IranDidban

The MeK’s failed Blackmail

Remnants of Rajavi trying to render withdraw into goodwill

The MeK leadership’s statement reveals that her intention of sabotage in the relocation process was not to improve the living conditions of her members, but to blackmail America’s government, especially for removing name of the group from the list of terrorist organizations. (It is likely that this scenario be repeated during next steps.)

The MeK leadership already had stated that no longer she would allow the rest of the group to leave the camp, unless her 6 conditions were met, and her sabotage in the relocation process was to persuade the US and Iraqi government to accept her illegal demands, but finally she was forced to withdraw and announced that another batch of MeK members will leave Camp Ashraf to Camp Liberty on August 23.

The MeK leadership’s statement on this topic clearly reveals that her intention of sabotage in the relocation process was not to improve the living conditions of her members, but to blackmail America’s government, especially for removing name of the group from the list of terrorist organizations. (It is likely that this scenario be repeated during next steps.)

In the statement, without any reference to outcome of the pre- existing conditions, the US government, three times, is asked for removing the group from the terrorist list:

Mrs. Maryam Rajavi, President-elect of the National Council of Resistance of Iran declared: As a gesture of goodwill, the residents of Ashraf will commence the 6th convoy of 400 residents from Camp Ashraf to Camp Liberty on August 23.

She added: The residents anticipate and expect that the completion of convoy 6 will be followed by a public statement by the United States Government that recognizes the cooperation of the Ashraf residents and reiterates continued U.S. commitment to:

(i) the approach on FTO designation and delisting outlined by Secretary Clinton on February 29, 2012, recognizing that the decision of US Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit requires the Secretary of State to make a determination regarding the FTO designation of the PMOI (MeK) by October 1, 2012;

(ii) a real effort to resolve the remaining humanitarian issues at Liberty that materially affect the daily lives of the residents, including sustainable mechanisms to provide water and electricity; and

(iii) support the safety and security of the residents until they relocate to third countries outside of Iraq, in mindfulness of the fact that this universally desired outcome cannot happen expeditiously without delisting.

The MeK leadership’s statement reveals that what matter for her only are propping up the organization and self-regarding. So, the UN and the US government should not be deceived by this terrorist group and have to provide individual rights of the residents of Camp Liberty, and refrain from engaging in political considerations.

August 22, 2012 0 comment

Mr. Kobler, Avoid repeating the error!

The intricate problem and deadlock in issue of relocation of Camp Ashraf residents to Camp Liberty is not only result of the MeK leadership’s excuses and blackmail, but part of that, and Mr. Kobler, Avoid repeating the error! perhaps its major part, relates to the incorrect entry of the United Nations to this file and the more incorrect decisions of the UNAMI and the UNHCR on this topic.

These errors can be investigated in two areas:

First, basically the UN and the UNHCR should not follow the America’s wrong path in giving special and illegal privileges to the terrorist group MeK, and during the review of Camp Ashraf residents’ application for asylum , instead of being caught in the MeK leadership’s trap, they should adopt a more correct decision.

The fact is that the camp’s residents are guilty and the UN cannot and should not facilitate terms of harboring criminals and especially those who create plenty of potential and actual risks for international peace and security. Even if the UNAMI authorities succeed in their path, they have established a wrong tradition that causes to escape criminals from legal proceedings.

When the UNHCR engaged to process Camp Ashraf residents’ application for refugee, from the first it should deal with individuals and entities, such as the all files that it handle throughout the world; but regrettably committed a fundamental mistake and attended to negotiations with the representatives designated by Rajavi, whose task was defending the organizational interests of the MeK, not humanitarian rights of the camp’s residents.

The UN representatives- with good faith- from the first were just thinking about their goals and in the negotiations addressed facilitating the relocation process, while with the two mentioned mistakes they made the situation more intricate, and now suppose that by advising the Iraqi government for restraint and asking the camp residents for collaborating they can take the situation out of the deadlock.

However, the UN authorities should not just think to completion of the relocation from Camp Ashraf to Camp Liberty, but, with the experience of this level, they have to put the overall conclusion on agenda that any negotiation with the persons as representatives of the residents or, more wrong, negotiations with Rajavi’s representatives is an irreversible error that will bring many times more destructive results than the current situation.

August 7, 2012 0 comment

Massoud Rajavi

Masood Rajavi removes from head of the MeK

It was 9 years ago that Masood Rajavi appeared in the public for the last time. Since then, a great effort has done to keep him hidden. During these years, protection from his whereabouts and protecting its information has been the red line of the MeK’s gang leaders.

In this critical period for the MeK, other persons have come to the sense as representatives and spokesmen of the terrorist group and have taken part in negotiations with representatives of America, Iraq and the UN. Specifically, Maryam Rajavi has been introduced in the media as leader and the main administrator of the group. Especially the international independent media through the past years have not cited Masood Rajavi.

Efforts to keep fleeing Masood Rajavi and keeping him hidden, with the pretext of physical protection of him, now are the main mission of the Mek leadership. It is notable that Rajavi’s concealment initially was conducted in coordination with U.S. forces and Pentagon helped the MeK in this matter.

The fact is that Masood Rajavi has fled because of being at the head of a terrorist organization, being responsible for hundreds of terrorist operations, collaboration with Saddam, establishing of the international criminal network, and dozens of other illegal actions. So, due to the terrorist records and a history of treachery and crime, Rajavi does not have legitimacy to represent a political group.

July 30, 2012 0 comment

France

The recent actions of Rajavi’s gang in France

The recent actions of Rajavi’s gang in France;
Testing France

Fabricating a file for Mr. Sadegh Mohammad kazem, an Iraqi official, and assailing rally of Iranians opposed to the MeK, were among recent actions of Rajavi’s gang in France.

These measures have been applied by the MeK to test ways to strengthen and expand their organization and paving the way for greater mobility in France.

In the first try, the MeK presented a so- called incontrovertible file to the French Court and, hoping to lead to detention for months or even a verdict against Mr. Kazem.

The complaint against this Iraqi official was a test to examine whether they could hit their opponents by the French judicial tool, or not. If they were able to create such a situation, certainly the defectors and critics of the MeK would not been assailed by Rajavi’s hooligans; Instead, any of these protestors would have a record of participation in terrorist acts!

Although acting against Mr. Sadegh Mohammad kazem apparently was randomly and simultaneously with his passing through France, but, the fact is that the MeK’s leadership already has been informed of this trip through the Baathist Penetrating agents and she had planned for such action, in order to exploit the Iraqi government, also to strengthen the MeK’s organization and securing its members in France.

French judicial system, with releasing of Mr. Mohammad Kazem and apologizing to the Iraqi government, also by detaining several hooligans of Rajavi’s gang, demonstrated that it is not a plaything for the MeK.

However, it is a matter of fact that France for political reasons has ignored the anarchist nature of the terrorist group MeK. This is a serious threat to this country; The MeK’s day and night propaganda against former French authorities who were involved in the case June 17, reveals that if this terrorists were ever able, they would fabricate a file for French authorities, too.

On the Other hand, self-immolation of the MeK’s members, assailing the defectors, and other anti- law actions make clear that this terrorist group is a threat to social order and national security of this country.

France now is on the eve of an important exam. Its governors should know that with the closure of the MeK’s main camp in Iraq, their country will be the center of this terrorist group- whether its individuals could take asylum or not, and Auvers-sur-Oise will be the center of their terrorist acts. So, the best option for France is following the Iraqi government to expel the MeK.

June 27, 2012 0 comment

The MEK Expulsion from Iraq

MKO from TTL to third countries

Tough road ahead of Mojahedin Khalq, MKO, MEK, Rajavi cult in Iraq

Temporary Transit Location (TTL), which is going to be the only camp of MeK in Iraq, may be an Tough road ahead of Mojahedin Khalq, MKO, MEK, Rajavi cult in Iraq end for the painful life of each member of this terrorist cult that Rajavi has imposed to them.

Over the next few months, Camp Ashraf will be completely blocked and its residents, whether they want or not, will be resettled in the TTL as Refugees- not Mujahedeen-e Khalq, or any other name.

However, the MerK’s obstruction and turbulence is still ongoing, so every moment it is expected from the terrorist group’s leadership to adopt new positions.

25. Dec. 2011, that is considered a turning point and qualitative topic in the project of closing the MeK case in Iraq, now, with transfer of the other Camp Ashraf residents to the TTL, is entering a new phase of its developments.

The existing evidences indicate that, although, European countries, U.S and the Zionist Regime already have made the most of the MeK, but, considering the terrorist cult a serious threat to the security of their citizens, almost none of them are willing to accept its members in their territory.

Philip Giraldy, former CIA agent, in his recent article about the MeK’s departure from camp Ashraf and final destination of its members, (the Mujahidin Khalq’s Useful Idiots) which was inserted on the Antiwar website, says: "…There might be some problem in arranging the move, as few countries want to take the MEK supporters, fearing that they would have to be deprogrammed from their brainwashing."

Also, according to the Habilian Foundation website (families of Iranian victims of terror), Antonio Guterres, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, on March 3 2012 in a meeting with Shia Soudani, the Iraq’s Minister of Human Rights, announced the UNHCR’s opposition with the granting asylum to terrorist group’s members.

At the meeting that was held in Geneva, Guterres said: "The UNHCR does not give asylum to groups, but it will be given only to individuals, if they quit violence."

So, MeK Have a tough road ahead from TTL to European countries. Renounce of violence and rejection of the sectarian organization is the first and the most important step to pass this arduous path.

Considering what was said above, UN, UNHCR, and ICRC can play the influential and unprecedented role to avoid turning the Temporary Transit Location to a new camp for more brainwashing of its residents by the MeK’s leadership and its gang leaders.

By Seyed Hojjat Seyed Ismaili, former member of the MeK’s central council

March 28, 2012 0 comment

Human Rights Abuse in the MEK

MKO cult leader, imposes conditions for releasing his hostages

The respected MeK dissidents nowadays have reported receiving letters from Ashraf residents who are seeking to exit the camp but they have problems, the most important is the thorny treating of the MeK leadership.

Rajavi has declared to the forces who sought departure that if they announce that they are”frightened”,”desperate”, and”regretful of fighting with the regime”, he would let them to leave the camp through three ways:

1. Betimes he introduces them to an Iraqi police station.

2. Each individual’s family to come and remove him/ her.

3. After lifting the siege and in possible time, they would be allowed to go out to everywhere, provided that until then they must totally adhere to the organization and avoid”putting obstacle”.

For all these scenarios, MeK leadership has put the condition that exit accomplishment depends on”not being contaminated and associated with the regime”. However, he had already designated Iraqi police and the families as the Iranian government’s agents that attending them is an unforgivable sin and is deserving execution.

It means that the forces who seek departure actually have no option except choosing the third way and waiting until the leadership decides to evacuate the camp. Up to that time, based on the commitment to the group, they have no right to protest (or what is called”putting obstacle”in the cult).

Also, MeK supervisors in Camp Ashraf are fantasizing insecurities and risks that threaten each of the forces outside the camp, in order to expand the Atmosphere of inanition and panic of going out.

Now, it seems that MeK leadership instead of alarming the troops about the enemies, who are standing in lines at the Ashraf gates, should struggle with the force uprising within the gates.

February 4, 2012 0 comment

Mujahedin Khalq Organization as a terrorist group

Baathist- MEK band’s plots fail

The plots that the Baathist- Mujahedeen band had been planned against Noori Maliki’s government are lost out; Iraqi government has remained sovereign and each of its opponents has fled to a corner.

However, the MeK yet hunt for Maliki’s withdrawal and kill the time hoping that their favorite option takes over Iraq. The MeK have ignored the fact that if another faction or person hold the fort of Iraq, the situation for them would be far worse. In addition, if Maliki’s ideological rivals or his foes could subvert him, they would not be satisfied with MeK expulsion, but they will begin the process to send them back to Iran.

Also, with Mek’s procrastination, the international organization, more than ever, became conscious of MeK’s cheating and offense, as the US officially announced the world that it had been deceived by the MeK, and the UN and the UNHCR authorities are criticizing MeK’s hypocritical manner.

Despite that MeK is looking for changing of the political arrangement in Iraq, there is one more important reason for them to procrastinate: fear. For years a deep fear of the world outside, damage, and imprisonment has encompassed MeK, especially MeK’s leadership. MeK Crawling in depth of Camp Ashraf, and actions such as stoning those who want visit them, origins from this fear.

Holding of numerous conferences roots in the MeK’s necessity for being constantly under projector of media and agencies, the fact that indicates their extreme fear of unknown future. MeK’s peak of fear manifests in their resorting to the US and Israel to invade Iran.

January 17, 2012 0 comment

Mujahedin Khalq Organization as a terrorist group

MKO Scheme to Fan the Flame of Ethnic War

Some Arab news sources report that the MKO plans to carry out a series of bombings at the holy shrines in Samarra in an attempt to fan the flames of a sectarian war and mislead the public opinion in Iraq from the issue of MKO expulsion and closure of Camp Ashraf.

Efforts by the Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to put things in order and restore stability to the war-torn country which had reached an important and fateful stage with the emphasis on withdrawal of the US military have now entered a sensitive and tense stage with the Baghdad government’s intention to expel the arms of the West’s terrorist operations.

the Iraqi Shia government in addition to issuing an arrest warrant for Deputy Prime Minister Tariq al-Hashimi, a politician close to Saudi Arabia, on charges of planning terrorist operations in Iraq, has also a serious plan on agenda to expel the terrorist members of the Mujahedin Khalq Organization (MKO), another arm of US terrorist operations inside Iraq and close down their Camp Ashraf.

This is while certain currents close to the West by planning a series of extensive terrorist operations in Iraq are seeking to wage a sectarian war in the country. The first blasts in this line occurred in Baghdad last Thursday in which at least 250 people died.

In related news, some Arab news sources report that the MKO plans to carry out a series of bombings at the holy shrines in Samarra in an attempt to fan the flames of a sectarian war and mislead the public opinion in Iraq from the issue of MKO expulsion and closure of Camp Ashraf.

In the meantime, Maryam Rajavi, leader of the MKO hypocrites issued a statement last week giving in to the closure of Camp Ashraf and transfer of the few remaining forces there. Sources close to the MKO have announced that the terrorist group helped by terrorists close to al-Hashimi and a spectrum of al-Iraqiya movement has a special plan to carry out bombings at holy shrines to distract the public opinion and prevent expulsion of the MKO from Camp Ashraf.

Meantime, the MKO leaders at Camp Ashraf have told their advocates that the Maliki government would collapse soon and replaced by Ayyad Alawi and al-Iraqiya spectrum who have good relations with the MKO.

Hassan Tawaliba, an activist close to the MKO who under the cover of support for human rights defends the Ashraf based Mujahedin, has published an article in al-Liwaa newspaper in which he tries to pave the media ground for an important bombing the group apparently intends to carry out in Samarra in the coming days. The pro-MKO writer has tried to already put the blame of the terrorist operation on Iran and thus ignite a widespread religious sedition in Iraq.

The writer who calls himself the head of the media delegation supporting Ashraf, has claimed that a group of 50-60 forces affiliated to the Qods Army and commanded by Abu Hassan al-Rakabi from Zubair city plans to bomb Samarra and stir up a sectarian war.

He has also made a statement against Iranian Qods Army Commander Qasem Suleimni and voiced concern about expulsion of MKO forces from Camp Ashraf.

This claim comes at a time that the Western media have pointed their fingers at al-Qaeda for Thursday’s blasts against Shiite targets and warned against outbreak of ethnic clashes in Iraq.

In its analysis of the Baghdad blasts, the CNN tried to underline the possibility of sectarian clashes in Iraq. It said the deadly explosions had raised concern that the gap caused by the US military pullback from Iraq would pave the way for a power struggle between Sunni militants with links to al-Qaeda and Iran-backed Shia militias.
Raja News

December 31, 2011 0 comment

Mujahedin Khalq as an Opposition Group

MeK leadership places massacre of the troops on agenda

After UNHCR, European Union confirmed Iraqi government decision to relocate the MeK inside

After UN, EU confirms Iraqi sovereignty; MeK leadership places massacre of the troops on agenda

its country, and to evacuate Camp Ashraf under control of the UN, therefore they offer another chance to MeK to surrender themselves to law, and give up turbulence and blackmail.

Terrorist group MeK and their supporters were demanding European Union FMs to take position against Iraqi government, and condemn its deadline to exploit them; or accept their Mass asylum, but the EU Did not act according to their demand.

Struan Stevenson, member of European parliament and MeK’s supporter says in this regard:

UN and European Union tell us that we should trust the security of Ashraf residents by Iraqi authorities. Have not we all heard this before? We are told that we should respect to the Iraq’s sovereignty. Well Hitler had sovereignty over the Jews in Nazi Germany. UN and European Union! Wake up For the sake of God!

So, it should be stated that MeK and its supporters also did not benefit from the involvement of Europe in This issue and, hereby, could not provide background to survive their organization. As before, they were dreaming it through intervening of the UN UNHCR in this matter.

Also in this time, the MeK had intended to legitimate their turbulence and blackmail based on possible support of EU and its stance against Iraqi government’s decision.

Frustrated of their inability in abuse of the Europe Union, Maryam Rajavi says in this regard: "Hiding behind the "Iraqi sovereignty" to justify the indifference toward crimes of this government against Ashraf absolutely is unacceptable."

Now, MeK seek to counter Iraqi government and create conflict at the end of the deadline.

From now, MeK leadership is preparing the troops to sacrifice, also he is inducing them that being Ashrafi means that never will we retreat, even one step; and with our deaths, we force the Iraqi government to withdraw. However, until last week, he was promising the desperate forces that the US, the UN, and the EU will protect them.

December 7, 2011 0 comment

Iraq

Iraq’s decision on MEK expulsion irreversible

To review the issue of Camp Ashraf, a meeting was held at the European Parliament, with the presence of Struan Stevenson, Alejo Vidal-Quadras, and Esther Dang (MeK supporters in EU Parliament); Jean De Ryte, Catherin Ashton’s advisor on Camp Ashraf; and the representative of Iraqi embassy. In the absence of the Iraqi Envoy, his representative explained the government’s position, and stressed its decision to close Camp Ashraf by the year end.

During the meeting, it was so clear that the MeK supporters are extremely disturbed because the EU officials have ignored their blackmails. This turbulence was to such an extent that Vidal Quadras warned Jean De Ryte and Catherin Ashton that if they do not cover their demands, they will be faced with the reaction.

He said De Ryte:

Mr. Ambassador! This Parliament has the right and duty to control the European Commission and Mrs. Ashton is the Vice President of the Commission. So I say to you that, from now on, if the Foreign Service, which is in maximum charge of Mrs. Ashton, does not fulfill its obligations with this sensitive issue, with the determination and commitment that we expect, you do not doubt that Parliament will apply his right to control, up to maximum. Since, for a long time we have explained and warned that what will happen, and that what should be done. We are exhausted!

The interesting point of this meeting was statements of Iraqi embassy’s representative, who once again addressed audiences the Irreversibleness of the Iraqi government’s decision:

…Let me welcome to Ambassador Jean De Ryte, who participated in this important meeting. We are sure that diplomatic experience and wisdom of Mr. Ambassador will help the evacuation of Camp Ashraf. The deadline set by the Iraqi government to close Camp Ashraf by the year end should be respected. On Sep 23, on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly meetings, Iraqi FM had a conversation with Mrs. Ashton.

In the past 2 months, he has sent 3 letters in this regard to Mrs. Ashton. These letters describe Iraqi government’s decision to close the camp by the end of 2011. The international society knows this group as a terrorist organization. According to the constitution of Iraq, MeK presence is illegal.

The Iraq’s constitution prohibits presence of any terrorist organization in the country (Article 7 of the constitution). This presence is a threat to security in Iraq and neighboring countries, and gives them an excuse to interfere in the internal affairs of Iraq.

As a democratic and peaceful country, Iraq seeks to form passive relations with the neighbor countries, and not to interfere in their internal affairs. Also, Iraq does not tolerate the presence of terrorist organizations on its territory.

After hearing statements of Iraqi government’s representative, MeK supporters began to taunt the EU that why, e.g, they do not use financial and economic tools to force Iraqi government to accept MeK presence on his soil.

During the meeting, Jean De Ryte said that the UN High Commissioner for refugees is the only responsible for this issue. He remarked that, the only work that European Union can do, simply, is to accept some of them.
Iran Didban

November 28, 2011 0 comment

Newer Posts

Older Posts