…”MKO supposed they will be welcomed by France thanks to their role in Iran’s post-election events, but Paris left them hopeless in Camp Ashraf,”said the source who spoke on condition of anonymity… Scores of Ashraf residents believe that they have no role to play following the fall of Saddam Hussein and they are willing to return to Iran following the camp’s siege by Iraqi forces, but they are prevented by MKO hardliners, the Iraqi newspaper reported.

Mr.Ahmad and Jamshid Sarayee and Mr.Yanpey who were banned behind the bars of Mujahedin at Camp Ashraf returned home and joined their families. Within a friendly atmosphere at Nejat Society Gorgan Office, the defectors gathered together and shared their bitter memoirs of the days of their being captives of MKO and that their new life in their motherland is filled with joy and peace.

Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council Saeed Jalili accused Germany of supporting anti-Iran terrorist group, the Mojahedin-e Khalq Organization (MKO), by allowing the group to have”bases”in that country. Talking to the online site of the Hamburg-based weekly news magazine Der Spiegel, Jalili said,”The Berlin government is promoting (MKO) terror”… by permitting it to have”bases in Germany.” held the MKO responsible for attacks in his country, the Islamic republic news agency reported.

(An interview with Batool Soltani on MKO self-immolations – Part 21)..A look at the organization’s[MKO/MEK/PMOI] own media at that time and later reveals that it had designated a big bulk of its propaganda space, both cyber and non-cyber, for the reflection of the relevant issues and news and did not spare to stick even at the trifles. The origin of these news was often the organization itself and most often used them quoted from other news agencies; as it benefitted the effect of media coverage on the incidents of 17 June immolations.

Despite Mojahedin’s attempt to exaggerate their status in international scene, the European countries even fail to recognize the legitimacy of Mojahedin/MKO/MEK/PMOI as an opposition. This paradoxical policy taken by the West has its roots in political considerations and can be discussed in depth. The unstable and hopeless situation of MKO in the past three decades proves that no country consents to support Mojahedin ..The problems Mojahedin have created for European countries in last three decades and the considerable costs paid for their expelling from Iraq ..

MEK despite what its leaders claim, has never followed a peaceful option to achieve its goals. Massoud Rajavi, like Stalin, divided the world to two groups:”With MEK and Against MEK”[MKO/PMOI]; he isolated the organization behind the barbed wires so no idea or no individual is able to get in or out..The culture of violence is not only included in physical violence but also in verbal violence. The physical violence is based on verbal violence.

As the MKO’s propaganda claims, on September 5th, the doctors recommended about 15 participants to stop their hunger strike because they were going to reach the unreturnable point! If the claim had been true, at least a number of those participants would have died until now, but there have been no news on the death of any of those participants yet. The current situation shows that the few people who were on hunger strike, were just playing a dramatic show..The criminal leaders of MKO terrorist cult defeated in their new show

(An interview with Batool Soltani on MKO self-immolations – Parts nineteen-twenty).. … it was the attempt to mythicize their death and consecrate them as saints and legendry heroines. Multitudes of poems, elegies and songs as well as the already mentioned mystical dances were composed and manipulated to justify the wounded and the dead of the immolation operations … The function of art was converted here; to die for the ideals is evaluated a fair, worthy death, but to die for an egoist who believes in no humanistic ideal value ..