Nejat Bloggers

6 people escaped TTL in a week

Following the relocation of the MKO members in Temporary Transit Location (Camp Liberty), a new wave of defection started among the cult forces. 6 people escaped TTL in a week

Six dissociated members of the group who were kept as hostages by the leaders could manage to run away, last week.

The first group of escapees who left TTL last week included four people: Hassan Yazdani, Meysam Panahi, Shahin Karimi and Shahab Karimi.

The second group included two members named Mojtaba Hashemi and Majid Mohammadi.
Nejat Society congratulates these people for their release from the cult of Rajavi. It also sends congratulations to the defectors’ families who have been awaiting their return for years.

May 19, 2012 0 comments

Why delisting the MKO is a threat for peace?

To illuminate the minds of those who wonder why supporting Mujahedin Khalq Organization Why delisting the MKO is a threat for peace? cause danger to the world, we should have a look at various records on the history and current practices of the group. There have been various documented reports on the MKO including reports by RAND Corporation, 2009 and HRW’s “No Exit”, 2005 but recent analysis on the group and its supporters in the West sheds light on the potential threat of harboring a terrorist designated cult.

After the last enlightening article by Seymour Hersh on the American financial and military support for the group a large number of analysts and journalists commented on the issue criticizing the US government for their double standards towards terrorists.

Members of the MKO are so notoriously famous that no country is willing to accept them. Their fate in Iraq is uncertain. Martin kobler, the head of the United Nations Assistance Mission for Iraq (UNAMI) warns that finding a place for the group members after they leave Iraq “is the most difficult part of the story”. No country is willing to accept a number of brainwashed, isolated military trained cult-like insurgents. Josh Rogin of the cable also suggests that part of the difficulty of dealing with the MEK is that they have been cut off from the world for years and little is known about their individual histories.[1]
Having been isolated in a Camp in Iraqi deserts, under sever mind control techniques, the MKO have turned into a cult of personality that Jeremiah Goulka truly describes:

“I studied the MEK for the U.S. military and visited Camp Ashraf, the MEK facility 40 miles north of Baghdad. I also interviewed former MEK members. As Human Rights Watch also concluded, I saw that the MEK is a cult. It uses brainwashing, sleep deprivation, and forced labor to indoctrinate members. It segregates men from women, mandates celibacy, forces married members to divorce (except for its leaders), and separates families and friends who must seek permission just to converse.

MEK members must report their private sexual thoughts at group meetings and endure public shaming. In a Catch-22, those who deny having sexual thoughts are accused of hiding them and shamed, too. The cult has but one purpose: to put itself in charge in Iran.”[2]

Goulka concludes that an MEK regime in Iran will bring neither liberty nor justice.

The MKO is often described by as a “cult-like organization” with “totalitarian tendencies”. Former members of the group interviewed by various human rights bodies and journalists explain how they were victims of the totalitarian cult like organization. Owen Benett Jones in recent article on BBC “An Iranian Mystery: just who are the MEK” clarifies the two sides of positions towards the group. He himself wonders who to believe, former members who are either” embittered “or “broken”; or western supporters of the group who are either financially “motivated” or just “naïve”. However, he comes to a conclusion with his dilemma:” in over 25 years of reporting .I’ve been lied to often enough but, as successive former MEK members told what they had been through, their tears seemed real enough to me.”[3]

The MKO has also a four-decade history of violence, assassination and espionage against the Iranian people and authorities, as well as targeting American military and civilians living in Iran in the 1970’s. Tony Cartalucci also strongly criticizes Western support for the MKO as “treason and overt criminality”. He writes about the group’s terrorist acts:

"Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization (MEK), has carried out decades of brutal terrorist attacks, assassinations, and espionage against the Iranian government and its people, as well as targeting Americans including the attempted kidnapping of US Ambassador Douglas MacArthur II, the attempted assassination of USAF Brigadier General Harold Price, the successful assassination of Lieutenant Colonel Louis Lee Hawkins, the double assassinations of Colonel Paul Shaffer and Lieutenant Colonel Jack Turner, and the successful ambush and killing of American Rockwell International employees William Cottrell, Donald Smith, and Robert Krongard.

"Admissions to the deaths of the Rockwell International employees can be found within a report written by former US State Department and Department of Defense official Lincoln Bloomfield Jr. on behalf of the lobbying firm Akin Gump in an attempt to dismiss concerns over MEK’s violent past and how it connects to its current campaign of armed terror – a testament to the depths of depravity from which Washington and London lobbyists operate."[4]

But why is that the MKO can gain such a support from the West although it is literally a cult-like terrorist organization?

Actually, the MKO foists itself as a democratic freedom lover organization. Goulka writes about the MKO’s propaganda and how western figures are trapped by it:

"The MEK presents itself well and is good at running “Astroturf” campaigns. Its NCRI is a self-proclaimed “parliament in exile,” dedicated to the principles of western liberal democracy. Over the years, lots of American civilian and military officials have failed to do their homework and fallen for the MEK’s sales spiel, excited as they were to hear what they wanted to hear. (If something sounds too good to be true…)"[5]

What is the potential danger of harboring a terrorist cult?

As it is widely known by different reports, the MKO is more than a terrorist group, it is a cult of personality, around a disappeared leader, Massoud Rajavi very similar to that of Al-Qaida around Osama bin Ladan, maybe more dangerous. Giving financial and military support to members of a cult of personality with a history of numerous terrorist attacks may hardly endanger the Iranian National security because the cult of Rajavi barely has supporters inside Iran. Most Iranians view them as traitors. But, it will risk the US national security. Removing the MKO from US list of Foreign Terrorist Organization will allow the MKO to act –even more freely– in the US society. Members who are totally obedient to their leaders will not hesitate to run their cause in a western free environment –where they can accelerate the leaders ambitions for power achievement in Tehran. To gain such a goal war with Iran would be inevitable and more American soldiers would go to endless battles and more taxpayers’ dollars would d be spent for the so-called US national security – which is already threatened by the cult of Rajavi. The MKO is a key for war and insecurity not only for Iran and the region but for the US national security.

By Mazda Parsi

References:
[1]Rogin, Josh, U.N. Iraq chief:the countries of the world must take MEK ‘refugees’, The Cable, April26,2012
[2]Goulka, Jeremia, THE IRAN HAWKS FAVORITE TERROR GROUP, Salon.com, March 28, 2012
[3] Benett Jones, Owen, An Iranian mystery: just who are the MEK?, BBC, April16,2012
[4]Cartalucci, Tony, US State Department Hands Terror Cult US Base in Iraq, Infowars.com, March 9, 2012
[5]Goulka, Jeremia, INVESTIGATINS BEGIN INTO MEK SUPPORTERS, Salon.com, March28, 2012

May 3, 2012 0 comments

Nejat Publications

Pars Brief – Issue No.65

Inside this Issue:

1. HR Minster confirms the removal of 100 MEK from Iraq

2. Clinton urges MKO to complete move

3. U.S. urges court to stay out of decision on Iranian group

4. Ex-US officials investigated over speeches to Iranian dissident group on terror list

5. Our Men in Iran?

6. Guest Op-Ed: MEK and its material supporters in Washington

7. "CYBER TERRORISM": US-supported Terrorist Group MEK Plants Stuxnet Virus Malware to Disable Iran’s Nuclear Facilities

Download Pars Brief – Issue No.65
Download Pars Brief – Issue No.65

May 1, 2012 0 comments

Mujahedin Khalq; A proxy force

The Disgraceful Pro-MEK Lobbying Campaign Continues

Daniel Larison of the American Conservative website warned US politicians who are active in lobbying efforts to delist the Mujahedin Khalq Organization from the State Department list of The Disgraceful Pro-MEK Lobbying Campaign Continues Foreign Terrorist Organizations. He states that the group advocates including Tom Ridge, Hugh Sheldon and Patrick Kennedy “make fools of themselves dreaming of the MKO as a democratic, freedom loving group. Larison criticizes US former officials for their “incredibly foolish” support for a terrorist designated organization:

“This is disgraceful. It is also exactly what I have assumed is behind the push to remove the MEK from the Foreign Terrorist Organization list: to embrace the MEK as part of a policy of regime change. It’s also incredibly foolish. Iranians loathe the MEK. Aligning the U.S. with the MEK for the express purpose of overthrowing the Iranian government would not only further alienate the Iranian people from the U.S. and give an extra boost to the regime by making Iranian propaganda claims into official policy, but it would also fail to achieve its goal because no effort by the MEK to change the Iranian government could ever succeed. The Iranian regime hates the MEK for the same reason any established government hates a group dedicated to overthrowing it, but it doesn’t actually fear that the group could successfully overthrow the government.”

As Mr. Larison quotes from the MKO supporters, they allegedly believe that the group is “a movement that epitomizes the very spirit of the Arab Spring”. Refuting such a naïve idea, Larison clarifies that Arab Spring has nothing to do with a “totalitarian Marxist Cult:

“..Iran and the U.S. consider the MEK a terrorist group, which by many accounts they still are. Whatever else one wants to say about the “Arab Spring,” its spirit has nothing to do with a totalitarian Marxist cult. It is a colossal lie to claim that the MEK favors creating a “liberal democracy that champions a non-nuclear Iranian future, equal rights for women and minorities, and a free press.” Later on, the authors refer to the MEK as a “declared democratic ally,” which is also entirely false. The MEK is neither democratic nor is it an ally of the United States in any sense of the word. “

Daniel Larison concludes that a government ruled by undemocratic, Marxist cult of the Rajavi would be repressive, violent and would be doubtlessly seized by force.

April 26, 2012 0 comments

Mujahedin Khalq; A proxy force

MKO: US-Israel’s Men in Iran

Day after day, dimensions of the MKO’s role as a proxy force of the United States and Israel government gets more and more clear. Seymour Hersh, the venerable American journalist wrote another enlightening story in the New Yorker on April6, 2012. According to Hersh’s inquiry, not only Israel but the US have been training, financing, and harboring the Mujahedin Khalq Organization. Hersh reports that during the Bush administration, the joint Special Operation Command (JSOC) trained, funded and armed MKO operatives at Department of Energy’s Nevada National Security Site. The training in the far mountainous arid area in South of Nevada began in 2005. [1]

Hersh’s revelations come a few months after NBC News exposed that the Israeli Intelligence Mossad trained the MKO agents to assassinate Iranian nuclear scientists.[2]

The US started housing and protecting the MKO in 2003 after the group’s main military and financial sponsor Saddam Hussein, fell off power. "The MEK’s ties with Western intelligence deepened after the fall of Iraqi Regime in 2003,and JSOC began operating inside Iran in an effort to substantiate the Bush administration’s fears that Iran was building the bomb at one or more secret underground locations,” according to Seymor Hersh. "funds more covertly passed to a number of dissident organizations, for intelligence collection and ultimately for anti-regime terrorist activities.”[3]

Hersh affirms that US-sponsored operations in Iran continue until today.

It is documentedly clear that the US and Israel are waging a covert war against Iran and the MKO is their stimulating tool to facilitate warmongers’ approach to attack Iran. Hersh quotes a retired US general that the group members got the standard training in communication, cryptography, small –unit tactics, and weaponry that went on for six months. [4]

The advocacy for the MKO-although listed as a foreign terrorist organization – in the US is both logistical and congressional. Several former American political figures, who have intensified their lobbying effort to delist the group, claim that it is fully in line with American foreign-policy and is well positioned to assist the US in the so-called future military confrontation with Iran.

The MKO advocates suggest the group’s role in the alleged revelations about Iranian nuclear program as a good excuse to trust it in the war campaign against IRI. On the alleged intelligence gathering by the MKO, Jeremiah Goulka ,an American lawyer and analyst who also assisted to write the report on the MKO in Rand Corporation, believes: ”Maryam trumpets the dangers of Iran’s nuclear program and gives the NCRI credit for discovering Iran’s Natanz facility. That self-serving claim is doubtful, as is the NCRI’s posture as a democratic government-in-waiting. While its propaganda arm espouses Western values to Western audience, the MEK continues to force-feed its doctrine to members who may not criticize the Rajavis and are not free to leave the Ashraf compound.”[5]

Scott Horton of the Harpers Magazine also asserts:” These claims might be true, but they don’t convincingly address the MEK’s historic use of terrorist tactics, its pattern of human rights abuses, and its culture of violence.”[6]

Horton advises US administration to remember the lesson they learned from Iraq war that was waged based on fake intelligence, too. “Moreover, the Iraq war should have left Americans wiser about émigré groups who peddle evidence of weapons programs as a rationale for the invasion of their homeland and for their eventual installation as a new and friendly government,” he writes.[7]The neo-cons are apparently building another case of war just as a repeat of history.

Despite the subpoenas the US Treasury department issued to investigate the speaking fees these US former politicians received for speaking on behalf of the MKO in its conferences and rallies, the Justice Department hasn’t taken legal action against them for crime of material support they offered a terrorist designated group.

“The Obama Administration may be caving into the political pressure brought by the MEK’s well compensated Beltway friend,” Scott Horton writes.[8]
If this happened and the MKO was delisted, it would eventually seek power in Iran. Then an MKO government in Iran would create a terribly dangerous threat for the West. It would create an official al-Qaida style regime that would doubtlessly turn back against the US. Hopefully, this will never happen.

By Treasury Department starting investigations on the MKO advocates, the Obama Administration might want to convince us that their anti-terrorism motto is not just a “laughing matter”. And, warmongers in the US government may realize that there is no convincible reason to embrace a terrorist group. As Jeremiah Goulka suggests: ”ignorance, profit and the dreams of a terrorist –cult group are lousy reasons to start a war.”[9]

By Mazda Parsi

References:
[1]Hersh, Seymour, Our Men in Iran, The NewYorker, April 5, 2012
[2] Engel, Richard& Windrem, Robert, Israel teams with terror group to kill Iran’s nuclear scientists, US officials tell NBC News, MSNBS, February 9, 2012
[3] Hersh, Seymour, Our Men in Iran, The NewYorker, April 5, 2012
[4]ibid
[5] Goulka Jeremiah, the Iran War Hawks’ Favorite Cult Group, Salon.com, March 28, 2012
[6]Horton Scott, For Official Washington, Terrorism is a Laughing Matter, Harper’s Magazine, April 9, 2012
[7]ibid
[8]ibid
[9] Goulka Jeremiah, the Iran War Hawks’ Favorite Cult Group, Salon.com, March 28, 2012

April 18, 2012 0 comments

Mujahedin Khalq; A proxy force

War on the MKO or war of the MKO

When the US President first spoke of the "war on terror", the world might barely think of a day when American politicians openly support a terrorist designated group , the Mojahedin khalq War on the MKO or war of the MKO Organization. Seemingly the war on terror has turned into the war of terror. The world can also expect the day US Congress will be lobbied by Al-Qaida supporters to delist their notorious cult as what the MKO is doing today. “It’s extraordinary that so many distinguished public servants would shill for a group that has American blood on its hands, “according to a US official who was shocked by his colleagues’ dual approach towards terrorism.[1]

The facts on terrorist substance of the Mujahedin Khalq Organization are “indisputable” for the US State Department, according to Reza Marashi, director of research at the National Iranian American Council and a former Iran desk officer at the US State Department. ”the requisite evidence to legally maintain the MEK’s terrorist designation is ample and indisputable,”He writes.[2]

But the juicy story here is that an indisputably designated terrorist group is sponsored by Israel and a heavy bunch of former US politicians. The MKO runs ads on American TV channels and newspapers.[3] The ads imperatively call on Secretary Clinton to delist the group. Deadly attacks on Iranian nuclear scientists were carried out by the MKO which is armed, trained and funded by Israeli Mossad, US officials told NBC News.[4]

For the US former officials who advocate the MKO’s cause in the Capital Hill, the case seems to be the matter of money. Some of these former top government officials, who have publicly advocated delisting of the group, have received federal subpoenas from the Treasury Department. The investigation is focused on figuring out where the speaking fees the MKO rally panelist – including conferences in European Capitals- received come from.[5]

Ed Rendell, former Pennsylvania governor and ex-chairman of the democratic National Committee, who was the first person to receive subpoena and has received $160,000 over the past year from the MKO – or allegedly from its exiled sympathizers-claims that the fees came from wealthy American and foreign supporters of the MKO not the group itself but NBC News offers one clue for the source of the money. A small Pennsylvania based speakers firm called Speakers Access wrote an email in September inviting a Washington based national Security Expert to speak at a conference in Geneva, Switzerland "on behalf of our client ,National Council of Resistance of Iran, Foreign Affairs Committee”, according to Michael Isikof, National investigative correspondent of the AFP.[6]

Isikof continues ,”the email was later turned over to the FBI and other US officials. The Speakers Access executive who wrote the email, who asked not to be identified ,said the email was a “mistake “ and that the client was actually another organization–“the committee for Human Rights in Iran”, which is not on the terror list but which has the same contact in Paris as the National Council of Resistance of Iran.[7]

It is obvious that the money come from the MKO — under different cover names. The legendary wealth of the group will not end soon. But as Clare Malone of The Prospect writes,” more disturbing is the fact that the MEK is basically a cult. In a 2009 report on the group, the Rand Corporation characterizes the MEK’s practices as ‘cultic’ and their recruitment tactics as ‘deceptive “. She also quotes from Elizabeth Rubin as a journalist who spent an extended amount of time in Camp Ashraf that Friendships and all emotional relationships are forbidden in the MKO. [8]

As a matter of fact, the case of the MKO designation in US FTO list sounds complicated but one thing is clear: The MKO’s Cult-like nature is today as destructive as its capacity for terrorism. "The group — which was once allied with Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, is also viewed warily because of the slavish devotion of its followers to its Paris based leader, Maryam Rajavi,” states Isikoff.[9]

As it was reported in the media, a few weeks ago US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton told that a decision on the MKO’s terrorist designation is pending in part to see if the group peacefully relocates to the new Temporary Transit Location near Baghdad. It’s definitely a weird criterion to define a group’s status as a foreign terrorist organization.” simply put, it is unacceptable to delist a designated FTO in return for them agreeing to relocate” Reza Marashi asserts, ”so as long as the MEK’s organizational structure remains in place, it legally remains a terrorist organization – regardless of where its base is located.”[10]

The case especially for the leaders of the MKO got more complicated when on March 27, 2012 Reuters reported that the Obama administration on Monday urged a US appeals court not to interfere with its review and decision making process over whether to remove the group from US terror list.[11]

According to Reuters, the States Department urged the court to stay out of the matter, saying it was continuing to evaluate the matter, consulting with the intelligence and other government agencies and that it had met with representatives of the Mujahedin-e Khalq .[12]

By the way, the MKO found it easy to buy its legitimacy in the US. As it goes for the MKO,” money talks” to US politicians.

Pro-MKO newspaper and TV ads are the evidence of this true fact. In the United States of America – land of Double Standards – nothing is impossible. You may see other terrorist groups including Al Qaida spending millions of dollars on lobbying to get delisted. For so0me of US former officials Law enforcement seems to be kind of joke.

By Mazda Parsi

References:
[1]Isikof, Michael, Ex-US officials investigated over speeches to Iranian dissident group on terror list, AFP, March 17, 2012
[2]Marashi, Reza, Money vs. Facts: Mujahedin-e Khalq Is a Terrorist Organization, Huffingtonpost, March 15 2012
[3]Malone, Clare, What’s Up with All the MEK Ads?, The Prospect, March 9,2012
[4] Engel, Richard& Windrem, Robert, Israel teams with terror group to kill Iran’s nuclear scientists, US officials tell NBC News, MSNBS, February 9, 2012
[5] Isikof, Michael, Ex-US officials investigated over speeches to Iranian dissident group on terror list, AFP, March 17, 2012
[6] ibid
[7] ibid
[8] Malone, Clare, What’s Up with All the MEK Ads?, The Prospect, March 9,2012
[9] Isikof, Michael, Ex-US officials investigated over speeches to Iranian dissident group on terror list, AFP, March 17, 2012
[10] Marashi, Reza, Money vs. Facts: Mujahedin-e Khalq Is a Terrorist Organization, Huffingtonpost, March 15 2012
[11]Reuters, U.S. urges court to stay out of decision on Iranian group, March 26, 2012
[12] ibid

April 5, 2012 0 comments

Mujahedin Khalq; A proxy force

Michael Rubin: Working with the MEK is bad policy

Last month, the US department of Treasury issued subpoenas against “a bipartisan array of prominent former US officials who have accepted hefty honoraria from Mujahedin Khalq(MEK) Michael Rubin: Working with the MEK is bad policy front groups even though the State Department lists the MEK as a terrorist group.” Michael Rubin of commentary magazine considers the MEK’s campaign to be delisted as their “largest war”.

Rubin criticizes US officials for their paid support for the MEK terrorists:

“There is no doubt that in the past, the MEK engaged in terrorism against Americans and that it has embraced a fiercely anti-Western ideology. Proponents of delisting the MEK, however, argue that the group has not engaged in terrorism against the United States or its interests for decades. The State Department may eventually be forced by the letter of the law to delist the MEK. That does not mean the group is entitled to any American support. The group’s culpability in recent terrorist attacks in Iran is murkier. Still, it would be a mistake to boil the MEK issue—and the question of U.S. support—down to the terrorism listing, however. Working with the MEK is simply bad policy.”

Although Rubin is not a fan of Islamic Republic government, he truly recognizes the terrorist substance of the MEK:

“Iranians living under the regime’s yoke hate the MEK. That is not regime propaganda; it is fact, one to which any honest analyst who has ever visited Iran can testify. Ordinary Iranians deeply resent the MEK’s terrorism, which has targeted not only regime officials, but also led to the deaths of scores of civilians. During the Iran-Iraq War—a conflict that decimated cities and led to tens of thousands of civilian deaths—the MEK sided with Saddam Hussein. No Iranian will ever forgive that treason. Iranians see the MEK in the same manner that Americans view American Taliban John Walker Lindh.”

April 3, 2012 0 comments

Mujahedin Khalq Organization's Propaganda System

MKO’s weapon: nonstop propaganda campaign in media

“Dirty, unusable, water shortage, power outage, highly controlled prison equipped with espionage cameras”; these are the alleged imperfections of Temporary Transit Location that are widely launched in the Mujahedin Khalq Organization’s hues and cries, these days. The first group of 397 members of the MKO moved to TTL on February 18.

The MKO’s slanderous statements on the so-called defects of the new location soon came after their resettlement. The group primarily accused the United Nations Assistance Mission for Iraq (UNAMI) which in January said Liberty (Temporary Transit Location) met” international humanitarian standards “ of misrepresenting conditions there, according to AFP.[1]

AFP calls the MKO’s propaganda campaign in the media as “statement issuing ire”. W.G Dunlop of AFP writes,“the PMOI[MKO]’s focus on public relations campaigns marked by frequent statements to the media and cultivating well-known western politicians to speak on its behalf differs dramatically from its past activities,”.[2]
The report states that the MKO’s spokesman Shahriar Kia sends emails accusing the UN of telling ”lies" and filing “unrealistic report” on condition of TTL as well as forcing residents of Ashraf to move to it.

It is far and wide known that TTL (formerly called Camp Liberty) had previously housed 5000 American troops and as Martin Kobler the UN representative ,told AFP” it should be possible to have the infrastructure ready for these 400 persons who are now living there.”[3]

But, it seems that the MKO’s “flurry of statements” speaking of conspiracies, aims to acheive something extra.

On March4, Assasicated Press also reported of a statement issued by the MKO that proposed “to temporarily move to the Jordanian border instead of Camp Liberty near Baghdad.” The group once more criticized the alleged poor conditions of TTL.”None of the minimum assurances that Ashraf residents had sought has been met”, the statement said. And, Maryam Rajavi offered her golden suggestion: “camp residents are ready to relocate temporarily to the Jordanian border this month in an area once set up as a tent city to house asylum seekers after the outbreak of the Iraq war in 2003”, AP reported. [4]

According to the group’s statement, it would handle expenses for the move. [5] What motivation makes Rajavi to propose such a suggestion?

The history of the MKO’s foreign relations includes Jordan as one of the allies of the group especially during Saddam Hussein’s era. In 2008, some members of the House of Representatives of Jordan accepted the group’s invitation to attend its conferences in European capitals. [6]

A day after Rajavi proposed her impudent plan, Jordan authorities in their turn rejected the suggestion.”Jordan is committed in its obligation that it should not interfere in the affairs of other countries,” a source in the Jordanian Interior Ministry told AL Arab Alyawm Newpaper. [7]

It seems promising to conclude that the MKO leader is highly confused about how to handle her cult of personality after the closure of camp Ashraf. She hopes to be able to gather her forces together in a tent city but out of Iraqi control. She might hunt for building another “Camp Ashraf”, this time in Jordanian territory!

By Mazda Parsi

References:
[1] Dunlop, W.G, Iran exiles in Iraq do battle using press release, AFP, March 5, 2012
[2]ibid
[3]ibid
[4]Associated Press, Iranian opposition group eye Jordan relocation, March 4, 2012
[5]ibid
[6]BBC, Jordanian MPs advised not to attend PMOI conference, December 11, 2008
[7]Kuna, Jordan confirms rejection of building a camp for MEK to its territory, March 5, 2012 (Originally Arabic, Translated by Iran-interlink)

March 8, 2012 0 comments

Newer Posts

Older Posts