Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip
Nejat Society
Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip
© 2003 - 2024 NEJAT Society. nejatngo.org
Mujahedin Khalq; A proxy force

The “Manufactured crisis” ended, the MKO left in Catastrophe

“After decades of tensions and distrust, 12 years of hope and fear and 22 months of intense, difficult, highly technical and political negotiations, we had finally made it,” write Mrs. Frederica Mogherini in her enlightening piece on the Guardian titled “The Iran agreement is a disaster for Isis”. The High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy believes that the nuclear agreement between Iran and the West will open a new chapter in the relations between the two sides. She explains one of the main reasons for her trip to Tehran concerns with the implementation of the agreement. Besides, she writes of another duty she and other sides of the agreement have to build on “the historical result” they have achieved in Vienna which is” an alliance of civilizations“ that according to her can be “our most powerful weapon in the fight against terror” and sectarianism in the region , particularly ISIS. [1] Mrs. Mogherini’s good will for peace making seems truly honest but why the Mujahedin Khalq Organization (the MKO) condemns her trip to Tehran?

The so-called National Council of Resistance of Iran the propaganda arm of the MKO claims that the Iranian Government is in decline and Europe should not tie its future to it! As he claims Europe will lose the friendship with Iranian people in future!

The future the NCR tries to imagine for Iran is entirely based on the mirage its leaders Massoud and Maryam Rajavi have been portraying for more than three decades. This is while Mogherini writes, “The Vienna deal tells us that we all have much to earn if we choose cooperation over confrontation”. She believes that hard work is needed to create peaceful mutual relationship but she points out,”We Europeans have a long tradition of cultural and economic relationship with Iran. Before sanctions began in 2005, cooperation between our parts of the world spanned many areas, from energy to trade. But our shared interests go well beyond the economy.” As she clarifies there is enough political will that “could open unprecedented possibilities of peace for the region”. [2]

The MKO leaders have other reasons to be mad at European countries. In the aftermath of the nuclear agreement, delegations of Germany and France also travelled to Tehran to expand economic and political relationships with Iran.  “German business leaders landed in Iran with Economy Minister Sigmar Gabriel and have said they have high hopes to renew contacts”, reported DW. “Sigmar Gabriel, Germany’s vice chancellor and economy minister, flew to Iran on Sunday, becoming the first top Western official to visit the country since world powers and Tehran reached a historic nuclear deal.” [3]

 “On the first visit to Iran for 12 years by a French foreign minister, Laurent Fabius conveyed an invitation from President Francois Hollande to Iran’s President Hassan Rouhani to visit France”, reported Reuters . “Fabius met with Iranian counterpart Mohammad Javad Zarif and was also due to meet Rouhani on his one-day visit, two weeks after a landmark deal under which Western sanctions are to be lifted in exchange for limits on Iran’s nuclear program.” [4]

Thus, the “manufacture crisis” made by the MKO-Israel alliance –as the famous historian journalist Gareth Porter investigated—seems to be ended.[5] The MKO now is endeavoring to ally itself with Zionist warmongers of the Congress to survive.

The two independent journalists Ali Gharib and Eli Clifton investigated the alliance between the Zionist lobby the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) that declared war on nuclear accord and the MKO: “AIPAC, Washington’s most influential pro-Israel lobby reportedly plans on spending $20 million over the next two months urging Congress to vote against the deal. But its efforts at a full frontal attack on the accord, inked by the P5+1 (the US, China, France, Russia, the UK, and Germany) and Iran is leading to some politically awkward alliances.” [6]

They affirm that an advocacy group called Citizens For a Nuclear Free Iran (CNFI) is an off-shoot of the AIPAC, “ Now that the campaign is taking shape, the AIPAC spin-off appears to be relying on a typical, if troubling, ally of American groups and individuals opposed to diplomacy with Iran.” They highlight the MKO’s part in this notorious alliance, ”Namely, two items on the website of Citizens for a Nuclear Iran, one of which was later removed, featured an exiled Iranian opposition group called the Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK).” [7]

The MKO is publicized in the multi-million dollar advertisement made by the Zionist advocacy lobby CNFI. As Gharib and Clifton state, the ad “incorporates b-roll footage from a press conference held by the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), which the State Department deemed the MEK’s “political wing” (earning it a corresponding terrorist designation). “ [8]

They add, “The footage in the Nuclear Free Iran ad shows Alireza Jafarzadeh, a longtime Washington-based MEK apparatchik, at the National Press Club using a pointer aimed at a satellite photograph.” [9] This must be one of the hundreds press conferences held by the MKO propaganda machine in which Alireza Jaafarzadeh, Sona Samsami, Mohammad Mohaddessin …or any other MKO agent repeats the repeated unproved claims of the so-called revelations on the Iranian nuclear program.

“Rajavi counts among her supporters one of Citizens for a Nuclear Free Iran’s advisory board members: former Democrat and former senator Joe Lieberman,“ Gharib and Clifton report. “Lieberman has made several appearances at MEK events, including this June when he appeared at a MEK confab in Paris.” [10]

There are a large number of warmongers who oppose any deal with Iran and support the MKO as an alternative for the Iranian government. On the MKO website you may see a list of people who had denounced Mogherini’s trip to Iran, from US lawmakers to Foreign Minister of the UAE. Good news for the MKO’s propaganda, skeptical lawmakers of the US Congress —some of whom induced by the MKO lobby and mostly backed by Israeli lobby — every day they challenge Secretary Kerry for not being firm on Iran. So what?

Seemingly, The MKO and its sponsors should understand that the aspirations of both sides of the agreement for peace and understanding are not easy to underestimate. It seems that the time for fabricating half-truths and false evidences about the Iranian nuclear program is over.

Mazda Parsi

References:

[1] Mogherini, Federica, The Iran agreement is a disaster for Isis, the Guardian, 28 July 2015

[2] ibid

[3] DW, German delegation aims to renew trade ties on trip to Iran, 19 July 2015

[4] Naegelen, Jacky, Fabius, visiting Tehran, invites Rouhani to France, Reuters, July 29 2015

[5] Porter, Gareth, Manufactured Crisis: The Untold Story of the Iran Nuclear Scare, Amazon.com,

 February 14,2014

[6] Gharib,  Ali & Clfton, Eli, Anti-Iran Deal AIPAC Spin-off Relies on Iranian Ex-Terrorist Group

, lobelog.com, July 21 2015

[7 ]ibid

[8] ibid

[9] ibid

[10] ibid

August 2, 2015 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Massoud Rajavi

MEK Formally Announce its Resumption of Terrorism

The MEK’s publicity outlets have broadcast a message from Massoud Rajavi to the members.

Before this, there had not been any video of his speeches since 2003. This time there wasn’t even an audio of Rajavi’s voice and the message was read by someone else.

After the usual lengthy rant, the main message is from one side threatening revenge against the Europeans and Americans for doing a deal with Iran.

From other side Rajavi ironically claims the deal signals the beginning of the end for Iran because the MEK will resume its terrorist operations and “You will hear about it in Iran; we will launch terrorist attacks soon”.

Contrary to the MEK’s mask of peace and democracy in the West, the MEK has announced its resumption of terrorism from its satellite TV in London and its website from Auvers-sur-Oise near Paris.

The general interpretation among MEK experts is that this mixed message demonstrates Rajavi’s panic as he sees Iran getting closer to the West and the gap he depends upon to exploit is closing up.

On the other hand the absence of audio has introduced more mystery to the question of Rajavi’s whereabouts.

Iran Interlink Weekly Digest

August 1, 2015 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Iran Interlink Weekly Digest

Iran Interlink Weekly Digest – 107

++ The MEK’s publicity outlets have broadcast a message from Massoud Rajavi to the members. Before this, there had not been any video of his speeches since 2003. This time there wasn’t even an audio of Rajavi’s voice and the message was read by someone else. After the usual lengthy rant, the main message is from one side threatening revenge against the Europeans and Americans for doing a deal with Iran. From other side Rajavi ironically claims the deal signals the beginning of the end for Iran because the MEK will resume its terrorist operations and “you will hear about it in Iran; we will launch terrorist attacks soon”. Contrary to the MEK’s mask of peace and democracy in the West, the MEK has announced its resumption of terrorism from its satellite TV in London and its website from Auvers-sur-Oise near Paris. The general interpretation among MEK experts is that this mixed message demonstrates Rajavi’s panic as he sees Iran getting closer to the West and the gap he depends upon to exploit is closing up. On the other hand the absence of audio has introduced more mystery to the question of Rajavi’s whereabouts.

++ Some ex-members have exposed a plot by the financial section of the MEK in Europe. Using documentation, they show that Shirin Moini and Babak NikTale’an, who were brought to Tirana from Iraq, first defected in Albania and got married and were then re-recruited by the MEK not as members but as mules for money laundry. While in Tirana they were given a house and a car and other facilities to establish a smuggling business there. But recently they travelled to Germany where they were arrested at the airport and the large sums of money they were carrying were confiscated. The MEK instructed them to try to find someone not connected to the MEK to claim the money is theirs and return it to the MEK. Knowing that anyone who claims such a large sum will be investigated, the MEK has tried to set up some of its enemies and get them implicated. They advised the couple to find ex-members and trap them in this scheme and engage them with the police. The couple have been revealed to be connected directly to the head of the MEK’s money laundry section called Mohammad Tariqat Monfared, who uses the pseudonym Yasser and who uses various passports, one of which is Lolachian which is the name of some of the MEK’s bank accounts. The ex-members who have exposed this scheme have identified similar cases that have happened before and concluded that the MEK regard this couple as expendable mules since they already defected from the cult. The MEK know they will forever be under scrutiny and are no longer of any use. But before giving them up the MEK is trying to get its money back and set up its enemies.

++ On the anniversary of Forough Javidan many people have written memories of how Rajavi knowingly sent people to their deaths and used their blood to revive the MEK, describing it as his “insurance” for his future. Hamed Sarrafpour in particular has written a detailed memoir of all the people he knew from the highest ranks to the ordinary members telling their individual stories along with pictures of the event.

In English:

++ Nedaye Haghighat website reported that two groups of fifteen individuals were transferred from Camp Liberty to Albania in the past two weeks. The process of relocation to third countries by the UN was scheduled to take only six months after the transfer to the temporary transit camp in Iraq, but obstruction by the MEK leaders has slowed the process. Also last week, Mojtaba Bidaqi managed to leave Camp Liberty after 31 years of membership in the destructive Rajavi cult by handing himself over to the UN officials in charge of the camp. His brother Amir had defected from the group last year after being relocated in Albania.

++ Mazda Parsi in Nejat Bloggers introduces the testimony of Manijeh Habashi who is a former sympathizer and member of the MKO. She gives first hand witness to Rajavi’s over-estimated Eternal Light invasion of Iran in 1988. In her detailed description she tries to portray the scenes she perceived, without judging or analysing the events. She believes that her expressive article is significant enough to enlighten the mind of her audience.

++ Following the nuclear deal, Daniel McAdams in Global Research writes a scathing criticism of neocon Bill Kristol saying at one point: “And Kristol’s objection to foreigners with American blood on their hands is highly selective. The Marxist-jihadist death cult Mojahedin-e-Khalq (MeK) has plenty of American blood on its hands, but Kristol’s own magazine joined other neocon voices in urging the US to remove the terrorists from the US list of terror organizations. Why? Because they are Kristol’s kind of terrorists: they infiltrate Iran to assassinate civilians and foment unrest, while passing off laptops with Mossad-fabricated data made to look like Iranian nuclear weapons activity.”

++ In a meeting with Elisabeth Guigou, the visiting head of the French National Assembly’s Foreign Affairs Committee, Alaeddin Boroujerdi, who chairs the Iranian Parliament’s (Majlis) National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, criticized the European Union (EU) for removing the MKO from its list of terrorist organizations and urged the French government to reconsider its position. Boroujerdi said “the EU decision has enabled the terrorist group, which has the blood of thousands of innocent Iranians on its hands, to “freely operate” in European countries”.

July 31, 2015

August 1, 2015 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Former members of the MEK

Dr Masoud Banisadr: “Al Qaeda, Daesh (IS, ISIL), MeK, and political cults…”

LONDON- A one-day conference exploring two important issues – extremist political cults such as Larouche’s and how to combat them, including a discussion of possible legal remedies; and an update on the institutional barriers faced by the Jeremiah Duggan campaign.

 Dr Masoud Banisadr, PhD The son of a prominent Iranian family, he entered radical political activity in 1978 while pursuing his postgraduate studies in Engineering-Mathematics. Then, he was 24 happily married with a one-year-old daughter. The group he affiliated with, the Mojahedin-e Khalq (MeK), played a prominent part in the mass demonstrations and paramilitary activity that led to the 1979 overthrow of the Shah. After Mek’s failed uprising in 1981, it changed into a clandestine terrorist group and Rajavi, MeK’s leader, and many high-ranking members, escaped to France. Soon MeK underwent a radical transition into a cult and by the late 1980s, MeK members were compelled to divorce their spouses, give up their children and live celibate for the rest of their life. In 1986, Banisadr became the representative of the group to UN agencies and human rights organizations, and later their representative in the US, acting as a sort of unofficial ambassador of MeK. He escaped MeK in June 1996 and later wrote a memoir of his experiences entitled Masoud: Memoirs of an Iranian Rebel (2004) and has written many articles about cults and their mind manipulation, including his 2014 book, Destructive and…..

Jeremiah Duggan campaign, June 30 2015

Download Al Qaeda, Daesh (IS, ISIL), MeK, and political cults

July 30, 2015 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Iran

France should enlist MKO as terror organization: Iran MP

A senior Iranian lawmaker has called on the French government to include the terrorist Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization (MKO) on its blacklist of terror organizations.

In a Wednesday meeting with the visiting head of the French National Assembly’s Foreign Affairs Committee Élisabeth Guigou, Alaeddin Boroujerdi, who chairs the Iranian Parliament’s (Majlis) National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, criticized the European Union (EU) for removing the MKO from its list of terrorist organizations.

Chairman of the Iranian Parliament’s (Majlis) Committee on National Security and Foreign Policy Alaeddin Boroujerdi (R) meets with Élisabeth Guigou, the head of the French National Assembly’s Foreign Affairs Committee, in Tehran on July 29, 2015. (ICANA photo)

Boroujerdi further said the EU decision has enabled the terrorist group, which has the blood of thousands of innocent Iranians on its hands, to “freely operate” in European countries.

The Islamic Republic expects France to blacklist the anti-Iran terror group and end its activities in the European country, added the top Iranian parliamentarian.

The MKO has carried out numerous terrorist attacks on civilians and government officials in Iran over the past three decades. Out of the nearly 17,000 Iranians killed in terrorist attacks since the victory of Iran’s 1979 Islamic Revolution, some 12,000 have fallen victim to the acts of terror carried out by the MKO.

The group was viewed by the EU as terrorist until January 2009, when the EU Council lifted the designation under immense pressure from political lobbies. The decision was followed by United States in September 2012.

Boroujerdi further highlighted the need for more efforts at the international level for fighting terrorism in the Middle East, saying the activities of the terror groups in countries like Iraq and Syria pose a huge threat to the global peace and security.

The French lawmaker, for her part, warned against the growing wave of terror threats in the region.

Guigou called Iran a stable country in the Middle East which can play a big role in the fight against terrorism, adding that Tehran and the international community can increase their concentration in this regard.

July 30, 2015 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
The cult of Rajavi

What would Iran look like if the Mojahedin-e Khalq were its government?

Quora is a question-and-answer website where questions are asked, answered, edited and organized by its community of users. The Website raised a query on Mujahedin Khalq.

Bellow you can read the question, a brief description on the topic inserted by the Quora and the replies of the website visitors:

What would Iran look like if the Mojahedin-e Khalq were its government?

They are quite controversial, and many documentaries and news sources describe this group as a cult, not just a militant political group. It also says it wants secularism, even though all its female members are forced to wear hejabs.

If you know the group well, do you think they would truly uphold democracy if succeeding in taking power in Iran, or would they attack and kill everyone with opposing viewpoints? Is this another of these types of groups that would make a country resemble North Korea if given power? What explains all the female members having to wear hejabs, including its leader Maryam Rajavi?

The answers to the question are as follows:

Sam Sinai who has introduced himself as a theoretical biologist who went to school in an Islamic country writes:

Bring Islamic Nazis to Iran? What? They are an absolute disgrace for anyone to associate with. Unfortunately western politicians occasionally do. (De-listing, refers to de-listing as terrorists). [1]

They are one of the most dictatorial, brutal, opportunistic, ideologically dangerous cults that exist in the 21st century. I don’t know of any organization that is more capable of replicating Nazis. I mean just look at their logo, it’s just an amalgam of extremes.

They have a self-appointed supreme leader, elected for life, a ‘president-elect’, that happens to be the wife of the supreme leader, also appointed for life. How did he marry her? He ordered everyone in the camp to divorce their wives, and then went ahead and hand picked the widow he was attracted to. Then he chose her as president, and they all call her the president-elect of the Iranian people! God bless the Islamic republic, at least we can half-elect someone there.

They helped Saddam Hussein, during the Iran-Iraq war, specifically providing information for the locations that Saddam used chemical weapons on. They then attacked Iran themselves, and lost.

They buy politicians in the west with HUGE sums of money that they force their members to pay. They collect homeless (by offering food) at their annual gatherings in NYC to aggrandize their perceived support.

Every member follows the instructions to the dot, without questioning. Those who don’t are bullied and abused, if not tortured. Those who escape the camps are never safe. They take orphan children to their camps and brain-wash them to use them as fighters. They refuse to leave their military camps in Iraq, because they want to keep the environment for their fighters isolated from reality.

Their ideology is communism and Islam tied together with a military flavor. Their game-plan is to overtake the government by military force, and their claim is that they will rule ‘only for 6 months’ to stabilize things, and then they would be open to elections (saying this to get sympathy from the west). No s***, why not just have an election to begin with?  Because they won’t plan on leaving power.

If they were to rule Iran, the officials will look like this:

Doesn’t it remind you of North Korea-Saddam hybrid? it should, or I am not doing my job right.

Islamic laws would be interpreted and executed as the leader wished, much less collectively than in the Islamic republic. The communistic side means a huge, dictatorial style government. A huge blood bath, from every "traitor’s" blood.

The current half-democracy will turn into absolute tyranny. People will run for their lives and try to escape to other countries. Some areas will attempt to declare independence.

NO, just no, please. I don’t even want to imagine.

[1]John Bolton Shockingly Denies Being a ‘Terrorist Supporter’

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Another user of the Quora says:

Oh my !!!!!…. That would be the worst disaster and misery for Iran, even much worse than the current government. They believe they can do ANYTHING to reach their goals, no matter how many innocent people die or suffer. They united with Iraqis and attacked their own motherland!!!!!!!….. I believe they are absolutely terrorists. Besides, their system is dictatorship, even more strict and scary than the current government. I have heard that in Ashraf Camp in Iraq, they were not allowed to question anything or discuss anything or contact anyone out of the camp or watch TV or listen to Radio (except their own programs!) and they never were allowed to leave the camp or change their minds about staying there. Also men and women couldn’t( and cant yet) contact, even talk to each other.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Farshid Palad, writes:

Something like the parts of Afghanistan that are in control of the Taliban. Life would have been terrible for Iranians.

Other examples include Iraq under Saddam’s rule or the current North Korea but less advanced.

You would definitely fear for your life. A different point of view? Killed instantly. No question asked.

Quora.com

July 29, 2015 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mujahedin Khalq; A proxy force

Kristol objection to foreigners with American blood on their hands,highly selective

Bill Kristol on Iran Deal: ‘Its Munich!’

Bill Kristol is the epitome of the neocon mindset: cultivating a staid and urbane image while writing the most unhinged and mendacious claptrap. In his utterly predictable denunciation of the successful Iran nuclear talks, Kristol frames the issue in the crudest terms: if the deal goes through on the US end it will mean the return of $150 billion that was seized from the Iranians by the United States — and that money will be used to commit terrorism against the United States!

Writes Kristol: “How can we debate [the deal] without attending to the $150 billion that is going to a regime with American blood on its hands?”

Kristol cites the National Review which makes the fatuous claim (first made by the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, which is headed by a close advisor to Israeli prime minister Netanyahu) that Iran has killed 1,000 Americans since 9/11. It turns out any weapon used in Iraq or Afghanistan against an invading US military that might have Iranian manufacturing origins means that the Iranians are responsible for that kill.

Do they want to extrapolate that methodology to include every bullet sold by the US military-industrial complex to every despot overseas?

But you can see how this works: A Netanyahu think tank makes an outlandish claim, it is picked up by the National Review and thus laundered from its biased foreign origins, and then recycled and further laundered by Kristol in his publication. Cute trick.

And Kristol’s objection to foreigners with American blood on their hands is highly selective. The Marxist-jihadist death cult Mojahedin-e-Khalq (MeK) has plenty of American blood on its hands, but Kristol’s own magazine joined other neocon voices in urging the US to remove the terrorists from the US list of terror organizations. Why? Because they are Kristol’s kind of terrorists: they infiltrate Iran to assassinate civilians and foment unrest, while passing off laptops with Mossad-fabricated data made to look like Iranian nuclear weapons activity.

The other thing that has Kristol up in arms over the deal is what he calls the “notorious” Annex III.D.10 of the agreement, which he claims will “help the Iranian regime fight off attempts by others to slow its nuclear program, and more.”

But what does that annex really say?

10. Co-operation in the form of training courses and workshops to strengthen Iran’s ability to prevent, protect and respond to nuclear security threats to nuclear facilities and systems as well as to enable effective and sustainable nuclear security and physical protection systems;

10. Co-operation through training and workshops to strengthen Iran’s ability to protect against, and respond to nuclear security threats, including sabotage, as well as to enable effective and sustainable nuclear security and physical protection systems.

In other words, the parties to the agreement will help Iran protect against attempts to attack and sabotage Iran’s peaceful and legal nuclear program. Recall the Israeli/US cyberattack on Iranian nuclear facilities and simultaneous programs to assassinate Iranian scientists. Kristol is furious that anyone would find such illegal and murderous activity to be objectionable. After all, blood on one’s hands doesn’t count if it is Iranian or other Muslim blood.

Oh, and, writes Kristol: “Munich!!!” That is obligatory any time diplomacy supplants neocon lust for war.

That Kristol remains a favored foreign policy “expert” on stations like FoxNews and ABC says very little about the quality of his analysis and much more about his saying what the mainstream media want their audiences to hear.

Who can forget Bill Kristol’s greatest hits, such as this 2011 piece on the “liberation” of Libya titled “The Party of Freedom“? In it he writes:

And so, despite his doubts and dithering, President Obama is taking us to war in another Muslim country. Good for him. …Our invasions have in fact been liberations…in our own national interest, of course, but also to protect Muslim peoples and help them free themselves. Libya will be America’s fifth war of Muslim liberation.

Ah yes, that glorious liberation of Libya!

Indeed the timeline of his faulty predictions would no-doubt span the equator. Imagine any other profession where one can be so consistently wrong and still be considered (and handsomely remunerated as) an expert. Imagine your doctor was wrong in his diagnosis 95 percent of the time. Imagine your financial advisor consistently lost 95 percent of anything you invest with him. Yet Kristol continues to drop his golden turds from the hallowed heights of the foreign policy firmament. What a country…

By Daniel McAdams,

July 28, 2015 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mujahedin Khalq Organization as a terrorist group

A portrait of “Eternal Light” drawn by an Eye – witness

On July 25 1988, the leader of the Mujahedin Khalq Organization (the MKO), Massoud Rajavi seized the first and last opportunity for launching a war against his own country. Both Iran and Iraq had accepted United Nations Security Council Resolution 598, which had ended the war on July 20th. Rajavi’s miscalculations led him to harbor the hope that the attack should be welcome by the Iranian people and it would lead to a popular uprising. Of course this was not the first and the last time that his analysis would go wrong.

Ms. Manijeh Habashi who is a former sympathizer and member of the MKO, witnessed Rajavi’s overestimated invasion, the ”Eternal Light”. In her detailed description of what she saw in the Eternal Light Operation, she tries to portrait the scenes she perceived, without judging or analyzing the events. She believes that her expressive article is significant enough to enlighten the mind of her audience.

Ms. Habashi states some examples of Rajavi’s miscalculations about the war and the Iranian government. For instance, about the disastrous last days of Iran-Iraq war she writes:

“It is necessary and significant to know about Massoud Rajavi’s evaluations of heavy missile attacks against Iranian cities. Rajavi’s analysis was positive. He believed that launching missiles would cause Iranians’ hatred against Ayatollah Khomeini.”(!) Habashi recalls that after each city was attacked by Iraqi missiles, Rajavi would give out sweets and candies in the camps!

Thus, Rajavi used this type of arguments to launch a new war against Iran after the ceasefire was agreed by both Iran and Iraq. Habashi heard one of the MKO commandants saying,” In current situation, we are the only people who want war in borders.”

According to Manijeh Habashi , the MKO leader had to make the ultimate decision before it would be locked behind borders. “So, they started to get prepared for a large-scale attack in shorter than a week!”

The group launched a world-wide propaganda to recruit sympathizers and members from around the world bringing them to Iraq. Ms. Habashi explains how rapidly members were trained for the operation: “Forces were divided into groups. Each group received military training for about two or three hours. It was like a joke. Each person had 10 to 15 minutes to learn how to trigger a gun!”

Rajavi’s unrealistic approach to start his so-called operation was obvious in Rajavi’s ridiculous belief that Ms. Habashi cites, “a Mujahed- e Khalq can face hundred people”.

Rajavi naively believed that his forces would be joined by groups of Iranians, so they would simply occupy Tehran. He promised his forces that hardly ever there would be clashes in the path!

Children and parents who are already kept separated in Camp Ashraf, kiss and hug each other goodbye. Despite large-scale propaganda, distress and anxiety is seen in faces, especially for 11-12 year olds who have been used for preparation works of the war. They made sandwiches

“That night, the atmosphere of Camp Ashraf was bizarre. Everyone spoke of getting back to Tehran passionately. One was looking for a coin to call his family as soon as arriving in Tehran!”

Ms. Habashi precisely explains how members of the MKO were manipulated by the leaders. “Female members were told to put their red headscarves in their backpack for the march they would have in Azadi Square, Tehran.”

The next morning, a long line of trucks, tanks and vans are headed to the Iranian border. They arrive in the border line at night. There are no people to join the MKO forces as Massoud Rajavi had promised.

They are so simply confident that they can take a break at night and begin advancing in the morning. Naturally, they are traced by the Iranian security forces.

Clashes break out. Untrained MKO members are not able to defend themselves against Iranian air force. Ms. Habashi recounts, “From the beginning, several dead and injured people are left. A Mujahed woman named “Manizheh” is standing up watching aircrafts bombing her. She even doesn’t know that she should lie down and hide her head with her hands. Her brain is collapsed.”

The MKO forces are ordered to climb the hills on the right side of the road in order to shoot Iranian soldiers, Habashi recalls. Their random shots are of no use. Their vehicles are one after another shot by Iranian RPGs and mortars.”

Manijeh Habashi describes painful scenes of grieving MKO members who were surprised by the sheer violence of the war despite the pleasant mirage of victory that Massoud Rajavi had shown them:

“Wounded and dead bodies and burned vehicles are seen everywhere. The girl who had come from London three nights ago, is left wounded near a burning oil tanker. The burning line of petrol is running towards her. You just wish that bullets had killed her before the fire gets to her body.”

After the MKO forces start withdrawing, they are still under the fire of the Iranian troops. A large number of Mujahedin are killed in their way back to Iraq.” forces who are shocked by the silly war, finally retreat across Iraqi border,” Manijeh writes.

The MKO’s withdrawal from Iranian territory takes a few days. The casualties of such a stupid disastrous attack is very heavy. According to Habashi,”In his deadly picnic, Massoud Rajavi didn’t leave elderly members free.” A large number of fighters are elderlies, mothers and fathers who are sent into death. “The body of Mother Meimanat is left behind in the Iranian soil”, Habashi writes.

By the way, Forough Javidan (Eternal Light) it is glorified as a great victory by the group, every year although it  was actually an absolute failure for the MKO. Why is that?

The answer is simple. The cult-like system ruling the MKO justifies any controversy. Members are indoctrinated by repetitive lies. Lies turn into truth in their minds gradually.

“Finally, the defeated troops get back to the Camp. Spirits are different. Some are obsessed with the overvalued war but the majority confirm Rajavi’s argument. He claims that the operation is a victory; Eternal light is the glorious point in the history of armed struggle; it is the great victory of the Iranian “People”!

Mazda Parsi

July 27, 2015 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Missions of Nejat Society

Mr. Mohammadali Bazkiyaei longs to hear his son’s voice

Mr. Bazkiyaei is the father of one of the MKO hostages; Ismaeil.

Mr. Bazkiyaei who is a retired farmer in Iran, has several times went to the MKO Camps  to visit his beloved son or even hear his voice via telephone call or at least get a news.

He is a member of Nejat Society Gilan branch.

Awaiting to here from his beloved son for several years, Mr. Bazkiyaei constantly visits Nejat Society office.

On July 2nd, 2015 he met Mr. Shaabani ; the newly arrived defector of MKO Cult to find a way to contact Ismaeil.

July 26, 2015 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Albania

Two other groups of Camp Liberty residents transfer to Albania

Two groups of residents of Temporary Transit Location (Camp Liberty) relocated to Tirana during the past Two weeks, Nedaye Haghighat website reported.

Each group includes 15 individuals.

The process of MKO members’ relocation to third countries was scheduled to be completed within 6 months after the groups’ moving to Camp Liberty as a Temporary Transit Location; however the Cult leaders obstructing the procedure has slowed down the relocation process.

The first group of transferees includes:

  1. Shahnaz Mohammadi
  2. Mohammad Davoudi
  3. Ali Judi
  4. Alizade Barforoush
  5. Fatane Sharifi
  6. Kolthum Ashhad
  7. Isa Akbarzade
  8. Fereshte Mohammadi
  9. Alamtaj Mahmoudi
  10. Amene Haghighat
  11. Akran Abedini
  12. Akram Fathpur Pakzad
  13. Hussein Masih
  14. Alireza Arab Najafi
  15. Tahere Moaref

The second group include:

  1. Keyvan Baharestani
  2. Hussein Akbari
  3. Dariush Seifi
  4. Mohammad Ali (Saffar) Rostampur
  5. Abbas gholo Khaib Shahidi
  6. Farahnaz Jadidiyan
  7. Reza Saburi Deylami
  8. Mamlekat (Nahid) Negahdari
  9. Mostafa Kashi (Kashani)
  10. Amireh Esfahani Nuri
  11. Manuchehr Sarkari
  12. Hasan ghaffari Sarabi
  13. Malihe Totunchiyan
  14. Ashraf Matlabi
  15. Sedighe Karimi Namdan
July 25, 2015 0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Recent Posts

  • Pregnancy was taboo in the MEK

    December 22, 2025
  • MEPs who lack awareness about the MEK’s nature

    December 20, 2025
  • Why did Massoud Rajavi enforce divorces in the MEK?

    December 15, 2025
  • Massoud Rajavi and widespread sexual abuse of female members

    December 10, 2025
  • Farman Shafabin, MEK member who committed suicide

    December 3, 2025
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Youtube

© 2003 - 2025 NEJAT Society . All Rights Reserved. NejatNGO.org


Back To Top
Nejat Society
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Cartoons
    • NewsPics
    • Photo Gallery
    • Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Nejat NewsLetter
    • Pars Brief
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Editions
    • عربي
    • فارسی
    • Shqip