aka: MKO, MEK, PMOI, Saddam’s private army), announced that the Mojahedin had arranged for a ‘Plaque of Support’ to be presented by the unelected members of the House of Lords, Lord Slynn of Hadley, Lord Russell-Johnston and Baroness Harris of Richmond, on July 1, 2006, to Maryam Azodanloo (Rajavi), head of the terrorist Mojahedin Khalq organization.

The plaque was presented to her in a ceremony to celebrate the anniversary of her arrest in June 2003 in France on terrorism charges – for which she is still under investigation. That particular event was immediately followed by the death of two and injuries to tens of cult members when they committed self immolation on her direct order in several major European cities in a clear act of aggression against the French government and judiciary.

The plaque has been created in the name of Lord Corbett – who is well known as a Rajavi cult member in the House of Lords. On it is the claim that this accolade has been presented "on behalf of the majority of members of the House of Commons and over 160 members of the House of Lords".

Lord Corbett is known as Rajavi’s leading cult protégée, who for the past 20 years has promoted her military cult and its aims through frequent comments and speeches under her Kalashnikov logo, in which he has uncritically promoted Mojahedin Khalq violence and supported the organization during its mercenary work for Saddam Hussein.

Lord Corbett has frequently claimed that hundreds of British parliamentarians support the terrorist Mojahedin cult and its leader Maryam Rajavi, but to date has produced not a single scrap of evidence to support these false claims.

The idea of a ‘plaque’ was dreamed up by the Mojahedin themselves. It is the latest in a long line of exploitation of parliamentary procedure and protocol. In the past the group has regularly composed carefully worded oral and written questions which they have supplied to their cult recruits in parliament in order to get signatures by deception in support of their violent ideology. They have used their leading political cult member Lord Corbett in order to hold meetings inside the Houses of Parliament which are attended by their own cult members, in which they celebrate death and violence and terrorism under the guise of support for human rights and democracy.

The Iranian community in the UK and, certainly, the constituents of every MP who, according to Lord Corbett, potentially supports the leader of a foreign terrorist organization, seek urgent clarification of this issue.

Is it true that many members of the British parliament are now supporting a foreign terrorist organization and its leader and have proffered a plaque to her as a symbol of that support?

I would appreciate a clear answer which will explain the actions of Lord Corbett "on behalf of the majority of members of the House of Commons and over 160 members of the House of Lords".

 Anne Singleton – Iran-Interlink, July 3, 2006

July 10, 2006 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Iraqi Authorities' stance on the MEK

Timetable for Expelling the MKO

The head of Iraqi parliament: "We will expel the terrorist MKO from Iraq after the withdrawal of foreign forces".

The new Iraqi government will never allow outlawed organizations carry out attacks against Iran, Iraqi Parliament Speaker Mahmoud al-Mashhadani said here Wednesday.

"MKO is under the protection of the US army and we will expel them permanently after the foreign forces leave our country".

Today, the Constitution rules on internal and external relations in Iraq, therefore the government and parliament will never allow outlawed organizations (like the terrorist Mujahedeen Khalq Organization) to conduct any operation against neighboring states especially Iran, Mashhadani said in a joint press conference with his Iranian counterpart Gholam-Ali Haddad Adel.

Asked about the timetable for the foreign troops withdrawal from Iraq, he said the parliament is studying the matter seriously.

The presence of foreign troops would not only affect Iraq negatively it also annoys neighboring states, especially Iran, he noted.

The Iraqi government will do its utmost to expel all foreigners and then drive out all outlawed groups from the country, he vowed.

Once the occupiers leave the country and full security is established we intend to implement a federal system based on principles of democracy in Iraq, the speaker stated.

Mashhadani welcomed Iran’s readiness to assist his country in political, economic, cultural, social and security spheres.

He expressed optimism that his visit to Iran will have great benefits for his country.

IRNA, July 6, 2006

July 10, 2006 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
The cult of Rajavi

An insight to the MEK organized cult

THE ORGANIZED CULT

THE ORGANIZED CULT

July 9, 2006 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Nejat Publications

Pars Brief – Issue No.25

1.    Mojahedin exploit Iraqi bombing victims to secure their own political asylum

2.    Paris Appeals Court’s Ruling on MKO

3.    US, UK, Israel Talks on MKO

4.    A letter to Lord Fraser

5.    Terror Ops Underway in Iran

Download Pars Brief – Issue No.25
Download Pars Brief – Issue No.25

July 5, 2006 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mujahedin Khalq; A proxy force

The protection of terrorism, for what reason?

In the third celebration of June 17, day of arresting Maryam Azdanloo the third wife of Rajavi and the leader of Mujahedeen terrorist sect, who absconded three years ago, some of the statesmen such as DOOMINIK LOOFER, JAN PIER BEKEH, JIL PAROUEL, PIER BERSI, ROONEH DOFOUR and…. have been gathered in a conference to protect the sect of Mujahedeen, which has been in the black list of terrorist more than 10 years. Furthermore, the unreal protections of 300000 people of France citizens have been added.

The question is that why the government paid no attention to common views of France citizens? Is the meaning of freedom to advocate from terrorism?

Perhaps the advocators of Mujahedeen sect are not aware about the history of the sect. It’s enough to know that the sect ordered to its members to burn themselves for the arresting of Maryam Rajavi by the government.

Or they can look at the views of Maryam and Massoud Rajavi about the American and European statesmen. These statesmen are considered as gull and stupid persons who can be utilized as instruments.

Here, are some of the site addresses which can be helpful to get important information about the black records of Mujahedeen. Please take a glance:

 1- http://www.nejatngo.com

2- http://www.irane-ayandeh.com/

3-http://www.iran-interlink.org

4-http://www.irandidban.com/

5-http://www.theblackfile.com/

6-http://www.roshana.net

7-http://www.mojahedin.ws/?cl=pe

8-http://www.negahe-no.net

9-http://www.pars-iran.com/

The blackfile  – 24June,2006

July 3, 2006 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
France

The Guest Who Rebukes the Host

A country’s judiciary system, before anything, administrates justice and follows a guiding principle that never doubts about the brought charges when it is to deliberate and come to a verdict. A judge’s judgment is done according to the law and he is cautious about his judgment because he is well aware of the evil that comes from judging wrongly. A judge’s verdict is delivered based on proven charges and the accused is acquitted of the charges only if the court is convinced according to sound evidences. Of course, a judge has to be more cautious when working on a dossier that instigates an official inquiry into terrorist charges threatening a country’s social security.

On 16 June 2003 the French best-known anti-terrorist judge Jean Louis Bruguiere and his team, following a 14 hours interrogation that had started at 15.30 hour local time on 16 June 2003, issued a detention order accusing the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), the political umbrella group dominated by the MKO, blacklisted as a terrorist group by the US, the EU, and other countries, of "terrorist activities, association with a terrorist organization and financing terrorist operations". Shortly after 6 am on 17 June 2003 more than 1200 police and gendarmerie forces launched the largest police operation in three decades to raid 13 MKO-run offices in Val-d’Oise and Yvelines, two departments of the Parisian region. The main target was the office of MKO at Auvers-sur-Oise and Police arrested 164 suspected Mojahedin cadres as well as Maryam Rajavi, the NCRI’s self-nominated president-elect.

The French Government said it was trying to stop the group from expanding its operations in France. Nicolas Sarkozy, the French Interior Minister, said the order to crackdown on the MKO was decided following two years of investigations on the network. He said MKO "recently wanted to make France its support base, notably after the intervention in Iraq. We cannot accept that". The head of France’s domestic intelligence service, Pierre de Bousquet de Florian, said the group was "transforming its Val d’Oise centre [near Paris] … into an international terrorist base".

The Police discovered and confiscated more than a million US dollars in 100 banknotes, 100.000 Euros, sophisticated communication equipments and computers. French Interior Ministry sources said they had confiscated more than 8 millions dollars in cash found in various offices of the MKO as well in the houses of its high-ranking officials throughout France.

In the next few days, people in some European cities were shocked to witness one of the most appalling potentialities of Mojahedin; a number of the group’s insiders immolated themselves in public to protest Maryam Rajavi’s arrest. Reportedly, more than ten Mojahedin sympathizers set themselves alight in three days in Paris, Berne, Rome, London, and Ottawa. The human tragedy ended with two deaths; two women, Sediqeh Mojaveri, 40, and Neda Hassani, 19, died because of the self-immolation injuries.

After three years, on 16 June 2006, MKO announced in a statement that the Paris Appeals Court had dropped all restrictions imposed on 16 active members of the Iranian terrorist group including Maryam Rajavi, following the raid of June 17, 2003. According to the Appeals Court ruling, the 16 members were free to communicate with each other and to travel abroad, nothing more. The French court ruling gave MKO an opportunity to fuel its propaganda machine. While the file is open and MKO is not acquitted of the previous charges, the group has initiated rebuking the French judiciary.

At a press conference held in Paris on June 20, 2006, several members, along with a few of its French advocates, reproved French judiciary for having made a transparent mistake three years ago. Bernard Dartevelle, a French jurist present at the press conference, said "This shows that all their charges against the Resistance were completely baseless. The terrorist charge against the Mojahedin has been undermined. On the international level, the ruling is a slap on the face of all those who have designated the PMOI in the terror list". Mr. Dartevelle’ statement, meant to slap MKO on the back, is more a slap in the face of international opinion.

Abolqasem Rezaii, deputy head of the NCRI’s secretariat, one of the 16, told the press conference that the “recent court ruling represented a total rejection of all terrorist and money laundering charges against the Iranian Resistance”. The French judiciary has exonerated none of the MKO’s previous terrorist and money laundering charges and the file is fully open. Now, after three years, Rezaii claims “I told them [investigators] from day one that I was in charge of the Resistance’s finances and that they could ask all their questions from me, but they did not speak to me even once… now that the falsity of the case and all those charges are proven, why do they not close the file?”. No doubt, he has been investigated on the charges more than once but proved to be non-cooperative or misguiding, otherwise, the court would rule return of more than $8 million to the NCRI whose sources are not still transparent. Moreover, the court has banned the group to be indulged in fundraising activities inside the Franc’s soil.

MKO must be thankful of the French judiciary and people whom they are reproaching. It is MKO’s habitual to claim the whole loaf if you favor them a morsel. Wise people leash hounds with rabies to save others in the vicinity. It is a heavy mutual duty on the shoulders of French’s judiciary and security systems to be watchful of a sect, blacklisted as a terrorist organization, to safeguard the social peace and nation’s well-being when it is settled next door. MKO is capable of jeopardizing peace and tranquility of people as it did when in Iran.

 

– The quotes are all from the NCRI website Dated26 June 2006.

By A. Afshar, 28 June 2006

July 3, 2006 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Recent Posts

  • Rebranding, too Difficult for the MEK

    December 27, 2025
  • The black box of the torture camps of the MEK

    December 24, 2025
  • Pregnancy was taboo in the MEK

    December 22, 2025
  • MEPs who lack awareness about the MEK’s nature

    December 20, 2025
  • Why did Massoud Rajavi enforce divorces in the MEK?

    December 15, 2025
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Youtube

© 2003 - 2025 NEJAT Society . All Rights Reserved. NejatNGO.org


Back To Top
Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip