Iran

Iran: Europe has been a safe haven for terrorists

Iran slams Germany for terrorist release

Abdul Rahman Haji Ahmadi, 61, was arrested in his apartment near Cologne, Germany on Friday.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry on Tuesday criticized Germany for releasing the leader of the terrorist group Party for a Free Life in Kurdistan (PJAK).

Abdolrahman Haji Ahmadi was arrested at his apartment on Friday, but was released Monday, a website affiliated with the Movement for Change in the Iraqi Kurdistan region reported.

PJAK is an offshoot of the internationally-recognized terrorist group, the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), which conducts deadly operations in Kurdish-populated regions of western Iran.
In reaction to the report, Iranian Foreign Ministry Spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast accused Western countries of not being sincere in fighting terrorism.

Mehmanparast said Tuesday that evidence at hand indicated that "Europe has been a safe haven for terrorists" and continues "to support terrorism despite chanting slogans in defense of human rights."

"We saw the same pattern about Mujahedeen Khalq Organization (MKO). This criminal group was taken off the [terrorist] list in Europe. We also saw another instance in Abdolmalek Rigi’s case where the footprints of foreign intelligence services were seen in supporting his group (Jundallah)."

The same holds true about the PJAK leader, who was released by Germany despite Iran’s hard evidence available regarding the group’s numerous acts of terror, Mehmanparast said.

According to a New York Times report in October 2007, PJAK has "direct or indirect discussions" with American officials. Its ringleader reportedly visited Washington in the summer of 2007.

The group is branded as a terrorist group by the United States.

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Massoud Rajavi

NLA, Iranian’s historical achievement

No need to say that a terrorist cult’s bastion is a matter of death and survival and that is the reason why MKO periodically upholds to groundless claims to safeguard its stronghold in Iraq. Rajavi and his propaganda machine are engaged in a never-ceasing, fervent struggle of supporting Camp Ashraf. Massoud Rajavi in his long message of January 20th once more focuses on the strategic significance of Camp Ashraf and NLA (National Liberation Army) pretending that the survival of Mojaheidn depends on keeping their ideological bastion. There is no need to say that this is merely another propaganda blitz for killing time and distracting the attention of the world from the real cultic and terrorist nature of MKO. However, he goes further making a novel claim that can be considered the latest of his serial false promises. As he puts into words:

Maryam and Ashraf proved that in the most tortuous and uneasy periods they will resist up to the last breath… Yes, now after 45 years of Mojahedin life passing in battlefields, it can be asserted that this is the supreme result of the Iranian struggle since constitutionalism in the past 103 years. It may guarantee the imminent victory of Iranians.

This illusion of grandeur and megalomania to the point of calling a cultic bastion like Camp Ashraf as the best result of Iranian struggles in last century has its roots in the Mojahedin common policy of lip service and subservience as an outdated one kept in Rajavi’s isolated museum of Camp Ashraf that is about to turn into a desolate spot after dislocation of Mojahedin. The fact is that Rajavi tries to exaggerate on the fabricated significance of Camp Ashraf from time to time under different excuses including embroidering on the position takings of some Westerners on the significance of Camp Ashraf as a result of Rajavi’s disbursing lots of money for publishing such news to infuse Ashraf residents with the idea that Western media have nothing to do but defending Camp Ashraf and the point that their resistance may result in a global support. Yet it is unclear why these European societies and media cannot persuade Iraqi Government in keeping Camp Ashraf and Rajavi has to resort to cultic procedures. The fact is that his supporters and advocators in defending Camp Ashraf are a number of retied politicians as well as some covering institutes under his command.

It seems that Rajavi has been persuaded that his tricks are of no use and new methods are required to divert the attention of Ashraf residents from realities. The new assertion of Rajavi in his message of January 20th can be evaluated in this regard. Taking a brief look at the past history of the organization and NLA may clarify the situation. Rajavi is like the man claiming to stand in the middle of the earth needing no reason for proving his assertion since nobody troubles himself to test this claim measuring all over the earth to find its middle point. Likewise, Rajavi can claim that his army is the fruit of 103 years struggle in Iran with no logical reason. Even if his whopper is accepted for his consolation, he has to bear in mind that the imminent annihilation of NLA and Camp Ashraf is equal to the total destruction of 103-year achievement of Iranians. Who can believe in such a groundless and false claim except a number of brainwashed victims of a cult of personality?

Rajavi’s grandiose claims have many irrecoverable consequences paid mainly by NLA and Ashraf residents as his false promise of short-time overthrow failed and was replaced by a promise of 6-month, 1-year and long-term overthrow that resulted in an organizational split in MKO. Rajavi has to bear into mind that time is not a phenomenon to be stopped or controlled. As three decades passed and his false promises were disclosed, his present claims will be tested in near future and may end in more disgrace for him. He can make many other false claims too, yet finally the truth will overcome illusion and fantasy and the global community will identify the real terrorist nature of Mojahedin and its leadership.

It seems that Rajavi is drowning in illusion trying to overlook what the reality is. As Don Quixote failed to recognize the reality surrounding him, Rajavi seems to live in an everlasting dream. He is far from understanding that a revolution cannot be achieved overnight through an outdated strategy and false promises. The time will prove the insubstantiality of Rajavi’s claims and then he has to answer what has been the basis of his so-called 103-year result of Iranian history that came to an end by a light breeze.

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Nejat Publications

Pars Brief – Issue No.51

·         Mujahedin Khalq Organization elements attacked the Iranian families and the Iraqi security forces.

·         Rajavi, Rigi to make Joint Terror front

·         DZI warns against PMOI money laundry

·         Iraq FM: Mojahedin Khalq deportation based on Iraqi law

·         Mojahedin Khalq lobby clutching at straws

·         Official Fatah Website drops all material from Iranian sources opposing the regime

·         French court rules against Mojahedin Khalq advocate Rajavi

·         MKO fundraising for Haiti

·         Iraqi pro-MKO MP cheats the cult

·         MKO still deserves its terrorist listing

·         The West must cut its terror ties

Download Pars Brief – Issue No.51
Download Pars Brief – Issue No.51

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Mujahedin Khalq Organization's Propaganda System

The Psychotic World of The Rajavi Couple and Their Marxist-islamic Cult

This is an article on the psychotic world of the Rajavi couple and their demented Muslim-Communist terrorist cult.

I used to believe the propaganda from the MEK [Mujahideen-e-Khalq]. I used to believe that it was a pro-democracy group and that its defectors who speak unfavorably about the organization were agents of the Iranian regime. I believed that it was popular in Iran and basically other big claims that the Rajavis and their terrorist cult want the world to believe [that’s why I unfortunately have a lot of material on the Internet praising this group]. However, their propaganda isn’t true.

Well-meaning people, who hope for the best of the free world, fall for it. After all, why wouldn’t they support an organization that fights for freedom and democracy in Iran, that gives vital intelligence information on the Iranian regime, its terrorism and nuclear weapons ?

But at least much of it is part of the propaganda that the Rajavis want us to believe. The MEK wants the world to believe that it is the only legitimate opposition.

If the Rajavis had their way, everyone would believe that any criticism of the MEK and any move not worshipping the Rajavis, means working for the Iranian regime’s intelligence agency. That’s the kind of propaganda that the Rajavis tell every member of the MEK when trapping them inside it. Plenty of people figured out that that’s not the case and left the MEK, many times at the risk of torture and killing. The MEK wants to kill and torture anyone who attempts to leave the group and runs all these secret Nazi-like prisons in Camp Ashraf. The fact is that even prison is more free than Camp Ashraf. You’re more free as a prisoner than as an MEK member.

According to the Rajavis’ propaganda, anyone who speaks out about their experiences in the MEK terror cult and their defection means that they must be agents of the Iranian regime. That’s what they tell their members. That’s what they tell the outside world as well, when they put on their pro-democracy facade in front of European parliaments, in front of the American congress, and in front of the Iran Policy Committee [IPC], the third of which is eating out of their hands. After all, the MEK, according to the Rajavis’ propaganda, is a heroic, popular and democratic group to the point that they terrify the regime in Tehran and to the point that Iran launches a disinformation campaign against them. This is the propaganda, both said to its own members, and to the outside world. And we have the IPC picking it up and parroting it off. And we also have Rabbi Daniel M. Zucker also parroting it off in his columns on Iran.

Plenty of decent people believe their propaganda. As stated, I was one of them. I fiercely opposed the regime in Tehran and their ideology and was ready to support a pro-democracy movement. In fact, I support the pro-democracy movement in Iran. To the Rajavi cult out there, you don’t see the pro-democracy protesters holding any emblem of the MEK or any picture of the Rajavis.

The MEK is intolerant to other opposition groups. It seeks to portray itself as the only legitimate Iranian opposition group. They refer to themselves as “the Iranian resistance” and Alireza Jafarzadeh refers to them when he talks about the pro-democracy opposition. Jafarzadeh is a commentator many decent people admire. After all, he speaks out against the regime in Tehran and comes out with all of this important information and seemingly wonderful ideas. He calls for strengthening the Iranian opposition. I fully agree.

However, I don’t fully agree with what he has in mind. He means to delist the MEK and its front the NCRI [National Council of Resistence in Iran] from the State Department list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations and to support them in their struggle to replace the Iranian regime with their own regime. So Jafarzadeh is an effective propagandist for the MEK.

The NCRI describes itself as the parliament in exile and has Maryam Rajavi as the President-elect, as if it is certain that she would be President once the Iranian regime falls. After all, she has been appointed by Massoud Rajavi and the Islamic Marxist cult to be President. Therefore, she’s the President-elect. Imagine if Republicans declare Michael Steele to be President-elect of America.

The MEK has worked for totalitarian regimes. Vladimir Kuzishkin, a former KGB head of its Iran agency, confirmed that the MEK has been a major source of information for the Soviets. That was during the Cold War. The US and the rest of the west supported the Shah, because they believed that he was a useful counterbalance to the USSR, and also pressured him to implement liberal reforms. It was while the MEK fought a violent struggle against the Shah and before they would find themselves having the same enemy as the free world does. After the 1979 revolution, the MEK found itself not getting their “share” of power. After all, their ideology had a more Marxist tilt than the ideology of Ayatollah Khomeini. The Rajavis and much of his organization fled to France and then to Iraq, where Saddam Hussein welcomed them with open arms and supported the group.

The MEK denies having gotten Saddam’s support and claims that they payed for everything themselves. However, there is a video of Massoud Rajavi hugging and kissing Saddam Hussein, as seen below [if the video isn’t shown below, then go here to see it]:

Many Iranians view the MEK as traitors because the MEK supported Iraq’s terror invasion of Iran. Though the MEK heatedly denies this, after the Gulf War, the MEK helped carry out Saddam’s brutal repression of Shiites and Kurds. So the MEK served Saddam Hussein, as even Daniel Pipes [who, though he’s a decent man who reveals a lot of facts, still falls for the MEK propaganda] admitted that “during its 17 years in Iraq, it also had to do Saddam Hussein’s bidding”. The MEK also got training from Qaddaffi’s Libya.

They portray themselves as freedom fighters even though they supported many other totalitarian figures. The MEK also formed close relations with Yasser Arafat’s PLO even before that organization pretended to recognize Israel’s right to exist. Even the MEK apologist Rabbi Daniel M. Zucker admitted that “the MeK trained with Arafat’s PLO in Jordan, MeK members simply used the training bases” and then excuses it with “but did not become involved in the politics of their host. This association took place in the 1970’s, before the fall of the Shah, when it was highly illegal for Iranians to possess any firearms without a permit”. Massoud Rajavi even gave Yasser Arafat the Herald of the MEK as seen below :

Massoud Rajavi even gave Yasser Arafat the Herald of the MEK as seen below

Below, you can also see two videos. The first one is a meeting with Maryam Rajavi and Yasser Arafat. The second one was an MEK mourning ceremony of Arafat’s death. There is a picture of Arafat and candles lit. MEK members mourn and at least one of them speaks about how “horrible” it was. Below are the two videos [see the last hyperlink if the videos don’t appear in this article]:

Notice how in the second video, there is a portrait of Yasser Arafat standing next to Massoud Rajavi. After Arafat’s death, at a memorial ceremony, Maryam Rajavi pays [to see the html version, go here] tribute to Arafat. In the speech, here’s what Mrs. Rajavi says:

Let us salute Yasser Arafat and celebrate his great achievements. May God bless his soul.

Arafat’s great achievements? Why not tell that to his victims? Arafat’s “great achievements” were creating terrorist infrastructure, terrorist movements, terrorist training camps and terror attacks. His victims are people from all nationalities, which includes Muslims, Arabs and Palestinians. Even many Palestinians themselves criticized Arafat for his corruption. Yet the Rajavis love him because he did a lot for the MEK and because he was close to them.

Like the Rajavis, Arafat was good at propaganda. Yasser Arafat was the notorious Arab Hitler. Yet according to Mohammed Mohadessin, another MEK propagandist and author of “Islamic Fundamentalism: The New Global Threat”, “We [the MEK] have good relations with the Palestine Liberation Organization”.

It would be hypocritical of Conservatives to [rightly] criticize Hilliary Clinton for hugging and kissing Suha Arafat, the wife of Arafat, after her disgraceful speech where she accused Israel of poisoning innocent Palestinians, to criticize the radical left in the west for idolizing the PLO and then to give the MEK a free pass to idolize the PLO They crossed the line with their idiotic nonsense when it comes to the PLO and is a terrorist cult.

The fact is that the MEK is a terrorist cult that has a history of aiding our totalitarian enemies and even a history of killing Americans and westerners.

by Benyamin Solomon

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Iraqi Authorities' stance on the MEK

Election will finalize fate of MKO in Iraq

Through general elections, Iraqi people and MPs are going to finalize the fate of terrorists in Iraq, whether they are Baathists, MKO members or Takfiris, former Iraqi MP and current candidate said.The Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization (MKO, aka MEK, PMOI) presence in Iraq has brought the country much disturbance, since the cult is much close to Iraqi anti-government groups.” Jawad Al-Attar

“The Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization (MKO, aka MEK, PMOI) presence in Iraq has brought the country much disturbance, since the cult is much close to Iraqi anti-government groups.” Jawad Al-Attar told Habilian Association (families of Iranian terror victims) news website.

“Iraqis generally view terrorist group like the MKO as those involving in the country’s internal affairs, so we should reach a consensus on expelling the MKO as an introduction,” he insisted.

“The government’s decision to relocate the cult’s members inside Iraq shows that the ideal consensus has not been reached yet. The MKO expulsion should be finalized as no Iraqi people as well as MPs want the country to be used to attack the neighbouring countries from,” editor of Iraqi Kurdistan’s Al-Amal Al-Islami newspaper said.

Iraqis will vote Sunday in parliamentary elections to determine who will govern the country.

Al-Attar labeled Saleh Al-Mutlaq and Dhafer Al-Ani views on the MKO as “unimportant”, insisting that “a large majority of Iraqi MPs wish MKO to be expelled”. “The two MPs are disqualified from running in Iraq’s general election,” he added.

“Despite the fact that Iraqi Transitional Council and Parliament insisted on expelling the terrorist cult, it has been able to keep its presence only thanks to the pressures of the US-led occupiers,” director of Iraq’s Centre for Developmental Studies commented.

“Legal mechanisms for expelling the terrorist cult will continue after the new government begins its work,” Al-Attar said. “The expulsion will be done more easily as the US-led coalition leaves Iraq in 2011 summer.”

“All Iraqi witness to the MKO’s involvement in suppressing Iraq’s 1991 anti-Saddam uprising, especially in Kurdistan,” he insisted, rejecting claims about MKO’s not involving in terror attacks against Iraqi people.

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Zeinab Taleb Jedi

US: Homeless woman was MKO top terrorist leader

An Iranian widow who became a naturalized US citizen 10 years ago was a top official for a heavily armed, Iraq-based terrorist organization dedicated to the violent overthrow of Iran’s government, the US government alleges in court documents. The documents, obtained from Brooklyn court files on Monday, say two confidential informants in Iraq identified Zeinab Taleb-Jedi, 51, as a leader of the Mujahedeen Khalq.

The group was identified in court papers as Mujahedin-e Khalq. One of the informants told the FBI that Taleb-Jedi was on a council”responsible for making leadership decisions for the organization, including approving specific acts of terrorism”against Iran, the papers said. Taleb-Jedi was arrested in March after flying from Jordan to Kennedy International Airport.

A judge agreed to release her on $500,000 bond. The court papers said she has been living at a women’s shelter in Manhattan. Taleb-Jedi was among 200 Muhjahedeen Khalq members detained and questioned by the FBI in 2004 after US military forces took over parts of Iraq once controlled by the group, the documents said. US soldiers seized tanks, anti-aircraft weapons, rocket-propelled grenade launchers and more than 420,000 pounds of plastic explosives.

At the time, Taleb-Jedi allegedly told agents she”wholeheartedly supports the Mujahedin,”the papers said. Federal prosecutors in Los Angeles, who have been investigating the group, announced last week that a grand jury in Brooklyn had indicted Taleb-Jedi on charges of providing support to a terrorist organization. If convicted, she faces up to 15 years in prison. The group, also known as the People’s Mujahedeen Organization of Iran, and its affiliates were deemed foreign terrorist organizations by the US State Department in 1997. The designations bar anyone in the United States from providing material support. The defendant, who was born in Iran, came to the United States on a student visa in 1978 to pursue a master’s degree in political science in Georgia, court papers said.

She later moved to Queens before settling in Virginia, where she became a naturalized US citizen. In her FBI interview, Taleb-Jedi told agents her husband joined the Mujahedeen and went to Iraq in 1986. In 1999, after learning her husband was killed in a bombing, she”left her job, sold all her belongings and traveled”to the group’s Ashraf Base in Iraq, 40 miles north of Baghdad, documents said. A call to her attorney on Monday was not immediately returned. Arguing for her release at an arraignment, defense attorney Justine Harris said her client had returned to the United States to see her adult son and to seek medical treatment for a severe digestive ailment that had pushed her weight down to 95 pounds.

“This a middle-age woman with absolutely no record,”the lawyer said. The group was founded in Iran in the 1960s and moved to Iraq in the early 1980s to base its activities against Iran’s government. It sided with Iraq in its 1980-88 war against Iran. The State Department says the groups were funded by Saddam Hussein, supported the seizure of the US Embassy in Tehran in 1979 and are responsible for the deaths of Americans in the 1970s.

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Iraqi Authorities' stance on the MEK

A lawsuit against the Mojahedin Khalq

Al-khaddran: We have set up a lawsuit against the Mojahedin Khalq

Al-khaddran added: "We hope the new government will remove this Organization from the land of Iraq and enforce the Constitution, which provides that Iraq not be used as a base for aggression and harm to neighbouring countries that enjoy good relations with them".Governor of Khales, Khalis Uday Al-khaddran, said he had filed a lawsuit on behalf of the citizens of Khales against the Mojahedin organization for the crimes perpetrated against them. Al-khaddran said that the MKO has held around 6000 dunums of land in Khalis district for more than 18 years. This organization was the right hand of the deposed (Saddam) regime and played a prominent role in sheltering and supporting what he described as (criminals of the state).
Al-khaddran added: "We hope the new government will remove this Organization from the land of Iraq and enforce the Constitution, which provides that Iraq not be used as a base for aggression and harm to neighbouring countries that enjoy good relations with them". At the same time I am requesting from humanitarian and international organizations that they find an alternative place for the organization and take them out of Iraq.
Diyala has seen a significant improvement in security since last July after the Camp of New Iraq (formerly Ashraf) came under the control of the Iraqi government, which has in turn offered MKO members that they may return to either Iran or to any other country. They do not come under the rules which apply to refuges or those with families within Iraq according to International law.
Al Dustour, Translated by Iran-interlink

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Massoud Rajavi

Rajavi comes to answer!

It is common in any relatively closed, hierarchical system with an emphasis on respectful and unquestionable obedience to the leader, on whom no sufficient checks and balances is placed, that nothing can make the leader accountable to the followers and to the outside world. For sure you will be cynical when you read a leader in guiding other people’s evolution claims his readiness to be accountable for his misdeeds. You may even become more suspicious especially when you hear Massoud Rajavi, believing in the necessity of deceiving unenlightened to rule over them and to advance his cult-like ambitions, is making the claim. In his message of January 20, he calls a set of imaginary audiences and declares his readiness to be accountable for the charges imposed on him during the last three decades from inside and outside the organization:
… for the time being I suffice to mention a point on Mojahedin, NLA, council of resistance and heavy charges made against us on the part of the regime as well as its agents and supporters. I am committed to account for all accusations and to clarify them for the Iranian people.
The reason why Rajavi has seemingly retreated his egocentric position of unaccountability to the inferiors is not clear; however, his statements imply that he still deems all these accusations related to the Iranian regime and its agents. As a result, he never trouble himself to answer these questions and doubts and also accuses his critics as infiltrators and agents of the Iranian regime. However, since his desired audience is outside the cultic circle of his organization and unfamiliar with his past history, Rajavi’s democratic and self-righteous gesture may justify it that coming to answer the questions posed on him is his absolute right. In this regard, we are to take a brief look at the concept of accountability in MKO’s organizational and ideological system and ideological revolution as well as the past history of Rajavi and his companions in defining this concept. Although these discussions are not novel or significant for those who have experienced the relations of Rajavi, they may be of a high interest for those having a superficial familiarity with the organization. The statements made by Mehdi Abrishamchi, the ex-husband of Rajavi’s present wife (Maryam Azdanlu), on the position of MKO leader may clarify the demagogic and fallacious claims of Rajavi. Referring to the concept of monotheism, Abrishamchi writes:
Theoretically, we know that God is one, yes there is one God and that is the main principle of our ideology yet the significant point is knowing the effects of this principle on the life of individuals.
Furthermore, he materializes the social effect and function of the monotheism:

In a summary, when an individual knows the leadership of the revolution and put him in his own position and notices not to be entangled with those issues whose solution lays in the hands of the leader, his intervention in ideological issues will be equal to his general echelon of qualifications in the organization and a balance is achieved. This individual never takes any position upper than that of the leadership in ideological recognition, if so, he may be claiming the position of the leader who is to be followed.
In a nutshell, inside the ideological, political, and organizational framework of Rajavi and also the larger echelon of the organization, any doubt and question on leadership and his actions, purposes and objectives is equal to an attempt of usurping and claiming the leadership status; from the viewpoint of Abrishamchi and Rajavi it is absolute polytheism and heresy whose punishment is organizational and ideological apostasy. According to Abrishamchi:
As mentioned already, inferiors to the ideological leader and his deputy are all accountable to them and their own upper-rankings. Yet, who is Massoud accountable to? Just to revolution. Ideologically, he is accountable to nobody except God. All members have rankings to whom they are accountable yet Masoud is not accountable to anyone except God.
He openly states that anyone coming to doubt the leadership and to question him has intentionally or unintentionally put himself in the position of God. In other words, as God is not accountable to anybody, MKO’s leadership is not accountable to the inferiors as well. In fact “Leadership can not bear any accountability to the inferiors”.
Now the question is that what is the destiny of someone who failed to recognize the defined position of the leadership in the organization and wanted to deal with it like the ordinary relations of the society? Abrishamchi takes the same position as that of Rajavi in this statement and puts the critic in the position of a convict to be charged with any accusation like being a detached member, betrayer and infiltrator:
As soon as we sit to judge Massoud and make accusations against him, and since his past history of competence looms in our mind, we immediately notice we can be a judge of this court just when we are not charged and accused ourselves since we have to first ponder our own charges to be able to speak about the accused one (Massoud).
It has to be pointed out that if the statements of Abrishamchi are not confirmed by Rajavi or he deems them to be distorted or changed he is welcomed to deny them completely. In this way, it may be reasonable to confirm Rajavi’s honesty in his recent statement. Of course, these are some instances of Rajavi’s failure in bearing criticism and accountability. He has always promised to answer ambiguities and questions arisen yet breaks his promise to kill time. We can also refer to the destiny of a number of the critics of Rajavi inside organization who had a tragic ending like fabricated suicide, accident, drowning, self-immolation, escape, heart attack, etc and have been buried somewhere in camp Ashraf or even outside the martyred cemetery of Mojahedin mainly because Rajavi calls them fetid bodies. Others were slaughtered in forced military operations like Eternal Light and thus, Rajavi not only succeeded to get rid of them all but also benefitted a propaganda blitz on their death as martyrs.

*All references are quoted from two speeches made by Mehdi Abrishamchi titled “on the ideological revolution inside MKO”.

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Maryam Rajavi

The Mask Maryam Rajavi wears

On February 23, official websites of the terrorist Mujahedin Khalq Organization (MKO/MEK/PMOI) announced that their she-guru Maryam Rajavi “met with officials and members of European Parliament”. “The meeting was organized in the run up to the International Day of Women” Mrs. Rajavi if you are sincere in your claims , then the first step would be to agree with the members’ right, the most basic right, including the right to visit their beloved ones easilyaccording to the group’s sites where Maryam Rajavi’s so-called speech was also published.

Under the cover of an elegant muslim Iranian woman, she claims to be concerned over what she calls “tragic suppression of women by the regime”. Then she introduces her cult of personality as an example of “women’s participation in leadership positions which supplies the dynamic and vitality for this resistance’s perseverance and progress”. She speaks of the role of her female members as “a guarantor for lasting democracy and development in tomorrow‘s Iran”

She also makes too much fanfare about “forced veiling in Iran and the inability of Islamic Republic to reform.”She ridiculously emphasizes that “let any woman choose what to wear and what not to wear”!

Yes, Mrs. Rajavi,
This is the minimum freedom for Iranian women as human beings. How can you guarantee lasting democracy in Iran while your cult members are all forced to wear scarves and military uniforms? Yes, let them choose what to wear and what not to wear. No Ashraf female member is allowed to wear the least casual clothes. They are never allowed to use cosmetics. If as you claimed, you are really inspired by the genuine Islam why are the members of your cult never allowed to decide for their eating time, their clothing, their sleeping time, their work schedule and any small choice they can have in their personal life?

Maryam Rajavi claims that women are suppressed for their appearance and for the manner they walk or talk. She might have forgotten that her cult members are not allowed to talk to their peers let alone talking to their opposite-sex comerades. In Camp Ashraf, even the time women can use eating place, gas station … are different from those of male members.

Mrs. Rajavi,
We say that if you are sincere in your claims for people’s freedom, then the first step would be to agree with the members’ right, the most basic right, including the right to choose their own clothing, to visit their beloved ones easily, to live among their family members especially their children and spouses, to get married and have children.

In Maryam Rajavi’s destructive cult the most fundamental human rights are denied, according to former members and numerous reports by journalists. Following the so-called ideological revolutions in the terrorist cult of MKO, all couples were forced to divorce even those who had once been forced to marry a comrade whom the leaders had ordered to marry.

Then in 1991, under the pretext of the Gulf War I all children were separated from their parents. Camp Ashraf was removed of children who were sent to Europe in order to be abused for the group’s propagandistic and fundraising activities.

In a terrorist destructive cult where any family life, emotion, love and individuality are forbidden, Maryam Rajavi’s claims for democracy and women’s freedom sound comic. For those who are informed of human right violations committed by MKO leaders, Maryam Rajavi’s speech in Europe is just like a hilarious comedy!

She speaks of complete equality in social, cultural and economic rights between women and men. It is all too much for Mrs. Rajavi while she is not able to guarantee the least right of living in a normal society with normal regulations and atmosphere.

Doubtlessly, Mrs. Rajavi’s few sympathizers in European Parliament including Mr. Alejo Videl – Quadras, EP Vice President and Edit Bauer of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality, should do some effort to increase their knowledge about the cult of Rajavi in order that they would not be tricked by Rajavi’s gang. They might not have considered the speeches of Mrs. Nasrin Ebrahimi (who defected from MKO destructive cult in 2008 used to live in Camp Ashraf for about thirteen years and witnessed a lot of terrifying facts about the cult) at the European Parliament on September ninth 2008 when she said:”the women in MEK are not only barred from marrying but they are forced to work for long hours, do so hard manual jobs under the hot sun every day that they no more look good, this way they do not think they can attract a man…” .

The Rajavi’s heighten their sabotage to the extreme extent when they try to cut female members of their cult from their only source of hope. ”they try to kill any hope in heart of women of Ashraf by removing their womb through a hysterectomy surgery which is operated under various pretexts. So far ten percent of Ashraf women have sustained such an operation” Nasrin Ebrahimi added. Is this the women right Maryam Rajavi promises to offer the Iranian women?

She proposes her only option for her alleged democratic change in Iran while she lacks the ability to find a solution to the problematic declining situation her group is stuck in. today the only option for victimized members of Rajavi’s cult is the dissolution of her cult in order to offer the captured members an opportunity to get released from the suffocating cult of MKO and to decide for their own fate with their own free will.

By Mazda Parsi

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Iran

Does fighting terrorism means supporting professional killers?

Iran: US war on terror, plot to train terrorists

Iran’s foreign minister says former US President George W. Bush’s so-called war on terror has actually served as a guise for training terrorists.

"Does fighting terrorism mean supporting professional killers?" Manouchehr Mottaki asked at the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, according to Foreign Ministry Spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast who accompanied him on the trip.

"The US must explain why it has scheduled a meeting with AbdolMalek Rigi. The US must explain what AbdolMalek Rigi was doing at the US base in Afghanistan and why he was going to meet high-ranking US officials at the US Manas base near the Kyrgyz capital Bishkek," he added.
Last week, Iranian security forces captured ringleader of the Jundallah terrorist group, Abdolmalek Rigi, while he was on a flight from Dubai to Kyrgyzstan.

"Doesn’t the US know that over 400 people have been killed or wounded in criminal activities carried out by this group?" Mottaki asked.

Mehmanparast said that the Iranian foreign minister had also criticized the United States’ European allies for removing the Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization (MKO) from their list of terrorist groups.

The MKO, listed as a terrorist group in Iran, Iraq, Canada, and the US, has claimed responsibility for numerous deadly attacks against Iranian government officials and civilians over the past 30 years.

The attacks include the assassination of the late president Mohammad-Ali Rajaei, prime minister Mohammad-Javad Bahonar and judiciary chief Ayatollah Mohammad Beheshti.

The MKO is also known to have cooperated with former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein in suppressing the 1991 uprisings in southern Iraq and the massacre of Iraqi Kurds.

The organization is, moreover, notorious for using cult-like intimidation tactics against its own members, such as the torture and murder of defectors.

0 comments
FacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappTelegramSkypeEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts