The MEK; the Hypocrites

Treasonous Mojahedeen

Last week Massoud Rajavi’s minions outdid themselves by raising over a million dollars at an event in Dallas with the help of John Bolton and other Neocons. This is the latest chapter in a lengthy history of partnership between the Mojahedeen (MEK) and Iran’s enemies.

John Bolton was invited as replacement for Rudy Giuliani who abruptly cancelled just before the event. The MEK organizers did not announce the venue for the event, likely in fear of potential backlash by the local Iranian community.

Articles and videos replete with statements by Bolton and Giuliani on the need to bomb Iran are easily available online, also expressed with equal zeal by Rajavi’s cult. While Bolton and Giuliani call for bombing Iran and "crippling sanctions", the MEK do just the same, only replacing "Iran" with "Mullah’s regime." But alas, the target in both cases remains the same–the people of Iran.

The issue with the MEK is not a philosophical one. It is simple. What these Islamist Marxian terrorists have done throughout their existence can be summed up in one word: treason.

From licking the backside of Soviet Russia, to bending over for their "Imam" Khomeini, to doing "Brother Saddam’s" bidding, and now prostituting themselves to Israel and its Neocons–theirs has been a history of constant betrayal–betrayal the likes of which has no equivalent in modern Persian history.

More than one million was raised by a group with a blood soaked past with the help of the Neocons, another group with hands drenched in blood. The target: Iran. And yet, America’s Iranians have yet to bat an eye. John Bolton and Rajavi’s minions may eventually sow the destruction they seek, and if they do, none other is to blame but our silence.

By Kourosh Ighani

February 28, 2013 0 comments

Media

Whoops! What a big gaffe in the US report!

Did Pentagon lobby for Mojahedin Khalq?

Letter to the editor
Mail on Sunday Ebrahim Khodabandeh

Mr. Geordie Greig.

An unpublished report produced by the US Library of Congress for the Department of Defense (the Pentagon), has been continuously quoted by the Mojahedin-e Khalq terrorist cult in their media since it was conveniently ‘leaked’ to the internet in January. The so-called ‘Pentagon report’ mentioned my name along with that of my brother and my sister-in-law, but because what was written was so obviously made-up to fulfill the agenda of the MEK themselves, I chose to ignore it.

Then in an article dated February 16, 2013, the British newspaper Mail-on-Sunday also referred to this report and again this has been widely used by the cult in its media. Amused by the dramatic tabloid headline "British housewife accused by the US of spying for Iran ‘to save her brother-in-law’s life’", I had a closer look to find out why this article had been published six weeks after the report was first leaked.

The US report claims that in 2002: "She (i.e. my sister in law Anne Singleton) agreed to cooperate with MOIS (Iran’s ministry of intelligence) to save her brother-in-law’s life – he (i.e. me, Ebrahim Khodabandeh) was still a member of MEK at the time."

In 2002 I was living in one of the MEK’s bases in London. This means that my life was in danger inside the MEK in the UK!

In my opinion the Mail-on-Sunday article was published specifically to cover up this gaffe. It even points to this in the title.

At the start of the article it says: "Anne Singleton, 53, is alleged to have been blackmailed into training with the Iranian secret service during a visit to Tehran in 2002. The Pentagon-commissioned report claims that Mrs Singleton and her Iranian husband, Massoud Khodabandeh, 56, agreed to work for the regime in return for saving the life of his jailed brother." [bold added]

Not only is this untrue, it is yet another gaffe. The original report did not say that I was in jail at that time and the author of the article either did not bother to read the actual report, or was probably as confused as everyone else who read it as to what it was actually trying to say.

The fact is that I was arrested in Syria and taken to prison in Iran in June 2003.

In the year 2002 I was still a member of the MEK living in their collective base in London. My brother and my sister-in-law who had both left the MEK had established the iran-interlink.org website and were active in exposing the violation of human rights inside Rajavi’s cult which had been going on for many years.

I can tell from my 23 years’ experience and as one of the key personnel in the MEK’s Foreign Affairs Department in Europe that the gaffes made in the report and in the article both originated from the MEK.

Ebrahim Khodabandeh
February 20, 2013

February 23, 2013 0 comments

Mujahedin Khalq Organization's Propaganda System

Vain Attempt to Question the UN Legitimacy

MKO fails to understand that it is making a futile attempt to question the legitimacy of the UN

The undeniable fact about the UN is that it is a recognized unique international character along with its affiliated Vain Attempt to Question the UN Legitimacy councils, bodies and committees. It has a global responsibility to fulfill and works on a broad range of fundamental issues and if it ever engages itself in solving regional differences, disputes and conflicts, that is because to achieve greater general causes and to coordinate efforts for a safer world. In the same way, when the UN Secretary-General officially appointed Mr. Martin Kobler as his Special Representative for Iraq and Head of UNAMI on 11 August 2011, he tasked Mr. Kobler with sensitive duties to take up. As Mr. Kobler said upon his arrival in Baghdad, “I am privileged to be here to contribute to serving and assisting Iraq and its people at a time when the country is going through an important phase in its transition towards a peaceful and prosperous state”.

As a matter of fact, Mr. Kobler is not in Iraq to deal with the never-ending problems, better to say non-stop excuse makings, of an outcast terrorist group that has no respects for internal or international agreements. As a coordinator to help solve one among many problems in Iraq, Mr. Kobler did his best to mediate a settlement between the Iraqi government and Mojahedin Khalq Organization (MKO, MEK, PMOI, MCR, NLA). The issue of Camp Ashraf, MKO’s bastion located in eastern Iraq, has been one of the main issues dealt with by UNAMI for more than two years. In line with a memorandum of understanding signed in December 2011 by the UN and the Iraqi Government to resolve the situation, the Ashraf residents were re-located to a transit location near Baghdad known as Camp Liberty to carry out a process to determine refugee status again by another office of the UN, UNHCR.

But Mr. Kobler, unfamiliar with MKO’s unconventional thanksgiving, never anticipated that his humanitarian efforts would leave him the most hated and despised man in the eyes of MKO along with Iranian and Iraqi officials. Strong condemnation of Mr. Kobler’s efforts and announcing his boycott as well as seeing him biased and siding with Iran and Iraq regimes is not an unprecedented campaign since MKO’s safe settlement in Camp Liberty. Even after the recent mortar attacks against Camp Liberty, Mr. Kobler did not hesitate to request the Iraqi authorities to ensure medical care for the wounded and confirmed that all those injured have been hospitalized. However, the most unethical, shameful attack against him that raised outcry from sensible politicians was made after the bloody incident when Rudy Guiliani, the former New York mayor, lambasted Mr. Kobler saying:

“You allowed it to become a concentration camp and you permitted it to become a killing field. You shouldn’t resign. Ban Ki-moon should fire you today.”

While the UN monitors are still on the ground and Mr. Kobler has asked the Iraqi authorities to promptly conduct an investigation into the mortar explosions, why is MKO pressing the UN’s head to dismiss his Special Representative for Iraq? That is mainly because Mr. Kobler has a general and humanitarian cause to fulfill rather than bowing down to irrational, impractical demands of a terrorist cult; that is because he cannot be bought and exploited as many other paid advocates of the group like Rudy Guiliani himself; that is because his efforts to redeem the enslaved insiders goes against the group’s barbaric plots to victimize them; that is because he played a decisive role in closing the cult’s bastion and returning the occupied lands to their real owners and … .

Mr. Kobler is not easily corruptible and cannot be manipulated as a stooge of MKO’s propaganda campaign; he is experienced enough not to be trapped in group’s provoked propaganda brawls and keeps away from rebutting unproven allegations leveled against him. In contrast to MKO’s press to be recognized an entity with exclusive privileges and rights, Mr. kobler insists to devote efforts to recognize the rights of the insiders as human beings with the rights of deciding for a free life in a third country. MKO fails to understand that it is making a futile attempt to question the legitimacy of the UN and its representatives. An effective cooperation is a more sensible approach, a right path which MKO is unfamiliar with.

February 18, 2013 0 comments

Camp Liberty

Inhabitants of Liberty do not enjoy the minimum of security

Urgent call
Inhabitants of Camp Liberty do not enjoy the minimum of security under Rajavi

It is 10 years now since the Baghdad dictator, the only state sponsor of MKO terrorist cult up to now, has been toppled, but the members are still both mentally and physically captive in the hands of Rajavi. As far as the suffering families whose loved ones remain confined by the MKO are concerned, the fall of Saddam Hussein did not improve their situation and did not lead to their safety. On the contrary it ended in greater threat and suffering. The families are shocked by the passivism of international organizations, in particular the UN in the face of this situation.

The process of the past 10 years, particularly the past 3 years during which the families have remained in Iraq with the hope of learning about their loved ones’ wellbeing, shows that the only party who doesn’t want to lift the burden of the MKO from the shoulders of the oppressed Iraqi nation is Massoud Rajavi. It is obvious that the burden of the MKO – the legacy of Saddam Hussein and a threat to national security – under pressure from the occupying forces, is still a problem for the Iraqis.

Previously we revealed reports from inside Camp Liberty that the top officials of the MKO were instructed to demonstrate that living conditions in Liberty are very difficult in order to feed the organization’s propaganda machine which in turn tries to put pressure on the UN and the government of Iraq, and follows the line of “getting back to Ashraf”.

News which has emerged following the hand-made missile attack on the camp which resulted several casualties, reveals that the officials of the MKO tried to impose every kind of obstacle to prevent the wounded being taken to hospitals in Baghdad in order to add to the loses. This attack, considering the atmosphere of revenge within some Iraqi forces that know the MKO as collaborators with Saddam Hussein in suppressing the Iraqi people, could easily have been predicted and the same threat still remains.

It is routine in the Rajavi cult to create martyrs and Rajavi calls it “opening a nut with blood”. In his previous speeches about the incident of April 8, 2011 which led to the deaths of 36 individuals, Rajavi had said that ‘with this amount of martyrs we managed to inspire the world and managed to delay evacuating Ashraf garrison’.

It is worth mentioning that in that incident some individuals died because the MKO prevented them from being taken to hospital immediately. Rajavi’s policy is to make the number of martyrs as high as possible for propaganda purposes. Now that Rajavi is following the path of “returning to Ashraf”, he strives to increase the number of dead in Liberty.

We know that the Iraqis did all in their capacity to help the wounded and gave every sort of aid to transfer them to hospitals in Baghdad and even managed to take some and have them treated. But the MKO officials of the camp deliberately tried to prevent this in order to increase the number of dead for propaganda use.

Rajavi tries to control both internal and external opposition and protest by claiming that he is struggling against the Islamic Republic of Iran and is giving so much blood for this struggle. He always pushes such claims at his critics instead of answering their sincere queries. He tries to legitimize his actions by claiming to have more martyrs than others.

Why does Rajavi insist on going back to Ashraf?

Considering the ongoing security status of Iraq, which is one of the worst in the world, it is obvious that the deceived followers of Rajavi residing in Camp Liberty do not enjoy any security. But the question is: if these people do not feel safe just outside Baghdad in an American base, how would they be safer nearer to the Iranian border and far away from Baghdad? If Rajavi is honest and his real concern is his followers’ security he should have asked for them to be transferred out of Iraq to a third country or at least to the west of Iraq further from the Iranian border.

The truth is that Liberty is much smaller than Ashraf and Rajavi’s cultic apartheid cannot be enforced in it so easily; gossip spreads quicker amongst the people and therefore cultic control is much harder. What has no place in Rajavi’s scheming is the life of the members of his cult and he even prefers to have more casualties for using in his propaganda campaign.

It must be mentioned that returning to Ashraf would be the clearest indication that the organization is to be restored for terrorist activities. This would make the present situation even more complicated and in consequence both the national security of Iraq and the security of the residents of the camp would be at greater risk.

Sahar Family Foundation which represents the families of the trapped members of the MKO in Iraq wishes to draw the attention of all international and humanitarian organizations worldwide, in particular the UN and UNAMI and the SGSR Mr Martin Kobler to the fact that while the residents of Camp Liberty are under the cultic rule of Rajavi they will not enjoy the least bit of security.

We urge all western countries and humanitarian organizations, despite all the obstacles created by Massoud Rajavi, to do all in their capacity to transfer the MKO members in Iraq to a third country and let their families be gratified.

February 17, 2013 0 comments

Mujahedin Khalq Organization's Propaganda System

MKO losing the opportunity to run its new plot

The February 9th mortar attack on the Temporary Transit Location (TTL) for the members of the Mujahedin MKO losing the opportunity to run its new plot Khalq Organization known as Camp Liberty, which left 7 dead and dozens injured, opened a new opportunity to the group leaders to run their new plot:”Return to Ashraf”.

The group said that more than 100 had been injured in the shelling and its demands to return to its previous location in Iraq, Camp Ashraf, had been ignored, New York Times reported.[1]

A few hours after the Liberty attack, the MKO websites launched largescale propaganda over the issue. They held an event where a number of their supporters including Howard Dean, Patrick Kennedy, and Strauan Stevenson, spoke on behalf of the group’s recently taken agenda; they all called for residents’ return to Camp Ashraf. Among the event speakers was Rudy Giuliani, former mayor of New York who condemned Martin Kobler and even former US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton for not protecting Liberty residents. He went further and suggested the relocation of Liberty residents to the United States territory. Surprisingly, this part of his speech is no more available on YouTube or the MKO websites. It seems that Mr. Giuliani’s passionate speech was not completely in line with the group’s tactic.

The attack on Liberty that only victimized the suffering hostages held in the MKO’s cult-like structure provided more fuel for the group’s propaganda machine to condemn Iraqi government for its so-called violent act.

New York Times quoted Ali Al Mousavi, saying the accusation from the MEK "is not the first time when they blame us for everything.”[2]

Since the collapse of Iraqi Baath regime, in 2003 and the takeover of camp Ashraf by American military, the MKO was ordered by the new Iraqi government to leave Iraqi territory. Ultimately, in late December 2011, a Memorandum of Understanding was signed by the UN, Iraqi Government and the MKO in order to evacuate Camp Ashraf and the relocation of its resident in the former American Camp near Baghdad airport, Camp Liberty. But, the MOU didn’t work until the US government promised to remove the group from its list of Foreign Terrorist Organization. the NY Times clarifies:” The MEK had long resisted leaving Camp Ashraf, on land that had been set aside by Saddam Hussein, the toppled Iraqi dictator, and did so only because the United States made it a condition of dropping the group’s terrorist designation”. The report also notifies, “An American official said in August that the MEK had been using Camp Ashraf for paramilitary training.”[3]

The group was delisted in September 2011, only a few weeks after it almost completely evacuated Camp Ashraf. Getting removed from the US black list was a great victory for the MKO that had for years launched a well-funded active lobbying campaign in the US government including the Congress and the Pentagon.

Now that they are no more in the terrorist list they have shifted to the new agenda; return to Ashraf. The attack on TTL (Camp Liberty) provided them with the opportunity to insist on their rude demand but actually it was opposed by the US State Department.
State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said on Tuesday, ”The answer for the individuals at (Camp Liberty) is not to relocate back to Ashraf, in our view”, reported the AFP.[4]

“The only peaceful and durable solution for these individuals is resetteltment outside Iraq, and that should continue to be the focus of everything involved in this effort.”[5]
French Foreign Ministry Spokesman Phillipe Lalliot also expressed support over transferring the residents of Liberty underlined its readiness to take part in coordination with the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).[6]

MKO is losing the last chances for maintaining its cult in Iraqi territory and this is good news for most Iraqi people. Head of Iraqi human rights group said that Iraq seeks to try absentia the members of the MKO. He said the people of Tuz Khurmato, (a Kurdish area in Iraq) who are victims of the MKO and the trial is going to be held in their city, expressed happiness and satisfaction over the issue. [7]

By Mazda Parsi

References:
[1] Ghaze, Yasir, Six killed in shelling of Iranian Refugee Camp in Iraq, the NewYork Times,February9,2013
[2]ibid
[3]ibid
[4] AFP, US rejects moving Iranian exiles back to old Camp, Febriary12, 2013
[5]ibid
[6]Aswat al-Iraq, France supports transferring MKO members outside Iraq,February13,2013
[7]ibid

February 16, 2013 0 comments

Mujahedin Khalq Organization's Propaganda System

MKO’s new propaganda on Camp Liberty

Following the campaign launched by the Mujahedin Khalq Organization (the MKO /MEK) on the alleged “inhumane condition” of Camp Liberty, the group leaders and supporters propagate “the necessity of returning residents to Ashraf”. Alejo Vida Quadras, the top MKO supporter in European Parliament suggested the new propaganda under the pretext of "lack of progress in relocation to third countries".

To our surprise, the group leaders do not call on their western supporters to aid facilitate their members’ relocation in European countries instead of returning to Camp Ashraf although a large number of Liberty residents have citizenship in various western countries. Earlier this month, speaking in their so-called international conference in Paris, Maryam Rajavi, the self-assigned president of the National Council of Resistance required the US government to relocate Liberty residents in Camp Ashraf. “Now the US must actively intervene as that the residents can return to Ashraf. Otherwise it would be responsible for what may henceforth happen in Liberty Prison” Rajavi addressed the conference. Fed by the large scale disinformation campaign of the MKO its supporters in Western states label Liberty as "Prison". They resort to the old pretext which has been flooding of storm and sewage at the camp. However, UN Mission in charge of the Camp believes that it complies with normal humanitarian standards as well as necessary infrastructure for residence of the group members. (View our previous post on Camp Liberty: Camp Liberty resembles a prison?)

On January21, 2013, in a debate in UK parliament House of Lords, a few number of Lords expressed their concerns over the situation of Liberty residents. Baroness Warsi, a conservative member of UK House of Lords convinced her coulleagues that heavy rainfall that flooded parts of Camp Liberty as well as many parts of Baghdad "did not affect residents’ accommodation blocks".

To respond her misinformed colleagues about the claims of ex-UNAMI chief Taher Boumedra and the alleged inefficiency of Martin Kobler over Camp Liberty issues, she noted:”Our own officials visited in July last year and the international community does not, at this stage, find any credible evidence to support the matters that have been raised by Mr. Tahar Boumedra.” Boumedra’s claims are still used as evidence by the MKO propaganda.

Lord Avebury who is one of the most loyal supporters of the MKO in UK parliament he pointed to allegations of “ill-treatment such as denial of access to urgently needed medical treatment”. In response Baroness Warsi mentioned that the situation of Liberty residents is “in many ways much better than that of residents in Baghdad.” She referred to the 24-hour electricity available in the Camp while Iraqi nationals enjoy power only three hours a day in some areas of Baghdad. She also noticed that enough water and medical facilities are available in the camp.

Baroness Warsi warned her peers in UK parliament that they “must be incredibly careful” about the MKO regarding its history and record.

The new tactic, the MKO has used to maintain the hegemony over its cult-like group seems to be an alternative to the previous agenda which was running petitions and lobbying efforts to make the UN grant the status of a refugee camp to camp Liberty. The failed tactic led the group to run the new one: return to Ashraf where they claim to own its properties.

In their most recent misinformation event in Paris, the “speakers condemned forcible eviction of Ashraf residents and their transfer to Liberty prison…”, according to NCRI website . They called for “the return of Ashraf residents to the modern town they built in 26 years.” Lord Dholakia’s asked about refugee status of Liberty while he confessed that he WAS misinformed by the MKO saying,”the information the Minister has is not the information that we receive from residents of those camps". Ordinary residents of liberty have no access to the outside world let alone contacting a UK Parliamentarian.
During the debate the conservative Baroness assured her colleagues that Liberty” is not a refugee camp as such: it is a place where individuals are being assessed as to the countries to which they could be relocated.”(View the debate here)

According to reports, almost all former members of the MKO who fled the group camps in Iraq could manage to resettle whether in Iran or in European countries. It sounds that leaving Iraq is not so difficult that the Rajavis could not relocate their members yet. Probably it’s not the matter of ability it’s the matter of will.

By Mazda Parsi

February 9, 2013 0 comments

Hassan Dai

Hassan Dai must explain MEK ties

Yesterday I posted a blog titled Hassan Dai: Unrepentant Fraud, exposing the self-proclaimed “progressive” activist. It quickly became Iranian.com’s hottest topic. Hassan Dai entered panic mode. Hassan Dai must explain MEK ties

Dai falsely accused me of working for NIAC and refused to address the points in my article. Then he reposted his comment word for word. And finally, in a comedic act of desperation, Dai posted a blog four hours after mine with an old recycled article to distract from the attention my piece was getting.

As I told Mr. Dai, Iranians do not like liars and frauds, and sooner or later he is going to have to come clean to the Iranian people.

Mindful of the fact that at least he did comment on my article and does read these blogs, this may be the perfect (and perhaps only) opportunity to ask Mr. Dai the questions he has long avoided answering. After all, this is a man who prides himself on being transparent and responsive to questions.

Since Dai constantly avoids answering questions about his links with Masoud Rajavi’s Mujaheddeen (MEK) cult, and friendly TV hosts don’t press him on it, I’ll begin with unanswered questions on this topic.

1. You were in Iraq, but you have never disclosed how long you were in Iraq and for what purpose. Please clarify this for us.

2. Members of your family, such as your brother and sister, have held (and perhaps continue to hold) important positions in the MEK organization, as spokesman and other roles. Was your time at Camp Ashraf solely for visiting them? How much time in total did you spend at Camp Ashraf?

3. Mindful of your ties to the highest levels of the MEK, how many times in total have you met Maryam Rajavi?

4. Do you believe the MEK has ever engaged in terrorism and what was your reasoning for lobbying for their delisting?

5. Do you consider the MEK to be a cult?

6. The MEK is infamous for practices such as forcible divorce and breaking up of families. You divorced your first wife, and it’s been said you no longer have contact with her or your son. Was the divorce and prohibition from contacting your son related to your time with the MEK?

I have seen the panic and emotional reactions you exhibit when asked about your MEK ties on television. Perhaps for once you can summon the courage to answer these questions for people. If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to be afraid of. At a separate time, we will explore your deep financial and political ties with pro-war Neocon racists. You have a lot to answer for, but let’s take this one issue at a time.

By Kourosh Ighani

January 26, 2013 0 comments

Hassan Dai

Hassan Dai: Unrepentant Fraud

If you ask US Iranians to identify their community’s loudest mouthpiece for Neocon-MEK disinformation, chances are Hassan Dai would place high on the list. And it seems like almost every month something new appears to reaffirm that view. Hassan Dai: Unrepentant Fraud

Dai’s latest blunder came in the multiple orgasms he had covering a report linking two anti-MEK activists to Iranian intelligence. The report by the Library of Congress was leaked to Neocon Bill Kristol’s Washington Free Beacon. The MEK’s online operation immediately distributed the report with its own interpretation, and Hassan Dai followed suit a day later.

But Dai’s excitement was to be short lived. In what appears to be an unprecedented move by the Library of Congress, they retracted the report for inaccuracy, as its findings were revealed to trace back to the MEK.

In the aftermath of the embarrassment, the Library of Congress has distanced itself from the report and most of the report’s online occurrences have been pulled (fringe Neocon publications notwithstanding.)

Dai’s piece has yet to be withdrawn, and no corrections have been issued.

Publishing bogus stories using faulty sources is nothing new for Mr. Dai. The real story here is Dai’s emergence as the instrument of choice by the MEK and Neocons to spread their message in the Iranian community. If the MEK takes up an issue today, Dai can be expected to echo it tomorrow.

Dai’s latest misinformation debacle follows explosive revelations just weeks earlier exposing his deep financial ties with pro-war, pro-MEK, anti-Iranian racists like Daniel Pipes who coordinated and directed his attacks inside the Iranian community.

It is important to keep perspective however; by himself, Hassan Dai is a nobody. But for Rajavi and his Neocon sponsors, he serves a useful purpose. Daniel Pipes is happy to use Dai as a smelly brown megaphone to serve his ends, only to toss aside like a roll of toilet paper when its usefulness has reached its end. With Dai’s “journalistic” blunders piling up, it won’t be long before the Neocons turn to someone else to do their dirty work.

January 26, 2013 0 comments

Mujahedin Khalq Organization's Propaganda System

MKO’s Trick of Concentrating upon a Single Foe

It is natural to see defected members being demonized as the paid agents of Iranian regime

Pretty remarkable in MKO-run propaganda machine is a strange paradox. It highlights anti-Iranian regime sentiments and demonizes whoever is attached to it and minimizes whatever might cause MKO fall into disrepute of being represented as an undemocratic terrorist cult. It It is natural to see defected members being demonized as the paid agents of Iranian regime fuels global rage against Iranian regime but praises the group and its leaders as pro-democratic unity devoted to peaceful campaign against all cruelties and violations of human rights! MKO is not the first in history clinging to such a paradox but following the footsteps of countless bullies who were determined to shift the focus of public attention and rage away from their own devious intention and plans to a hateful image of a “single adversary”.

For example, Stalin‘s collective label for his foe was the bourgeoisie or exploiter and Hitler aimed his propaganda at a similar enemy, mainly Jews. As Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf:

“The art of all truly great national leaders at all times consists…primarily in not dividing the attention of a people, but in concentrating it upon a single foe…. It belongs to the genius of a great leader to make even adversaries far removed from one another seem to belong to a single category.”

Learning his lessons from the dictators and leaders of the personality cults rather than the great men of peace, Rajavi, as the leader of a terrorist cult, came to grasp that the first rule in any struggling movement is to have an enemy to challenge and overcome. Thus, a particularly important place in the struggle matrix of MKO was assigned to Iranian regime as the sole adversary along with those it accused them to be siding with it. In fact, MKO requires the existence of enemies, internal and external, all associated with the single adversary at all times because too many enemies arouse suspicions and questioning. That is exactly outlined by Hitler for MKO to adhere to:

“Once the wavering mass sees itself in a struggle against too many enemies, objectivity will put in an appearance, throwing open the question whether all others are really wrong and only their own movement are in the right. And this brings about the first paralysis of their own power. Hence a multiplicity of different adversaries must always be combined so that in the eyes of one’s own supporters the struggle is directed against only one enemy.”

And all roads in MKO’ propaganda blitz end to demonizing an opponent and critic as a hand joined with and paid by Iranian regime. Inflicted as a harsh psychological punishment, the insiders stand on the verge of being suspected agents of the enemy in case of making protests, just as any detached and escaped member is accused to be. Indeed, the threatening omnipresence of the enemy acts like a Damocles Sword that protects MKO against the internal threats. As Eric Hoffer depicts in his The True Believer:

“Suspicion is given a sharp edge by associating all opposition within the ranks with the enemy threatening the movement from without. This enemy-the indispensable devil of every mass movement-is omnipresent. He plots both outside and inside the ranks of the faithful. It is his voice that speaks through the mouth of the dissenter, and the deviationists are his stooges. If anything goes wrong within the movement, it is his doing. It is the sacred duty of the true believer to be suspicious. He must be constantly on the lookout for saboteurs, spies and traitors”.

Asserted by majority of defected members, any suspected dissidence and defiance of leaders or taken decisions within the group would be harshly repressed. Unfortunately, there exist no tangible evidences to prove anti-human practices within MKO but the confessions made by the defected members themselves whose confessions MKO tries to misrepresent as untrustworthy voice of the enemy that speaks through the mouth of the dissident.

That is how suddenly three defected ranking members of the group, Massoud Khodabandeh, a high-ranking and highly trusted member working as a computer expert and deeply involved in intelligence activities as well as providing security for the group’s leadership, and his later wife Ann Singleton, an English born veteran who defected MKO, and Ibrahim Khodabandeh, Massoud’s brother, also a ranking member highly trusted by MKO for illegal acts and international smuggling programs, turn to be agents of Iranian regime after starting to talk and exposing against MKO. And there more to name whom MKO has so far refrained to mention.

For sure, the most reliable information one can have access to concerning cultic and atrocious practices inside MKO are those revealed by the active defected members like Khodabandeh brothers who were the closest to the group’s leading echelon. And of course it is natural to see them being demonized as the paid agents of Iranian regime while they are enjoying their free life and feeling a responsibility to do their best to help rescue more enslaved victims out of the cult.

January 21, 2013 0 comments

France

Iranians critical of MEK terrorist group seek protection

An open letter has been written by Iranians resident in France to French authorities asking for protection against the Mojahedin Khalq terrorist operatives in that country. The letter shows how a two of Saddam's torturers, Mehdi Abrishamchi and Mohammad Mohaddessin fabricated report by the MEK said to be from The Pentagon is being used to legitimise the physical elimination of critics and survivors of the Rajavi cult.

The report names two of Saddam’s torturers, Mehdi Abrishamchi and Mohammad Mohaddessin, now posing as human rights activists in France, as part of an orchestrated attack by the Mojahedin aimed at eliminating
—
Dénonciation du « mensonge pentagonien » de Radjavi contre les repentis et les dissidents Iraniens

Lettre de l’association d’Aria adressée aux autorités française et au parlement européen

Paris, le 16 janvier 2013

Mesdames, Messieurs,

Chers présidents,

Depuis le début de l’année 2013, l’organisation des moudjahiddines du peuple d’Iran (OMPI) et ses différentes divisions ont lancé une vaste campagne spectaculaire contre les iraniens libéraux et les repentis de cette organisations.

Les leaders des moudjahiddines cherchent à neutraliser l’effet que les efforts des iraniens et des repentis peut avoir dans le sens de l’éclaircissement de l’opinion publique c’est pourquoi ils essayent de dévier les intentions en accusant les repentis et les iraniens libéraux de collaborer avec les gardiens de Qods et les agents iraniens de renseignements. De cette manière, les leaders des moudjahiddines etoufferont leurs dissidents à jamais.

Le dernier projet mensonger de l’OMPI s’est affiché dans le grand rapport légendaire Pantagonien ( !) sur le ministère iranien des renseignements dont seule, l’OMPI prétend son existance. Or, à ce jour aucun rapport de cette nature n’a pas été publié ni par le Pantagone et ni par le Congrès !

Mais l’OMPI ayant installé la base de ses activités terroristes en Auvers sur Oise, avec ses lobbies, a essayé de compléter son tableau de mensonges en falsifiant les logos et la signature de Pantagone afin de mieux vendre ses contrevérités.

Lorsque Massoud Radjavi et ses séctateurs ont subis l’echec juridique au tribunal de Paris sans pouvoir brader leurs accusations à travers d’un ouvrage signé par Monsieur Yves Bonnet et sans parvenir à convaincre leurs vieux lobbies habituels au parlement européen, alors ils transferent le centre de leurs chantages immoraux aux Etats Unis pour épingler ce faux rapport aux autres récits anti iraniens dont cette organisation est la productrice. D’ailleurs ce prétendu rapport est resté un énigme car aucune institution Etatique ne l’a approuvé. Il est évident que ce rapport restera dans le tiroir du bureaux des soi disant politiciens qui reçoivent 160 milles de dollars pour dix minutes de présence et de discours aux côtés de Maryam Radjavi !

Depuis quelques années, les moudjahiddines multiplient les efforts afin de limiter les activités de leurs dissidents. Pour cette fin, ils ont rencontré quelques colonels américains en les invitant à Paris pour rendre visite à Maryam Radjavi. Mais ces visites n’ont pas apporté le résultat recherché par les Radjavistes alors ils décident de solder leurs lobbies américains en faisant publier ce faux rapport dans les divers journaux sous le couvert d’une annonce publicitaire qui comprend une nouvelle sécuritaire et ultra importante venant de nulle part ! La télévision de CNN diffuse également cette annonce alors que le contenu parle d’un rapport fictif élaboré par le Congrès, le département d’Etat et le Pantagone ! Il est évident que le seul objectif d’un telle manœuvre consiste à terroriser les autorités européennes de sécurité et par conséquent isoler les dissidents de l’OMPI dans le continent vert.

Suite à la diffusion de cette annonce, les moudjahiddines ont orchestré une série de fanfares anti iraniens et anti repentis, en mobilisant leurs lobbies européens qui se réfèrent à la publicité de CNN pour exiger l’expulsion des repentis et des dissidents de l’OMPI, systématiquement présentés par cette organisation comme les agents iraniens de renseignements installés en Europe. Dans ce même sens, le comité parlementaire britanique avec la direction de Lord David Wddington et le groupe parlementaire des amis d’un Iran libres en Belgique, et certains mercenaires français étant dirigés par Massoud et Maryam Radjavi, Mehdi Abrishamtchi et Mohammad Seyed Almohadessine sous le couvert d’un groupe intitulé «les deux assemblés de l’Angleterre et du parlement européen » exigent l’expulsion de la famille ‘’ Khodabandeh’’ de l’Angleterre et l’association d’ARIA de la France.

Chers responsables

Après les recherches menées aux Etats Unis, en Allemagne, en France et en Belgique, il s’avère que ce prétendu rapport de Pantagone n’existe pas réellement et c’est une tentative de manipulation dont les moudjahiddines engage via leurs réseaux dans les divers pays afin de noircir leurs dissidents et d’autres militants de l’opposition iranienne en Europe. Or, le contenu de ce rapport se trouve exactement dans les différentes publications et communiqués de l’OMPI, étant répétés dans de multiples reprises par la télévision des moudjahiddines.

Le brouhaha des moudjahiddines, leurs objectifs et la terreur morale des dissidents

Les moudjahiddines tentent de manipuler l’opinion publique et atteindre les objectifs suivants :

Terroriser les dissidents, les repentis et les iraniens libéraux avec les accusations infondées telles qu’ agents iraniens de renseignements …

Semer la terreur, sacrifier et exercer la pression sur leurs adversaires politiques afin d’évacuer le champ

Dévier et falsifier des actualités à leur gré pour s’échapper à la responsabilité de 30 années de terreur en Iran, en Irak et en Europe

Fuir le grand échec en Irak

Se venger de la démolition de l’organisation des moudjahiddines du peuple avec la chute de Saddam

Se venger aveugelement des repentis, des dissidents et des iraniens n’ayant pas souhaité d’approuver les démarches anti patriotiques de cette organisation

Se venger des familles des victimes et des membres refugiés au camp de Liberty

Souffler sur la braise des faucons en Occident

La vigilance des Etats et les autorités de sécurité

Avec un regard sur les dix dernières années, nous constatons facilement que les efforts des iraniens, des repentis et des dissidents de l’OMPI ont joué un rôle significatif dans la représentation de la réalité de cette organisation sectaire. Tous les services sécuritaires des pays européens ont également pu réaliser que les propagandes de l’OMPI contre ses dissidents ne servent qu’à fuir la vérité que les moudjahiddines n’ont jamais voulu admettre.

Les activités des iraniens et des associations opposés au terrorisme Rdjaviste , de l’Irak à l’Europe ont été clairement exercées dans le cadre de « la loi 1901 relative aux associations » et avec la permission de la police locale. Contrairement aux shows de Radjavi, pour aucune des activités socioculturelles des repentis et leurs amis , les mauvais acteurs des film de James Band n’ont pas été engagés par contre la police et la loi ont convenablement apporté leur soutien à ces efforts. Alors les acharnements de Radjavi contre ses dissidents sont constitués autours de plusieurs accusations infondées, de mensonges et de terreur morale dont ils peuvent être jugés par les tribunaux européens.

L’association d’Aria souhaite alerter les autorités judiciaires et sécuritaires de la France et d’autres pays européens en insistant sur le fait que toutes ces manœuvres sont conçues ,programmées et soutenues par les commandants des moudjahiddines installés aisement en Auvers sur Oise. Selon le communiqué du département d’Etat américain ces terroristes expérimentés (les moudjahiddines) ayat été expressément désarmés par les forces américaines après l’invasion de l’Irak n’ont vraiment pas renoncés à leurs manières terroristes et ils ont repris les mêmes méthodes terroristes dans la persécution de leurs dissidents en leurs faisant subir des harcelements moraux et juridiques.

Nous sommes prêts à dénoncer toutes activités terroristes des moudjahiddines dans les tribunaux français et demandons que les autorités françaises prennent les mesures nécessaires pour arrêter la machine de terreur véhiculée par les mensonges de cette organisation en Auvers sur Oise. La machination de Radjavi dégrade la tranquilité, l’esprit et les biens des iraniens dissidents de l’OMPI en les rendant plus accessibles aux menaces et aux dangers dont les sectaires Radjavistes peuvent leur causer !

La copie conforme de cette lettre est également envoyée aux :

Le ministère de l’intérieur

Le ministère de la justice

Le ministère des affaires étrangères

L’Elysée

L’ambassade de la grande Bretagne en France

Mme Catherine Margaret Ashton Haut Représentant de l’Union pour les affaires étrangères et la politique de sécurité

Les partis et les associations iraniens en Europe

L’ambassade des Etats Unis en France

Mr Martin Kobler Représentant spécial et Chef de la Mission d’assistance des Nations Unies en Irak (résponsable du camp Liberty)

Aria Iran, Paris

January 19, 2013 0 comments

Newer Posts

Older Posts